Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/11/2024 in all areas

  1. No blow is too low for Donald Trump, who this week began peddling the claim that Nikki Haley is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as President, because her immigrant parents were not yet citizens at the time of Haley’s 1972 birth in South Carolina. Trump, who is himself Constitutionally ineligible to serve as President, has also falsely claimed that Barack Obama and Ted Cruz were born overseas and Constitutionally ineligible to serve as President. Meantime, I await for the day when the MAGA wake the F up and realize that Donald Trump is a conman who’s been lying to them for years about practically everything. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111721484609384209
    3 points
  2. And then some... And meanwhile.... Inside a BDSM Dungeon with a Hillary Dom and a Guilty, Diaper-Clad Trump Voter During the election, Mistress Couple had started posting Backpage ads as "Madame Hillary" as a joke. Far from a Hillary super fan—she'd voted for Sanders in the primaries—Mistress Couple was mostly interested in Clinton as an archetypal dominant woman. "I was so enjoying Trump having his ass handed to him in the debates that I was like, Oh, this is a character that I could get into doing role play with in sessions," she explained. The responses were prolific, and illuminating. She says she heard from several different general categories of people: There were the Trump supporters who felt guilty and ashamed, the misogynists who thought nothing would be more humiliating than being dominated by a woman, the liberals who despised Trump but were intrigued by this specific role play scenario. There were also the Proud Deplorable submissives who relished even more in their deplorability than the rest of their ideological cohort. "Well, I'm voting for Trump, so smothering me with face farts is probably what I need for punishment," one such person wrote in a response to a Madame Hillary ad before the election. "I want you to fart up my nose so much that my face turns orange and my nose squeaks just like Trump's. I'll be sure to set up an appointment so you can fart in my deplorable basket that I call a nose." https://www.vice.com/en/article/paepjv/inside-a-bdsm-dungeon-with-a-hillary-dom-and-a-guilty-diaper-clad-trump-voter
    3 points
  3. Canada doesn’t have a free press. Our mainstream media is government funded and approved.
    3 points
  4. "Get woke, go broke" is not a good economic solution and even our military will be diminished once you pink marshmallows transform it. Trump is right: NATO IS dead, but he can revive it - we just need to take care of our own backyard, first.
    3 points
  5. Of all the things rich boy JT is guilty of, slumming around a pig farm with skid row hookers and bikers and druggies is not likely to be one of them.
    3 points
  6. Trump slams New York AG in unexpected courtroom remarks at fraud trial: Live updates i had a relative once that was just like Trump. he had numerous family court conflicts where he had a tonne of opportunity except that he just refused to get a lawyer and refused to not make it a personal matter in front of judges... and judges ruled against him every time because he clearly had beefs with everyone and could not be trusted to act fairly. this is why Trump is such a bad candidate whose base is made up of rural non-college voters. in the New York case all he had to do was have his lawyers argue that there were some systemic problems in company accounting that caused these errors over a long period of time, that the company has taken every measure to correct and has put oversight in place to ensure that this never happens again. all they had to do was take a slap on the wrist and go about their business like nothing ever happened. but no! this is Trumps legal idiocy! everything is personal to him. he's unhinged.
