Leaderboard

No. Always "No".

Those are honest and reasonable concerns, so they will be ignored by our government. The whole Canadian 2030 Climate Action Plan is an utter lie and joke when you consider how much more waste our country will produce and how much more energy we’ll consume with these millions of additional people. The whole Liberal platform is a fake show of greenwashing and identity politics. Woke-green rhetoric with real added costs for Canadians in the form of carbon taxes and overcrowded cities with overstretched infrastructure, overpriced homes, and siloed communities. Canadians continue to buy into this narrative, so I doubt anything will change anytime soon. We will literally be funding gender transition surgeries in Africa as Quebec bans use of the English language and young people can no longer afford housing.

So, maybe think more than 4 months ahead? Seems the imprisonment is shorter term than the freedom though, right? If you didn’t think very far in advance, you have a lack of freedom for 4 months and then freedom for 10 years. Did I get that correct? Is this honestly what you think qualifies as totalitarianism?

they're coming to replace you, wrinkly, pimply, warty dark skinned people clad in goat skins who'll gibber like coyotes outside your windows as they steal your rhododendrons for a side dish they serve beside your roasted pet pomeranian. they'll steal your job as a custodian and collect welfare at the same time, worship the Old Gods at 2:00 everyday and be constitutionally guaranteed that time off with pay. your daughter will have no choice but to marry one and wear just a gunny sack if she wishes to fulfill her only purpose of breeding grandchildren you can never be able to even talk to. they won't live anywhere but downtown Toronto and Vancouver so the gov't will take your house away to build them housing and you'll have to live in an igloo in Nunavut.

Take it as a point of pride that he doesn't. That's one of the few people on this forum I've muted. I've yet to hear a reasonable thing come out of his mouth.

Another non-answer from you. Please get with the times and stop hoping that Oil will be a key industry for another century.

What happened to your Heritage fund ???

Until more people call out the government for these irresponsible policies, this will continue. I think people have been swayed by government and media into a disinterested compliance. Fear, exhaustion, messaging…People don’t know which way is up or down and are focused on trying to pay bills as Rome burns and Nero plays the fiddle.

A better question is: why the country wouldn't turn into a (third world) banana republic, in the next say 50 years? What is there to prevent it? Anything?

She’s come to symbolize the anti-human. Reduce the human footprint out of existence. That’s where this is going. It’s the utopian Puritanism (dystopian nightmare) of an environmentally pure world of shivering, starving humans worshiping a Gaia that will carry on with or without humans. It’s a death cult. Extinction Rebellion uses similar rhetoric. I wasn’t a Trump fan but he made a hilarious comment about Greta when he said, “She seems like a happy girl.” Greta is the exemplar of wet blankets.

The system is heading into a crisis and meaningful change is a taboo here. The caviar class have to do something and they can do anything. Massive dependent population is much easier to manage. China and Russia know.

and again, here you are with your silly, emotional hyperbole. Next time you want to complain about the poor truckers getting "smeared", remember how consistently unreasonable your own language is. ?‍♂️

We barely have enough construction tradesmen to build what we're building now, which isn't enough NOW. You want to increase the rate at which housing is going up we need more people in the construction trades. A lot more. You think they're going to want to plunk their arses down in Thunder Bay or Whitehorse, people largely coming from areas near the equator? They're going to Toronto, Vancouver, and a few other cities. Which means making those cities more crowded or increasing urban sprawl by paving over farmland. And for what, exactly? Will they remit more than the government has to spend on them? The last study done strongly suggested otherwise. Economics experts? Like this guy? https://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/douglas-todd-canada-has-abandoned-middle-class-says-b-c-s-former-top-civil-servant Oh yes, I forgot about all those empty houses that can't be rented or bought because, like, there's such an oversupply. More potential customers? Indeed. But you know what else comes with more potential customers? More potential competition. The only businesses that are certain to benefit are the oligopolies who have lobbied the government for this, and some of the real estate and construction industry.

I think also, that the alphabet entities we've been traditionally able to trust, are now stacked with non-medical bureaucrats. We have politicians and bureaucrats running a pandemic and the majority of public health officers have zero immunology, virology or epidemiological knowledge and are relying on the politicians and bureaucrats to direct them. That's why so many of the decisions made during covid have had no scientific backing, only political expediency. The public health officers who were making decisions on their own, with no assistance from any other industry, are people who are also just bureaucrats now. They haven't treated a patient in years and not one of them ever treated an actual covid patient during this whole mess.

