Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/25/2025 in all areas
-
Left4rds sure are all over the map when it comes to the age when people have achieved the requisite amount of knowledge and wisdom to make informed decisions.... "8-yr-olds possess the wisdom to decide on sex change procedures that will render them incapable of procreating!" "20-yr-old university students lack the wisdom to understand how loans work!!!" "Adults should be forced to take dangerous injections that they don't need, because they are too stupid to weigh the risks themselves and bodily autonomy isn't really a thing, but a 17-yr-old can abort a healthy baby 2 weeks before its due date because bodily autonomy is the most important human right we have!!!" "16-yr-olds should be allowed to vote, because tik-tok gives them all the information they need!!!" I'm 100% certain that anyone who votes leftard should just be stripped of their rights to make any decisions for themselves and their children should be taken away.3 points
-
2 points
-
This is exactly what it is. K-12 education is dominated by left wing educators influencing children and they are historically ignorant of the real world because they are children. Their entire life is controlled and provided for by adults. This is why the left wants children to vote, for the same reason war lords in Africa have children in their armies and China had children ratting out political dissidents to be killed. They are easily influenced, immature, and don't know much about how the real world works yet. In otherwords, they are the ideal leftist voters.2 points
-
Whatever it takes to stabilize that desert.2 points
-
War is entirely different than a planned mass civilian killing2 points
-
It does boggle the mind And these are the people that frequently scream follow the science. The science is pretty overwhelming and if they had taken even 2 seconds to look into it they would have found numerous studies that point very strongly to the age of maturity being about 18 when it comes to mental development. Like this one Cognitive Maturity: 18 is the Threshold of Cognitive Adulthood - Neuroscience News Cognitive maturity measures their executive function skills. That's exactly what we're talking about here. And if they cared about the subject and didn't care more about trying to find a way to exploit kids to vote for their side while they're in school where teachers can get their hands on them then they would have found this report and dozens of others like it in 2 seconds and realize they were wrong. But of course the science doesn't matter to them when it doesn't support them. And it's hard to get your head around the level of hypocrisy these people have2 points
-
2 points
-
He should be dumped at the next convention. Never before has a leader blown such a lead in the polls. Never before has a leader listened and stuck with such pitiful out of date and shallow advice. Nor has one gone out of his way to or inadvertently offended so many groups of people.2 points
-
Not even the same questions , my poll was what voters intentions were if we had another election....Yours was approval rating....not the same issue..I voted for conservatives , but i do agree with the direction the country is headed in right now...does not mean i would change my vote....and in that regards both parties have lost ground...2 points
-
Mark Carney has just announced that Canada will reach it's 2% of GDP spending on the military by March. He also pointed out that this is not due to NATO pressure, it is due on the fact that the USA is no longer a dependable military ally. BTW 2/3 of Canadians have said F Off to the Orange Overlord's Golden Dome fever dream. Might have to do with we heard that song before. that it is a ridiculous price being asked of us, or the fact that 40 years later we still remember that putting weapons in space is a BAD idea.1 point
-
The sun isn't over the yardarm yet. The sun isn't over the yardarm yet.1 point
-
Well someone sure pointed out they got their definition of Sainthood from the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition rather than the Bible.1 point
-
This is not a partisan opinion. There's a debate going on about what damage was caused. https://www.coastreporter.net/politics/trump-grapples-for-upper-hand-in-debate-over-damage-caused-by-us-strikes-on-iran-10860583 Sure. Again back to the 2003 scenario where you're being pulled into a quagmire that only leads to war.1 point
-
Maybe that's what they want you to think. The truth is, we don't know. Any definitive stance without solid evidence is only conjecture. Apparently both Iran and Israel were running low on missiles and didn't have the resources to continue on like that. Israel was paying a cost for this war too.1 point
-
Has it? There's no independent verification. Because Trump can't keep his mouth and/or social media feed shut, I'm sure Iran made sure to move important items away from these sites that Israel had no ability to attack effectively. Apparently intel reports say that this only delayed their program. Trump obviously creates his own reality so he's fine with this being a huge success and moving on. But Iran can now keep making those Nukes in secret.1 point
-
They were co-operating with the agreement signed with Obama.1 point
-
I would expect them to be more insular. Hope everyone forgets about them, so they can achieve their goal. Does saying "Death to Israel" warrant a war? And some would say Zionism is religious zealotry as well.1 point
-
Oink-oink to you, miss piggy. 🤣🤣🤣1 point
-
Nice try and avoidance, comrade Stalin. You know the question, now answer it, you commie little creep. LOL. 👎1 point
-
"We acknowledge we live on X traditional territory. We're not going to leave of course, but it makes us feel better to say these things. while not having to actually do anything. "1 point
-