    2 points
  7. Donald Trump told the president of the European Commission in 2020 that the US would “never come help” if Europe was attacked and also said “Nato is dead”, a senior European commissioner said. (The Guardian) According to Breton, Trump also said: “By the way, Nato is dead, and we will leave, we will quit Nato.” It that same strategy was tried back at the times of WWII, the West would have fallen piece by piece and we would be living in quite a different world now. Waking up to Nazi anthems. Quite possibly, in the North America too. A one-two calculation and no miracle interventions. Just at the time when a new dark Axis of tyrants is rising, this sounds more, way more than his regular loudmouth bullsh*t: an invitation into collective insanity. Once in a while, human populations like to give in to collective loss of sanity. Examples are just way to many to cite. There's something attractive in abandoning, leaving by the door that complex and awkward contraption called "intelligence" and just heading into a wild dance, no thinking, no responsibilities, just wave your hands and stomp, boom boom. In between, the civilization rekindles and we reach the level of advanced technology. What happens next? Kaboom! Interesting from the scientific, medical point of view is the position of some Republicans: with one part of their brain, they write the bill to protect NATO; with the other, push for the out-of-bounds of sanity loudmouth clown who pledges to annihilate it. Was there a word for that? Go on. And so, gerontocratic self-binding caution and indecision or plain out, in your face insanity? Which, which is the better one who could break the conundrum! This will be an interesting one to watch. What if it would go into our collective history as the final period? There has to be a reason we couldn't find intelligent aliens, right? And guess what? It's a leap one too!
    2 points
  8. Not just spurious and salacious, but also retarded. There is enough real stuff to criticize Trudeau for that low-effort and unimaginative sexual deviancy rumours peddled amongst dumdums in their basements is just embarrassing to listen to. I heard that Pierre Poilievre and Max Bernier get together and jerk each other off to bestiality vids. We should probably talk about that too, if only to acknowledge it's probably false? 🤔
    2 points
  9. Right, he didn’t say it, because that’s the question he was asked, but writing, “Trump’s Lawyer Says Yes” does not convey anything. I know you’re really stuuupid, but it isn’t complicated: The man said, precisely, that the President could not be charged even with murder unless the President was first impeached and convicted. So if the secret is discovered after the President leaves office, the President is Scott free. Or if he resigns, as Nixon did. But Nixon was pardoned by Ford because the clearly did not believe that Nixon was immune from any prosecution.
    2 points
  10. wow, woke is so powerful... its like the only thing holding back one of the biggest armies in the world... Russia! unless, its like missiles, tanks, warships and stuff. and has nothing to do with woke. you woke fever man.
    2 points
  11. NATO IS dead - What with all the woke nonsense it's infested with; it may as well be the North Atlantic TRANNY Organization instead. No, Trump is right, and he's going to need lots of bulldozers to clear out all the woke filth in this country - January 20th will be the beginning of early spring cleaning.
    2 points
  12. 1. I saw that. Ok, correction is good then. 2. No way. Wow. You must be a very rude person. I have never heard of that happening in my career. I have worked with, basically, White Supremacists who knew how to keep their traps shut. Sorry for your tragic comuppances. 3. So there ISN'T a ban then. Correction is good. I'm sorry you find it hard to get by being anti-social and such.
    2 points
  13. 2 points
  14. A giant angry mob storming the Capitol at the same time when the election was being confirmed was just enthusiastic tourists really.
    2 points
  15. At this point, I think we know the old saying is not true. We see that words do hurt. They can hurt anyone, but the emotionally vulnerable are particularly at risk. And with the easy reach words have today we've seen an epidemic of young people socially bullied to death. Or you can think of Hitler and the Nazi propaganda machine dehumanized Jews and other vulnerable minorities to the point that an otherwise sane populace came to accept unbelievable atrocities. So words do matter and they certainly can hurt. The idea of a hate crime is that it has the secondary effect of terrorizing the targeted group. It's similar to the way that we think of terrorism and murder differently. Yes, they are both killing, but terrorism (like hate crimes) causes additional harm to the population outside of the direct harm to the victims.
    2 points
  16. Donald Trump will, I predict, be pontificating from a prison cell, have lost hundreds of millions of his followers money donations paying fines for criminal actions he is and has already been convicted of or will be in the future, but he will, most assuredly NOT be the U. S. President, not then, not now, not ever again.
    2 points
  17. Of course words compel people. Where would we be without rhetoric? But nobody's banning speech. A lot of ignorant people seem to be upset that politeness is a common value, I think. That's all it is.
