Question for Trudeau Haters....

[DogOnPorch]

4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

 

"False. Canadian Prime Minister did not publish a tweet about a hashtag that circulated that opposed his leadership. The screenshot is fabricated."

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-trudeau-hashtag-idUSL1N30R21F

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trudeau-fake-tweet-on-censorship-841211591306

 

You had better hope that those two million posts are fake.

[ExFlyer]

41 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

You had better hope that those two million posts are fake.

Don't need hope.

Keyboard warriors are everywhere.

[DogOnPorch]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Don't need hope.

Keyboard warriors are everywhere.

 

Oh yeah? How's your hashtag doing?

[I am Groot]

2 hours ago, Goddess said:

Women are not rehab centers for men.

Men marry women expecting them not to change and they do.

Women marry men, expecting they can change them and they can't.

[I am Groot]

18 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

But what attracted her?  I’m not denying the importance of civilizing the brute, but the passion and spark matter a lot. 

Is this a serious question? Rich, good looking, powerful, well-dressed and well-spoken. 

Personality does not attract people. You have to actually get to know someone before you even learn what their personality is.

[DogOnPorch]

3 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Men marry women expecting them not to change and they do.

Women marry men, expecting they can change them and they can't.

 

I'm liking you more and more.

Can we go for a drive? I'll hang my head out the window and bite at the air.

😄

[I am Groot]

On 9/22/2022 at 12:25 PM, Zeitgeist said:

Not really.  What was attractive was the power and strength.  Sure there’s a flaw to be fixed.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not promoting dominance or servitude.  I’m saying that there are biochemical and physiological realities that make a mockery of some of our ideas about the fluidity of gender and the incorrect idea that gender is just a social construct.  Biology informs much of what we establish as social norms.  That doesn’t mean that there won’t be outliers, but that’s what they are.  If we ignore the norms, stop recognizing traditional female and male qualities, and pretend that they’re all a choice and don’t have value to most people, that’s a lie and a disservice to the children we’ve been entrusted to raise as healthy and strong individuals.  Does it mean that females and males can’t take on roles traditionally associated with the other gender?  Of course not, though I don’t think it’s advisable to play with human hormones and reproductive systems unless necessary.  Reconfiguring men to be able to give birth is probably a terrible idea.

Most of what attracts men and women to each other is instinct, based on a million years of experiences.

[WestCanMan]

On 9/22/2022 at 9:25 AM, Zeitgeist said:

If we ignore the norms, stop recognizing traditional female and male qualities, and pretend that they’re all a choice and don’t have value to most people, that’s a lie and a disservice to the children we’ve been entrusted to raise as healthy and strong individuals.  

That point can't be overstated.

The time between childhood and the first year after puberty are a whirlwind for a lot of people, of course they have a lot of questions that don't get answered properly and of course they get a lot of misconceptions, it has always been the parental role to help kids along the path which has the greatest chance of happiness and fulfillment for them. 

The new way of encouraging them to take the toughest road possible, based on their decisions that they made with virtually no life experience or wisdom, is appalling.

[Nexii]

On 9/22/2022 at 1:25 PM, Zeitgeist said:

Not really.  What was attractive was the power and strength.  Sure there’s a flaw to be fixed.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not promoting dominance or servitude.  I’m saying that there are biochemical and physiological realities that make a mockery of some of our ideas about the fluidity of gender and the incorrect idea that gender is just a social construct.  Biology informs much of what we establish as social norms.  That doesn’t mean that there won’t be outliers, but that’s what they are.  If we ignore the norms, stop recognizing traditional female and male qualities, and pretend that they’re all a choice and don’t have value to most people, that’s a lie and a disservice to the children we’ve been entrusted to raise as healthy and strong individuals.  Does it mean that females and males can’t take on roles traditionally associated with the other gender?  Of course not, though I don’t think it’s advisable to play with human hormones and reproductive systems unless necessary.  Reconfiguring men to be able to give birth is probably a terrible idea.

More fair to say that status, confidence, and prowess are attractive. 

Now I haven't read 50 Shades and a lot of it is more described as abuse than actual BDSM. But given the wild popularity it definitely hit on some primal yearning within most women. Something that most don't get out of their relationships for whatever reason. It's something pre-dating civilization that can't be acted out in a civilized society. Or it's too taboo to explore and try.

I'll say that there are a lot of big misconceptions from both the medical left and religious right around what being trans is like. Mostly because it's trying to rationalize through the lens of someone straight, something that is much more emotional/primal in the same way. One doesn't think "I'd like to do female things so I'm going to become female". I never believed women couldn't do a career dominated by men. Or that a man can't be a nurturing father, etc. It's just insane to think anyone would go through with transitioning with 'gender roles' (whatever that means in modern society) as a motivator.

