Leaderboard

I wasn't just talking about Gaza. What are you talking about you demented Boomer freak?

Nonsense. Religions jockey for dominance, not mutuality and tolerance. Central to those faiths is the idea that everyone else is wrong--and often damned to hell because of it. Hence why that dehumanizing tactic has been used for thousands of years to justify sectarian violence. Similarly the "pro life" flag is not a symbol of tolerance, safety or support. It says a LOT about the people who would fly it and their intention to strip women and girls of a fundamental right to choose. Both of those flags stand for the triumph of ideas in which someone else is the loser. They are exclusive. The pride flag is fundamentally different, in that no one loses. It is inclusive. And noooope, teens are definitely having more sex than you think--and the minority who aren't are still coping with the same challenges. They are literally bombarded with unhealthy sexual content. So, again, why shouldn't they have access to content that models healthy, sex-positive relationships? Are you having those conversations with your children? Do you sit down and tell Junior that you don't spit in mommy's mouth or step on her face when you are intimate? (Or maybe you do, no judgment between consenting adults.) But most parents aren't having that explicit conversation. So where are kids supposed to get the information to offset the dark fantasy world of porn? Shouldn't healthy sex be modeled as well? Consider that the world has changed and the information kids need might not be the information you had growing up. Or to look at it the other way, do you think a consensual cartoon blowjob is too titillating for these kids? Is it going to corrupt them, when Extreme Asian Backdoor Gangbangs vol 3 is just a Google search away. How do you think such a book is harmful?

Oh, get lost. He says he's FOR transparency and accountability, but also fully supports the current scandal-riddled gov't and hangs on every word they say. That was the extent of our difference.

@CdnFox That Justin Transition - by Douglas Farrow (substack.com) The behaviour of this man, and of his party, is not merely irresponsible. It is criminal in character and treasonous in kind. It makes a mockery of Canada's fundamental law and openly repudiates the principles on which the country was built. It regards the nation-state as such, the country itself, as an anachronism. The Justin Transition is not a transition from nasty fossil fuels to beautiful green energy. (Ask the Chinese about that.) It's a transition from democracy to oligarchy. Yes, the prime minister is shameless. But so are we. We put him into power. We've been keeping him in power. It's not a few yuan here, a little strong-arming there, and a couple of rented busses that have kept him in power. It's not even the hopelessly compromised NDP. It's the urban voter in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. The urban voter has kept him in power.

True dat. But when they're taking a billion $ from the gov't - they're not going to bite the hand that feeds them. And when they see how the gov't treat journalists who DO hold them to account, again - they won't be going there. Careful. You sound exactly like that Diagolon guy 😉

A columnist is still an opinion and it is certainly valid to discuss the new vulgarity in in modern politics and the Prime Minister to be stadium under “F Trudeau” flags given expletive-laden speeches. And make no mistake about it, PP didn’t accidentally let a F word slip out or accidentally stand under a F Trudeau flag, it was all a deliberate decision to present himself to the public this way. When Diagolon mused about raping PP’s wife, PP complained to police and publicly called them “odious losers”. Now he’s buddy buddy with them again? PP’s performance is new to Canadian politics and it is worthy of comment, period. I don’t know why you conservatives think the job of the media is only to flatter you and only mention the things you want to hear but you should get over it. Also lets get real you and the other conservatives don’t believe in reaching across the aisle. You believe the “left” should reach out to you bit you believe reaching out to the left is treason. In the US even moderate conservative are labeled left wing communists these days and from what I can see Canada isn’t too far behind. PP in particular has built a 20+ year career out being a snarky combative politician who adds insults and name calling into nearly everything he says. You think his majority government is going to “reach across the divide”? To whom? You think standing under F Trudeau flags and swearing about Trudeau is “reaching across the divide”? what a joke.

Palestinian children under Hamas: The indoctrination in the schools starts even at a younger age than this. Is it any wonder they become bloodthirsty maniacs? Why do so many people in the West support this kind of thing?

There is no ethnic cleansing or apartheid.

