Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/07/2025 in all areas
-
Countries without a sense of shared identity and vision don't survive.4 points
-
Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who killed two Israeli embassy officals earlier this year was a member of the DSA. Many fellow Democratic socialists justified the murders, just like Charlie Kirk's assassination and Luigi Mangione. Mamdani was elected by a coalition of the foreign born who vote in ethnic/religious blocs and White liberal women, who've been indoctrinated with incessant anti-White guilted propaganda pushed through our institutions since they were little children. Feminism will plunge Western societies into violent destabilization and open ethnic conflict. Straight out of thr book of Genesis, and I'm an atheist.3 points
-
We don’t have the type of king that No Kings refers to, something closer to this guy: https://www.icij.org/investigations/swazi-secrets/in-eswatini-africas-last-absolute-monarchy-bucolic-landscapes-belie-a-darker-underbelly/ We have a constitutional monarchy in which the King has a ceremonial role. Also note that we didn’t make the elementary and potentially dangerous mistake of combining head of state with head of government.2 points
-
We had oranges and TVs before you guilt-ridden Canada haters invited in the third world to swamp us with goat herders who hate Jews, think western women are whores that are theirs for the taking, and have little interest in working for a living.2 points
-
You're welcome. Now go kiss some terrorist ass like a good Libbie.2 points
-
Zorhan Mamdani is a Muslim plant. Trained expressly to take advantage of current social upheaval, to aggrivate the situation further. What Americans might call failure for his term, he will call success. So will his financiers.2 points
-
2 points
-
Awww, best you could do during your meltdown? C'mon, it's almost the weekend, you must be drinking by now, surely you can be more entertaining than THAT! So you're still mad that i'm right? you'd think you'd be used to it by now1 point
-
So you're saying there aren't still large crowds of mainly Muslims marching through the streets of every city (illegally) screaming out their hatred of Jews? My real-life experience says otherwise. Are you aware that this religion, like no other, has an important and well-known clause that suggests its adherents lie to non-believers when this will advance the cause of Islam? TAQIYYA — What Is Taqiyya (And Kitman)? Is It Really Lying?1 point
-
Speak? This is an online forum, there's no voice chat. Are you hearing voices speaking to you again? How many times have we told you to take your meds!!!1 point
-
1 point
-
Bernie preaches the common sense that's used everywhere else in the world. That's why they call him an 'extreme leftist'. The 1% must convince people he is a danger to the 99%1 point
-
Well... the thread title seems to directly say that climate does stay the same. So the post was bait, meaning it was bvllshit ? Ok... this is why you sit on ignore, in sadness... Anyway, the logic is twisted: "climate change might not be bad... it used to be really really HOT and humans were fine although they didn't exist yet !" There used to be this old guy on the corner with a little organ and a monkey with a purple hat. He had a tin cup. Sometimes he said things.1 point
-
How profound. LOL LOL LOL More insults ...WOW, that was unexpected LOL They got your name, number, and everything about you. Suck it up...you are in their books LOL1 point
-
It sounds like he is responding to a personal family matter. Beyond that, speculation is inappropriate. He has served his country for over a decade. He deserves our respect and privacy.1 point
-
Indeed, that's the issue in a nutshell... digital ID is a data fusing APP. There are both benefits and pitfalls with this, here's a simple two part "dumb grunt" scenario: You go to the bank to use the ATM, it's quiet and it's raining, you park in the fire lane because it's close to the door and you're wearing good clothes. As you step out of the car you fall to the ground clutching your throat. A kind (progressively minded) lady decides not to run you over and calls 911 instead. - The camera identifies you via facial recognition, your' medical records indicate a recent anaphylactic shock event and newly acquired allergy to wasp venom. The ambulance response is prioritized and coded... epinephrin is administered by the responding EMTs immediately and you have a complete recovery. Everyone applauds. OR: - The camera identifies you via facial recognition, you're hail and hardy, dash into the bank and emerge 90 seconds later cash in hand. The system charges you with a moving violation and deducts the fine directly from your bank account. The notification you receive allows you 72 hours to make the election to plead not guilty and establish a court date. Failure to respond is deemed to be a guilty plea and the fine stands. I'm being really (REALLY) kind here BTW. Pick your poison.... You would think that greenies in Ontario would welcome automated radar speeding enforcement efforts. Imagine the fuel and emission savings if everyone (nation wide) simply drove the speed limit and it was rigidly enforced in an effort to save the planet. Nope... they're hatching out multi coloured kittens on the blacktop instead. Prove it for yourself and drive a motorcycle across Ontario. Lock in the speed limit, drive in the right hand lane and then count the tailgaters and those who pass you at warp speed. You will lose count and give up within 50 KMs. Ask me how I know that... As it stands now lots of your data is digitized but the data (from a host of sources) isn't fuzed by a single APP and accessible by clicking a meta data tag that's based on facial /gait recognition. The question boils down to do you trust the government? Based on some of the Hitler and Nazi references bandied about right here on the forum I think that opinion changes with voter preference... and no one is willing to consider the the potential see-saw ride that, in the fulness of time, is very likely to catapult them over the playground fence. In the course of my career I've had the privilege of using some cutting edge technology that the passage of time has now (very likely) rendered obsolete. Might just be me but I found it pretty impressive. By that I mean impressive to the point that I would rather be the one exploiting the data than the one being exploited by it. Then again, that's all IMO and it might just be me. I find the lack of engagement on this particular thread to be concerning as well and I think we will collectively sleep walk into this and come to regret it later.1 point
-
