Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/22/2024 in all areas

  1. This is very relevant to Canada and our politics and what people believe. It was reported that half of Canadians believe in Socialism. If that is the case, we are in serious trouble. We know the Liberal-NDP coalition seem to be pressing ahead with new Socialist programs. Many people demand these programs and believe government is their caretaker from cradle to grave. Canada is in big trouble because of all this. The more taxation and intervention in the economy by the various levels of government, the less private entrepreneurship and investment there will be in the economy. "Satan a Socialist—Really? Conspiracy Theory or Fundamental Truth of the Ages Satan Is a Socialist stirs up a lot of social, political, and spiritual questions such as: What are the real differences between free enterprise and socialism? Just how important are the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? What is the real cause of today’s turmoil in the streets and homes? What does the Bible say about socialism/communism? Dr. Jennifer B. Clark and her husband Dr. Dennis L. Clark take on this declaration that Satan is a socialist with forthright answers and bone-chilling conclusions that every citizen needs to know. Satan Is a Socialist will surely generate riots of souls and protests of spirits in all who care about their country." Satan is a Socialist: Free Enterprise vs. Socialism: Dennis Clark, Jennifer Clark: 9780768459746: Books - Amazon.ca
    2 points
  2. Actually Jesus was a socialist. Satan was a far-right populist.
    2 points
  3. unlike most.. the louder someone is.. the less I trust them or take them seriously. The pandemic taught me just how desperately seek affirmation. I got vaxxed but unless you live with me, you would never have known. LIkewise.. i could not care less if you got the jab or not. Folks posting their views on Facebook repeatedly I found to be immature. They are free to say it but I can and did unfriend or unfollow those who harped on it.
    2 points
  4. Satan is a fictional character. So this is a thought exercise but not done for any reason of exploring or discussing with people who disagree.
    2 points
  5. They do, but it has nothing to do with taxes. There are private fools that lease vehicles and rent furniture and appliances too and never get to own them. spoken like a true tyrant (or scab). Floggings will continue until morale improves.....
    1 point
  6. Godless, westconman, confux, and a few others are so obsessed with themselves and still cannot get out of the loser column. They have to stroke each other by writhing in old covid news and useless studies and stats. They get in the jello wresting pool and jerk each other off and around. 1.3K posts to admire each others 1diocy. Some of us really truly don't give a shit about you obsession and it just pisses them off more and more every time we post. We post only to wind them up and...it works so good and is so easy and so much fun. LOL
    1 point
  7. How is he a dictator for one day that makes the Constitution go away? I am not dense, but you cannot articulate anything reasonable here to justify your fears.
    1 point
  8. It must be hard to have spent the last several years angrily shouting at people, whilst getting laughed at. I have the intelligence to understand that the scientific and medical consensus is worth more than the bitter ranting of buffoons doing their own research on Facebook etc. You're a real Karen's Karen.
    1 point
  9. Yes I have. But your facts are false. Each year, the amount of debt interest that must be paid increases substantially. So with no changes at all, annual deficit spending increases. Biden’s deficits are substantially lower than Trump’s were. And you’ll recall that during Obama’s Presidency, the Congress shut down the government in order to keep Bush’s irresponsible tax cuts in place. And Trump cut taxes even more, particularly for the wealthiest.
    1 point
  10. You, too, Moonie. When studies are posted that show the spike/LNPs in the ovaries and testes and adults discuss the possible implications of toxins navigating their way to human reproductive organs, you two HAHAHA'ing about it, makes me pity you. It must be hard going through life without the intelligence to comprehend the implications of things like that.
    1 point
  11. ExF and Moonie always remind me of those annoying kids who run around screaming and yelling and knocking shit over: "Everyone pay attention to Meeeeeeee!" while adults are trying to have a conversation.
    1 point
  12. ExFlyer, I'm sure you think by putting the HAHAHA emoji on everything I post, that you are somehow "getting to me". You're not. I kind of think of you as the mental patient sitting in the corner, rocking and giggling, too unintelligent to understand what's going on around him. I know you do it for attention and acknowledgment. Consider yourself "acknowledged."
    1 point
  13. Yeah, you're right. It's got to start with the parents, and that's always been the case, really. The problem is that the Left-wing has been working for decades to destroy traditional families and they've been largely successful. It really needs to be a two pronged attack. 1. To get traditional, responsible parenting back to the forefront of society. 2. To stamp out attacks on traditional, responsible, parenting.