I'm finding this is a common way of hiding what's happening. Someone tried to post studies on my thread to prove that unvaxxed are dying in vastly larger numbers, and didn't really read them. Pfizer funded studies play fast and loose with the numbers. Although 2 of the studies did caveat that the results of the study weren't reflected in real life (they said it more eloquently than me, but that was the gist.) One of the studies had Neil Ferguson - a UK guy who "predicts" how many deaths from certain illnesses that go around. He hasn't been right once, but the world used HIM to predict covid deaths and VOILA, he is the father of the lockdown in the West. Ironically, he was fired in disgrace for visiting his mistress for sexy time during the lockdown he recommended implementing. But apparently, he's still contributing to "studies." Well done on the research. I know how hard it is to find out the true picture when they make it so difficult. England is actually a bit easier. But ya, they try to slip things in, like including men in the data to prove that menstrual irregularities are "rare."

The game is to bring in people who are grateful for a lot less than the people who have been living here for a while would accept. Such people generally won’t make waves. There’s no question of what the impacts on our social services, healthcare, ESL educators, democratic values, home prices or rents will be. It’s about the Liberals looking pro-diversity and counting on the immigrant vote. Canada always needs some immigrants, especially in certain sectors, but 500000 per year is irresponsible. Canada has almost double the foreign born residents of the US. In areas of the GTA where immigration has been heaviest it’s very hard to tell how much integration outside the immigrant community is taking place. This situation is unlikely to change until everyone on this forum is long gone.

That is the sort of thing which ought to have been studied prior to the decision to increase immigration - 7 years ago. But Canada has undertaken no real study of the benefits or drawback of immigration, what immigration can do for the country, what it has done so far, or how to adjust/alter it to get what we want. Or even what we want. The government has studied none of this and has no plans to do so. Obviously, bringing in even more immigrants will exacerbate the housing shortage and resulting price increases in everything from rent to mortgages. Very few of the new immigrants will be construction tradesmen, and we have no idea how well their skills (presuming they have any) will meld with Canada's needs. Bringing in half a million people a year means more demand for housing, which in the absence of a flood of new people into the construction trades we will be unable to supply. Likewise medical services, especially since Trudeau has grandly increased the number of elderly immigrants three times in the last seven years, from 5,000 to 30,000 now (and counting). What we can be fairly sure the new flood of immigrants will do is make it easier for low wage jobs like those in the restaurant and hospitality industries to be filled without raising wages. Ditto for the tech industry, which will continue to spurn Canadian software grads in favor of more experienced and much cheaper Indians and Chinese. There's no real suggestion any of this will be good for Canada, at least in the short to medium term. Nor, I suspect, is it supposed to be. It's designed to make corporate Canada happy and to meet the Liberal party's goals under the Century Initiative as well as increasing immigrants from ethnic groups seen to be strong Liberal party supporters.

The average Communications Security Establishment salary ranges from approximately $64,846 per year for Agent to $104,544 per year for Administrator.

Ever hear of James Earl Ray? When he was arrested, he was carrying a Canadian passport. After that, they tightened up the background checks. I am sure none of us want the wrong people getting a passport. OTOH, if we are a tyranny, I've always thought it would be fun to belong to the secret police. I have 25 years expeience. I've even been called Stasi on occasion. Maybe I should mention that on my application. Zeit, any idea what the pay is like?

Hi, I went to the Guy-Favreau complex in Montréal to get a passport 2 weeks ago on a Monday, having declared mine lost a few years ago (thankfully I recovered it but since it was declared lost, I had to get a new one). I waited in a line for 2 hours with my spouse, because we need to go to Belgium as her mother passed away recently and funerals are there. Finally, at the counter where the government representative was, I was told alongside my partner that we needed to have a form in order, filled, before talking to her to get an appointment to get a passport. No one told us that when we went in the line, despite there being 5 staff members asking us why the hell we where there, none bothered to tell us we needed to fill a form before inquiring to the officers. The officer gives me the forms, and we're back at the end of the line after we take 5 minutes to fill them. We spend another 2 hours, finally for them to tell us we'll get an appointment for in 4 days. That's what I call efficient, baby. I had an appointment for 2PM, went there at 1:45PM, and waited until 3:30PM to finally get my passport. I had to wait in line despite having an appointment scheduled at a certain time. It's great out here, our procedures are so modern and very up to date in the great country of ours. Oh and it's not better at the provincial level. When I had lost my Health Insurance Card in a moving, I had to go on Québec website for health insurance to order a paper form to be sent at my Home, that I could send back to the Government of Québec. I did a mistake in the form so they sent me back my form, and I had to resend it. It took 6 weeks to get my Health Insurance Card back. I could have been sick during those times, but hey, I guess I'm lucky. Talking about the form... it could have been available on the online portal of the Québec website, but no, I had to order a paper form on their online web service.

