Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/08/2024 in Posts
-
"Why do so many of your critics have issues with falling out of windows or getting radiation poisoning?"3 points
-
Couldn't you just smell the liar? How many countries has the U.S. invaded, without any just cause, unilaterally and in a blatant violation of international law, to subjugate and/or annex? The three Baltic states Finland Poland Romania Czech Republic Hungary Afghanistan Lithuania (after declaring independence) Moldova Georgia Chechnya (after declaring independence) Georgia again (2008) Ukraine (2014-2022) Ukraine again (2022 - ) Are you counting, still? Is this USA? Check your glasses. There's a cause! Ai-ai so threatened! Pathetic, worthless excuses of a brutal, murderous psycho bent on capturing, controlling and complete subjugation of his victims. This is who and what you're trying to excuse and explain: nothing less.3 points
-
If he doesn’t win, he will be in jail for quite some time. If he wins, there will be a new constitutional crisis when he fires the guy prosecuting him and then pardons himself. Whether he wins or not is still 50/50, imo.3 points
-
The vote to impeach Yanukovych was unanimous. Because his Berkut killed 100s of peaceful protestors in Maidan. Duh. And also cause he reneged on his promise to sign a trade deal with the West and signed one with Putin instead after being BRIBED. I can tell you right now, Putin will LIE his ass off and Carlson won't call him on it. Which is why Putin is talking to Carlson. 🤮3 points
-
Because that is not legal, and The Dumb-Dumb Party, at Trump’s insistence just blocked legislation that they wrote which would do that. They also blocked additional border protection funding. You are complaining about a Republican-Party created “crisis” being used as an election plank. I am against illegal immigration and even excessive refugee immigration. But the government must use legal means to stop it, not dictatorship. Personally, I think the law should let law enforcement or a court ask for proof of legal residency in the U.S., and if you cannot reasonably prove you belong here (not on the spot); you should be put on a bus. I have no problem with that, but it must be legal.3 points
-
A syllogism: Premise 1: Actual journalists are arrested in Russia. Premise 2: Tucker can move about freely in Russia. Conclusion: Therefor, Tucker is not an actual journalist.3 points
-
its an age old gag for "conservatism" in the US... that "conservatives" aren't conservative at all. they are just another vehicle for the richest of the population to get richer and a lot of it directly from tax payers. the gag goes like this... get people all riled up about some imaginary enemy ("social conservatism")... gays, "wokeness", immigrants, abortion. the issue doesn't really matter, it used to be something else, the actual issue can be switched on a dime. this works mostly with uneducated rural types. just keep repeating that they are in danger and they will believe it. now the center of the GOP support, the uneducated rural types are already pissed that they've missed the "american dream" economically because GOP policies mean they've been getting more poor for 40 years. they need someone to blame. get them to blame gays and immigrants! studies show that people who suffer more from black and white thinking lean "conservative". and so these people are targeted by the business status quo. Political Ideology and Black-and-White Thinking and then have a god like cult figure like Trump to push these people over the edge. a cult like figure that will attack the faceless evil. save the country from "wokeness". while only making them more and more... poor! Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (no Jobs there!) "under the Act individuals and pass-through entities like partnerships and S corporations would receive about $1.125 trillion in net benefits (i.e. net tax cuts offset by reduced healthcare subsidies) over 10 years, while corporations would receive around $320 billion in benefits. The CBO estimated that implementing the Act would add an estimated $2.289 trillion to the national debt over ten years" "Bloomberg News reported in January 2020 that the top six American banks saved more than $32 billion in taxes during the two years after enactment of the tax cut, while they reduced lending, cut jobs and increased distributions to shareholders." meanwhile, Democrats continue as always to support unions and working people. no one can point to ANY policy evidence that the GOP support working people. they only support business and promise "economic trickle down" except that that hasn't been working for 40 years. as a business owner here in Canada... Trudeau has not made it easy for me. because i control the corporation from which i make money, my effective tax rate went up from 8% to 11%. poor working stiffs have to pay a minimum of 17%! but i'm aware that the happiest societies are those where the wealth gap is smallest. Income Inequality Makes Whole Countries Less Happy and with that wealth inequality destroys democracies... because it leads to concentration of power.2 points
-
Supporting an allies' defense against an imperialist aggressor is not "advocating for war" it's understanding that there's already a war on and we need to pick a side.2 points
-
Of course he won't. He stayed at home for 2 years for a flu-like disease, and then pretends to be a courageous warrior since Feb 2022. Coward. I never advocated for a war. You are the one advocating for it. You are the one to go to the front line, mr Chicken Hawk.2 points
-
You're so brave. Asking 18 years old of a foreign country to fight for your ideals and Joe Biden's ideals, with taxpayers' money. I really wish you go there.2 points
-
No, I'd rather send fighter jets, missiles and long-range bombers to Ukraine. Fu ck Putin and especially the cowards who prescribe submitting to him.2 points
-
