Leaderboard

I wasn't just talking about Gaza. What are you talking about you demented Boomer freak?

Nonsense. Religions jockey for dominance, not mutuality and tolerance. Central to those faiths is the idea that everyone else is wrong--and often damned to hell because of it. Hence why that dehumanizing tactic has been used for thousands of years to justify sectarian violence. Similarly the "pro life" flag is not a symbol of tolerance, safety or support. It says a LOT about the people who would fly it and their intention to strip women and girls of a fundamental right to choose. Both of those flags stand for the triumph of ideas in which someone else is the loser. They are exclusive. The pride flag is fundamentally different, in that no one loses. It is inclusive. And noooope, teens are definitely having more sex than you think--and the minority who aren't are still coping with the same challenges. They are literally bombarded with unhealthy sexual content. So, again, why shouldn't they have access to content that models healthy, sex-positive relationships? Are you having those conversations with your children? Do you sit down and tell Junior that you don't spit in mommy's mouth or step on her face when you are intimate? (Or maybe you do, no judgment between consenting adults.) But most parents aren't having that explicit conversation. So where are kids supposed to get the information to offset the dark fantasy world of porn? Shouldn't healthy sex be modeled as well? Consider that the world has changed and the information kids need might not be the information you had growing up. Or to look at it the other way, do you think a consensual cartoon blowjob is too titillating for these kids? Is it going to corrupt them, when Extreme Asian Backdoor Gangbangs vol 3 is just a Google search away. How do you think such a book is harmful?

Oh, get lost. He says he's FOR transparency and accountability, but also fully supports the current scandal-riddled gov't and hangs on every word they say. That was the extent of our difference.

@CdnFox That Justin Transition - by Douglas Farrow (substack.com) The behaviour of this man, and of his party, is not merely irresponsible. It is criminal in character and treasonous in kind. It makes a mockery of Canada's fundamental law and openly repudiates the principles on which the country was built. It regards the nation-state as such, the country itself, as an anachronism. The Justin Transition is not a transition from nasty fossil fuels to beautiful green energy. (Ask the Chinese about that.) It's a transition from democracy to oligarchy. Yes, the prime minister is shameless. But so are we. We put him into power. We've been keeping him in power. It's not a few yuan here, a little strong-arming there, and a couple of rented busses that have kept him in power. It's not even the hopelessly compromised NDP. It's the urban voter in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. The urban voter has kept him in power.

True dat. But when they're taking a billion $ from the gov't - they're not going to bite the hand that feeds them. And when they see how the gov't treat journalists who DO hold them to account, again - they won't be going there. Careful. You sound exactly like that Diagolon guy 😉

A columnist is still an opinion and it is certainly valid to discuss the new vulgarity in in modern politics and the Prime Minister to be stadium under “F Trudeau” flags given expletive-laden speeches. And make no mistake about it, PP didn’t accidentally let a F word slip out or accidentally stand under a F Trudeau flag, it was all a deliberate decision to present himself to the public this way. When Diagolon mused about raping PP’s wife, PP complained to police and publicly called them “odious losers”. Now he’s buddy buddy with them again? PP’s performance is new to Canadian politics and it is worthy of comment, period. I don’t know why you conservatives think the job of the media is only to flatter you and only mention the things you want to hear but you should get over it. Also lets get real you and the other conservatives don’t believe in reaching across the aisle. You believe the “left” should reach out to you bit you believe reaching out to the left is treason. In the US even moderate conservative are labeled left wing communists these days and from what I can see Canada isn’t too far behind. PP in particular has built a 20+ year career out being a snarky combative politician who adds insults and name calling into nearly everything he says. You think his majority government is going to “reach across the divide”? To whom? You think standing under F Trudeau flags and swearing about Trudeau is “reaching across the divide”? what a joke.

Palestinian children under Hamas: The indoctrination in the schools starts even at a younger age than this. Is it any wonder they become bloodthirsty maniacs? Why do so many people in the West support this kind of thing?

There is no ethnic cleansing or apartheid.

That's a school book? Today...it's not unusual for you to lie. But this has no place in school libraries. That you defend this trash only serves to further prove that you hate America and are an active enemy of the nation.

Here's what people are really worried about. And if biden loses this will be a big part of why. You can lie to people about how well the economy's doing but they know what's happening when they reach the check out lady:

UN partition plan would have given Palestinians their own land, they rejected it. British left in 1948, Israel declared themselves a state... Arabs/Palestinians go to war against them instead of keeping their own. 1948 War - Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestinians, Egypt 6 Day war - Egypt, Syria, Jordan with more contributing On and on and on...