    2 points
  18. What Trump’s lawyer said was neither sensible nor was it true. What he said was the only excuse he could think of to justify the absurd. The Constitution does not say that the President is immune from criminal prosecution unless convicted by impeachment. What’s more, Trump’s lawyers argued that Trump could not be convicted by the Senate because he was no longer President, and several Senators voted for his acquittal for that very reason. Thus, Trump’s logic says that if a crime is undetected until after the President leaves office, or if the President resigns one day before the Senate votes to convict, then he cannot be charged with criminal offenses. This would create a unique system of justice in which one person cannot be tried for crimes the same as anyone else.
    2 points
  19. A politician is not just anyone who gives their opinion, Trudeau and Biden's support for Israel is tacit support and international green light for their crimes against the Palestinian people. Netanyahu is a criminal who should have been in prison forever, he is currently committing war crimes and planning genocide. So make sure to file a complaint against these unjust people so that they can be arrested and brought to court. I even believe that Mélanie Jolie, a canadian minister, went to the Middle East to ask other leaders to support Israel's crimes. Biden and Trudeau's support for Israel is to be complicit in their crimes that they are committing.
    1 point
  20. Colorado Supreme Court has the backbone to enforce the law. I'm skeptical that the Trump-packed SCOTUS will have the same integrity, but these are thinking people rather than politicians and perhaps they've had enough of his destructive anti-democratic nonsense.
    1 point
  21. Who benefits from the war in Ukraine and anti-Chinese propaganda in Taiwan? In the United States, not the Chinese or the Ukrainians. What difference does it make for Taiwanese and Ukrainians in eastern Ukraine and Crimea to be part of Russia or China? Nothing, but the war which could cause hundreds of thousands of deaths in China and Ukraine makes the Americans happy, these astral scum and corrupt souls to the highest degree.
    1 point
  22. Well it's widely known that they're both into some pretty weird stuff, so I think it's important that we have this conversation. If we don't find any evidence for it in the next couple of days, someone can take my posts down about it. Personally, I don't really know. I'm just asking questions. 🫠
    1 point
  23. I don’t know why you are calling a Federal Judge “little.” The woman’s been subjected to countless death threats, but it hasn’t stopped her from doing her job. She’s got a lot more courage than you’ve got. Truman could have been charged with a crime, but it is unlikely that U.S. Attorneys would believe that serving as commander in chief during war was a not role of the Presidency, and if they charged anyway, the judge would throw the case out. Congress formally declared war on 1941. Trump had no authority to illegally interfere with state election officials and he certainly did not have the authority to incite a mob to attack the U.S. Capitol. As President, Trump had more power than anyone in the nation to explore every legal pathway to investigate and legally intervene to ensure the election’s integrity. He had over 60 lawsuits and many recounts. But he did not have the authority to break laws to change the results of the election.
    1 point
  24. Not just any "wealthy racist," former owner of the NBA Clippers which caused a problem cause 90% of his players are black and HE caused a problem for the ENTIRE LEAGUE..
    1 point
  25. We all know what compel means expect for those too weak minded to acknowledge their hatred.
    1 point
  26. That was the point of a joke that I thought was obvious.
    1 point
  27. Yeah but you didn't get punished by the government for calling her a fat pig. You can say whatever you want but you can't get away from the consequences which are handled by society. There was a CFO who went to a Chik Fila and berated a drive thru worker over the Presidents views over gay marriage and he proudly uploaded this to YouTube. He probably thought he was going to be treated as a hero buuuuuuut, he went viral angered a bunch of people and they found out who he was and where he worked and called en masse and as a CFO he is a face of the company so he was terminated. Ended up losing everything and living in a trailer park because no one would hire him. Society punished him, not the government. Free speech like anything, it has good and bad and you have to decide what matters to you more. Free speech allows you to challenge the government without being arrested but it also allows people to say awful things to/about each other without being arrested.