    1 point
  14. No, but that doesn't make this chart you buffoonishly posted any more relevant. w You're posting figures from the first two months of the pandemic, from the ground-zero states. Using updated numbers, this chart loses all validity. The Red States (even the sparsely populated ones) did a great job catching up to NY, NJ and CT, and in many cases surpassed them! Shout out to the Bubbas! Yes, it was a factor. It was one factor, among many. It does not explain why US COVID outcomes were so poor compared to the rest of the world, as you attempted. US COVID outcomes were terrible across the board, adjusted for population density, and there's an exhaustive list of the most densely populated countries in the world doing much better.
    1 point
  15. I suppose it might be wise to pipe up before kids are actually having anal sex in class. At least till they're out of elementary The problem is that we tend these days to tell them when they can't do a specific thing or not rather than telling them what we expect of them precisely in the first place. Parents let their kids run around and if they do something wrong they'll say "oh honey, don't do THAT", but they won't sit them down and say "you're going to school. Here's what we expect, you will pay attention, you will arrive on time, you will be prepared and you will be respectful of the teachers and other kids". Of course they're going to push the boundaries. And then they grow up to be leftie loonies who keep pushing the boundaries. And because there's no concensus on what represents polite behaviour the country tends to struggle.
    1 point
  16. A lot less healthy... how? Trump is out on the campaign trail non-stop, holding rallies and giving speeches, except when he is being dragged into court. Biden has to have his handlers escort him off stage or away from almost all questions from the Press almost daily. He had to be rescued from questions Easter before last by a person dressed up as the Easter Bunny. Trump is an old man and an all-around circus clown... but trying to pretend like Biden is somehow in better health when he is clearly not all there mentally or physically is just absurd on its face. How will Trump nullify the Constitution based on saying he would be a dictator on day one? I am not terrified by obvious figures of speech that Trump can't do, even if he did mean a real dictator.
    1 point
  17. That's the million dollar question. We don't know. And the scientists and researchers who are trying to find out how bad it is, so that we can work on finding help for people, are continually being shot down and silenced by media, gov't, Big Pharma and their useful idjits like the ones here, who are against finding out. What we do know - excess deaths in highly vaxxed countries are far more than covid deaths ever were and this is being ignored. The #1 reason for death in Alberta is "unknown cause". We do know the spike and the LNPs are settling primarily in the ovaries and testes. What that means for future generation's fertility, time will tell. But it's likely not good.
    1 point
  18. "A tense Brevard County School Board meeting turned feral this week after members raised concerns" LOL - i see what they did there So anyway - the fact that this is enough of a problem that it requires special rules is just insane. I was raised (as were my friends) to pay attention in class or pay the price. Screwing around like that and 'mewing' and grunting at each other like animals in class would not have been tolerated WITHOUT any extra rules by the teachers OR the parents. What a world we've come to that this is actually a problem.
    1 point
  19. The Republicans ALWAYS rack up bigger deficits than Democrats. ALWAYS. Biden’s spending on Taiwan and Ukraine is a pee in the toilet compared to the trillions Bush burned invading Iraq. And we don’t give these countries money. We give them military aid. It’s basically a credit card that lets them purchase American military products. So Raytheon gets the money, not these countries. And,like it or not, it gets those weapons tested.
    1 point
  20. Trump looks a lot less healthy than Biden, and the rest of your fears are ridiculous. If you’re worried about the US Constitution being “nullified,” then don’t vote for a guy who said he will be a dictator on Day One. Bad idea! THAT is what should worry us all. It should terrify us.
    1 point
  21. 1. Yes. 2. I know how the devil came into the public imagination but it's not relevant to 63% of us so a non-starter. I was brought up deeply religious and theistic. 3. Fine but you still have to deal with me as a member of the public. So you can spend your time trying to convert me if you think that's my core problem. Respectfully, I'm well past being converted. 4. I don't consider anyone on here an opponent. Not even trolls and chuds.
