Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/20/2025 in all areas

  1. The bottom line is that the CBC and MSM are government-funded organizations that ask softball questions because they dare not bite the hand that feeds them. Canada is ideologically captured by parties that believe heavily in intervening in the free market, including the market of ideas. The CBC journalists criticizing Rebel News basically said speech should be compelled. That’s a threat to free speech and freedom of the press. The questions you ask determine the range of possible answers. Many if not most Canadians would indeed like to know why the government ignored the burning down of around 200 churches on the basis of an unproven assumption of mass graves, a story that the CBC irresponsibly disseminated.
    5 points
  2. Happy Easter everyone. I sit here in reflection today. On this Easter weekend, one more kid is leaving our nest. They're all adults now. Soon "Wifey-Baby" and I will be alone in our family home. I watch them today and find I'm content. The kids are respectful, honorable, and we've given them a good head start. Yes..."Wifey-Baby" and I have raised our family well. They will be producers...not drains. And they will be successful. So I will thank the Gawd of the living. Not for taking an active part in my life to date...but simply for giving us the gift of creation
    4 points
  3. Happy Easter to all our American friends.
    3 points
  4. CBC pretended that the Freedom convoy was a sea of swastikas and confederate flags and you parroted their nonsense here Mikey 😉 Don't talk about "beyond the pale" here you silly little serial propaganda victim.
    3 points
  5. He has risen!
    3 points
  6. Yeah, it's a double-edged sword. Some reporters are worse than others. One thing I have to give Rebel over some of the less sensationalist indie media is the fact that they are able to get people on the ground to cover some of these stories. It's more than a podcast. They are always out on the street. They cover international stories. Their reporters have been attacked. I remember one of them having urine thrown at her. Alexa Lavoie was pepper sprayed with convoy protestors. They had people going out and filming at Roxham Road years before I ever heard mention of it on mainstream TV or in parliament. I am really grateful for how they have stood by people facing draconian charges. Overall I really appreciate what Ezra has done. So much. I think Canada is lucky to have Ezra and those rebel reporters. Nobody else is in Canada is willing to do what they do.
    2 points
  7. Rebel makes no pretense about being unbiased. It's no secret sometimes they are sensational. While I don't agree with the arrests on Menzies, he does go a little overboard in some situations. That said, since Rebel has existed, I have seen many instances where they have reported on something that the regular media ignores, until months or even years later when they are forced to do so. No one who watches only mainstream media knew about Roxham road until years after Rebel was reporting about it.
    2 points
  8. This is it exactly. The Independent Media is an absolutely critical part of thriving democracy. They will frequently ask questions that the mainstream media sources will not and over the years that has led to some rather startling revelations. If they only ask questions and nobody wants to hear then they won't stay in business. and they won't stay in business echoing what the mainstream is asking. That means the mainstream and others are going to dislike them when they outshine them but that's the way life goes.
    2 points
  9. Michael this has been explained to you so many times. The problem isn't that Rosemary Barton is bias. The problem is that Rosemary Barton is bias on the public dollar. If Rosemary wants to start her own news agency and be as biased as she wants and collect no federal money at all then fine. Let her go to town and do whatever she wants. But while she's collecting public money but only representing a small portion of the people in her news because of her bias then there's a problem. Do you finally understand the simple concept or do I need to find a six year old who can explain it to you in terms you'll understand?
    2 points
  10. So the court has decided that they are legitimate journalists. They won that case, they are in fact legitimate journalists whether you like it or not So if polly have wins and decides that the Toronto Star, CBC, ottawa citizen etc are fake news just because he's decided that's the case and won't allow them to attend any media events, you're fine with that right? I mean after all politicians are the ones who get to decide who is and isn't media right? You are such an anti-democracy nut job
    2 points
  11. I remember the same day CBC reported that the convoy was responsible for arson, Rebel News made a simple call to the RCMP and verified that it was false and they did not suspect the convoy was involved. You would think so called qualified journalists on the govt dime could have done that themselves. It's great we have media out there like Rebel. Not to mention all the help they have given by providing lawyers to people who were unfairly charged or fined during the covid insanity.
    2 points
  12. Exactly. People who think this is normal aren't being honest. The line of thinking is: objectivity is impossible so why even try ? Instead we'll openly and aggressively push one candidate and tell everyone the others are the same. Shameful behaviour and we should do our best to ignore it.
    2 points
  13. They do when they're asked by legitimate journalists. Why do Rebel News billboard trucks need political messages on them? Got any pics of CBC trucks with Fùck Poilievre bumper stickers on them?
    2 points
  14. Treebeard is starting to remind me of that guy who says Americans aren't proud enough to call themselves UnitedStatesians.
