Leaderboard

Its about time.

Well it's comforting to know you keep @robosmith company in the "Wrong" column. At least it's not all alone.

How do you say 'FU, we'll think about investments when he's gone' in South Korean?

Not all leftists want to see conservatives dead but just like radical Islam there is enough of them to treat it as a serious threat.

Oops? They looked Mexican, maybe? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/15/trump-foreign-workers-welcome-south-korea-arrests President Donald Trump has said foreign workers sent to the United States are “welcome” and he doesn’t want to “frighten off” investors, 10 days after hundreds of South Koreans were arrested at a work site in Georgia. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote: “I don’t want to frighten off or disincentivize investment. “I want them to bring their people of expertise for a period of time to teach and train our people how to make these very unique and complex products, as they phase out of our Country, and back into their land,” he wrote.

Wouldn't be due to her speaking Ukranian and Russian and being their most skilled in negotiations. The higher status and pay must be a demotion, eh?

75 years ago. Now if only your side could acknowledge the Palestinians are the ones who have been commiting terrorism for the last 75 years.

But Poilevre was going to put gay people in prison and ban abortions!!🫣

Speech in and of itself should not be criminalized BUT if you say violent things then go out and commit something that is a crime, such as murdering someone, this could prove your INTENT.

Our SCOTUS has said that free speech ends when you call for violence. So, calling conservatives fascists and nazis is free speech unless they expressly or strongly imply violence. I agree with SCOTUS.

Bullshit. They didn't show up at those rallies with concrete milkshakes, gas masks, trash can lids, tire irons and other home made weapons to march peacefully. They went there to be violent.

Everything you don't like isn't racist and anti-Alphabet people. Especially when it's you people that are actually the racists and anti-women.

MAGA is, above all, confusing 🤔

Drunk again?

Irgun didn't "become the IDF", it was absorbed into it. Your false claim gives the impression that it had control over the IDF, which it did not. Irgun was a fringe group whose tactics and ideology were rejected by the mainstream Zionist leadership at the time they existed. Menachem Begin was PM of Israel 30 years after Irgun ceased to exist. Instead of terrorizing Palestinian Arabs with violence he negotiated the Camp David accords, signed a peace treaty with Egypt and normalized their relations, and gave them back the Sinai peninsula, for which he won a Nobel Peace Prize for. For some reason you continually make false claims that exaggerate or lie about the terrorism committed by Zionist Jews and yet stay pretty mum on the terrorism committed by Palestinian Arabs and their allies the last 100 years. Your western guilt won't allow you to not have double-standards.

So you swapped out violence for political reasons with people "associated" with what the authors consider a 'radical' group, even if it had nothing to do with the violence. For example based on that the 4 black people who tortured the disabled boy to death spouting BLM propaganda wouldn't count because they weren't actually officially part of BLM. And i bet they didn't include the violence or damages of the george floyd riots either right? Bad science, and i see you still can't address what i posted.

You mean like the tide?

No. Your take is just stupid. What Kathy Griffin did was not a joke, and yet liberals pretended that it was. By condoning the sentiments of Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Depp, DeNiro, the cast of Hamilton, etc, the left were grooming their cultists to think of political killings as heroic.

That is possibly not covered on free speech. Brandenburg v Ohio basically said that because the head of the KKK there called black people all kinds of names and claimed they were destroying society and all this other rascist crap but didn't explicitly or implicity say to go harm them, that it was free speech. Even though people did commit acts of violence, maybe as a result of his speech, he wasn't responsible. Now, had he explicitly called for killings or directed people to do it, then it wasn't free speech. If your example could show that the speech was intended to justify violence, then it would not be free speech.

I don't know about that last one. We have to find out if he weighs more than a duck to know for sure.

New? I have been using this with you for a while now. No, your repeated lies and blaming everyone is pathetic.

He also expressed support for more spiders.... and not the little cute ones but the big assed hairy ones you find in your garage! (plus he's a witch!)

Really? And yet, they've been managing to eat for two years now. And if the IDF bombed everything they could, how come Palestinian casualties have been so low?

Actually the definition is to "rid of" and I stand by my assertion that folks who abuse the bench for political purposes should be removed. In a judicial context: To "eradicate from the bench" a judge (specifically a federal judge) implies removing them from their judicial role. This process is called impeachment, and it involves the House of Representatives bringing articles of impeachment and the Senate holding a trial and voting on conviction.

I've seen all your comments on climate, vaccines and anything else Trump wants you to believe. Waste of my time to debate things that are unequivocal, but not in your understanding of facts. Republican violence.... Have you already forgot about the made for TV J6 Insurrection event? Your boy apparently enjoyed the show with his bag of popcorn and friends. Or how about In June, two Democratic Minnesota state lawmakers were shot, one of whom died. In April, there was an arson attempt at the home of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, another Democrat. And in December 2022 and January 2023, a former Republican candidate paid people to shoot up the homes of Democratic officials in New Mexico. Also in 2022, Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, was the victim of a brutal hammer attack by a man who said he’d been looking for the then-speaker. There was also the plot to kidnap Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in 2020. Were you against any of that?

So... you lied, you lied about lying, you tried to justify your lies, and now you try to gaslight, lying again, that I just can't read.