Are the teachers blockading streets and disturbing an entire neighborhood late into the night? Are businesses closing as a result of their strike?

The rationalizing of these obvious questions is always a fun exhibit ?.

Holy crap. I'm going to award you some kind of trophy, because I've never seen so much wrong crammed into 3 lines. 1. The M1 exploded in early 2020, under Trump, a year before Biden took office 2. The money supply is primarily controlled by the Federal Reserve, which operates independent of the federal government (and the current chair Powell was originally nominated by Trump). Regardless of who is in office, the POTUS is not the primary driver M1. 3. The M1 explosion was deliberate, in response to challenges of the pandemic, with every expectation that inflation would follow. 4. It's not just the US. Central banks around the world turned to loose money to cope with the pandemic. FRED You have not taken Econ 101, but it'd be a really good idea.

If he is being “illegally installed”, why would it matter how people vote? A doctor who got very rich selling snake oil.

Azov vs Trudeau's Nazi guy pretending to be a trucker.

about as remarkable as a confederate at the trucker protest. Of course one you'll blow out of proportion, and the other is apparently harmless. What's really telling is that you actually convinced yourself the censors were scrubbing the former from the internet, when it's painfully clear that they are not. It's a fantastic example of how you manage to delude yourself on such a regular basis. I'll assume it was an honest mistake, and that you just don't know how to internet.

Because "it's 2015 somewhere"? And because everything is about race for them. At the head of the Libs and Dems are a bunch of people born as wealthy, privileged brats (Hillary, Trudeau, Morneau, etc in politics, and at the top of the media food chain guys like Anderson "Vanderbilt" Cooper and Chris "Governors of NY" Cuomo) who lecture people like me and you about 'our' white privilege just to court the "darker than a paper bag" vote. I don't know about you, but my family came from dark shacks on the frozen prairies, heated by coal stoves and with oil lamps for light, and their privileges included super-fun things like working in coal mines and fighting in wars. Talking to me about my white privilege is like signing up for the Bobby Clarke dental plan. Yes, I had a better life than my parents and grandparents did, but they built that life with a lot of sweat and even more tears, and I don't appreciate skids like Trudeau & Hillary throwing me under the bus for votes.

So you think when the Liberals book a facilitaty for some event, they send a team in to send away security guards that might appear 'white' ? Interesting. And you just THINK this happens, right ? No evidence ? Why wouldn't they do that for every single position ? Every event, every employee ? Obviously they have limited resources so why are they selecting security guards ? BTW, non white security guards happen to be a 'thing' in Toronto so they probably don't have to bother doing that here

1. I have always found it interesting that so many Zionists find their way to the top of the American power structure. 2. I could care less for your "debunking". The migration path of the Ashkenazi is well documented. 3. I am not gonna debate this with you. It's way off topic.

No. I'm saying those listed are Jewish. The only religion trying to make people believe it's also a denomination. I have no quarrel with Jewish people. I do have an issue with Zionism. But then...I know their history. BTW...I note you simply had to make a reference to Germany. You really should stop embarrassing yourself.

Biden is solely responsible for the massive EXPLOSION of M-1 dollar supply. He is also responsible for the supply chain crisis. Too many dollars chasing too few goods. The definition of inflation. Economics 101. Find someone with an education to explain that to you.

The other issue I think humanity needs to address is: We've allowed the majority of the world's money to be hoarded by a few individuals. In times past, wealthy people built hospitals, libraries, theaters, critical infrastructure like bridges. They're not doing that any more. Money is just sitting there, being hoarded. I find it hypocritical that billionaires are lecturing the rest of us on reducing our carbon footprints while they jet around the world on private jets and float around on giant yachts and pay Disneyland to close down for everybody else on their birthdays. They need to be shamed. Trudeau cost us a metric f*&^Kton of money, partying in the UK with his giant entourage. That money, our money, could have brought a lot of water to remote reserves.