The admission by the Left that they would not talk to a World Leader capable of starting a major nuclear war is an admission of their warmongering. No one on the Left dares to bat an eye when journalists and politicians talk to Xi Jinping, despite him literally making concentration camps and being THE rival of the US. Russia bad. China good. This is preposterous. This foreign policy is extremely unproductive, as China will not be on our side towards Russia and vice versa. The Nazis allied themselves with their mortal enemies; the Communists, before WWII. Here we have the Russians and the Chinese who are allying themselves, because like the Nazi and the Communist Regimes, the West made it convenient for them to ally. Russia and China are supposed to be rivals. They have territorial conflicts. Now they are united, and we must thank Antony Blinken, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden for that mess.2 points
-
Again, I don't see anyone saying he can't or shouldn't interview Putin. But if you're expecting anything orher than a different kind of fawning softball affair, you're ripe for a let down.2 points
-
I'm not sure we've had someone this dumb to play with since americana antifa ran home crying2 points
-
I listened to the opening arguments live, and they are night and day different in terms of clarity and efficacy, but I am deeply skeptical that this court is going make the plain judgment. They will 100% weasel out of it because it's a political hot potato and it's a highly political court.2 points
-
I'll be watching too. I have always liked Carlson...even when he was on CNN...and I want to know what Putin thinks. That's called "knowledge" and the accumulation there of. But check out the 2 Tweenkies here. They have no desire to hear anything that might contradict their firm belief that war is good...as long as its not them getting shot. I do hope Tucker asks Putin some uncomfortable questions...which I'm sure he will. The interview should shed some light on the blackout Comic-Boy's state media is feeding these lackeys.2 points
-
Will Tucker ask Putin anything useful at all, such as: 1) Why have you refused interviews with all the other American journalists who requested them? 2) Why are all of your political opponents in jail? 3) Why have you jailed so many Russian journalists? 4) Why are Russians jailed for opposing the Ukraine War?2 points
-
Tucker went form the most watched man on cable to a nobody posting on Twitter to a few thousand views practically overnight and now he's allowing himself to be used as a human megaphone by a vile despot in a desperate bid for relevance. You almost hate to see it.2 points
-
The US certainly exercises force, but I'm not sure you know what the word "aggressive" means. The US is active in world affairs. In the last 50 years it has often often played the role of peace maker or peace keeper or otherwise intervened in conflicts, often as part of a coalition. It has taken defensive action. It has taken retributive action. But it is not wantonly invading other countries. It is not conquering. It is not expanding. In short, it is involved in many conflicts, but it is not, as an aggressor, starting conflicts. The one very notable exception to this is W's invasion of Iraq. He definitely started that war--and without reasonable justification. It was entirely elective and is a huge black eye on the legitimacy of the US as force in the world for stability, freedom and peace. This doesn't mean that the military itself is perfect, or that I personally agree with all of the actions, objectives and aims of every intervention. But the US is not, generally, aggressive. And we certainly aren't trying to gobble up our weaker neighbors and steal their resources. You're welcome.2 points
-
I know of a teacher who has a student, Edwina, who is dressing very boyish like. Has asked everyone at school to call them 'Eddy'. The parents are thought to not be ok with this. The teachers are following the student's wishes.2 points
-
keep calm & carry on British is not a race British is not a place British is the Glorious Revolution to found the modern liberal state British North American Loyalists, Guardians of Confederation after every dark age, there comes a renaissance thus we have a duty to keep the torch lit and hold it high for some future generation we will never meet bydand2 points
-
Typical Tory knee jerk idea. 4 ways to punish car thieves more is not a plan to reduce car thefts. Just a simple gut reaction to appease the simple minded.2 points
-
2 points
-
does it matter? what about all the other points i make? YOU GOT NOTHING except your illogical belief systems. and thats the rub, isn't it... that you believe that you are logical, when you are not.2 points
-
Good thing, if he had won, Biden could have him shot.2 points
-
I'm pretty sure FOX News has been infiltrated by Russian government influence and i've thought that for years.2 points
-
We see the long list of false teachings and practices that have evolved in the Catholic Church under the pretext it is "tradition". Look where that got the RCC. Mary worship, idol worship, purgatory, doing penances for sin, Mass, and the church and sacraments for salvation. These things are opposed by the Bible so how can they be right. Proof that your claim of tradition don't hold up.1 point
-
I have to wonder about the goings on in a mind that thinks Hell is a real place but people experiencing pain and suffering as a result of terminal medical conditions are fake.1 point
-
Carlson makes a valid point in that all Western media interviews with Zelenskyy have been fawning, softball affairs. So why not hear what Putin has to say?1 point
-
Well a recent Free Press article by a trans doctor talked about how she was directed to affirm requests without much consideration at a US clinic. England closed its Tavistock clinic over lawsuits. It’s not as copacetic as you make it sound.1 point
-
If there was ever a reason to assume that a child would be at risk of abuse, that requires follow up with CAS, but that’s pretty uncommon. I think there are many parents who would worry and not like the news that Johnny wants to be Sheila, but that doesn’t mean they’re going to be mean or abusive. Almost all parents would want to make sure their kids are okay, getting thoughtful support, and are carefully assessing the implications to avoid moves that they might regret. They love their kids. If after talking it out and careful consideration, Johnny still wants to be called Sheila, that can be made to happen. A sex change can also happen, but we’re not deciding which shoes to buy here. This is life altering.1 point
