Leaderboard

I wasn't just talking about Gaza. What are you talking about you demented Boomer freak?

Nonsense. Religions jockey for dominance, not mutuality and tolerance. Central to those faiths is the idea that everyone else is wrong--and often damned to hell because of it. Hence why that dehumanizing tactic has been used for thousands of years to justify sectarian violence. Similarly the "pro life" flag is not a symbol of tolerance, safety or support. It says a LOT about the people who would fly it and their intention to strip women and girls of a fundamental right to choose. Both of those flags stand for the triumph of ideas in which someone else is the loser. They are exclusive. The pride flag is fundamentally different, in that no one loses. It is inclusive. And noooope, teens are definitely having more sex than you think--and the minority who aren't are still coping with the same challenges. They are literally bombarded with unhealthy sexual content. So, again, why shouldn't they have access to content that models healthy, sex-positive relationships? Are you having those conversations with your children? Do you sit down and tell Junior that you don't spit in mommy's mouth or step on her face when you are intimate? (Or maybe you do, no judgment between consenting adults.) But most parents aren't having that explicit conversation. So where are kids supposed to get the information to offset the dark fantasy world of porn? Shouldn't healthy sex be modeled as well? Consider that the world has changed and the information kids need might not be the information you had growing up. Or to look at it the other way, do you think a consensual cartoon blowjob is too titillating for these kids? Is it going to corrupt them, when Extreme Asian Backdoor Gangbangs vol 3 is just a Google search away. How do you think such a book is harmful?

Oh, get lost. He says he's FOR transparency and accountability, but also fully supports the current scandal-riddled gov't and hangs on every word they say. That was the extent of our difference.

@CdnFox That Justin Transition - by Douglas Farrow (substack.com) The behaviour of this man, and of his party, is not merely irresponsible. It is criminal in character and treasonous in kind. It makes a mockery of Canada's fundamental law and openly repudiates the principles on which the country was built. It regards the nation-state as such, the country itself, as an anachronism. The Justin Transition is not a transition from nasty fossil fuels to beautiful green energy. (Ask the Chinese about that.) It's a transition from democracy to oligarchy. Yes, the prime minister is shameless. But so are we. We put him into power. We've been keeping him in power. It's not a few yuan here, a little strong-arming there, and a couple of rented busses that have kept him in power. It's not even the hopelessly compromised NDP. It's the urban voter in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal. The urban voter has kept him in power.

True dat. But when they're taking a billion $ from the gov't - they're not going to bite the hand that feeds them. And when they see how the gov't treat journalists who DO hold them to account, again - they won't be going there. Careful. You sound exactly like that Diagolon guy 😉

A columnist is still an opinion and it is certainly valid to discuss the new vulgarity in in modern politics and the Prime Minister to be stadium under “F Trudeau” flags given expletive-laden speeches. And make no mistake about it, PP didn’t accidentally let a F word slip out or accidentally stand under a F Trudeau flag, it was all a deliberate decision to present himself to the public this way. When Diagolon mused about raping PP’s wife, PP complained to police and publicly called them “odious losers”. Now he’s buddy buddy with them again? PP’s performance is new to Canadian politics and it is worthy of comment, period. I don’t know why you conservatives think the job of the media is only to flatter you and only mention the things you want to hear but you should get over it. Also lets get real you and the other conservatives don’t believe in reaching across the aisle. You believe the “left” should reach out to you bit you believe reaching out to the left is treason. In the US even moderate conservative are labeled left wing communists these days and from what I can see Canada isn’t too far behind. PP in particular has built a 20+ year career out being a snarky combative politician who adds insults and name calling into nearly everything he says. You think his majority government is going to “reach across the divide”? To whom? You think standing under F Trudeau flags and swearing about Trudeau is “reaching across the divide”? what a joke.

Palestinian children under Hamas: The indoctrination in the schools starts even at a younger age than this. Is it any wonder they become bloodthirsty maniacs? Why do so many people in the West support this kind of thing?

There is no ethnic cleansing or apartheid.

That's a school book? Today...it's not unusual for you to lie. But this has no place in school libraries. That you defend this trash only serves to further prove that you hate America and are an active enemy of the nation.

