Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/29/2025 in all areas
-
4 points
-
Borrowing from the playbook of yet another successful dictator, Trump is attempting to purge history, art and science of ideas he doesn't like. We've seen it at NIH, we've seen it at the Kennedy center, and now it's coming for the Smithsonian. Politico (and everywhere else) Vice President JD Vance has a new job: erasing what the White House considers “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian, a task that allows him to cast aside the progressive ideas he has decried since long before he was elected to public office. The vice president, who sits on the museum network’s board, has been tasked with slashing funding for exhibits or programs that promote “ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy,” including those that recognize trans people, “degrade shared American values,” or “divide Americans based on race,” according to an executive order President Donald Trump signed behind closed doors on Thursday. I have no doubt that this aggressive, ham-handed attempt to use political office to dictate culture will be celebrated by so-called conservatives (who clearly aren't), but it should be recognized for the sinister, cynical scheme that it is.3 points
-
Meanwhile... Canadians have better health outcomes than Americans, with longer life expectancies, lower infant mortality rates and of course lower costs.2 points
-
Sinister? Who let men into women's bathrooms and sports? Pfft...Sinister...2 points
-
Once again... this is the stupidity I already pointed out. It is eliminating coal power in Canada... just to ship coal to China to be burned there instead. If the point is to help global CO2 emissions and combat climate change, you have done nothing. A consumer carbon tax doesn't do anything except price your own country out of manufacturing or other important things like fertilizer production to grow your crops. Instead of making it in Canada, you clowns will just import it from China. You still need to grow food, you still need fertilizer, making it so costly that you drive the business overseas has accomplished nothing.2 points
-
Unconfirmed, but I suspect they started putting crystal meth in our water supply around 2020.2 points
-
The people who called the Afghanistan withdrawal "the most successful military withdrawal ever" started a thread to complain about the WH's war effort all of a sudden... Weird2 points
-
Little known fact: "eyeball" is the ancient Algonquin word for "retarded crap that they said on CBC."2 points
-
And thank God for that. Of course, America hating psychopaths like robomarx and the rest of that cult are losing their shit, but nobody really cares what they think.1 point
-
Stuff is getting real now folks. The left thought they were cute with their banana republic b.s. Now that table is turned and they are in the cross hairs. Good luck.1 point
-
I think he's more like a team owner who knows he invested in a lemon but he still has to try and sell it.1 point
-
It's the Can'tservative mentality of you can't do two things at the same time. Either ship all trades offshore OR boost jobs here. More Candians building more products to ship somewhere else is unimaginable....1 point
-
So a 4% carbon tax will stop climate change sometime in the amorphous future Why not have a 100% tax and stop the climate by next Tuesday?1 point
-
"akin to norms" does not mean legal. That much is overstand.1 point
-
Carney’s position is a response to Trump. It can’t be considered in isolation.1 point
-
True story. Of course, robomarx hates that shit. He doesn't give a f*ck about immigration law. He just wants illegal aliens roaming free, dropping anchor babbies, and browning a town near you.1 point
-
1 point
-
Well robo...right now I'm having hot boneless goat roti so...I survive just fine. But thanks for caring.1 point
-
Which part of "not" did you "not" understand1 point
-
Still not legally binding. Which means squat, consideration does not mean legal1 point
-
the way to do that is to invest more in 3D printers and robots, the problem with Canadian companies is that they refuse to invest in technology, so again, forcing them out of that comfort zone is creative destruction1 point
-
No, there's just the desire for human decency. You can still be as indecent as you like.1 point
-
And you’re basing that on what an avowed enemy of our country says? Dear me. Are you the kind of fan who can’t criticize his own team when they are screwing up? Do you really think PP has run a fantastic campaign so far? What mark out of ten do you think his team deserves? He’s a career politician with a devoted, uncritical base who has been preparing for this moment all his life up against an elderly, inexperienced candidate of an unpopular incumbent party. All he has to do is convince a handful of centrists that he’s trustworthy on Trump and he’s in majority territory. The contest is still his to lose if he can listen to what people on his side of the fence are saying and modify his pitch.1 point
-
Which like much from the UN has no clout. Aspirational, Not Binding: The UDHR was adopted by the UN General Assembly as a resolution, not a treaty, meaning it doesn't create legally enforceable obligations for member states. Therefore they can ask but it is not legally binding.1 point