That's a school book? Today...it's not unusual for you to lie. But this has no place in school libraries. That you defend this trash only serves to further prove that you hate America and are an active enemy of the nation.

Here's what people are really worried about. And if biden loses this will be a big part of why. You can lie to people about how well the economy's doing but they know what's happening when they reach the check out lady:

UN partition plan would have given Palestinians their own land, they rejected it. British left in 1948, Israel declared themselves a state... Arabs/Palestinians go to war against them instead of keeping their own. 1948 War - Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestinians, Egypt 6 Day war - Egypt, Syria, Jordan with more contributing On and on and on...

“If Trump and [John] Roberts and Alito and [Neil] Gorsuch and [Clarence] Thomas and Leonard Leo and the Heritage Foundation, if they get a hold, there will be no government left, there will be no rights left, you will live under theocracy, you’ll end up with Christian nationalism. But that’s all right, you little f[edited] 26-year-old, you don’t feel like ‘the election’s important to me. They’re not addressing the issues that I care about,'” said Carville. Clearly Carville believes that Trump will win or he wouldn't be freaking out over younger voters not wanting to vote for Joe. Anecdotally: a good friend of mine has a very liberal daughter. She got into teaching and just graduated last year. She's a councilor in Chicago right now. She was all in D. Now she's not. She's not voting for Trump. Let's make that clear. This is no full conversion story. But she is done with Democrats. She is quitting after this school year to move back to Texas and she is sitting out the election. That is an example of what James is addressing. But that leads to another discussion, will Democrats replace Joe. I believe they will. I actually stated that (on a different forum) when the boxes where found at Penn-Biden, that that was the first step in getting Joe removed. Do not be surprised if he is forced out. They will either get enough damning info on him, his son and his brother to blackmail him into quitting, get his family indicted or use a doctor to say he is to senile to continue. In any case, something will drive Joe out of the race.

So when has the CBC done that in reporting the news, not in an editorial?

probably should. If he was rational.. he would get the hint that I do not agree with him and never will. There is this definition of insanity...

Neither was my response only in regards to Gaza either.

Absolutely false. Allowing something to die is NOT the same as killing it. And what kind of sick fark would want to keep a brainless newborn on life support? To what end?

You don’t see how slanted the coverage is.

Yup. At the end of the day in a democracy the people must be the circuit breaker, (with the GG as the safeguard for the process.) If the people are not prepared to severely punish a political party for corruption, then it becomes a race to the bottom. Once there is no consequence to corruption then it never stops and both sides will start doing it pretty soon - because why not. Eyeball would pretend that sure - we didn't do anything when justin was caught being corrupt before but MAYBE SOMEHOW if we know in the future it'll be different? It'll be different when voters don't tolerate that crap. For the liberal supporters tho it practically seems like a prerequisite. You're the last person who should be saying that.

LOL - do you realize you've spent all day today trying desperately to include me in conversations with other people? Did i break you again? And your motivations are pretty transparent, and if they're not you're free to clarify them at any time. But when you call for more transparency but cannot explain why you didn't act to punish justin for the crimes he did commit which we know about (Which you tried to pretend were harper's fault or didn't happen), then your credibility goes in the gutter Sure. There's no such thing as people in this country - they can't exercise power by ... oh i don't know... electing people they like to power instead of based on their ability to virtue signal or their sock pattern? You vote for big gov't, you support big gov't, you get told that the woke programs big gov't is selling you are not good but you support them anyway - and then you complain about big gov't . Yeash.

You're like CdnFox. You have to lie to yourselves about what people you don't agree with are motivated by. It's just so unfortunate that more people can't bring themselves to realize the only polarization that really matters in our society is the one between the governed and the government. I'm with the governed. Who's side are you on?

Lol. Read the first two sentences of you quote you posted. And no, there was no such implication.

I don't think that. It just doesn't jive with your habit of believing every single thing you read or hear on MSM. What you say and what you practice seem to be different.

I seem to recall that - i think Robosmith thinks that inequities are some sort of investment product.

bzzt wrong The thing that didn't happen?