-
Kremlin Spokesperson: “Mr. Carlson is not correct. In fact, there’s no way he could know this. We receive numerous requests for interviews with the president, but mostly, as far as countries in the collective West are concerned, these are from major network media: traditional TV channels and large newspapers” https://meduza.io/en/news/2024/02/07/kremlin-says-putin-agreed-to-interview-with-tucker-carlson-because-he-differs-from-traditional-anglo-saxon-media1 point
-
1. Why don't you tell us all the name of someone you consider to be "a journalist" so that everyone with an IQ over 60 can get a good laugh? 2. Who do you actually know that requested an interview with Putin?1 point
-
1. I wouldn't call it a secret. The staff and students all know this. The student may indeed have told the parent. The parent does know. Mandating the teacher to reveal behaviours of this kind to the parent dictates state primacy more than the status quo. As the community is simply using its judgment. 2. I wouldn't call it invasive at all. The students know about the world, and they make their own decisions as we did. If the student dressed in a feminine manner, and liked the name Eddy would the teacher be obliged to snitch to the parent, in your view? What if she wore jeans. Would you have a list of state approved clothing and behaviours? If the student doesn't conform, you report them? Or do you have... what's it called again... freedom? To be clear, I do think that there's a line at which the parent should be engaged but wearing certain clothes and using nicknames isn't it.1 point
-
What Hitlers, Jong Uns, Putins and other murderous dictator scum of the world thinks? Yes we know; of course anyone with eyes and a brain can know: because we can see it, with our own eyes what they think: because it shows in what they do, their act. A murderous psycho is seen and judged for what they do, not what's inside their sick brains. One cannot be so dumb as to not understand that an act is a physical evidence and a direct continuation of the thought. Not some spinning, lying words: the act, that speaks for itself, and all there's to know. And you can't even pretend to be so dumb to not get it. Just lying; or regurgitating the lies of your cult Idol. The two possibilities.1 point
-
You are so pathetic. You said that indictments do not establish probable cause. You were wrong. I proved you were wrong, by citing the U.S. Department of Justice as my source. But you are so pathetic that you can’t just say, “Oh, I was wrong, I didn’t know that.” The rest of us should use this little exchange to see that you do not conduct yourself with integrity nor honestly. And you should consider that perhaps you are wrong about a great many other things: The election was not stolen, for starters.1 point
-
Do you hear yourself? NO one knows - so tell us. Like... nobody's claiming you're the brightest guy on the board but surely to christ even YOU could hear that right? Why? How is that my job? Care or don't care that's up to you. I have never said you SHOULD care. Point to where i said that. Ahhhh - i see what's going on now. You're a small minded person, and in your limited capacity to think you've decided that all people on the right love putin and support the war or something. So because you perceive me that way you think that -I- support putin or think he's justified here or give a flying crap for his motives. Swing and a miss sparky - i've had a few knock down drag out fights with a member or two over this but I think putin is a nutter and the invasion was unjustified and i support arming the ukraine in a general sense because the war is brutally weakening russia at a very reasonable cost compared to most wars and that's to our advantage. We already fight with them about the arctic the weaker they are the less we have to worry. See - this is why it's hard to take you seriously. Without even asking me what my feeling was regarding putin, your bigotry and prejudice lead you to strike out at me in a fit of ignorance. If you approach eveyrthing that way then nothing you have to offer can be considered of value. Can it.1 point
-
Because only someone VERY stupid would still be watching a man who, in his own words clearly admitted to deliberately lying to his audience for months, and whose lies cost his former employer almost a billion dollars? And let's be clear Tucker has always been a liar, and had never been a journalist. It's just that he's on record admitting it now. It's unbelievable that there are people dumb enough to give him their time and viewership revenue after all of that.1 point
-
He tried to claim immunity because his lawyers looked at the hundreds of times he lied to his followers about a "stolen election." They watched video of how he turned a crowd into a mob be telling them that they had to march to the Capitol right now and "stop the steal" or they wouldn't have a country anymore. And after all that it was clear that no rational person or jury would believe that he didn't create a phony existential crisis that incited a riot. So better to make the case that he should be immune to the consequences of what he quite obviously did. But don't worry. After they lose the immunity case they'll go right back to pretending he didn't do anything wrong.1 point
-
1 point
-
So far the Criminal Con Man Grifter in Chief has only proven one thing...HIS followers are as stupid as he paints them; they continue to pour in money thinking its for his campaign, when in fact his campaign is only fund raising for his continued criminal activity and a road show for the Media. Certainly the Courts are not impressed.1 point
-
What you really mean to say is that you've chosen to join the loons because they hate the left like you - sorry kiddo but that's loony too.1 point
-
Trump’s 1st day back will probably be on a “Whitehouse tour for prisoners” program. I’ll probably watch live on CNN as President Biden shakes the hands of all the prisoners on the tour and wishes them well in getting reformed and onto the straight and narrow.1 point
-
While the mafia was part of Mike Pearson's base, I doubt car thieves are going to vote for the grits.1 point
-
1 point