-
Gee... what did I already say? "Sure... anyone can claim asylum" Also, the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" is not binding law.1 point
-
1 point
-
The amount of fentanyl heading south is virtually zero, period. The amount is trivial1 point
-
^MAKE BIGOTRY GREAT AGAIN 🤮 You were born 100 years too late. How do you even survive in the modern world? LMAO1 point
-
The CBC is ahead in the polls too. Why is Poilievre chasing such an unpopular policy? Is it to appease the base? Did anyone mention to him that he will need more than his base to win? Especially at a time when Canada’s sovereignty is under attack, it’s not good policy to abolish a Canadian institution. https://www.mediatechdemocracy.com/all-work/canadianinformationecosystem-edzep-gd874 The vast majority (78%) of Canadians would like to see the CBC/Radio-Canada continue if it addresses its major criticisms. Canadians are not aligned on what their major criticisms are of the CBC/Radio-Canada. We asked whether they agreed or disagreed with such criticisms as “it is irrelevant,” “it is too ‘woke,’” or it “doesn’t speak to me or my interests." When asked what they would do with CBC/Radio-Canada’s budget, 57% of respondents would either increase (24%) or maintain (33%) funding. Conservative supporters are the least aligned when it comes to funding, but more prefer to increase/maintain funding (47%) than reduce/eliminate (40%). When asked whether a large public service media organization like the CBC/Radio-Canada is still essential or relevant to Canadians in the digital age, given the rise of social media — 79% of respondents said it was either equally important or more important than before.1 point
-
There's nothing wrong with purging regressivism from the country's institutions. Nobody who's worth a damn believes for one second that there's anything progressive about your f*cked up belief system.1 point
-
1 point
-
This crap is so tiresome and dishonest. These clowns spent the last 4 years trying to push LGBTQ/DEI madness into anything and everything they could. Now Trump is undoing it and they are crying about Trump being some kind of authoritarian trying to erase history. Sigh...1 point
-
You versus pretty much the entire weight of climate science. Citing ppm on its own, without relating it to anything else is an example of wrongheaded thinking. Tiny amounts of some things can have huge effects. Plutonium for example. In this case, the relationship between CO2 and the greenhouse effect is causative. You can show this in a lab, that CO2 in the atmosphere increases warming. CO2 is increased by human activity, and we can measure the this is happening to a large degree.1 point
-
Yes but weren't those documents only 'classified'? Like its' not like they were "corvette level classified" and stored with his car or the like....1 point
-
You do know in order for something to be classified it actually has to be marked classified a reporter can not just deem it classified. So until you can show me the classified markings stfu.1 point
-
here is something funny, take a look at the name of the bus....and it was by a one of carneys new members...1 point
-
They're drowned out by your Liberal media-funded screeching on every channel - "We can tax Canadians into oblivion to save the planet!" And ding-dongs like you believe every word of it.1 point
-
1 point
-
I know he's wrong. I'll try to find it but there has been a couple of times on this planet when CO2 level rose dramatically and there was zero chance of MAN being the culprit. Climate alarmists don't look at the entire history of the planet. They look at one tiny window - thus, the hysteria.1 point
-
That's not what Polievre has said. He's actually explained how the Conservatives plan to cut GLOBAL emissions in multiple interviews. That's the difference. Libs claim that taxing Canadians will cut Canada's emissions - it hasn't. But they don't talk about how Canada can cut GLOBAL emissions. Is this a GLOBAL problem or is it a Canada problem? Conservatives are thinking bigger than Libs on this one.1 point
-
1 point
-
Maybe Carney simply told him to shut his stupid mouth and listen for a change. Bullies usually do get polite when they know they've been beaten.1 point
-
but the only imperative for fighter planes is NORAD, with the Americans become hostiles, that can be put on the back burner, spend the money on the army instead, new artillery & ground based air defence, new IFVs, UAVs, UGVs replace all the soldier equipment, small arms, then raise the pay across the board, build new PMQ's in terms of the air force, prioritize the Griffon replacement before fighter planes, plus buy ammo, from 5.56mm all the way to 155mm, you can't have too much,1 point
-
It has become a fight fire with MORE fire, unfortunately.1 point
-
Cultists like hodad and beaverfever are desperate for a political win. Hell, they've already proven that they're more than willing to abandon their climate bullshit to destroy more Tesla cars and dealerships.1 point
-
I already made the relevant point... lets go back to the beginning: Oh, looks like you have a short memory. Here you go:1 point
-
99.9% headed north. As are the refugees. Stop gobbling up Trump's bullshit and look at the facts.1 point