Don't ask if you don't want to know. If there was a way to make it affordable the Libs would find a workaround. You forgot to mention: "Free to not get raped, free to not get beaten up or imprisoned for not wearing a hijab, etc" Places with crime rates more like Baltimore than Victoria. If there's no way to pretend that it won't be a massive drain on the system, then the official answer will be "Shut up, racist." I was just in downtown Vancouver a couple weeks ago to see Jim Jefferies, there are a lot of tents on the streets in downtown. I'm not sure if those people think they can survive the winter like that, or if they like getting peed on by the winners slithering around the Shark Club, but it's a thing in Vcr now. That's all by design, but I can't say why that's the case. About as well as when The WHO decided that it would be a great idea to let people fly out of Wuhan into all the major cities of the world, so as not to appear racist. IE, predictably.

I actually get really mad if I think about it too much. It seems like "Err on the side of stupidity/danger" is our mantra now, just like when The WHO decided to say "This coronavirus probably isn't all that contagious. Just let people from Wuhan fly into all the major cities of the world unimpeded."

I've read that there are studies being done now. The experiment isn't over yet, so we won't know long-term for many years down the road. What we DO know now, is that the spike protein does not stay in the arm, as the CDC told everyone it did. It travels throughout the body, settling in major organs, and especially in the heart, lungs, ovaries and testes. We also know that the body keeps producing spike protein, one study showed spike in major organs was still being produced 15 months post-jab. There is no mechanism in the jabs to turn off production of the toxic spike. We also know, in spite of the study that tried to gaslight women into thinking it was all in their heads and included men in it to hide the data, that the jabs ARE affecting menstrual cycles. Some women are reporting heavy, clotting bleeding for up to a year after the jabs. I'm not a scientist, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that spike protein collecting in the ovaries and testes, is not going to bode well for future fertility. Children should have been left out of this mass experiment, IMO. They have zero risk of covid and no benefit from getting jabbed repeatedly.

The Liberals know they are more popular among Canadians not born in Canada. This is why they've dramatically increased immigration levels and lowered the # of years in Canada required in order to get citizenship (voting rights). The Liberals are engaging in demographic warfare tactics to secure their power, which is pretty racist. I once attended a Trudeau campaign rally during an election period. 100% of his security and enterage is made up of non-whites. I found that very odd and very racist. Trudeau and the Liberals are obsessed with identity politics like race and gender issues. Only a racist would care what race the members of their security detail are. Enter: blackface.

"you people" ? didn't Don Cherry get cancelled for saying that ?

“You people”. Your pea brain can only lump everyone together and paint them with the same brush.

Here's a comparison of Canada "almost completely unvaxed" vs Canada "86% vaxed". I'll say right now that it shows that the vaccines did a big, fat, zero, but if you gotta see the full proof, read on.... The meat and potatoes starts at the "How Many Canadians Died of Covid" section. What's between here and there is background info that you can choose to read for your own info. Vaccine, or Pflacebo? If what we have truly qualifies as a covid "vaccine", and it really gives people an 80% chance better of surviving covid, then we should be able to see evidence of that by seeing how well we fared back when we were "unvaxed" to when we, the exact same group of people just one year later, fared after 86% of us were "vaccinated" multiple times. In order to do that, first you need to know what % of us were vaxed, to what extent (1-4 doses), and when that happened. Covid "Vaccination" Status of Canadians: I have the "% of Canadians vaxed" timeline and the Canadian covid deaths" timelines attached below: How are vaccination stats presented to us in Canada? The next thing you need to know is that the "outcome" stats (deaths, cases, etc) presented to us by our government are always from Dec 14 2020 moving fwd . It's important to know that they never talk in terms of "how many people died in the last x number of days", they only refer to the number of deaths from Dec 14 to the present. It can be very misleading if you don't keep that in your head, and they won't remind you. As an example, they'll post something like "Dec 14 to present" at the top of a page, and then halfway down they'll say something like "Only 4.5% of covid deaths are among the quadruple vaxed", which would imply that's what's happening right now, but they actually mean "4.5% of people who died since Dec 14 2020 were 4xers". (in fact they said that exact thing and someone from this site was fooled by it and quoted it here). It's very misleading when they do that, some would say "intentionally misleading", because the timeline goes back almost two years, and people didn't even start getting the 4th jab until this spring, but they'll do a straight across comparison between 4 months of quadruple-vxed deaths and all 22 months of all he other deaths. It's like if I talked about the number of points by LA Lakers over the past ten years and I said "LeBron only has 4.5% of the points scored by the Lkers in that time". It's a completely worthless stat because he's only been there for 1 year or so. There's no way you can even make it relevant. The only way to judge his presence there is by "what % of the team's points were scored while LeBron was there". It seems obvious, but health Canada presents stats in a very misleading way imo. You have to do all the legwork yourself. How many Canadians died of covid? The bulk of the covid stats which I refer to all start on Dec 14 2020, so I do all my statistical comps from that day fwd. Their choice, not mine. Here's the overall graphs for deaths, but I'll break it down into relevant sections for the purpose of this tpic. We have a lot of stats from Dec 14 2020 moving fwd. Let's look at the vax/death stats from Dec 14th, when 38M Canadians were all unvaxed, and exposed to covid during flu season. Vax status after the initial rollout: You can see that almost everyone in Canada was basically unvaxed from Dec 14 to the start of July. How many Canadians died during that period? What was the vax/status and the number of deaths a year later, when 86% of us were vaxed? And the number of deaths? Here are the death charts cropped, side by side, so you can quickly compare: Dec 14 2020 - Aug 2021 and Dec 14 2021 - Aug 2022 Does that look like case of "vaccinated vs unvccinated"? I see now, with the charts side by side, that i didn't crop them perfectly. If you need to do that, go for it. I'm done here.