They don’t want to hear this, just like they didn’t want to hear it when UN inspectors said Saddam didn’t have WMD’s. A few hundred thousand dead Iraqis and a smashed country later, guess what. The UN inspectors were right.1 point
-
Denied aid to disaster victims because they liked trump. Using power and influence and money for other political pursuits. I mean seriously - letting disaster victims suffer and possibly die because they like trump? The woman should be in jail for ordering her people to do that, never mind 'fired'. Etc etc. The MOMENT that happens the org has to be shut down. It's been compromised. It's a shame, i'm sure it did do some really good work. Cautionary tale to other gov't orgs i'd say.1 point
-
Nobody should comment on families...or family that has passed on.1 point
-
The entire Middleeast hates the idea of Israel. And that's likely only escalated seeing what they've done to civilians in Gaza. It doesn't mean that Iran would nuke Israel. But it sure would mean that Israel would think twice about attacking Iran.1 point
-
How are you this dishonest? Trump is not lying when he is relying on the intelligence he has. There have been many different assessements of the damage and quite frankly, unless someone is standing in the crater of one of those holes with a camera, none of them are perfectly accurate. Also, Gabbard was talking about an actual weapon, not the enriched uranium to make one. This is a stupid gotcha game that most people are too ignorant to understand or are dishonest about. Actually building a nuclear weapon is the easy part, building an ballasitc missile is more complicated (but Iran has those already, clearly, they launch them at Israel), it is the enrichment of uranium that takes time and massive amounts of centrifuges to complete. Iran has clearly been doing the latter, and clearly has the missiles, so once they have weapons grade uranium, making the bomb is the easy part. Iran is not interested in MAD in the traditional sense, they clearly hate Israel and chant death to Israel. Iran was already not being transparent... hence the mountain bunker to hide and protect their program.1 point
-
To be honest Gato, Drs make decisions like that all the time. They can't just do everything in their power, every time: they have to pick their spots to help the highest number of people they can with the amount of resources they have. The amount of time, energy and money that they will invest in keeping someone alive is based on availability of several different resources (medicine, Drs, nurses, beds, general funding, etc), odds of success, prognosis, other urgent needs at the same time, etc, etc, etc. If you're Bill Gates, you'll pay for what you need yourself, but hospitals won't pump $3M worth of resources into keeping a 79-yr-old car accident victim alive when they could just die of a heart attack the next day. Sure, maybe a specific amount of medicine will extend one person's life a few weeks, but the key here is that person's condition was still deteriorating even with that medicine. Maybe that same amount of medicine could go ten times further with 5 other children, or even give 2 kids a shot at a full recovery. And it sucks to be the person who has to make that determination, and then live with it. But Drs do it all the time. All the time.1 point
-
Yes, because we all know bombing a country is the best way to win hearts and minds. Iran's best course of action would be to develop nuclear weapons. North Korea has them and every leaves them alone. Trump denying his own intelligence reports is hilarious. This strike literally was just for show. Iran can continue to develop nuclear weapons without any oversight now. The word of Trump means nothing.1 point
-
1 point
-
Don't get too excited there, comrade. It looks like we're going to have to hit them harder.1 point
-
No. "adults" go to the bathroom, eat at McDonalds, and do a million things... that doesn't make anything and everything thus an "adult" activity. Should I make a Venn diagram for you? You are still avoiding the point anyhow, you have yet to make any kind of argument here. All you have done is list of other things adults do.1 point
-
It's like robo is hoping for a nuclear war, just so he can pin that on Trump. Dweebles has sunk to the lowest form of human. An enemy of the entire race.1 point
-
You are an amusing little troll.1 point
-
1 point
-
There's a list of things they can't do (by regulation) and the reason behind it is because they are deemed to lack a sufficient level of maturity at the age of 16. So yes.... it certainly is logical to examine / discuss whether that list and the individual items on it are still valid or not before modifying one or more of them. You're essentially arguing that it's now OK to eliminate one of those restrictions and your only response to people who question your logic is to accuse them of being illogical. Read this a couple of times and then take a nap... once refreshed you may be able to discern who the illogical one is:1 point
-
Strongly disagree, for many reasons. In a single day, on a beach in Dieppe in Aug 1942, some 900 Canadians were killed.1 point
-
But......as in your original assertion still more expensive than fossil fuels. Did you forget? Try upping the Adderall.1 point
-
There were 14 holes at Fordo. But your balls will be glowing when you get done. And your golf balls too.1 point
-