Title says it all. I personally thinking reducing immigration would be a start, but it would also help to reduce zoning and building height regulations especially for Urban Centres. Greater subsidies of public housing would honestly be a lot better too.

^^ Sexual intercourse is a much smaller subset of sexual activity. And schools don't have any responsibility to teach puritanical values--no more than they have to teach creationism. You're welcome to do that at home, but schools have a responsibility to give kids the factual information they need to thrive and succeed in the world. You're welcome to debate what that information might be, and how it should be presented, but to discount it out of hand is pretty silly. You may have met a lot of people who wished you understood the basics of a proper blowjob.❤️ And your argument about the flags has now devolved into the absurd notion that a pride flag is intolerant of the intolerant. Bravo. Reductio ad absurdum, we have arrived!

probably should. If he was rational.. he would get the hint that I do not agree with him and never will. There is this definition of insanity...

I'm mystified over the fact that Canadians and those in the YOU people category openly support a terrorist group and their actions...Thinking these protestors are somehow going to influence our government or economy when dealing with Israel is a pipe dream...even in today's cancel culture they will make no change that will affect how we as a nation do business... What is not acceptable is the violence and threats and hate speech that accompany these protests, leading to many arrest...Not to mention supporting any group that condones terrorism, there is not much separation or Hamas or it's people right now....unless the protestors condone Hamas and it's actions...

Great. Cheating wasn't an issue in the last election either. That's why you fools can't furnish even a shred of evidence, despite this being the most scrutinized election in history. That's why automated recounts and hand recounts and forensic analyses all came to the same conclusion. It's why Fox paid $800 million for lying about election fraud. It's why Trump was laughed out of court 60+ times. The worst part is that you don't even know enough to feel embarrassed by braying on about these baseless claims. You may not have my respect, but you do have my pity.

You people obviously being people who are mystified about why people protest western support of Israel and don't protest the actions of dictatorships overseas who we have no influence over. I'm starting to wonder if some of you people understand the point of protesting. The idea is to call for tangible change, not simply virtue signal. Yes this is true, much to the chagrin of a great many conservatives. Those are extremely easy questions to answer. Hamas isn't interested in the welfare of the people, they also need Israel to continue to act with a heavy hand and Israel is happy to oblige as the nutjobs are on both sides here.

There's terrorism on both sides for sure. There are also reasonable people on both sides. But there's no advantage to anybody in promoting politics at this point. Until people start saying stop the divisiveness we won't be able to talk about an actual solution

Absolutely false. Allowing something to die is NOT the same as killing it. And what kind of sick fark would want to keep a brainless newborn on life support? To what end?

You made two statements claiming your side isn't radical. You got proven wrong. Are you going to renounce their actions or try to cover for them? Dude, since when is endorsing violence against political opponents a "controversial opinion"? We used to all agree that using violence--terrorism--as a means of shaping political process was wrong. But apparently that's now controversial in your view? Geez. And yes, it is definitely A-Okay for homeland security and the FBI to scrutinize anyone who would endorse political violence. Including the 3 conspiracy nutball "whistleblowers" Jordan rounded up.

in most cases, online forum posters use the words, "Nazi" or "commie" to describe anyone that disagrees with them. Most use those two words interchangeably along with fascist. Been doing the forum game since 2008 and have since became numb to the use of those words.

The "Christian flag" is exclusive. It asserts dominance over other faiths and non-faiths. Not inclusive. The "pro-life flag" (whatever that is) is similarly exclusive. It says THIS instead of THAT. The pride flag is not a zero-sum game. The only message it connotes is that of LGBTQ friendliness, and literal pride and acceptance. It does not connote superiority or dominance. There is nobody on the downside of that message. The "entire movement" and "ideology" are tolerance, acceptance and equality. If the idea of tolerance, acceptance and equality hurt one's feelings, they have much bigger problems than a colorful flag. You made an offhand and unsubstantiated claim. I have no idea what "in classrooms" means, and I suspect it's deliberately vague. But from an educational perspective, the conversation about "if and when" students should be exposed to such material it should be well informed and in good faith. You dismiss it as "smut" when it may well serve an important educational function. It's not prurience, right? It's not pornography. So you should be asking what students might learn. And are those lessons important in light of the vast amount of unhealthy sexual content they see every day. Nobody wants to acknowledge that their teens are having sex, but they are. Do you want them to see healthy sexual relationships modeled, or to think that porn is a real-life roadmap? Is there any merit in counterprogramming against porn?