[I am Groot]

3 hours ago, blackbird said:

"“The Democratic Socialist Republic of [Canada], [massacred] for the better part of the past two [years] primarily by the [Singh/Trudeau] family, [will begin] to run out of food, medicine, oil fuels, natural gas, and nearly every other basic good by March, [2023,] the result of lavish government spending and the imposition of “green” policies that banned chemical   fertilizer use.” 

-from a commenter on:

 Jagmeet Singh Backs Khalistan Independence, Brands Canada Racist (capforcanada.com)

To quote the outgoing Republican governor of Maryland on the man nominated to succeed him: whoever wrote the above sounds like a wackadoodle.

Edited September 23, 2022 by I am Groot

[blackbird]

17 hours ago, I am Groot said:

To quote the outgoing Republican governor of Maryland on the man nominated to succeed him: whoever wrote the above sounds like a wackadoodle.

You are probably correct.  I doubt we will run out of those staples in 2023.  I will delete the original post.

[ExFlyer]

On 9/23/2022 at 12:22 PM, DogOnPorch said:

 

Oh yeah? How's your hashtag doing?

Hashtag? What is that??

[DogOnPorch]

2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Hashtag? What is that??

 

#trudeaumustgo

 

[Dougie93]

5 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

#trudeaumustgo

 

oh, that's interesting, never seen that one before

[DogOnPorch]

3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

oh, that's interesting, never seen that one before

 

Over two million posts apparently. Regular Canadians branded by Trudeau.

[Dougie93]

8 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

#trudeaumustgo

another Mcpl (ret.)

 

[Dougie93]

3 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Over two million posts apparently. Regular Canadians branded by Trudeau.

indeed, it's quite inspiring actually

[ExFlyer]

56 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

#trudeaumustgo

 

I am not a twit. (is that what twitter users are called?)

I also don't jump on bandwagons (I think they are called lemmings).

[Infidel Dog]

This one's also interesting because it's an American noticing the viral 'Trudeau Must Go" campaign:

 

[ironstone]

I just don't like how far left Trudeau is taking the country. History won't be kind to him if it's honest.

 

[SkyHigh]

On 9/10/2022 at 6:23 PM, WestCanMan said:

That was a really long story to just end up right back where we started.

Yes, 1) getting high is your claim to fame, 2) you know a veteran (woohoo!), and 3) you think that all veterans behave the exact same way to confrontation. 

I'll just warn you that people who came back from Afghanistan, Yugo, etc have their own issues from their own circumstances, which can be completely different in a lot of ways, and they can be very unpredictable when they're triggered.

They can be triggered many different ways, some of which are pretty random, and honestly, they're not the kind of people you want to trigger. The difference between a triggered non-binary she-boy and a triggered combat veteran is quite large, on average.

As bad as it is to steal valour, it's just as bad to deny valour. I prefer not to be guilty of either, but you can just keep running your mouth like a little Tik-Tok for all I care. 

Ok big guy if you need to resume everything i said to, "getting high is my claim to fame" and " I know one veteran" to make yourself feel better go ahead,  the opinion of some random internet fool is of no importance to me.

What is important is to actually help veterans, since you ignored my suggestion to go to a legion ( the legion is a nonpartisan, not for profit organisation whos sole purpose is to serve veterans in case you were unaware) buy a beer, talk to some people and make a donation ( I understand that might be beyond your means) Here's another suggestion, volunteer for the poppy drive it won't cost you anything but time and the proceeds must go directly to veterans unlike other fundraisers different legions may run. I know this because Ive actually held administrative positions with the legion ( now you can sum that up by saying, I once visited a legion to make yourself feel better if you want)

Or you can continue to think white knighting for some internet troll playing soldier boy is actually doing something. Your choice

Edited September 27, 2022 by SkyHigh

[ExFlyer]

On 9/25/2022 at 12:05 PM, DogOnPorch said:

 

Over two million posts apparently. Regular Canadians branded by Trudeau.

https://tnc.news/2022/09/19/trudeaumustgo-trend/

"According to Rebel News, the #TrudeauMustGo hashtag went viral on Sept. 15, 2022, ranking as the number one hashtag in politics, with 153,000 tweets."

A few short of 2 million

[DogOnPorch]

8 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

https://tnc.news/2022/09/19/trudeaumustgo-trend/

"According to Rebel News, the #TrudeauMustGo hashtag went viral on Sept. 15, 2022, ranking as the number one hashtag in politics, with 153,000 tweets."

A few short of 2 million

 

I'll leave it to you to count. It just goes on and on and on.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/trudeaumustgo

 

[DogOnPorch]

Seeing too, that upon checking, your article posted came from Sept 19th and it is now the 27th...with many new #trudeaumustgo posts coming every minute by the looks...that's a lot of people and it continues to grow.

Ignore them.

That's a plan....

[ExFlyer]

28 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

I'll leave it to you to count. It just goes on and on and on.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/trudeaumustgo

 

Just helping validate your statement "Over two million posts apparently. Regular Canadians branded by Trudeau." Personally,I could not care less. as I don't twit.

Just passing on information from True North News, the leading conservative website