Nationalist Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, Moonbox said: Okay, how about Keystone XL, denied expansion in January 2012 by the Obama administration weeks before Harper's speech to the WEF. Nope nope. The battle over fossil fuels is new and hasn't been going on for decades. Nope! ? KXL was delayed a year by Barry. The Donald approved it all as soon as he took office. Biden killed it finally as soon as he took office. I didn't say this was a new battle...clown-boy...I said in 2012 they...you...were not actively squelching the oil industry. Clown-boy... Edited January 27, 2023 by Nationalist 3 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
West Posted January 27, 2023 Author Report Posted January 27, 2023 2 hours ago, blackbird said: GOLDSTEIN: Freedom in Canada and globally on decline, says report (msn.com) The ConSpiracY TheoRIsTs must be up about 50-0 by now Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 9 hours ago, West said: You keep mentioning "cabal" a word I've NEVER used on here.. so you are delusional But if you wanna use it in a sentence, it goes something like this: "TNI, aka the Global Disinformation Cabal News Network, finally stopped censoring information about the BSL4 lab in May of 2021, 17 months into covid. Your CBC tax dollars only go so far." 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
WestCanMan Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 8 hours ago, Moonbox said: Making a mistake is no biggy. What's frustrating in your case is that you went into the debate poorly-informed, and then doubled-down after your error was pointed out and still didn't make the basic effort to confirm whether what you were saying was right. OMG get off your high horse. Were you right about something for once in your life and now you can't let it go? I can't even believe some of you guys didn't change your usernames again after all the things you said about covid that turned out to be just as stupid as they sounded. 2 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
West Posted January 27, 2023 Author Report Posted January 27, 2023 15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: OMG get off your high horse. Were you right about something for once in your life and now you can't let it go? I can't even believe some of you guys didn't change your usernames again after all the things you said about covid that turned out to be just as stupid as they sounded. I just clued in the moonshine and eyeball may be the same dude 1 Quote
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 12 hours ago, Nationalist said: I didn't say this was a new battle...clown-boy...I said in 2012 they...you...were not actively squelching the oil industry. Gosh I guess if qualify the argument as "actively squelching" (whatever that actually means) you can portray it however you want. What, specifically, qualifies as "actively squelching?" ?. 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Nationalist Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 13 minutes ago, Moonbox said: Gosh I guess if qualify the argument as "actively squelching" (whatever that actually means) you can portray it however you want. What, specifically, qualifies as "actively squelching?" ?. Gosh I think you should give it up. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
WestCanMan Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 11 hours ago, West said: moonshine and eyeball may be the same dude Or maybe it's a case of "fools seldom differ". 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth.
ironstone Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 20 hours ago, Moonbox said: Can you show me where eating bugs is part of their platform? Is this perhaps another example of you reading the headlines and garbage-news and accepting it immediately without further thought? Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) They certainly have mentioned the idea of the people eating bugs in order to save the planet. 1 Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 36 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Gosh I think you should give it up. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong? This sort of natter would make more sense if you could actually tell me what I'm wrong about, coherently make your point, or even attempt to answer a challenge to your argument. What are we specifically doing to "squelch fossil fuels" today that we weren't doing 10 years ago, or even 3 years ago, before the WEF became the newest incarnation on the Illuminati? 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 6 minutes ago, ironstone said: Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) They certainly have mentioned the idea of the people eating bugs in order to save the planet. There's a wide chasm between mentioning the idea and potential benefits of bug farming, vs an actual plan or even a desire to replace traditional farming, especially in places where food is plentiful like Canada and Europe. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would understand that pushing bugs onto our plates and taking away our BBQs is not happening. As I said, this was "mentioned" on the WEF website back in 2016, and for some reason eating the bugs, owning nothing and being happy didn't become THE AGENDA until it was dug up and went viral in 2021. 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