    1 point
  22. 1. I reject your premise outright. 2. If me rejecting your idea right out of the gate is "discussing it" then sure... but it's not going anywhere. 3. I don't care. It's not a basis for discussion with the public. 4. I have developed ideas of the causes that don't rely on faith. I don't share yours so there's no point in discussing it, again. 5. 6. It's all nonsense and superstition. Respectfully, you have to take your private faith out of the discussion if you want to move forward. I checked. This says 37% of Canadians believe in Satan. I'm stunned but it's still a minority. https://news.gallup.com/poll/14083/divine-subjects-canadians-believe-britons-skeptical.aspx#:~:text=When it comes to the,believe that the devil exists.
    1 point
  23. When I think of the word "cult", it automatically takes me to the democrat party. The democrat party touts its tolerance; it touts its diversity, equity AND inclusion. And what better party to welcome groups such as satanic cults and voodoo cults? You're all over the f*cking map with tolerance for cultism. Where tolerance hits the wall with you a$$holes is traditional American values & Christianity, which make up the ANTI-cult. Is the democrat party a cult? YES. It's a cult steeped in all kinds of wrong behaviors that will eventually destroy this country if it's not purged.
    1 point
  24. Nobody's discussing your OP. Nobody's going to read it. Even if people don't immediately dismiss the post just by its title and the reputation and tendencies of its author, they certainly will when that wall of text assaults their senses.
    1 point
  25. Nothing new here. This stuff should be common sense. When you have someone like Biden and the Democrats take office, where they immediately enact something like 90+ Executive Orders to weaken our border security policies, they openly encourage illegal immigration through action and words. Guess what? More people flock to the borders.
    1 point
  26. Nope. That's just you making shit up, and arguing with yourself...again, LOL! I have no problem with the research you posted. The problem is in the buff conclusions you drew from it. No, the research shows a moderate correlation (in the US ~0.55), which is is unsurprising given how viruses spread from person to person. What it cannot explain is: 1) Why the worst performing states in the US are low density ones (like Arizona, Mississipi, West Virginia and New Mexico) 2) Why even States with lower population density to Canada performed significantly worse. 3) Why places in the world with 10x the population density of the USA had less than 50% of its population adjusted deaths. Once again, you've pooped your pants and proven how much of a clueless bullshitter you are.
    1 point
  27. Not actually responding to you per se although I can see how you would think that. I found the “fun” aspect of your post intriguing so I used the quote simply for the sake of the quote. You could have been anybody here, even someone who cares. Frankly, I took no particular notice of your screen name at the time, only your tone. The link itself has value in terms of being a snapshot. Statistics are difficult to get a grip on when they’re overly broad, at least they are for me. Maybe it’s why there’s so much interpretive debate and insults flying around here. Smaller groups, like specific police departments, policing in general, or the military as a whole can sometimes shed more light on trajectory than huge swaths of data that require in-depth examination. With this particular group we see relatively young, relatively fit members who were assessed to be medically fit for police duties prior to receiving the vaccine. It provides a snapshot, that’s all. The quote I used was a target of opportunity, I used your words as illustrative of something that may cause us grief in the future and of the cavalier way we are approaching (and deflecting) the issue based largely on narrative. That said, be assured that I’m rooting for you, no one hopes that my concerns are groundless more than I do. Yes you can, but there’s only two possible outcomes here so I’d prefer not to, your milage may differ. Over the long haul, this either gets better or it gets worse. I usually begin seriously assessing contingency options when the likely hood of a specific occurrence is at 30% and rising. Nothing in my experience suggests that ignoring such things leads to good outcomes but please, you do you with my blessings. Ya… I know, thanks. I try to adapt to the reality of that by considering a range of unintended consequences and negative outcomes, sort of a QA thing… after all, we did get a few things wrong on our journey to Crazy Island. I call it maintaining a positive attitude through the assumption of a negative result. In other words hope for the best and prepare for the worst. And yet here we are (for the last time BTW) discussing how much you don’t care. Your first sentence seems curiously at odds with the last one. It also stands as an example of “strength of an idea” which is one of the barriers to prudent contingency planning. Then again, it’s your’s to embrace with my blessings. As an aside, I only used words and phrases that were previously hurled in my direction by others, none of them were/or are mine including ilk and CHUD. They’re unlikely to see the light of day again in any future correspondence. Your closing sentence is noteworthy though and part of the reason I used those terms in the first place. I hope it resonates here more than I expect it will, but hey, if nothing else it serves as a second example of me rooting for you in the same post… cool eh? With that said, I’m now done with the “opinion forum” experiment. I'll leave you to it. Best wishes to all.