Ya, I know. I want the gov't to leave me the F alone.

They're literally stealing land and homes from their rightful owners, maintaining a repressive security regime over all Palestinians and depriving them of economic opportunities and human rights.

Yes lots of atrocities happened on oct 7 which is why it's mystifying people keep harping on ones that were fabricated like the "babies in ovens". You're another one of those dummies who thinks "that specific thing didn't happen" means "none of those things happened" huh? No I leave that line for the Israel cucks like you.

I have already explained how I base my opinions: 1. Joe Biden makes up a vague boogeyman. Last election cycle it was "alt right" now its "Christian nationalists 2. Joe Biden ascribes mainstream views to Christian nationalists 3. Joe Biden justifies targeting Christian universities and pro life groups with IRS audits and everything else because they are Christian nationalists If you stand for that injustice then I'm sorry

Precisely. It becomes a very effective leash. "if you as an industry don't behave decently then we might cut that funding, and if specific parties don't play ball we might rough your people up a little." That doesn't mean that the media won't report ANYTHING but it does mean they'll soften gov't stories a bit, and when the gov't people call they'll pick up the phone and if they get asked to spin something one way or another or ask a question in a specific manner to set the gov't up for a softball answer. " Sir, are you demanding people take the jab simply because you believe in following the science, or because you don't like unnecessary deaths?" LOL!! And just like that i'm a radical

Yet you will repeat these claims without a shred of evidence. Not even one example. You can't cite where anyone was called a domestic terrorist for having an opinion on abortion. You can't cite even one example of the "full force" of the government coming down on someone for participating in a discussion. So what gives? These are obviously baseless claims. Why are you pushing them as if they are real?

They're big words, and Libbies LOVE using big words here, they just don't know how. If you ever see them use terms/words like confirmation bias, seditious, cognitive dissonance here, get ready to laugh. And don't bother explaining anything to them, they won't get it.

A. So you were indeed, incorrect. He was explicitly talking about severe situations. B. There is a difference between letting a body die and killing a person, no? Again, anyone without a living will must rely entirely on the judgment of doctor and families to determine when to cease heroic measures to maintain a semblance of life. This is no different. it's pure nonsense to call it a "post-term abortion"--which is a silly word salad to begin with. Remember Terry Schaivo's "post-term abortion"? 🙄

You're tilting at windmills. Nowhere has anyone been called a domestic terrorist for having a point of view on abortion, and nowhere has the government's "full force" come after people for participating in a discussion. Seriously, why are you even posting this nonsense?

Aw, you silly, silly man. There are always monitors from both parties at polling stations. Nothing different there. And the only verified voter fraud to swing a federal election in the last 50 years was republicans--and they got caught because the system works just fine. I propose that you are among those easily fooled by this kind of disinformation. When you saw this claim, did you go watch or read the full quote in context? That should be the absolute first response to any crazy claim you see.

I don't think that. It just doesn't jive with your habit of believing every single thing you read or hear on MSM. What you say and what you practice seem to be different.

I realized today that conservatives have to say a lot of things like: "If a white guy said that about a black man...." "If a man said that about a woman..." "If a jew did that to a muslim..." What better illustration is there that the left is, at the same time, the biggest champion of hate filled rhetoric that uses superficial characteristics as their justification for their hate and supposed champion of equality. I'm sorry, but that is blatant hypocrisy. I don't believe, not for one minute, that the left has any intent to create equal footing for all men, women and children among all races, religions and ideologies in every corner of the world. Their entire political theology is driven by hatred stemming from perceived inequalities.

bzzt wrong The thing that didn't happen?

Do you subject a hopeless patient to heroic measures to maintain a pulse? That's the same conversation--between families and physicians--that every patient deserves. Think about a baby born without a brain or some other essential organ, for whom life is impossible outside the womb. Do you think they should do chest compressions on the thing until it's just a pile of mush? Or offer whatever palliative care they can and let it pass with grace? These are actual conversations that have to take place. They are difficult and heartbreaking. And here you are exploiting that fact in an effort to score some cheap political points. Have some decency.

You missed the context. Hodad vs Nationalist in the post above mine on the last page. You can be upset without calling people hatemongers and child molesters.