Certainly they are two separate things, thanks. The pride flag should not be controversial though. Students should know that they are safe and supported regardless of sexual orientation and that's the message it sends. It can help young people to hear that message and it is no capacity to harm, so there should be no problem with a pride flag. That book, on the other hand, is rather explicit. Is it used or available in schools? Who knows, because it's been presented with all the thoughtfulness we're used to I here, I guess the intention is to imply that it's not only in schools, but that it's in the kindergarten classroom next to Dr. Suess. That seems very unlikely. Perhaps it's part of sex education curriculum? Which is where we get into reasonable conversation. It's 2024. Our children live in a world of information with unlimited graphic, sexual content just a click away--and they are watching it. However I think we can all agree that pornography does not model healthy, caring relationships or safe and appropriate sexual behavior. In that context, do you see any argument for why an illustrated story that models safe practices and consensual sex has value? Is there a case for sex-positive counterprogramming to give young people a healthier perspective on sex than they get from their smartphones?

was in a union once and i will make it short and succinct... overrated.

Well, I mostly agree with this sentence apart from the rest of the post. But I think what's going on is: politicians (the populists) are performing in a new skin, contrary to the old performance skins such as Trudeau's. People think they're genuine. So there still needs to be a "real" politician that will be different from both performative main party leaders, I think.

And it's also up to the audience to choose how they react to politically charged rewrites. I've chosen to trash Disney and other woke entertainment companies because they ruin beloved stories. You've chosen to sit on your ass and stupidly consume politically charged content. Isn't having the right to choose just the coolest thing ever?

Meh - the left tends to use those words back and forth to suit their purpose, it's hard to keep track. Of course he does. Make no mistake - the left right now is incredibly bigoted, racists and prejudicial. They are all about dividing people into dozens of groups based on race, sex, etc etc and then assigning each group an 'intersectional' score. If you're a woman you score higher than men, if you're a black woman you score higher than a white woman, if you're muslim you score higher than christian etc etc. Heck at the ndp convention people were only allowed to speak based on that very order - black lesbian women would be first to be allowed, and then if there's still time at the end white men. There are job listings right now at universities in the east that say no white christian men allowed. These people are not interested in equality or equity of any kind no matter how you look at it.

Did you know they also just got another boost of $$ from Trudeau, then immediately gave themselves all giant bonuses AND fired 800 people?

They are OK with it when Trudeau does it. What they need to do - is imagine that same power in the hands of a politician they DON'T like. No politician should fund and control the media.

Ahhh, you're one of those "there is no truth, we can't know the truth, so why bother trying to find out the truth" people. But MSM is unbiased??? OMG 🤣

Yes, they do have a reason: they're religious bigots. Pakistan never declared itself a country. It was spearheaded by the Brits and consecrated by the UN. The Pakistanis never had an opportunity of were able to declare anything. In 1947, when Pakistan was formed, they committed a genocide that's still orders of magnitude larger than all the people killed by both sides in all of Israel's wars. Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Egypt and Lebanon never attacked Pakistan. Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Egypt and Lebanon never complained about all the murdered Sikhs and Hindus, whose families had lived in that region since the beginning of time. Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, Egypt and Lebanon don't gripe about anyone's "right to return" to Pakistan. There are ten million people who have ancestral claims to that land. What's the difference? Why do muslims care so much that 700,000 muslims were negatively affected, but they don't care that 10M Sikhs and Hindus were affected the exact same way? Why do muslims care so much that 500 muslims were killed in 1948, but they don't care that 800,000 Sikhs and Hindus were killed when Pakistan was formed? Is 500 more than 800,000? Is it worse to kill 500 than 800,000?

Your days of warped reality, sexualizing children and destroying this nation...are fcking over Hodad. You can belittle this all you like but...your crap is over.!

Whoredad runs interference for the GPL, or Gay Predators League.