Here's what people are really worried about. And if biden loses this will be a big part of why. You can lie to people about how well the economy's doing but they know what's happening when they reach the check out lady:

UN partition plan would have given Palestinians their own land, they rejected it. British left in 1948, Israel declared themselves a state... Arabs/Palestinians go to war against them instead of keeping their own. 1948 War - Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestinians, Egypt 6 Day war - Egypt, Syria, Jordan with more contributing On and on and on...

Title says it all. I personally thinking reducing immigration would be a start, but it would also help to reduce zoning and building height regulations especially for Urban Centres. Greater subsidies of public housing would honestly be a lot better too.

Ok. Sounds good to me.

Everyone has biases. I have them and so do you. Just because someone is telling you something you don't want to hear doesn't mean they are lying.

Yes, it's too bad that 10% of citizens live in states that have been bamboozled into WASTING MONEY and VOTER SUPPRESSION. Anyone INTELLIGENT knows that voter impersonation fraud is ineffective at stealing elections. That's why Republicons concentrated on VOTER SUPPRESSION.

Great. Cheating wasn't an issue in the last election either. That's why you fools can't furnish even a shred of evidence, despite this being the most scrutinized election in history. That's why automated recounts and hand recounts and forensic analyses all came to the same conclusion. It's why Fox paid $800 million for lying about election fraud. It's why Trump was laughed out of court 60+ times. The worst part is that you don't even know enough to feel embarrassed by braying on about these baseless claims. You may not have my respect, but you do have my pity.

There’s negative coverage of Trudeau just about every single day in just about every single MSM outlet including CBC. If Trudeau kicks a puppy in the face as a PR stunt its not “slanted coverage” to write an article criticizing that one specific thing and nobody else.

You people obviously being people who are mystified about why people protest western support of Israel and don't protest the actions of dictatorships overseas who we have no influence over. I'm starting to wonder if some of you people understand the point of protesting. The idea is to call for tangible change, not simply virtue signal. Yes this is true, much to the chagrin of a great many conservatives. Those are extremely easy questions to answer. Hamas isn't interested in the welfare of the people, they also need Israel to continue to act with a heavy hand and Israel is happy to oblige as the nutjobs are on both sides here.

There's terrorism on both sides for sure. There are also reasonable people on both sides. But there's no advantage to anybody in promoting politics at this point. Until people start saying stop the divisiveness we won't be able to talk about an actual solution

You don’t see how slanted the coverage is.

1. Joe Biden didn't make up the concept of Christina nationalists, lol. Or the alt right. 2. Christian nationalists likely have many views that overlap with mainstream Christianity. That does not mean that they are the same. Many Christians are perfectly fine to let other people live as they believe. 3. No evidence of any such activity. Please cite an example of any entity being audited by the IRS under Biden solely because of religious affiliation.

in most cases, online forum posters use the words, "Nazi" or "commie" to describe anyone that disagrees with them. Most use those two words interchangeably along with fascist. Been doing the forum game since 2008 and have since became numb to the use of those words.

Ya, I know. I want the gov't to leave me the F alone.

They're literally stealing land and homes from their rightful owners, maintaining a repressive security regime over all Palestinians and depriving them of economic opportunities and human rights.

Yes lots of atrocities happened on oct 7 which is why it's mystifying people keep harping on ones that were fabricated like the "babies in ovens". You're another one of those dummies who thinks "that specific thing didn't happen" means "none of those things happened" huh? No I leave that line for the Israel cucks like you.

I have already explained how I base my opinions: 1. Joe Biden makes up a vague boogeyman. Last election cycle it was "alt right" now its "Christian nationalists 2. Joe Biden ascribes mainstream views to Christian nationalists 3. Joe Biden justifies targeting Christian universities and pro life groups with IRS audits and everything else because they are Christian nationalists If you stand for that injustice then I'm sorry

Precisely. It becomes a very effective leash. "if you as an industry don't behave decently then we might cut that funding, and if specific parties don't play ball we might rough your people up a little." That doesn't mean that the media won't report ANYTHING but it does mean they'll soften gov't stories a bit, and when the gov't people call they'll pick up the phone and if they get asked to spin something one way or another or ask a question in a specific manner to set the gov't up for a softball answer. " Sir, are you demanding people take the jab simply because you believe in following the science, or because you don't like unnecessary deaths?" LOL!! And just like that i'm a radical

Yet you will repeat these claims without a shred of evidence. Not even one example. You can't cite where anyone was called a domestic terrorist for having an opinion on abortion. You can't cite even one example of the "full force" of the government coming down on someone for participating in a discussion. So what gives? These are obviously baseless claims. Why are you pushing them as if they are real?

