Boges Posted April 25, 2017 Report Posted April 25, 2017 And under the legalized model, you stand to get more time in jail if you give your kid brother a joint than if you actually sexually assaulted him.
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 (edited) On 4/25/2017 at 11:09 AM, PIK said: So our evidence based decision making PM is a cupper. It is a old egyptian procedure that is the same as giving yourself a hickey. And also he spoke about his corrupt father using his power to make a drug charge disappear for his brother. Thanks to all that voted for this fool. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/trudeau-says-father-used-connections-to-get-brother-michel-cleared-of-pot-charges A LOT of people have gone down a similar route as the Trudeaus over the years, a lot of charges have been dropped or never made, which I think is the point of the story, and he deserves credit for his honesty. Possession of cannabis for personal use should not ruin any young person's life when so many young people do it. Edited April 26, 2017 by SpankyMcFarland
AngusThermopyle Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 On 2/15/2017 at 9:02 PM, Michael Hardner said: FYI - please use appropriate names for political leaders, thanks. Are you saying we should be extremely profane when talking about Trudeau? I yam what I yam - Popeye
PIK Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 2 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: A LOT of people have gone down a similar route as the Trudeaus over the years, a lot of charges have been dropped or never made, which I think is the point of the story, and he deserves credit for his honesty. Possession of cannabis for personal use should not ruin any young person's life when so many young people do it. You are right and trudeau will not decriminalize it, but his family is allowed to get away with it and he smoked weed as a MP and nothing was ever done about it. 1 Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 32 minutes ago, PIK said: You are right and trudeau will not decriminalize it, but his family is allowed to get away with it and he smoked weed as a MP and nothing was ever done about it. An awful lot of people have got away with it.
eyeball Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 6 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: A LOT of people have gone down a similar route as the Trudeaus over the years, a lot of charges have been dropped or never made, which I think is the point of the story, and he deserves credit for his honesty. Possession of cannabis for personal use should not ruin any young person's life when so many young people do it. And despite his intimate familial awareness of this Trudeau insists on leaving the means for the state to do so to other people anyway. Do as the politicians say not as they do is the real point of the story - this attitude effectively ruins everything eventually. Trudeau is a sphincter of worst kind. 1 A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
AngusThermopyle Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 7 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: A LOT of people have gone down a similar route as the Trudeaus over the years, a lot of charges have been dropped or never made, which I think is the point of the story, and he deserves credit for his honesty. Possession of cannabis for personal use should not ruin any young person's life when so many young people do it. The point of the story would appear to be that his father used his status and former position to make the whole thing disappear. It's not a matter of charges being dropped, it's a matter of using influence in a corrupt manner. In short it stinks but is also pretty typical of Pierre Trudeau. I yam what I yam - Popeye
AngusThermopyle Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 4 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: An awful lot of people have got away with it. So in your opinion, even though it's still illegal, that makes it okay? A lot of people have also gotten away with theft and murder, does that principle also apply to those crimes? I yam what I yam - Popeye
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 26, 2017 Report Posted April 26, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, AngusThermopyle said: So in your opinion, even though it's still illegal, that makes it okay? A lot of people have also gotten away with theft and murder, does that principle also apply to those crimes? Trudeau deserves credit for freely telling a story that many could have told. I hope it is no revelation to anybody here that the rich and powerful get to bend the law a lot more than the poor. I did not say it is okay and neither did JT. His candour is refreshing. And we are not talking about murder but possession of a drug considerably less dangerous than alcohol by any reasonable measure. Edited April 26, 2017 by SpankyMcFarland
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 26, 2017 Author Report Posted April 26, 2017 It comes as no surprise that PM Justin Trudeau was an illegal drug user and admits to still doing so. Economics trumps Virtue.
PIK Posted April 28, 2017 Report Posted April 28, 2017 (edited) And our defence minister got caught in a ugly lie and must resign. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/sajjan-retracts-claim-he-was-architect-of-canadas-biggest-combat-operation-in-Afghanistan Edited April 28, 2017 by PIK Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
DogOnPorch Posted April 28, 2017 Report Posted April 28, 2017 He fit the suit. Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 28, 2017 Author Report Posted April 28, 2017 34 minutes ago, PIK said: And our defence minister got caught in a ugly lie and must resign. I would expect nothing less from a Justin Trudeau appointed minister. Eisenhower was only a reservist major when he architected D-Day landings all by himself ! Economics trumps Virtue.