Corporate greed explained: When those on the left keep pushing for much higher taxes on corporations, they simply just pass on the cost to the public.

Many doctors and scientists have been calling for this for almost 2 years. The institutions in power positions, who had to be dragged to court to release the data, obviously don't want anyone analyzing it but themselves. Pfizer touted its jabs as 95% efficacious, that's how they got the EUA and got governments to sign off on liability. Once the data was released, it was clear that efficacy was nothing near 95%. Even more obvious now. But governments had already signed binding contracts with Big Pharma and given them full immunity from liabilities and were forcing everyone to jab repeatedly or lose their jobs. I think at this point, institutions and authorities know. But to admit they were wrong to put blind faith in Big Pharma and coerce jabs and lockdowns, restrictions and mandates would result in mega lawsuits. and loss of careers. It's far easier to continue the bamboozle on populations who have already been cowed into compliance with unprecedented overreach by a constant barrage of fear porn. The average person is still too afraid to demand any kind of inquiry. At some point though, it's going to be too obvious and the gig will be up. There's been over 1000 athletes drop on sports fields, over 700 of them died instantly. Normally, there's 39 in a year. That number doesn't even include all the non-famous children and teenagers dropping dead in sports. Google "died suddenly". It's astonishing. "Unknown Causes" is the biggest cause of death in Alberta now. That's unacceptable. People will only take it for so long. They keep trying to squash the groups - scientific and otherwise - but it's really just a giant game of whack-a-mole at this point. Notice how quickly "monkeypox" died out? I think because people know now. Nobody's jumping on getting jabbed 10-12 times a year - I mean, c'mon. You'd have to be totally brainwashed. Any inquiry is likely years away yet.