    1 point
  28. For reals? Diseases are more deadly in places with higher population density? Might as well tell us the sky is blue. Like...Alaska, with 2000 deaths per 100,000 (higher than Canada's ~1500) despite having 1/8th Canada's population density? Like...Wyoming, with half Canada's population density, but double the COVID deaths per 100,000? Once again, you've been caught cluelessly bullshitting. Way to humiliate yourself again.
    1 point
  29. That is in March. We were talking about Feb. And we were talking about what works, not what some rogue justice thinks is illegal. Texas has deployed National Guard troops and state police officers up and down the Texas border since 2021, and began stringing concertina wire along the banks of the river the next year. What changed last month in the park, known as Shelby Park, is that Texas began preventing federal agents from routine access to the riverbank or from using the park to detain and process large numbers of migrants. That is how the month started. It didn't matter how wide spread it was. The fact that they might be sent home sent them to Cali. Hell, half of them are flying to the border to cross any way.
    1 point
  30. Got an idea. Stop being a dope, and instead, look up the rules for who qualifies for Secret Service protection. It isn’t difficult to do. https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=who+qualifies+for+secret+service+protection Among other things, it’s not 5%, it’s 20%: “Whether the candidate is an independent or third-party candidate for President polling at 20% or more of the Real Clear Politics National Average for 30 consecutive days.” RCP has Kennedy at a pathetic 4%.
    1 point
  31. What worries ME most is that if he wins your head will explode violently and i won't be able to think of a single nice thing to say at the funeral.
    1 point
  32. America couldn't, but maybe you should get your ass over to Cuba. I think they're still communist.
    1 point
  33. It would certainly save them the trouble of manufacturing all these bullshit lawsuits.
    1 point
  34. In addition to simplified tax systems we also need to make agreements with other countries that put everyone's tax systems on the same playing field so we can choke off the ability of wealth to play countries off against one another. In addition to taxes on the rich we need sanctions against countries that refuse to get with the program and try to cater to tax avoidance and who embrace being chased to the bottom.
    1 point
  35. Certainly the West was sleeping when Putin made his move in 2014. But when Trump became President, Putin expected Trump would allow him to take all of Ukraine without an invasion. The Trump 2016 campaign team and former Putin Oligarch employee Paul Manafort specifically had discussed this with Russian officials including Russian intelligence asset Konstantin Kilimnik. They specifically discussed how a Trump administration would end US support for Ukraine and end US opposition to Russian aggression, Only when Biden was elected did Russia realize they would have to try and take by force what Trump would have handed on a silver platter. Trump continues to be Putin supporter to this day.
    1 point
  36. Yeah, I'm using facts and you're spitting out conspiracy BS that's so batshit crazy that even robo-tard, Hodad and Rebound aren't chiming in. Is that some kind of record? Is the internet broken right now?
    1 point
  37. In related news. The tree climbing cows of the Borneo interior have turned to cannibalism because the locals keep cutting down the trees. A majority if the indigenous people blame Trump for the carnage.
    1 point
  38. Yes, quite. Brand is not about selling "stuff." It's about positioning and perception in the marketplace--in the hopes that that status leads to finding customers/clients and, more importantly, the right kind of customers. Believe me, every time some a-hole gets perp-walked in TV in a sleeveless t-shirt the manufacturer doesn't clap his hands about the great publicity for the "wife beater" line. Nobody wants their brand associated with creeps. Well, except for the MyPillow fool.
    1 point
  39. Queen i do not respond to your post just to make you feel shame, i do it to help you understand the topic, not only you but others as well that read these posts..., Most Canadians don't understand what our military does or how it does it...even i do not fully understand the entire topic...Shaming anyone is not my intention, rather trying to share my experience and knowledge that i had in the military. I thought i was very forthcoming about admitting my mistakes or when i did not know what i was talking about, I hope you would feel free to call me out on any topic that you think i'm full of sh*t...One of the key reason i'm here on this forum is to learn from others either by asking question or doing research on a vast array of topics, and lastly being corrected on something i thought was right.