    1 point
  28. As so many of them confuse freedom with the "right" to be an a$$hole.
    1 point
  29. In the history of the United States, no government official has ever been impeached after leaving office. The purpose of impeachment is removal from office. George Santos was charged with crimes without being impeached. So is Senator Menendez. There is no law or judicial precedent which has ever ruled that criminal or civil prosecution cannot occur without impeachment. The only such limitation we have is that the Justice Department has a policy, which is not law and which can be changed, stating that the President will not be prosecuted while in office. Although I believe Bill Clinton was prosecuted while in office. So I don’t think your argument has any leg to stand on, and I have very high confidence that the Federal Appeals Court will reject, and the SCOTUS will as well, probably by not even hearing the case. The only other possibility is that the Federal Appeals Court will rule that Trump’s interlocutory appeal has no standing, which will kick his case back to court and then Trump can try to raise the issue on appeal, where it will still fail. Dude, I get that you listened to some right wing media channel like NewsMax, and they’re telling you that this whole argument of Trump’s is next-level genius and perfect, but it’s not at all.
    1 point
  30. No, they don't. They understand that there is a spectrum of compulsion informed by the context. Again, I refer you to the first definition and example that YOU posted. 1. force or oblige (someone) to do something. "a sense of duty compelled Harry to answer her questions" Nobody thinks that a "sense of duty" physically forced or even explicitly threatened consequences. Post after post, you dig a deeper hole. lol Read your own damn definition.
    1 point
  31. BLM attacked the WH. Claimed sovereignty over several blocks of US soil, in Seattle. They overran police stations. Laid seige to federal buildings and threw molotovs on them. Threw molotovs and shot fireworks at police. Ambushed cops and killed them. None of that was insurrection, but almost all of it fits the description, and it was organized. BLM took over police precincts and prevented police from entering large areas. It was all a lark. They injured dozens of police defending the WH. The POTUS had to hide in a bunker. Stop acting like 1 thing was monumental and everything else was ok. It was not ok at all. It was the exact opposite of OK. The Dems'/FBI's joint crime spree against Trump means that there wasn't a peaceful transition of power in 2016 either, dummy.
    1 point
  32. You posted it, but apparently didn't read it. 🤣 The very first example: "a sense of duty compelled Harry to answer her questions" <-- oh, look, it's not physical. Summons? <-- oh yeah, those are words Did you happen to read that long list of "similar" words? Or synonyms? Apparently not. Coerce, pressure, demand, insist, urge, etc. I'm guessing you're the sort of person who will choose to die on this hill rather than admit you didn't know the meaning of the word, but it wont' change the fact that everybody else is pretty clear what it means. You're erecting an artificial barrier to communication.
    1 point
  33. If it were anywhere else, it would be a riot. But since it directly attacked the United States Congress and prevented them from conducting business, it was an insurrection. And it was compounded by the fact that many of the rioters were preventing the government from conducting business with the specific intention to prevent, delay, impede, whatever, the peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next. The simple fact is that, for the first time in our nations history, the transfer of power from one President to the next was not peaceful. There is not way you can say that the transfer of power was peaceful, because the Congressional events of January 6 were part of he transfer of power, and they were clearly not peaceful, and that was deliberate.
    1 point
  34. 1. You said "I care what people think" 2. God doesn't post on here. He said it to me verbally in one of our sessions. 3. Yes it's necessary some times. Speaking of all or nothing prospects, didn't you use Hitler to defend your insulting the secretary at work, or whatever incident(s) you got fired for ? 4. My position ? If you have to bring me into it you don't have enough evidence to support your ideas. I'm not going to back you up on this, sorry. I don't care about NBA owners or whatever.
    1 point
  35. Voters are taught to believe their vote means something and that people even died for their right to vote and they should really think of it as a duty. Monarchs however are apparently told we're really not a democracy at all. You seem to have an insiders perspective that corroborates that.