Nationalist Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 29 minutes ago, Moonbox said: This sort of natter would make more sense if you could actually tell me what I'm wrong about, coherently make your point, or even attempt to answer a challenge to your argument. What are we specifically doing to "squelch fossil fuels" today that we weren't doing 10 years ago, or even 3 years ago, before the WEF became the newest incarnation on the Illuminati? Trashing the XL Pipeline for starters. Not allowing drilling. Imposing edicts about electric cars. About killing the nat gas business. I can't figure out if you're really this uninformed...or just plain old stubborn. There is a way to execute a transition to "green energy" without all this hardship. But the Greenies won't stand for it. They want fossil fuels disposed of and they want it now. They act like a bunch of screaming babies. This whole fiasco has been a childish exhibition of panic, fear and propaganda. Not a single prediction from the doomsday crowd, has come to pass. The sky is not falling today. Go have a beer...if you're old enough to drink. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
ironstone Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 21 hours ago, Moonbox said: I'll urge you again to try and find that a formal policy or even desire of the WEF or its membership. I think this would fit the definition of desires for the WEF. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) I personally don't have much faith that the WEF is totally benevolent and open for all to see. Perhaps this image on the cover of Chrystia Freeland's book is prophetic. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Zeitgeist Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 Clearly Freeland couldn’t resist the dark side, so it’ll be champagne kisses for her from here while the proletariat shlubs eat dirt. Rules for thee but not for me… Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 12 minutes ago, ironstone said: I think this would fit the definition of desires for the WEF. I imagine you would favour a wealth tax ? 1 Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
TreeBeard Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I imagine you would favour a wealth tax ? You think you’re going to win this debate by suggesting reasonable policies to conspiracy theorists? They’re going to take your wealth tax and turn it into a conspiracy about a government fund for transgender city planners locking you into a 5 block radius so they can read story books to your children while they have to eat worms as a snack. It’s not about the wealth paying their fair share. It’s about conspiracies of the wealthy people (at least the ones they disagree with… oil barons = good wealthy) making you eat bugs. Quote
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 19 minutes ago, ironstone said: I think this would fit the definition of desires for the WEF. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) No, I think that's exactly what it says it is - 8 predictions from the former editor of an opinion pieces and analysis papers journal from 2016. 19 minutes ago, ironstone said: I personally don't have much faith that the WEF is totally benevolent and open for all to see. Perhaps this image on the cover of Chrystia Freeland's book is prophetic. That's fine. I don't have much use for the WEF personally and doubt its usefulness or merits. As the Conservative MP I quoted earlier said (in paraphrased terms), "Trudeau repeats WEF catchphrases because he's an idi*t and because he wants an invite back to the parties." As for Chrystia Freeland's book, you should probably look beyond the title because it's supposedly about the super-rich getting richer and leaving everyone behind, and that it's not a good thing. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
eyeball Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, Moonbox said: I don't have much use for the WEF personally and doubt its usefulness or merits. Nor me given it's about 35 years too late. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 32 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Trashing the XL Pipeline for starters. Not allowing drilling. Imposing edicts about electric cars. About killing the nat gas business. There's tons of drilling capacity and open permits already, and as we've seen in recent years, producers are dragging their feet with drilling on purpose to keep prices inflated. Trashing the XL Pipeline was a process that went on for 10+ years, starting with Obama. Electric cars are the future. Sorry to tell you. The natural gas business is expanding and should continue, for the time being. Some jurisdictions are banning it, which to me is crazy and I think those municipal governments etc will suffer for it. Maybe not in Quebec, here hydro is cheap, but Vancouver/BC and the tree-huggers there will re-think when they get a cold winter. 32 minutes ago, Nationalist said: There is a way to execute a transition to "green energy" without all this hardship. We've already talked about this, and we've already agreed on the basic principle and that there has been a lot of bad policy over the years. Regardless, none of these issues are new, and certainly weren't invented by the WEF. Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ironstone Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I imagine you would favour a wealth tax ? The wealthy already carry most of the tax burden do they not? Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Moonbox Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 1 minute ago, ironstone said: The wealthy already carry most of the tax burden do they not? Considering they carry all of the wealth, I you could look at it that way. Another way to look at it is that the top 20% own 86% of the USA's wealth, but only pay 73% of the taxes, shouldering the difference on the middle class instead. 1 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