    2 points
  15. There's no doubt. And it's a disaster of a budget that will inevitably create massive inflation. This from my so-called "Economist" . $65 billion dollars in the first year alone This one might just do him in
    2 points
  16. This. I'm not sure why anyone would consider the US for their tourism dollars. I saw on Twitter that California has started a campaign to get Canadian tourism dollars. That's fine and good, but ICE can still get you in California. No one in the free world should support the US tourism industry.
    2 points
  17. The US is now a country where you can be grabbed by ICE and shipped off to an El Salvador prison with zero due process. Regardless of how unlikely, why take the risk if you don't have to.
    2 points
  18. OMG you used a Marxist term, you're going to hear how that proves you're a communist by people who think saying that means they've 'won' the debate. It's a truth that shows the rise of the Illiterati the many who've never darkened the doorway of a public library and rely on Facebook and Rebel/Fox news for information. The ones who found the card catalogue and Dewey decimal system "just too hard" but consider themselves computer literate because they can post, but are still hunting for that ANY key....
    1 point
  19. If you're of retirement age you you didn't even use them until you were in or out of high school. The world must have been sheer hell before that. And those flat wooden spoons in the waxed cardboard ice cream containers, they scraped along your tongue! Finding strips of wax in our quarts of milk, paper grocery bags that disintegrated in the rain! Where would we be without our plastic shit that we could dig up and reuse 200 years from now? It's not about waste disposals and the environment, it's all conspiracy about 'control' and woke virtue signalling... bring back our freedumb to dump used motor oil in the alley, shit in the well and chuck no-deposit bottles out the window on the freeway. FFS it's sickening that a once legitimate Conservative Party has sunk to the level of courting dotards that promote single use plastics in 2025.
    1 point
  20. CBC are political advocates as well. 100% they are. Moreover, they're liars as well. I would have far more patience for the CBC if they were honest about the fact that they are LPOC advocates because that would leave the viewer with the knowledge that what they just heard was slanted. For them to take the high-handed approach of saying "WE'RE THE JOURNALISTS HERE! THEY'RE ACTIVISTS!!!!", while CBC is actually lying and spinning to beat the band is just sickening. It's like watching Marion Jones call another athlete a steroid user while pretending that she was not.
    1 point
  21. Of course I do if they show up in trucks with billboards wearing their registered political advocates hats.
    1 point
  22. There are millions of Americans suffering from no known psychiatric disorder who seem to take pleasure in damaging their own country.
    1 point
  23. Because to them, that was not a loaded question. It's further proof to them that Pierre is somehow Trumpian. By calmly eating an apple and not agreeing with the premise of the question and explaining why, he is being aggressive to the media. Don't you see that? Trump is orange man and Poilievre is apple man. They are counterparts.
    1 point
  24. So if Carney hadn’t produced one until the eve of Election Day you’d have advised PP not to produce one at all? Who is the Oppostion here, trying to get itself known and self-defined?
    1 point
  25. Mikey and eyeball are just like the LPOC: They ignore questions when the answers will make them look bad, they just want to have a side-conversation that's centred around their false narratives "The CBC is super-duper legitimate, and independent news orgs are all just liars, so they should never be allowed to ask Trudeau, Carney and Singh questions." Carney's a total liar, and we know that for a fact because he has already been caught telling FOUR serious whoppers in just the last couple of months. Why would it matter if a liar asked another liar a question? The resulting answer is gonna be a lie regardless of who asks it... What difference does it make if a liar asks anyone a question? That doesn't mean that it has to be answered with a lie... The CBC and other legacy media outlets in Canada are famous for framing accusations as questions, such as in the famous apple-munching interview... Reporter: "People say that you're a..." Poilievre: "Who's 'they'?" ^^That^^ is a masterclass in: "How does a 'reporter' insert snuck premises into questions?", and also "How to hoist a fake news snake on his own petard when he's trying to insert snuck premises into questions". How can lefties sit here and act like that was an actual interview, by a legitimate reporter, and not just some biased reporter trying to get an awesome soundbite for Team Trudeau (now Team Carney)? How can lefties pretend that Rebel News could be any less legitimate than that guy? How can lefties pretend that Singh has a right to run for election in this country while refusing to answer legitimate questions that Canadians want an answer to? Our government accused Canadians of a genocide against children, and it turned out that they were passing off tree roots as dead toddlers. Why has CBC never asked that question? Why did Rosemary Barton lie about that?
    1 point
  26. Because you "know" what he was talking about? LMAO YOU KNOW CRAP. Trump is DEFYING the SCOTUS because there is NO ATTEMPT to bring Garcia back to face due process..