The tough thing about fighting commies and socialists is that their slogans sound so good. Being a conservative is like saying: "Eat healthy and get some exercise" while the Libs are saying "Take this snake-oil pill and you can continue to sit on your couch and eat like a pig while you lose weight." Conservatives say: "The snake-oil pill has been tried over and over again and has never worked for a single population, anywhere. It even kills some people", but the pat answer that makes leftists feel good is "Follow the science, and stop being racist."1 point
-
1 point
-
Thanks for sharing these "valuable insights" from the Crazy Old Man email chain letter.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Well...there goes 10,000 Ukrainian soldiers. https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/10000-ukrainian-personnel-encircled-krasnoarmeysk-kupiansk1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Leviticus doesn't mention any caveats regarding permanence, washing or kids. Who cares, they're printed marks. It's almost like you're suggesting we should take the Bible with a grain of salt. Seriously?1 point
-
You are 100% on the winning side in this debate, it will happen... and probably sooner rather than later. The sentiments you expressed above will become the standard rebuttal to any and all concerns about the road ahead and will be used to counter all references to the potential for systemic abuse. What remains to be seen is whether or not you will approve of the end result when the see-saw swings in a direction you either didn't anticipate or currently refuse to acknowledge as a possibility. In short, It leaves me with three predictions: It will happen, it will be implemented and later defended with your own (or similar) rhetoric, and you will come to see it used in ways you would never have condoned if you knew about it today. Even then my guess is that you'll defend it based on the party in power without consideration for how the next Trump will morph it into something you despise by reflecting it back in an equal and opposite manner. How could I possibly think such a thing could happen eh?1 point
-
It's a looney bin. I have both Black Dog and Luigi/Coolio/Charlie openly cyber stalking me. It's insane! And the ironic part of it is Luigi/Coolio/Charlie started a topic complaining about being cyber stalked! You can't make this up!1 point
-
Remember when the Dems supported violent rioting and the occasional mass-shooting of police officers for 4 years, and then went apoplectic on Jan 6th? "OMG, there are seditious mobs at the capitol!!!!!!" This is the same thing. Any violence that affects any left-wing politician or community leader will be seen as "THE MOST ATROCIOUS ACT OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE EVER! IT'S ABSOLUTE PROOF THAT THE GOP ARE ALL NAZIS! RACISTS! MISOGYNISTS! THIS REPRESENTS THE EVIL OF EVERY CONSERVATIVE!" There will be no mention of the killing of Kirk, or the Trump assassination attempts. Leftists will be made to believe that there is a constant stream of attacks on the left while they, themselves, are peaceful and kind-hearted.1 point
-
1 point
-
It sounds like you have a lot in common with Andy - he probably had much the same calculus going thru his mind. Yeah, it shows.1 point
-
I didn't excuse anything, jackhole. I said, and quite rightly, that a private fantasy pales in comparison to actually, literal, sanctioned political violence at scale. If private fantasy were the equivalent of action your mail order bride should be dumping your ass for all the filthy ways you fantasize about Trump dominating you. And that three-way with Putin, whooo boy.1 point
-
Why are you frightened of Poilievre?1 point
-
I addressed exactly what you said. This is your thesis: "After the election of Jay Jones, I am completely disheartened by the left." This is your conclusion: "Give me hope for them. Because all I see right now is a violent mob attempting to take over government by any means necessary." And this is your beloved shitbag president: pardoning HIS mob that LITERALLY helped him try to take over the government by any means necessary. Your woeful lamentations about political violence and attempts to "take over the government" (by being elected, I guess) will never, ever have even a smidgen of credibility until you denounce and renounce Donald J. Trump for for his literal support of avowed insurrectionists and his literal attempted coup. Save your crocodile tears. It's impossible to take you seriously on these subjects while you're supporting the worst of the worst. Full stop.1 point
-
No rebuttal for my points, then? D-1 point
-
Legendary, a synonym for mythical, meaning something everyone's heard about, but no one has seen.1 point
-
Not frightened. But I wouldn't let a hospital orderly do brain surgery on me. PeePee's incompetent.1 point
-
1 point
-
Travelling abroad is literally part of the job of the prime minister. And in this case it’s to form trade ties and investment to boost the economy I don’t see you complaining about Trump traveling abroad and I doubt you complained when Harper did. Get a grip.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
If I am on ignore, why do you reply to me almost daily? You just claim I am on ignore because you can't debate with me. You suggested that illegal immigration was necessary because no one would work for the slave labor wages. Or do you want to deny saying that? Did you not say that deporting illegals would prevent us from getting food or having our lawns down? Yes....yes you did.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Its rather remarkable when you think about it. One day a or some "scientist(s)" noted that adding elements to the atmosphere can create a general warming affect. A correlation was found in the amount of carbon we burn for energy. Ergo...carbon bad. The problem the "greenies" have is...they panic and do dumb sh1t. Plus...the primary source of energy currently happens to be...carbon burning. So...objections to any interference in the carbon business is...semi-expected. So after 20-some-odd years of fear porn and inflationary actions against carbon, it's turning out that, while it's quite plausible that carbon burning has had an affect on earth's climate, it appears evident there is no reason to...panic. Indeed the carbon sources and burning methods are much cleaner today as a result of technological advances. We can also build "mini-nuke" generators now. Instead the "greenies" dot our farmers fields and fishing fields with...windmills and mirrors. How truly pathetic. @Greenies...Your panic and subsequent lies to propagate this economic and social disaster has produced nothing of benefit. Go back to the drawing board.1 point