Noooooope. I wouldn't recommend that anyone read the NY Post, but if you had read your own link you would know: A. Nowhere does it call anyone a domestic terrorist for having anti-choice views. B. Nowhere is the full force of the government "coming after" someone for participating in a conversation. Rather, it says that if someone has become an impassioned believer in a cause, and has started to justify or rationalize the use of violence in support of that cause, then they are worth keeping an eye on. That's just common sense. Again, here's the hypothetical profile: “This is Ann, a resident of Elkville in rural America,” one profile reads. “Ann has always been religious but since the death of her mother, she’s become increasingly devout. She’s a regular in the small-town community, active in several church groups. While she has always been protective of her four kids, she has become increasingly more concerned about the welfare of other children including the unborn.” The document, obtained by American First Legal, then tells employees to consider ways to address the fictional Ann’s behavior after she questions whether “the bible justifies violence in defense of life” during a prayer group meeting and calls the mayor of her small town a “baby killer” at a ribbon-cutting ceremony. ^^So, this person states that a mayor who supports a woman's right to choose, is a baby killer, while also asking whether the bible would support someone using violence against this mayor because of his views. Yeah, anyone who thinks they have a biblical mandate to kill those with whom they disagree politically should be on all the watch lists.

They're big words, and Libbies LOVE using big words here, they just don't know how. If you ever see them use terms/words like confirmation bias, seditious, cognitive dissonance here, get ready to laugh. And don't bother explaining anything to them, they won't get it.

A. So you were indeed, incorrect. He was explicitly talking about severe situations. B. There is a difference between letting a body die and killing a person, no? Again, anyone without a living will must rely entirely on the judgment of doctor and families to determine when to cease heroic measures to maintain a semblance of life. This is no different. it's pure nonsense to call it a "post-term abortion"--which is a silly word salad to begin with. Remember Terry Schaivo's "post-term abortion"? 🙄

You're tilting at windmills. Nowhere has anyone been called a domestic terrorist for having a point of view on abortion, and nowhere has the government's "full force" come after people for participating in a discussion. Seriously, why are you even posting this nonsense?

Do you subject a hopeless patient to heroic measures to maintain a pulse? That's the same conversation--between families and physicians--that every patient deserves. Think about a baby born without a brain or some other essential organ, for whom life is impossible outside the womb. Do you think they should do chest compressions on the thing until it's just a pile of mush? Or offer whatever palliative care they can and let it pass with grace? These are actual conversations that have to take place. They are difficult and heartbreaking. And here you are exploiting that fact in an effort to score some cheap political points. Have some decency.

You missed the context. Hodad vs Nationalist in the post above mine on the last page. You can be upset without calling people hatemongers and child molesters.

Ahhh, you're one of those "there is no truth, we can't know the truth, so why bother trying to find out the truth" people. But MSM is unbiased??? OMG 🤣

If it is comfortable and viable enough to resuscitate, it is a post birth abortion. Make all the justifications you want, but you are supporting people that are ok with killing a post birth child. “If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen,” Northam says in a video from the 2019 interview being shared online. “The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

Down with Jews! -- The Left

Ah, so not a chain email, but rather a disinformation meme. Great. But Northam was only addressing what happens in cases where a baby is born with severe deformities and has a low chance of survival. So, yes, the fate of severely deformed newborns, who naturally lack a living will, should indeed be a discussion between parents and physicians. I wish people would do some critical thinking about random shite from the internet before sharing it like it's news.