Sorry kiddo, do the math. For the expenses an older person has (mostly food and the like) inflation which the libs caused outpaced it. Sucks to be you Most of whom had coverage already, and there have been all kinds of problems. Each province had plans in place, and it even says right on the gov't website that if they qualify provincially no problem they can still sign up federally, which means the feds have been stacking the numbers. Most of those people already had coverage. Not to mention the other issues Why dentists are not signing up for the Canadian Dental Care Plan - CCPA Why Are Dentists Frustrated About the Canadian Federal Dental Plan? - Savanna Dental More dental care, more problems with the Canada Dental Care Plan: expert | Benefits and Pensions Monitor And for this "sub optimal" plan as one person puts it we spent 4.4 billion each and every year, which when you do the math is enough to buy PRIVATE COVERAGE FOR FULL MEDICAL DENTAL FOR EVERY ADULT IN CANADA who doesn't already have it through work. It would have covered their Pharmacy tab, the dental, eyewear etc But you stuck your head so far up your ass you can't even see what should have been obvious from day one. This is a horrible deal that is horribly expensive and most of the people it helps we're already being helped. Explain to me how this is anything but a failure If it's so useless why bother giving it at all. And all we have is old gear, we don't have any new gear. And considering he was giving armored fighting vehicles that were coming off of the assembly line it kind of is hard to believe that it's all old gear Sure, and next week there will be more short-term ones and that will cover the same issues that the 148 used to. The first nations have spoken out about this at length and they're not happy. You remember when two of them went to a Trudeau fundraiser to raise this issue and he told them thank you for your donation and kick them out? So you're saying the definition didn't change, it's just that the definition changed. 🙄🙄🙄 You have your head so far up Trudeau's ass that you can't see that the man was a freaking disaster from day one and all of these supposed programs have been total failures. And now we're stuck with a debt that is so high that the children being born today will still have a lower quality of life than they should have as a result of it in their adulthood. Banks are estimating that we are going to underperform badly for 40 years or more as a result of our circumstances. And that's if we start doing things right now. Which we aren't because carney is screwing up already and won't deliver on what he's promised And you don't give a shit if an entire generation of Canadians has to suffer as long as you get to support your precious little liberals and lie about what they've achieved1 point
-
CdnFox has a point, but the lack of symmetry in how much/little attention people pay isn't so easy to explain as that. Why did Canadian media pay more attention to the Boston Marathon bombing then the Quebec mosque shooting? People on the left will simply say that it's racism. They are wrong also. The problem is rather unfathomable, however you can frame the question very succinctly as a great Canadian named Harold Innis did: "Why do we attend to the things we attend to?" Maybe AI will figure it out.1 point
-
Wow....your perversion is oozing out of every pore and out your keyboard. Only a disrespectful pig would even think anyone would lie about the death of a parent and it is clear, that is what you are. Sad sad sad to be you1 point
-
Arrows down is his passive aggressive way of crying. He thinks we care In his mind is a big thing, but the rest of us just recognize it as his little cry for help I do it back because it pisses him off Hey Ex, how's you're mom? Still hooking to try to put you through therapy?1 point
-
Awww, not your comrade anymore?? I am so sad. Remind me...what was your question? Oh an din case you forgot....PP lost the election and his seat and the liberals won and so did Carney Suck on that one little man1 point
-
1 point
-
This is true but it's a little too late to be worrying about it now. The government and police screw up so basically made it impossible to pursue any charges1 point
-
Because it is Highly Questionable to allow those who have violated the law to elect the lawmakers It's a little like putting rapists in charge of a woman's abuse shelter1 point
-
Shitty all the way around for this child and family, but the government hasn't killed the child. The drug is considered no longer effective for her current situation. To blame this on the BC government as a disregard for human rights is only reading headlines, and disregarding the unfortunate facts.1 point
-
So what would be the chances of her getting this drug in the US without insurance that would cover it and who would provide that insurance?1 point
-
You don't understand the difference between a province and a country do you. The provincial government (BC) denied the funding.....NOT the federal government (Canada) government. Google what a province is.... Not sure how bad #6 is, but the US is ranked #59 so maybe you have some insight into how pitiful that is .... U.S. Added to Global Human Rights Watchlist Over Declining Civil Liberties https://time.com/7266334/us-human-rights-watchlist-civil-liberties/1 point
-
Wow, celebrating the elimination of slavery in your country is now pandering to black people. Sure says something about you. The US must be the only developed country in the world that doesn't have any minimum mandated annual vacation and now you cheer when Trump wants to get rid of stats as well. Talk about brainwashed.1 point
-
I think the indigenous leadership has to help it's people to become contributing remembers of Canadian society instead of a burden to all Canadian taxpayers. The problem with the indigenous leadership is the hundreds of thousands of dollars they receive every year for being "leaders". They would lose that. Their lifestyles would take a shitkicking and they do not want that. Our Canadian society has become too "soft", "kind" "gentle" and would never force the reality hammer to hit them on the head and we will continue to pay them for doing nothing for themselves, let alone Canadian society. You are generally right, the Americans said, shit or get off the pot because they are not filing the indigenous bank accounts. I will not get started on Quebec LOL1 point