ironstone Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 14 minutes ago, Moonbox said: No, I think that's exactly what it says it is - 8 predictions from the former editor of an opinion pieces and analysis papers journal from 2016. That's fine. I don't have much use for the WEF personally and doubt its usefulness or merits. As the Conservative MP I quoted earlier said (in paraphrased terms), "Trudeau repeats WEF catchphrases because he's an idi*t and because he wants an invite back to the parties." As for Chrystia Freeland's book, you should probably look beyond the title because it's supposedly about the super-rich getting richer and leaving everyone behind, and that it's not a good thing. Some of it sure sounds like a wish list. We get labelled as conspiracy theorists for having serious concerns about the WEF and it's agenda. Why shouldn't be be concerned since it's not really an open event for everyone and many meetings are held in secrecy. A lot of the attendees already have a large degree of control over much of the world and everything indicates they want more. Yes it is a private organization, but one that has an enormous amount of influence with governments all over the world. Yes, it seems like the uber rich are getting even richer. Chrystia Freeland said it. And she has a hell of a lot more influence and power than most people. It can be argued that this is happening under her watch. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
Michael Hardner Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 25 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: 1. You think you’re going to win this debate by suggesting reasonable policies to conspiracy theorists? 2. They’re going to take your wealth tax and turn it into a conspiracy about a government fund for transgender city planners locking you into a 5 block radius so they can read story books to your children while they have to eat worms as a snack. 3. It’s not about the wealth paying their fair share. It’s about conspiracies of the wealthy people (at least the ones they disagree with… oil barons = good wealthy) making you eat bugs. 1. There is no "winning" to be done by anyone here. This poster appears to find a problem with the power of oligarchs. 2. Let them. Even conspiracy people feel constrained by principles. 3. Ah. Well maybe. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Nationalist Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 17 minutes ago, Moonbox said: There's tons of drilling capacity and open permits already, and as we've seen in recent years, producers are dragging their feet with drilling on purpose to keep prices inflated. Trashing the XL Pipeline was a process that went on for 10+ years, starting with Obama. Electric cars are the future. Sorry to tell you. The natural gas business is expanding and should continue, for the time being. Some jurisdictions are banning it, which to me is crazy and I think those municipal governments etc will suffer for it. Maybe not in Quebec, here hydro is cheap, but Vancouver/BC and the tree-huggers there will re-think when they get a cold winter. We've already talked about this, and we've already agreed on the basic principle and that there has been a lot of bad policy over the years. Regardless, none of these issues are new, and certainly weren't invented by the WEF. I am not sure who "invented" this crap, but the WEF is actively supporting/proposing it all, and they have more clout that they should. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Army Guy Posted January 27, 2023 Report Posted January 27, 2023 (edited) 22 hours ago, Moonbox said: Making a mistake is no biggy. What's frustrating in your case is that you went into the debate poorly-informed, and then doubled-down after your error was pointed out and still didn't make the basic effort to confirm whether what you were saying was right. I guess the saying is true about leading horses to water. ?♂️ We haven't established much of anything. The word "influence" is a meaningless term without further qualification. Attaching "major" to a vague descriptor doesn't change that. The WEF is a forum. An organization and event through which to exchange ideas, good or bad. The idea that it has a singular agenda is where you go wrong. It doesn't. Can you show me where eating bugs is part of their platform? Is this perhaps another example of you reading the headlines and garbage-news and accepting it immediately without further thought? I'll urge you again to try and find that a formal policy or even desire of the WEF or its membership. Some Danish MP wrote an essay in 2016 and the window-lickers on 4chan turned it into a viral meme that's spread everywhere. Congratulations. You've progressed to repeating conspiracy copypasta from 4chan. That's where you're at now. ? I think i have apologized enough for my over sight, time to let it go... Now we are into playing word games, Yes the WEF is a forum, made up of some very influential people, who according to your suggestions they are not very influential at all... which is why our government has used dozens of their ideas, ya no influence at all....And i did not point out a singular agenda, i originally pointed out dozens...including a WEF web sight that has 8 to 10 items they promote, not some 4 Chan site... and you have yet to look at, makes me think this conversation is going exactly where all our conversations go round and round until i get dizzy....It is easy to sit back and tell the world they are full of shit, but you have not provided one single piece of evidence to back your claim...instead your follow your own moto and deny deny deny... And just as a side note, not once have i promoted this topic as a conspiracy theory, what i have said countless times was the topic interests me and i want to follow it, and what i posted was what i thought was strange or unusual... you seem to think those items i did post are normal behavior... Beware this is not a Chan4 theory...it is an actual WEF U tube video... I found the video becauase some of you are having issues with reading... n a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements: People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. Organs will not be transplanted but printed. Meat consumption will be minimized. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) Whoops did it again... these must be fake news Edited January 27, 2023 by Army Guy 2 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.