    1 point
  36. Of course words compel action. They just have to be compelling words. Are there any laws that you follow that cause you to behave in ways that you wouldn't voluntarily or naturally behave? Of course. Congrats, words have compelled you. To be compelling, words have to be believed and communicate plausible positive or negative benefits of a proposition. You believe the words are earnest and true, they give you information and you take action on that information if the perceived consequence is sufficiently attractive or repulsive to justify the action.
    1 point
  37. If anyone needed proof that Mr. Trump is a slave to the Russian despot Putin, this is it. Has the US gone crazy?Trump is the Moscow candidate and he will win. The rest of the world is going to lose.
    1 point
  38. I doubt that he understands that NATO was part of a strategy that include economic goals for the USA. Without military strength at the center. America's influence is widely diminished. In the post war term, they lead and they speak first. That is because they are the superpower.
    1 point
  39. The court. Ffs - do you live under a rock? AN fbi agent was convicted of criminally altering documents to get search and surveilance warrants for trump. Look it up. Several others were severely chastised. And investigations into the whole thing found a huge number of 'irregularities' and failing to follow standard procedure. I can't hold your hand through every single discussion, you've got to start reading for yourself. And no, the book about the "big Red Ball" doesn't count.
    1 point
  40. Well somehow these groups have to find a way to get along. I do think some cultures are more destructive than others. There are Palestinians in Jerusalem living well. In the West Bank has gotten better too. Gazans keep betting on the same bad horse. It was always absurd to say that Jews don’t belong in Israel. Between Palestinians and Jews, I’d think the Jews are the more Indigenous group, but that kind of pure blood original race type rhetoric is the whole problem. It’s the Indigenous versus settler colonial nonsense that’s keeping these groups from functioning in harmony.in a pluralistic multicultural society. For all the problems we have in the West, our social fabric in Canada is more harmonious than many countries. It’s when people refuse to look outside their circle to find common values that tensions arise. I think the melting pot may be a better solution than the cultural mosaic, but new and old North Americans generally integrate quite well.
    1 point
  41. 🤣 Thanks for your constitutionally illiterate opinion.
    1 point
  42. My first impression was that Freeland could have stepped in and supported Menzies' journalistic rights. I think she may have missed a big opportunity.
    1 point
  43. 1 point
  44. So you tried to find the difference, just couldn't get over yourself? Note, not a single fact there. That's all there's to know isn't it? I hate it when folks are lying except when it's me.
    1 point
  45. How would it be so different though from " the election was stolen" claim, without a single piece of evidence thrown out by dozens of cases and still all of the MAGA and half of Republicans (seemingly) believe it? If one has moved from the standard of fact and objective truth, to "whatever serves me best becomes, is made into the truth", how much sense does it make to fish for the lowest bottom? There wouldn't be any, obviously. Every new low will be breached by the next enthusiast of false news and manufactured lies.
    1 point
  46. Dems: "Except for the laws against rioting. Or violent crimes. Or theft under $1000. Or assaulting cops. Or illegal border crossings. Or influence peddling. Or disobeying subpoenas... or basically any law that's going against us or our special interest groups. How about if we just take total control the FBI and the media so that we can just squeeze democracy out of America like a giant anaconda?"
    1 point
  47. Trump's word on ANYTHING is worthless. He is often contradicting himself days or weeks after his initial BULLSHIT. Like when, after years of pushing Obama birtherism, he finally admitted that Obama was born in the US. And one of the first lies on the Wapo 30K list, that it didn't rain at his inauguration, was proven false by video posted here that was CLAIMED to show his LIE was true. Same video conclusively showed in many frames it rained during his speech. Trump is a pathological liar, and there are still people here who deny that.
    1 point
  48. ftfy.... Your denial will not change the laws that Trump violated.
    1 point
  49. The demonstrations are in support of everyday Palestinians and the remaining people in Gaza. They are the ones that have incurred over 20,000 deaths and destruction of most of the homes and infrastructure. Not everyone is Hamas or a terrorist. Harper introduced??
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...