You know what's worth mentioning? A short while back if you'll recall it was discovered that Biden might be sick and possibly dying. No violence or anything, he's old and he has health issues. And even as a few jokes started to fly around many on the right including myself and others stepped up and said hey, it's not appropriate even though we hate the guy to celebrate the fact that someone is sick and dying. So even when it's not violence or something evil the right on this board still stood up and said let's not revel in the fact that an opponent may pass on even though we hate the guy, and even though there may be nothing that can be done to prevent it. Compare that to the left who is thrilled that Charlie is dead, insist he was a bad guy who deserves it, and is out on youTube singing songs like 'we got charlie in the neck". ??? Are you imagining yourself as a man again because you're ashamed of your Womanhood? I'm not sure the point of the post

You make a great point. We should let China use Uyghurs as slaves so they'll buy soy beans and we can buy poorly made, Guicci knock off hamdbags on Temu for $10. What is a Uyghurs any way? They arent really humans, right? Just let them be slaves. You tell him. You are twice the ass h he is!

Not surprising. But it's important to note that it's going forward. I assumed (Correctly) that the US government was apologizing, somewhat behind the scenes but it came out in the media through various statements. Good news for Georgia IMO.

I don’t think alliances are taken as seriously as they were by the six European empires which got dragged down together into the abyss in 1914. These days those ropes would snap more quickly.

Truth. Fascism is what fueled Charlie Kirk's murderer. Because they are fascists.

You are trying to discredit the whistle blower. Adam Shit would like a word

I think I'll wait for the documents. Then...of course...you'll go silent or call it all a lie. Meh...simpletons...

Yes. Kirk was very relevant for today. But does his message carry 60 years from now? Kirk was fantastic, don't get me wrong. We are arguing like it's LeBron or Jordan here. All I am saying is that MLK transformed the nation while Kirk changed some voting patterns. Yes, there are similarities to these people. No, I don't think Kirk is better than or on the same level as MLK. Both are on my list of American Political Legends.

What the heck are you talking about? I'd rather be a d*ck than a p*ssy.

Western leftists seek the destruction of western civilization, whether they even realize it or not. Modern leftism contains some terrible morality and some terrible ideas, so bad that modern leftism is likely the biggest threat to western civilization that has ever existed. Not all of their ideas aren't bad though. There's destructive conservative ideas too, some that are cruel to people. However, at the end of the day it's better to be too cruel than be too weak as leftists are. Why? Because cruel people and cruel societies survive and weak people and weak societies don't. This is an iron law of nature and evolution across species and across time, you can't survive if you're unwilling to defend yourself. I'd rather survive and sometimes be called a d*ck than cease to exist.

You understand That's a lie don't you? Those figures exclude a lot of politically motivated left-wing violence and include a lot of violence where there doesn't appear to be a political motive . As always the left provides false information But here's something that is actual science. Here's a scientifically conducted Poll looking at which side is more likely to be violent for political reasons. As you can see the left is three to five times more likely to be accepting of political violence Now run away and hide like the little fembot you are

Was Charest the most bilingual politician in Canada? We certainly don’t have too many outside Quebec approaching his level of fluency. I thought he was an Anglophone when I first heard him.

Out of context it sounds pretty bad, but he's talking about "violent serial-offenders with mental health issues who refuse to take any meds and end up killing people", not just random "homeless" people, as your title suggests, you f'ing lying weasel. It's even in the screenshot from your video. Duhhhhhh. What you just said there is like saying that Obama did drone strikes on people just for having black hair. Do us all a favour: next time you feel like running your stupid mouth, just stay in your mom's basement and talk whatever pet is unfortunate enough to be stuck there with you.

A man dressing up as a woman, doesn’t actually become a woman. You don’t need a PhD to understand how absurd and ridiculous that is.

Okay, I'm tapping out.... You can't get around your political bias of the left and continue to think his name is being dragged through the mud even when data showing right extremists are far more active in political violence than the left. I'm not sure how that correlates in any way but I leave that to you.... And how do you rationalize 'The leftists are radical, period end of story' and then in the next paragraph say 'In the end, We are all Canadians or Americans or what ever, there is enough evil out there that we don't need to take it out on each other....This should be a red flag for everyone, this is how divided our nation has become....we wonder why we can not get anything done in this nation, how can we , we are so divided we Can't even have a simple conversation....' ? I can only interpret that as you're suggesting we all take on right leaning ideals so we can have a simple conversation....not likely.

Not according to the vice president of the United States.

We pay more when inflation rises, so far it hasn’t. Meanwhile, with just the threat of tariffs, oversea countries lose their entire economy. The losses don’t scale 1:1. No, what they want is open border immigration and free trade for importer. Hollowing out the American industry. That’s what the oligarchs want. You’re just a useful ideot to them.

Definitely. There should be painted crosswalks as well.

Because Charlie Kirk was a good person and a good pundit, but he does not rise to the level of MLK.

And yet, Democrat approval is around 30%. Meh...

No, it was just happy as long as there was a Jewish state. And I think he and the Jews would have been happy with the bilateral state but the Palestinians didn't want that. So instead of getting along with the Jews they kept starting and losing wars one after another so they had nothing left I'm sure even Einstein couldn't have figured out why they were that messed up as a people why they want their children dead and their homes and families destroyed, but that's what they want. Who are the Israelis to say no? But you're lying as always. This is what he had to say: “Zionist cause is very close to my heart…. I am very confident of the happy development of the Jewish colony and am glad that there should be a tiny speck on this earth in which the members of our tribe should not be aliens,” -Einstein

I guess you also don't give a shit about foreign investment. A Korean company is investing in US manufacturing. Is it shocking they would want people from head office to oversee the plant's construction. I remember when I worked for a company with a US parent company, Americans were at the office all the time overseeing operations.