Argus Posted April 28, 2017 Report Posted April 28, 2017 54 minutes ago, PIK said: And our defence minister got caught in a ugly lie and must resign. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/sajjan-retracts-claim-he-was-architect-of-canadas-biggest-combat-operation-in-Afghanistan You are clearly being racist for attacking a fine upstanding Sikh man because of his brown skin! 1 "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
PIK Posted April 28, 2017 Report Posted April 28, 2017 2 hours ago, Argus said: You are clearly being racist for attacking a fine upstanding Sikh man because of his brown skin! I know, but someone has to take one for the team. Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
dialamah Posted April 28, 2017 Report Posted April 28, 2017 5 hours ago, PIK said: And our defence minister got caught in a ugly lie and must resign. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/sajjan-retracts-claim-he-was-architect-of-canadas-biggest-combat-operation-in-Afghanistan What an idiot, speaking ego instead of accuracy. Didn't see anything saying he must resign, although I don't disagree with the sentiment.
blackbird Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 On 2017-04-26 at 4:29 PM, SpankyMcFarland said: Trudeau deserves credit for freely telling a story that many could have told. I hope it is no revelation to anybody here that the rich and powerful get to bend the law a lot more than the poor. I did not say it is okay and neither did JT. His candour is refreshing. And we are not talking about murder but possession of a drug considerably less dangerous than alcohol by any reasonable measure. And lawyers will be arguing in court that their clients should also get off since the PM got off.
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 58 minutes ago, blackbird said: And lawyers will be arguing in court that their clients should also get off since the PM got off. You are going to have to explain that in rather more detail than you have provided. What particular point of law are you referring to that would impress a judge? There's a real Trudeau Derangement Syndrome operating here. Everything he says has to be evil. Would you have preferred he didn't say anything at all? Time for a little honesty. How many here have families who never got away with anything?
blackbird Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: You are going to have to explain that in rather more detail than you have provided. What particular point of law are you referring to that would impress a judge? There's a real Trudeau Derangement Syndrome operating here. Everything he says has to be evil. Would you have preferred he didn't say anything at all? Time for a little honesty. How many here have families who never got away with anything? I'm not a lawyer but I think they go by precedent a lot. If Trudeau made much of getting off because his father was a Prime Minister, maybe they could argue their clients should receive the same treatment, especially since Trudeau told about it in public. Equal treatment for everyone? Equality under the law?? Edited April 29, 2017 by blackbird
Omni Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 28 minutes ago, blackbird said: I'm not a lawyer but I think they go by precedent a lot. If Trudeau made much of getting off because his father was a Prime Minister, maybe they could argue their clients should receive the same treatment, especially since Trudeau told about it in public. Equal treatment for everyone? Equality under the law?? Got off what? Was he ever charged?
Michael Hardner Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 6 hours ago, Omni said: Got off what? Was he ever charged? Aren't you splitting hairs ? Didn't PM Justin Trudeau as much as admit that his father could make charges go away ? That, to me, comprises having the investigation stopped, having the Crown not pursue the case or anything that would stop the process. Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
-TSS- Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 I would have thought the prize of the worst PM would go to Kim Campbell under whose premiership an entire party was destroyed. Or was she just unlucky to inherit a sinking ship from her predecessor Mulroney?
Wilber Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, -TSS- said: I would have thought the prize of the worst PM would go to Kim Campbell under whose premiership an entire party was destroyed. Or was she just unlucky to inherit a sinking ship from her predecessor Mulroney? It was destroyed under Mulroney, Campbell was the sacrificial goat. "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Wilber Posted April 29, 2017 Report Posted April 29, 2017 8 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Aren't you splitting hairs ? Didn't PM Justin Trudeau as much as admit that his father could make charges go away ? That, to me, comprises having the investigation stopped, having the Crown not pursue the case or anything that would stop the process. Doesn't matter, you can't claim a case that never happened as a precedent. "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
eyeball Posted April 30, 2017 Report Posted April 30, 2017 20 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Time for a little honesty. How many here have families who never got away with anything? I suppose asking that of fellow posters with similar sorts of connections is fair game so...fess up those of you whose Dad conveniently happened to be a PM. A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Recommended Posts