    1 point
  27. No, no. PP carping about Carney’s platform without having one of his own looks amateurish. Not serious. All opposition parties have to do this first. Let Carney copy if he wants and mock him for it. Releasing it after the debate is ridiculous. It should have been out weeks ago when it could have framed what the election was about.
    1 point
  28. More balderdash. It's bad grammar and incorrect to use the words "journalism" and "CBC" as references to each other in the same sentence. Then you further sully the context by using the phrase "real journalists".
    1 point
  29. It's true, if anything trump has brought us together. The liberals were the ones that tore us apart. And after that budget announcement I think they realize that the liberals haven't changed a bit
    1 point
  30. More to it than that. Loaded questions beyond the pale, parking a truck out front as per eyeball's cite above, and aggressively taking up question time from the real journalists.
    1 point
  31. Oscar it really debate if the other side is clueless?
    1 point
  32. The anomaly itself is not a sex. The same way an M and M that comes out with a mixture of green and red coloring and is slighty misshapen is not a new variety of M and M.
    1 point
  33. I voted yesterday and I brought 2 friends with me who have never voted before. But I've been trying to educate them on politics for months now. We all voted Conservative. Then we went for breakfast. We went as soon as the polling station opened and there was no line up, but there was lots of people already there. I had an interesting discussion with my neighbour on Friday night. (I had a little bonfire in the backyard with friends.) My neighbour, Phil, is about 80 and he has NDP signs on his lawn. He said he has voted Liberal in the past (and sometimes NDP) but he won't vote Lib this time because he feels this gov't totally forgot about and ignored the West for the last 10 years. Phil used to be a nurse and he said the pandemic restrictions went on far too long, long after we knew it was only the very elderly and the very ill who were at any risk. He said it didn't surprise him when the convoy happened because the Liberals were catering to the laptop class for far longer than necessary. The laptop class was able to "stay home, stay safe" while the people they looked down on, the peons, delivered Skip The Dishes to them and delivered groceries. He describes the laptop class as mostly Ontario, while the West has the farmers, the oilfield workers, the ones working to keep the country running and the Liberal gov't shat on all those people. I asked him how we can get Ontarians to care about the rest of Canada and he said they never will. They never have. He said the only thing we can do is turn off the equalization taps. Stop giving the laptop class the money that the real workers in Canada are forced to fork over. Even though we are voting differently, I agree with Phil on these things.
    1 point
  34. And exactly how is Trump a dictator? Like all other Libbie talking points, this dictator BS is nothing more than sh1t flung at the wall. Nothing Trump has done is outside the purview of the POTUS. Nothing.
    1 point
  35. Liberal definition of lie is an opinion or fact that they don't like. Rule #5.
    1 point
  36. More despicable behavior that leftists will justify. The family of Austin Metcalf was swatted on Thursday night. https://www.foxnews.com/us/slain-texas-teen-austin-metcalf-home-swatted-hours-after-tense-press-conference-showdown
    1 point
  37. Dude I had to explain what a subpoena was to you. And you've been wrong on every single case that's gone to court. I don't know that I would be drawing any attention to your legal credentials
    1 point
  38. Yeah that was pretty bad. Whether you like it or not rebel news has been recognized as a legitimate news source it has won the right to attend I did everything about board and did nothing that anyone else couldn't have done. The efforts of the Legacy Media and shamefully the NDP are absolutely horrible in a free society. To be blunt, all of the things that Jaggers said about rebel media I have said about the CBC. But I would never say that they should be denied access to a media event. This was just ultra scummy and it was disappointing to see to say the least. Rebel media fought hard, they earned their right, they got to the front of the line, they asked their questions. Anybody could have done that, they did it, this is ridiculous
    1 point
  39. The glues and other toxins in paper straws end up inside your stomach, herbie. Everything that they say is good for you now is what's found to cause cancer ten years from now. By the time you get hair on your earthworm, you'll know.
    1 point
  40. That took him by surprise. And he had a hard time answering the follow-up. Didn't rehearse for such question.
    1 point
  41. No, that's exactly what it is to most people, especially on here.
    1 point
  42. Nobody won the debate. Or did you not watch it?
    1 point
  43. By globalism do you mean trade between countries? How is that Marxist for crying out loud? Does anyone learn what Marxism really is any more beyond a slogan that illiterates shout at those they don’t like?
    1 point
  44. Who here is ready and willing to work in one of these allegedly returning factories? The whole story is nonsense.
    1 point
  45. Her job against Trump was pretty good, after all she had lots of practice. Unfortunately practice does not always mean perfect. You Democrat's pulled down the statue of limitations, now you want to rebuild it.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...