If it is comfortable and viable enough to resuscitate, it is a post birth abortion. Make all the justifications you want, but you are supporting people that are ok with killing a post birth child. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam says in a video from the 2019 interview being shared online. “The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

So did Jews. There are Jews that have been there since 2,000 BC, continuously. 4,000 years now. "Palestine", or the ancestral home of the Phillistines, never contained Jerusalem and most of the rest of that region, just like Toronto is not part of Quebec. Jerusalem was just lumped into "Palestine" by the Romans. If Trump takes over Canada and says that Toronto is part of Quebec, do people 2,000 years from now have to abide by that? Where do you want the Israelis to go?

Down with Jews! -- The Left

Ah, so not a chain email, but rather a disinformation meme. Great. But Northam was only addressing what happens in cases where a baby is born with severe deformities and has a low chance of survival. So, yes, the fate of severely deformed newborns, who naturally lack a living will, should indeed be a discussion between parents and physicians. I wish people would do some critical thinking about random shite from the internet before sharing it like it's news.

Why is it everyone doesn't drive a Lamborgini today? -They do not produce enough value through their current work to afford one. So why would a gift economy be different? Who is this "we" that is going to be making Hundreds of millions of Lamborginis so everyone can have one? If someone did not save anything for retirement, they have nothing to gift in retirement. Do they just take whatever they want? What limits them from taking more in retirement than they ever gifted when working? How do you account for any of that? How does a gift economy account for people today who save more so they can enjoy retirement more vs those who did not save anything at all and will barely make ends meet in retirement? You are completely not answering how people prioritize wants vs needs in a gift economy when goods and services are scarce.

I thought it was quite obvious, I will be more explicit: In 1948 those surrounding Middle Eastern countries went to war against Israel. In the 6 day of war, Egypt engaged in actions tantamount to war by closing shipping lanes, and when Israel responded as they said they would, surrounding Middle Eastern countries engaged in a war against them... Not sure why you put "wars" in quotes. It demonstrates exactly what I said earlier: "Every country surrounding Israel has waged war on Isreal since its inception." What you posted further did not show that what I posted was incorrect, you just listed information prior to what I did. That does not change the fact that later, in 1947, the UN did develop a partition plan for 2 states. Israel accepted, Palestinians rejected it. When British left, Palestinians could have done similar to Israel, declared themselves a state and taken what they had... but instead they went to war against Isreal. The destruction of Israel has always been a higher priority to them than their own statehood.

A. That's false. He didn't say anything about evangelicals, unless you'd like to make the argument that all evangelicals are Christian nationalists? B. I don't think you know what "voter suppression" means. For that to be true he would have to come up with some way to prevent or make it more difficult for them to vote. Purging view rolls, eliminating polling locations, adding new requirements, eliminating alternative voting times--you know, the Republican playbook.

Pakistan got their own country in 1947 and ethnically cleansed it right away. 800K slaughtered, 8M displaced, and virtually no one cared. Iraq, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Syria saw that genocide and figured that they could do the same thing to the Israelis. If every single Jew died that day the Iranians etc would be happy as clams right now, and so would people like @eyeballand his Hamas-lovin' buddy @ExFlyer.

When did the nazi's and commies show up? Did you have a family reunion or something?

The MSM has failed to distance itself from the levers of power and be a free press because it courts official circles for the “inside scoop” (which is often political spin) and funding. MSM essentially became an extension of government communications departments throughout the pandemic, doxing any real criticism of pandemic measures and causes. We should all be worried about the pervasiveness of propaganda and we should all be worried about expansions of the definition of hate speech and the various committees set up to discern what is hateful and dangerous. Basically these are all expansions of the role of the state in the everyday lives of citizens. The space for critical thinking is being removed. The tolerance for opposing viewpoints and opposition is shrinking in the name, once again, of public safety. No thanks. I’d rather think and speak freely than be kept “safe” by people who pretend to know better than private citizens what is best for them.

You intentionally misrepresent their position to justify such vile behavior. Well in Joe's definition, opposing post term abortions is considered "Christian nationalism". Basically by labeling views he disagrees with as a threat to the nation he can justify himself in his attempts at using lawfare against his political opponents and covers up his attempt at VOTER SUPPRESSION.

Microsoft finds Russian influence operations targeting U.S. election have begun Of course, Trump's announcement he won't spend a penny on Ukraine means he is Putin's favorite AGAIN. 🤮

Trump said he will be a dictator. I'm just speculating about how he will do it based on Hitler's example. You have inside information on his plans? Do you even know about HIS project 2025 plans? Trolling is what YOU DO.