Jump to content

Question for Trudeau Haters....


Boges

Recommended Posts

On 9/6/2022 at 9:33 PM, Zeitgeist said:

Men and women have different strengths.  It’s not a better or worse, but it’s telling that the most popular book among female readers for a long time, 50 Shades, is about a dominant male dominating a submissive female.

I don't think you understand what that story was actually about. It wasn't about a man dominating a woman. It was the typical women's fantasy of a perfect man with just one little flaw which the woman will work at fixing. 

It wasn't about submitting to the man it was about taming him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2022 at 10:04 AM, Goddess said:

The nuclear family - is a man with free child care, maid service, laundry, cook, psychologist, social coordinator, arm candy, private shopper, emotional punching bag and family obligation buffer.  It was never meant to be a "family".

It was meant to give poor men what rich men have.

It was meant to provide the woman with someone to protect and provide for her as she had children. Which is how it functioned for most of the history of our species. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another reason that Trudeaumustgo.  His government is only now lifting vaccine requirements for international incoming travelers..  And the Arrivecan nonsense is going away.  Why are these things happening?  Because Brian Peckford's court case against the Vax mandates started yesterday, apparently. 

And giving the people a national holiday to mourn the queen?  Canada, Australia and New Zealand.  Notice anything about those 3 countries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

I don't think you understand what that story was actually about. It wasn't about a man dominating a woman. It was the typical women's fantasy of a perfect man with just one little flaw which the woman will work at fixing. 

It wasn't about submitting to the man it was about taming him.

Not really.  What was attractive was the power and strength.  Sure there’s a flaw to be fixed.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not promoting dominance or servitude.  I’m saying that there are biochemical and physiological realities that make a mockery of some of our ideas about the fluidity of gender and the incorrect idea that gender is just a social construct.  Biology informs much of what we establish as social norms.  That doesn’t mean that there won’t be outliers, but that’s what they are.  If we ignore the norms, stop recognizing traditional female and male qualities, and pretend that they’re all a choice and don’t have value to most people, that’s a lie and a disservice to the children we’ve been entrusted to raise as healthy and strong individuals.  Does it mean that females and males can’t take on roles traditionally associated with the other gender?  Of course not, though I don’t think it’s advisable to play with human hormones and reproductive systems unless necessary.  Reconfiguring men to be able to give birth is probably a terrible idea.

Edited by Zeitgeist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, betsy said:

 

Poilievre will go easy on Singh......................for now.

 

It would make no difference if he didn't anyway. He has no weight and no power.

Polievere has to establish his big dick now. He will turn into his trumpian ways and diss everyone not agreeing with him later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Not really.  What was attractive was the power and strength.  Sure there’s a flaw to be fixed.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not promoting dominance or servitude.  I’m saying that there are biochemical and physiological realities that make a mockery of some of our ideas about the fluidity of gender and the incorrect idea that gender is just a social construct.  

I'm not disagreeing. And yes, his strength and confidence were among the classic traits which made him an attractive mate. But the BDSM thing had to go, and as the books moved along, his determination to make her his submissive faded away as she schooled him in proper respect.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I'm not disagreeing. And yes, his strength and confidence were among the classic traits which made him an attractive mate. But the BDSM thing had to go, and as the books moved along, his determination to make her his submissive faded away as she schooled him in proper respect.

 

 

But what attracted her?  I’m not denying the importance of civilizing the brute, but the passion and spark matter a lot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I don't think you understand what that story was actually about. It wasn't about a man dominating a woman. It was the typical women's fantasy of a perfect man with just one little flaw which the woman will work at fixing. 

It wasn't about submitting to the man it was about taming him.

It was both.

Women don't want to tame a wuss.  There's nothing to tame. They try to tame the bad boy who will pull their hair in bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, I am Groot said:

I'm not disagreeing. And yes, his strength and confidence were among the classic traits which made him an attractive mate. But the BDSM thing had to go, and as the books moved along, his determination to make her his submissive faded away as she schooled him in proper respect.

 

 

Women are not rehab centers for men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Glorious, isn't it? I have hope we'll throw these bums to the curb.

🙂

And it's not just the unvaxxed, who Trudeau wanted everyone to hate on.

There's a lot of tweets from people who had 2 shots, say they were coerced or lose their jobs and that they refuse to take any more.  Lots of people tweeting they had one shot and had serious adverse reactions and refused to take another.

People were so indoctrinated with terror and things happened so fast, that they didn't have time to learn about the actual science.  2 years in and the science is clear.

Hopefully we don't get fooled again.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Glorious, isn't it? I have hope we'll throw these bums to the curb.

🙂

 

"False. Canadian Prime Minister did not publish a tweet about a hashtag that circulated that opposed his leadership. The screenshot is fabricated."

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-trudeau-hashtag-idUSL1N30R21F

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trudeau-fake-tweet-on-censorship-841211591306

Edited by ExFlyer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,537
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    mercurygermes
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • psikeyhackr went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • psikeyhackr earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Perspektiv went up a rank
      Mentor
    • herbie went up a rank
      Veteran
    • CrakHoBarbie went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...