Incorrect

I compare immigration to a raft. If you pile 20 people on a raft meant for 8 people you are going to sink the raft. It's like our institutions whether that be classrooms, health care, social security etc. Eventually overcrowding is gonna sink the raft

You were flirting with reasonableness for a few weeks there, but now you're just saying crazy stuff again. Nobody is taking about "post-term abortion" and Biden is not involved in any voter suppression effort. You forget your lines? Your job is to rail at Democrats for making it easier to vote.

I don't know many adults who don't pay attention to what's happening, and I don't know many people who trust the CBC or CNN. They're not primary sources at all, no, but if you have 700 FB friends and something happens, someone will always find useful info about it somewhere. That doesn't mean that I run around telling everyone it's true, it's just something to file away as a possibility, or not. The point is that you'll see thing that you'd never see on CBC, They're in a different class from the rest. Even Dems watch Fox News. In some population demos, they have the highest viewership among Dems. I'd almost swear that the women on The View are trying to kill ABC's credibility entirely with the things that they say. Ditto for Joy Reid on MSNBC, she's just a vile racist pig and it's hard to believe she's still got a show. CNN finally got around to firing Cuomo, etc, but they did a lot of damage before they left. CNN let him air footage of his "coming out of covid quarantine" moment, but he was caught on video getting into an altercation with a jogger just a few days earlier. He wasn't coming out of quarantine at all and millions of people knew it. It was bizarre. The fact that you don't know that the FBI were caught lying to the FISA court, Kevin Clinesmith was convicted of falsifying evidence and providing it to the FISA court the FBI was told to make a list of protocols that they would put in place to ensure that their agents would act with integrity in the future... is a massive indictment of the MSM that you're defending. That info was wide out in the open, they just thought that people shouldn't know about it. How many stories have come up in the past twenty years that were more significant than "An FBI agent was convicted for falsifying evidence in an investigation into the president? Isn't that something that Americans should know about? Isn't that something that we should know about? If Obama was president and the FBI did that, don't you think you'd know? The story that you're referencing came out in March 2019, all they did was edit it a month before the election. That doesn't mean that it went to the front of their home page it doesn't mean that they said anything about it during their primetime news hour for all we know it could have been an edit that the PMO asked or even told them to make. Maybe they had info in the original article about SNC's crimes in Canada and they edited that out at Trudeau's request. Do you have access to the original article? CBC basically let all of Trudeau's scandals die on the vine. They gave them the exact minimum amount of coverage possible, then they let him have the final word and dropped the stories for good. Honestly the last thing I ever saw about the WE scandal on CBC was Trudeau saying "I merely should have recused myself from the decision to use WE." That's it. https://globalnews.ca/video/7171014/trudeau-says-he-deeply-regrets-involving-his-mother-in-ongoing-controversy-with-we-charity Can you find video of Trudeau acknowledging that his mom made $250K + expenses from WE? A quarter of a million, plus expenses... Can you find a video where a reporter said how much Margaret made from WE and then Justin Trudeau responded that he now knows how much she made there? He basically put his own spin on it, and the story went away quite conveniently. There's a lot more to the WE scandal, I just won't bore you with the details because I know you have more important things to talk about here than the width and breadth of Trudeau's scandals.

Incorrect...on both counts

Yea but Poilievre's shelf is the size of the Siberian continental. Whereas Trudeau's shelf looks like an Ikea knockoff.

I'm not sure if the LGTB alphabet crowd has any idea what Hamas and the Palestinians would do to them if they set foot in Gaza. I've seen a number of videos where a lot of these protesters seem to be pretty clueless about what they are protesting for.

There's a video making the rounds on social media where RFK Jr unequivocally states that the NIH owns 50% of the patent on the covid jabs. That's a pretty strong accusation coming from a presidential candidate, and a Kennedy no less. It's also insanely worrisome. Fauci was the head of the NIH, he used NIH money to fund research that made a coronavirus in the Wuhan lab more transmissible among humans, then he told the world that covid came from a bat-pangolin-human combination, people got kicked off of social media for talking about the BSL4 lab right beside that wetmarket, then Fauci pimped the vax as our only hope, promised herd immunity, said that they'd be safe and effective, said that they actually were safe and effective after they were in use, told people that they didn't need to worry about covid if they were jabbed which was a lie, told people that they didn't have to worry about giving covid to grandma if they were jabbed which was a lie, then said that there was a "pandemic of the vaccinated" which was a lie, etc, etc. If Fauci or his NIH received a single dollar related to the sale of the covid vaccines, or if they got so much as some cotton from the inside of a bottle of Pfizer/Moderna ibuprofen, or a trip across the street where they received some free McDonald's at a 'seminar' or something, there needs to be an old-skoole investigation, with fingernails ripped out, etc.