    1 point
  40. Indeed, and it takes us back to some vaccine day one questions I think. The questions I had were high school level biology but the answers certainly required medical expertise and I have absolutely none. But, the only thing easier than asking those questions was ridiculing them, look no further than right here to see why 30% of Canadians balked at the vaccine. Take the off label use of Ivermectin for example, a cheap, readily available and innocuous drug. If you understand how it works (in basic terms) then you would likely accept the idea that it needed to be prescribed early; at the very first sign of symptoms. You would also expect it not to be effective with high viral loading if prescribed too late in the process. But come on now... screaming Trumper, "tin foil hatter” and chicken dancing in a t-shirt that asks “are you a horse?” didn’t address the issue at all. The noise meant that none of those high school questions had a hope of being answered. Then, consider toxicity of the spike protein and add LNPs to the equation and the next question (I think) becomes one of distribution. Is it a surprise that in the presence of LNPs that the protein migrated from the injection site, lodged in organs or was found in breast milk? I don’t think it is but do you remember the bevy of assurances that it wouldn’t happen? The condescending fact checks that were always prefixed with “there is no evidence to suggest.” The rough translation being... Slap, no further discussion required, shut up Trumper. Now I’m curious if the presence of lipids will allow penetration of the BBB? We’ll find out soon enough I guess but why would we assume that it wouldn’t? Don’t lipids facilitate that sort of thing? As to observed effects (vaccine harm), inflammation as a direct result of systemic distribution was another day one question. Again, those particular questions came easy but the answers required medical expertise and discussion in the absence of ridicule. As I recall the inflammation/immune system concern revolved around repeated viral exposures in the wild (during a pandemic no less) setting of full blown immune responses in individuals already susceptible to inflammation and inflammatory type diseases. I think the main concern being repeated immune responses occurring in the presence of a mutated viruses that the body responded to but couldn't actually fight due to the mutation itself? In other words your body recognizes a car for what it is (a car) and it responds accordingly but it simply doesn’t have a key. You are left with an ineffective immune response and all the inflammation that accompanies it in a protracted wash and repeat cycle. Take that a step further and consider the wisdom of mass vaccination during an ongoing pandemic. Then consider the logic behind asserting that it was unvaccinated individuals driving virus mutations. Well, I don't know, but It doesn’t jive with my recollection of high school biology. The long and short of it for me was that I never heard the answers to basic questions and wasn't smart enough to figure them out for myself. It seemed like all I ever heard was ridicule from people who couldn’t even spell BBB. That would be the very same people who now say "move along son", you lack the self awareness to understand that we don’t care anymore. Another of those initial lipid vs BBB penetration questions was about possible future prion diseases and brain interactions (with the protein), I don’t know the answer to that either. But what if it becomes a real thing, what if the unvaccinated actually do move on and stop caring? What if some unforeseen future condition requires unvaccinated blood for transfusion? No one knows how that will play out yet but at a minimum, I'd think y'all might want to consider the possible benefits of being polite in the interim. One things for damn sure, somebody has this wrong and there are only two sides.
    1 point
  41. In reality it is about FREEDOM to decide. Few are "pro abortion," many are pro choice by the individual with skin in the game. Pro tip: stop your silly and erroneous platitudes.
    1 point
  42. No. Your position is anti-life. Leaving decisions to the states is counter to the nation's interest. Last great cry of states rights was about slavery. Now it's about enslaving women.
    1 point
  43. Yeah they should've left Al Capone alone too Witch hunt! Say it again... the truth comes out. 1930s dimwits rise again. Already holding their Bund rallies again.
    1 point
  44. Specifically if you are: -a government sanctioned and protected monopoly -a monopoly that is protected from international competition -a monopoly that is charged with providing essential infrastructure to the nation -a monopoly that is charged with providing essential information services to the nation The fact is that they ARE a private company, so the "Marxist" part is out the window. Socialist ? Maybe ? There are about 40 state-owned telecoms, to start with... including in Norway, Britain, Sweden, Trinidad, Serbia, Australia, Saskatchewan. Canada's are private for the most part.
    1 point
  45. Hey, I appreciate your perspective. While living in a world without money sounds ideal, it's also important to consider practicalities. Money facilitates trade and helps meet diverse needs efficiently. Volunteering is indeed fulfilling, but for many, it's not feasible to sustain life without income. Finding a balance between monetary transactions and altruistic actions might lead to a more harmonious society.