Why is it everyone doesn't drive a Lamborgini today? -They do not produce enough value through their current work to afford one. So why would a gift economy be different? Who is this "we" that is going to be making Hundreds of millions of Lamborginis so everyone can have one? If someone did not save anything for retirement, they have nothing to gift in retirement. Do they just take whatever they want? What limits them from taking more in retirement than they ever gifted when working? How do you account for any of that? How does a gift economy account for people today who save more so they can enjoy retirement more vs those who did not save anything at all and will barely make ends meet in retirement? You are completely not answering how people prioritize wants vs needs in a gift economy when goods and services are scarce.

I thought it was quite obvious, I will be more explicit: In 1948 those surrounding Middle Eastern countries went to war against Israel. In the 6 day of war, Egypt engaged in actions tantamount to war by closing shipping lanes, and when Israel responded as they said they would, surrounding Middle Eastern countries engaged in a war against them... Not sure why you put "wars" in quotes. It demonstrates exactly what I said earlier: "Every country surrounding Israel has waged war on Isreal since its inception." What you posted further did not show that what I posted was incorrect, you just listed information prior to what I did. That does not change the fact that later, in 1947, the UN did develop a partition plan for 2 states. Israel accepted, Palestinians rejected it. When British left, Palestinians could have done similar to Israel, declared themselves a state and taken what they had... but instead they went to war against Isreal. The destruction of Israel has always been a higher priority to them than their own statehood.

A. That's false. He didn't say anything about evangelicals, unless you'd like to make the argument that all evangelicals are Christian nationalists? B. I don't think you know what "voter suppression" means. For that to be true he would have to come up with some way to prevent or make it more difficult for them to vote. Purging view rolls, eliminating polling locations, adding new requirements, eliminating alternative voting times--you know, the Republican playbook.

Gonna need you to decode that. I didn't get your chain emails.

Pakistan got their own country in 1947 and ethnically cleansed it right away. 800K slaughtered, 8M displaced, and virtually no one cared. Iraq, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Syria saw that genocide and figured that they could do the same thing to the Israelis. If every single Jew died that day the Iranians etc would be happy as clams right now, and so would people like @eyeballand his Hamas-lovin' buddy @ExFlyer.

When did the nazi's and commies show up? Did you have a family reunion or something?

Funny story... Like you said, lots of people do it, and one of the jobs that he put on his UI form that he was theoretically looking for work in was the Coast Guard, because nobody ever gets it, but they got him a job in the coast guard. He was on the upper deck chopping ice off of everything to prevent the boats from getting top-heavy and tipping over. He quit that job and lost his UI 🤣

Incorrect...on both counts

The MSM has failed to distance itself from the levers of power and be a free press because it courts official circles for the “inside scoop” (which is often political spin) and funding. MSM essentially became an extension of government communications departments throughout the pandemic, doxing any real criticism of pandemic measures and causes. We should all be worried about the pervasiveness of propaganda and we should all be worried about expansions of the definition of hate speech and the various committees set up to discern what is hateful and dangerous. Basically these are all expansions of the role of the state in the everyday lives of citizens. The space for critical thinking is being removed. The tolerance for opposing viewpoints and opposition is shrinking in the name, once again, of public safety. No thanks. I’d rather think and speak freely than be kept “safe” by people who pretend to know better than private citizens what is best for them.

Microsoft finds Russian influence operations targeting U.S. election have begun Of course, Trump's announcement he won't spend a penny on Ukraine means he is Putin's favorite AGAIN. 🤮

Guilty of pretending to while doing nothing Guilty of giving the auto sector billions in free money with no guarantees. Which covers nothing that 95 percent of people weren't already covered for. Guilty of driving out business investment from canada for the first time in our history. Yeah they did that. Was it worth the rest? not even close. Which has achieved nothing Guilty of inflation that drove prices up 10 times more than any rebate gave back. Guilty of giving billions in 'covid relief' to businesses that didn't need it Guilty of bringing in too many and driving housing prices through the roof to the point where 'trudeau town' tent cities are springing up everywhere. Yes - they do. Much. You do too for supporting their destruction of Canada.

A soft coup. LOL... Did Trump try to have the military deployed to protect the government? Yes. Did he tell the crowd to go peacefully protest? Yes. Did he ask the crowd to stop rioting? Yes. The only softness here is between your ears...or legs...or both.