quote A No Go Zone is sort of a failed state in miniature form, and is not that recent of a development. In the strictest sense, a No Go Zone (or ”No Go Area”) is an area that has been barricaded off by military or paramilitary authorities. However, a broader definition has emerged in recent years as governments such as France and Sweden use euphemisms such as “vulnerable area,” “exposed area” or “sensitive urban zone” for what are effectively No Go Zones. For our purposes, a No Go Zone is anywhere that the government is incapable of providing basic support services – policing, firefighting and emergency medical services. This is also the common meaning when “No Go Zone” is used in the media. Uncomfortable for some to consider, it is an undeniable fact that most, if not all, of the No Go Zones in Europe coincide with large Muslim populations. In these areas, large radicalized immigrant populations are indifferent or hostile to the central government. Beyond the merely uncomfortable for some and into the deeply disturbing for all, second-generation Muslim immigrants tend to be more radicalized than their parents, not less. This is true across Europe. Second-generation Muslim immigrants have been behind nearly every terrorist attack in Europe post-9/11. The kind of assimilation America saw after its massive immigration wave between the Civil War and the First World War simply is not happening with Muslim immigrant communities in Europe. No Go Zones in Europe Much of the debate around whether or not Europe has “No Go Zones” comes down to how terms are defined. A 2017 article on RT’s website put the matter very succinctly: “Thus those looking to dismiss no-go areas as a ‘myth,’ can argue the semantics of what constitutes a ‘no-go zone,’ or how much of a threat they present, but not that term represents a real phenomenon.” Here are some examples of growing civil unrest in Europe: Belgium: Following the November 2015 terror attacks in France, Belgium’s Home Affairs Minister Jan Jambon stated that the Belgian government does not “have control of the situation in Molenbeek.” He described this as a “gigantic problem” without actually using the term No Go Zone. France: Fox News created controversy in 2015 when they declared France had No Go Zones after the Charlie Hebdo shooting. However, looking beyond the hysteria, there’s considerable evidence that France has No Go Zones. In fact, Reuters referred to No Go Zones in Paris in October 2016. In June 2018, the French President Emmanuel Macron gave a speech with repeated euphemistic references to No Go Zones. The National Post, Canada’s paper of record, did an in-depth feature on No Go Zones in 2016. In 2017, an app launched called “No-Go Zone,” allowing the French to report lawless areas to be avoided. So while there may be a reflexive reaction to dismiss reports from Gatestone Institute or Breitbart on French No Go Zones as “right-wing propaganda,” there are no shortage of so-called “mainstream” sources reporting on No Go Zones in France. Germany: Angela Merkel has spoken about No Go Zones as a “reality” in Germany. In April 2018, the Daily Mail reported on a poll showing that a majority of Germans feared No Go Zones, with over three quarters stating they believed the government should crack down harder on organized crime. Sweden: Much of the media attention surrounding No Go Zones is centered on Sweden. Despite vehement denials, there is overwhelming evidence of No Go Areas in Sweden, no matter what term one chooses to use. An April 2018 Sputnik report described areas where emergency services cannot enter without significant police support. In 2018, the Prime Minister of Sweden referred to “parallel societies” in Sweden. The spectre of civil war in Sweden is openly discussed in Parliament. A 2017 RT article quoted Swedish National Police Commissioner Dan Eliasson as saying “we cannot continue in this direction ten more years.” In December 2017, the nation’s chief prosecutor described a Stockholm suburb as being like “a war zone” and stating that she would look to countries like El Salvador and Colombia for potential strategies. United Kingdom: President Donald Trump was ridiculed for suggesting the presence of No Go Areas in the UK, however, there is evidence to suggest he was correct. Raheem Kassam, a UKIP activist and former Breitbart UK Editor in Chief has written an entire book on the subject. Kassam is of Tanzanian extraction and was raised as an Ismaili Muslim, though he now identifies as an atheist. An anonymous London police officer went on popular British radio program LBC and stated that the British capital did in fact have “No Go Areas.” Councillors for Leeds suburb Bradford have similarly described areas of that city. unquote No Go Zones: A Guide to Western Failed States and European Secessionist Movements (richardsonpost.com) Notice it says second generation Muslims are often more radical than their parents. That means the more you bring in, the more radicals you may have in the future generations.

No Mike. Give YOUR head a shake. Read the article. Where have you read similar words and ideas? Europe is fracturing under the weight of the EU thumb. Greta Thunberg. Slipped through Sweedish eugenics to be used as a child and now promotes pure communism. How ... nice.

1. So bringing a tech worker from Pakistan to Canada when there's a shortage of labour in that field is bad for the economy? 2. As has been pointed out, only questionable sources make this stuff up and put it on the web for gullible people, who are at heart fearful racists, to regurgitate. You discredit your ability to engage in serious discussion when you come in with this garbage. 3. I thought you were making the case that Muslims pose a threat to Canadians. Your admission means that it's not so, it's the other way around. Whatever your case about their numbers is paranoid speculation. I already posted the PEW poll showing they're less religious than Christians.

There are benefits to bringing people here, of course there are. There have been more terrorist acts against Muslims than by them in Canada. 'No go zones ' are made up nonsense. You're gullible.

Let us recall when she helped displayed the banner of the Ukrainian Nazis of old. This photo is being scrubbed hard from the ol' search engines.

Since the early 1980s, several billion people are living better than at any time in our planet's history. What we have achieved in the past 40 years is astonishing. As a community, we have brought several billion people into the modern world. In 1600, no one knew what a derivative was. Nowadays, kids can take a derivative using their iPhone.

Why not just do the investigation? I mean...the US has nothing to hide...right?

You ARE mistaken. The EC representatives are required by law to be assigned according to the popular vote in ALL states. That is democratic. Republicans are SEEKING to change that, independent of their state constitution, review by their courts, and VETO by their governor, as described ABOVE in BeaverFeaver's post on Moore v. Harper currently being heard by SCOTUS.

Like state legislatures passing laws saying they get to decide who wins instead of the voters. You NOT KNOWING what's going on is YOUR EMBARRASSMENT, NOT MINE.