    1 point
  46. God you're a stupid little liar. I can't believe you still post here, collusion boy. https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/us/chicago-facebook-live-beating/index.html CNN lied about M Brown, G Floyd, Trayvon Martin, Rayshard, etc, etc just to incite riots. Just because you're too stupid to notice doesn't mean everyone else is too. That's 1/800th the story of Wushin Cowushin, dummy. CNN's own Van Jones admitted that collusion was a big nothingburger almost 2 years before they finally gave it up. I never said he's entirely innocent, I said that he didn't get a fair trial - which is 100% true - and all the lies about "IT'S DEFINITELY RACISM!" and "His own chokehold that no one ever saw before" were mainstream media mainstays. I never said that anything there proved that he was innocent, I said that it painted the entire event in a completely different light. All of a sudden we saw that George was saying that he couldn't breathe before the cops ever touched him, and we saw how much of an id10t George actually was that day. This wasn't an incident of a cop using his own restraint on a "gentle" black guy who they already had on the ground, and who was telling them that he couldn't breathe because of the hold he was in. It was a Minn PD restraint used on a completely ridiculous m0r0n who was resisting arrest and was having troubles of his own breathing, which had nothing to do with the restraint used on him. The whole George Floyd narrative that you heard on CNN was entirely false, and a Dem AG kept all that info from the public, just to incite riots. Not long before that video was released, June 17th, Kamala Harris was all excited about the prospect of the riots lasting until after Christmas. The burning and looting wasn't letting up at all. It was early August that the video came out and there was no rioting after that. It stopped cold. Try to find an instance of rioting after about Aug 5th. People saw that the CNN narrative wasn't true at all. It's one thing to riot for a peaceful guy who was murdered, and who was telling the cops that their restraint was making it hard for him to breathe, it's another thing to riot for a total id10t who actually needed to be restrained like that, and who was telling police that he couldn't breathe when it didn't make any sense. People who were sucked in by CNN's/the Dems' lies suddenly knew better. What footage "that nobody else believes"? Do you think the bodycam footage is fake now? Nothing would surprise me less, just say it. I gotta hear it straight outta your id10t moth... M Brown? That was totally violent. If Trump did that to a black guy you'd even call it a hate crime. The whole point of that video is that it completely shattered CNN's false "gentle giant" narrative, even though it didn't stop them from allowing people to say it on their network. Brown was a violent bully, not "a peaceful teen wo never did nuthin' bad in his whole life", and the cops had every reason to interact with him. He wasn't gentle, period. Not at all. Have you ever done that to a store-owner? No, my opinion is that CNN shouldn't have gone all-in with that false narrative, and it wasn't just "one person" saying it you lying loser. He had the nickname Gentle Giant dummy. Do you speak English, dummy? Beave: "I've built homes all my life, and do people call me 'Beave the carpenter'? No way. But you get caught shaggin' one sheep..."
    1 point
  47. Ahhh yes - your usual "Moonbox say something stupid and then blame someone else for it" routine. Yawn. You literally said you have a problem with the research I posted. And further - The researche's Conclusion: Density affects mortality. Me: Density affects mortality. You: I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE RESERCH"S CONCLUSIONS, IT'S YOURS I DISAGREE WITH!!!!! Hoooo kaaaaayy there little guy 1) Most of the lower density states performed better. And the high density states did the worst. Why did Oregon do so much better than bc, the vast majority of the two populations live closely. together There's other factors that come into play of course. Access to health care for example, you might not be as quick to go to the hospital in the states if you have to pay, whereas in Canada someone sneeezes and they're in the emerg ward so they're less likely to die. BUT - population density plays a big role. Here's some more if you need it - because the US's biggest city got hit hard first and because everyone is packed into that city like sardines, New York managed to skew the entire scale. If you take out the new york deaths and just show the rest of the US then they're almost the same as canada. New York has a very dense population (and Cuomo sent the sick old people back to the hospitals.) New York has no rival in Canada when it comes to population density, which epidemiologists identify as a contributing risk. It has twice the density of Vancouver, Canada's most-crowded city. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/covid-19-us-canada-death-rates-1.5553168 Here's what the chart looks like if you take new york new jersey and conneticut out of the mix, Remove the most dense populations and we're practically the same. Bottom line is that a) - you and Eyeball were wrong, b) - you lied as usually when you tried to pretend i hadn't presented any data NUMEROUS times, and c) You can't even keep your story straight for one whole post without flip flopping Soooo - you're doing a lot of whining about data - and not presenting any yourself Now - this is where you fall back on claiming i'm wrong because my posts are too long LOLOLOLOL!!!! You're such an !diot
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...