A sitting PM gave over $1.3B to media corporations, and regularly has the police go after Rebel news. They regularly get shoved and thrown on the ground, they're not allowed to get within 100M of Trudeau or they get the beats. There was even a cop who ran into a Rebel news reporter and then pretended that the reporter assaulted him. He was caught on camera doing it all: Those filthy God-damned pigs are a disgrace to our country. So we have some media orgs that are failing, and getting lavished with billions of dollars from our PM, and other media outlets that regularly face violence from our police. Does that look like something that happens in a free western country?

That's the thing about the 'mistakes' narrative that many on the left hide behind. "Sure they grossly misreported something but hey - everyone makes mistakes!" If that were true, the mistakes would be pretty evenly distributed between the right and the left. They are not. When a mistake is made - it favors the left 90 percent of the time Then there's the outright lies. CNN and NBC were busted for deliberately altering tape of the christian school fiasco to make it look like something happened that did not. NBC was also nailed for editing the travon martin 911 call again to make it look like something happened that did not. CBC lied about Smith all through the alberta election and then claimed it was a mistake after. Etc etc etc. It's not a mistake. And trying to blow it off as just 'mistakes' is beyond egregious. It is willfully participating in fraud. And people wonder why the CPC has such support for scrapping the CBC.

You intentionally misrepresent their position to justify such vile behavior. Well in Joe's definition, opposing post term abortions is considered "Christian nationalism". Basically by labeling views he disagrees with as a threat to the nation he can justify himself in his attempts at using lawfare against his political opponents and covers up his attempt at VOTER SUPPRESSION.

Military leaders saw pandemic as opportunity to test propaganda techniques, report says | Ottawa Citizen Coronavirus: how the UK government is using behavioural science (theconversation.com) Military campaign to influence public opinion continued after defence chief shut it down | CBC News COVID lockdown is world's biggest psychological experiment | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) ^^^ Psy-ops ^^^

Now you are just making stuff up. I'm not Canadian. Oh, and yes, the POTUS has supervisory role over all federal offices. That includes the EAC. Don't worry, you don't have to go to Google to find out what the EAC is. EAC stands for Election Assistance Commission. Their purpose is to assistant state and local officials in election security, integrity and accuracy. The EAC falls under the Independent Agencies that are overseen by the Executive Branch (AKA the President). It was well within the President's preview to monitor the accuracy of an election. As for the phone call, you know about him asking Brad to find the votes. That is a key word too, "find". You can't find votes that don't exist. They must exist to fond them. However, do you know about the lengthy case President Trump laid out for massive voter fraud in GA? Because he did. He made the request that the state analyze every signature in Fulton County. He laid out specific numbers in illegal or highly suspected votes. He wanted to challenge the validity of 300,000 votes. https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html That isn't someone trying to steal an election. That is someone making the case that the election was stolen. Now, it may very well be that the information they had was wrong. But that is the point of asking for an investigation.

I can agree we make choices. The main issue is, what gets us to make x or y choice? I believe the answer is our environment. In terms of a physics approach, I think that physicist and youtuber Sabine Hossenfelder has a good video on why physics backs up the notion that though we make choices, we don't have free will. Her video is below. This doesn't mean we should strive to make the best choices we can make, only that our choices are essentially dictated by our environment.

Trump said he will be a dictator. I'm just speculating about how he will do it based on Hitler's example. You have inside information on his plans? Do you even know about HIS project 2025 plans? Trolling is what YOU DO.