Leaderboard

Oh please...this is stupid. Must you Libbies roll in the mud constantly?

Probably. Extraordinarily paranoid statements such as this require especially extraordinary evidence.

The purpose of the notwithstanding clause is that so that courts don't have unlimited power. Courts aren't always right, given that court rulings can often contradict or overrule previous rulings, so giving them unlimited power to interpret the constitution is as silly as giving any other branch of government unlimited power to fulfill its duties. Just as an example - in 1993, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a ban on medical assistance in dying was constitutional. They ruled the opposite in 2015, contradicting and overturning their previous ruling. Which time were they right? If the Supreme Court admits they are sometimes wrong, shouldn't there be checks on their power?

Libbies just love Jerry Springer style drama. Sad

The only thing you people give a shit about is your preoccupation with the left which consumes you to the point you can't think straight about anything. The left lives, as they say, rent free in your heads.

You literally just did. You absolutely just made her death political to try and further your argument. You are now an Olympic grade hypocrite

This was brought up... in 2018 when it happened. The open borders left didn't give a crap back then either.

You're a vile piece of shit.

But the Joy!

There is a grave and fundamental problem in Quebec Politics, if while wanting independent state it still can never remove itself from the social and economic pitfalls that plague Canada and the rest of the Western world. An Independent Quebec, is doomed to rot at its core if the leadership does not diverge from a conventional Corporate Capitalist model that renders every state in peril. The Housing crisis is a case in point. Unless they embrace Social Democracy, they will be dooming themselves to interminable crises and failures within the Socio-Economic and Socio-Political system, creating an environment of instability, fragility and dependency on ties with Corporate Capitalist elements even from beyond its own elites. The right-wing conservative stance of the CAQ does not lend itself to the goals of the PQ or Quebec Solidaire. Just merely creating a defacto independent state, only embeds the elites in a constant legal and constitutional quandry. The illusion will soon find its termination point. Federally, the raison d'etre for the nation of Canada may before too long be called into question. Jeffrey L. Weinstein M.A. (Public Policy and Public Administration) Concordia University

The general pattern of the threads here, if you look at them all, take the form of conservatives calling leftists out for their mismanagement, known lies, abysmal failures, racist policies, etc leftists calling conservatives names, making dire predictions of what they'll do, and citing anonymous sources to make serious claims The laundry list of the Biden and Trudeau regimes' failures is like a roadmap of "how to get from freedom and prosperity to corruption and decay". Whether we're talking about the economy, the safety of our cities, the state of our democracy, individual rights, women's right to compete against other women, the freedom and integrity of the media, open borders, crime resulting from the border, the diminishing integrity of elections, etc, conservatives can lay out actual, verifiable, incontrovertible facts and proofs of their positions on every single one of those issues. There's not a single thing there that can't be proven to be true. By contrast, the laundry list of leftist talking points is a trash heap of unsubstantiated and disproven slanders and lies. Whether we're talking about: Russian collusion, Russian disinformation on a laptop, the need to vaccinate young healthy people against covid, the immorality of requiring ID to vote, whenever a black guy hets killed by the police it's only because cops re all racist trans men should be allowed to compete against women and change in girls' bathrooms, the lynching of Jussie, the hijab hoax in Canada, the racism and misogyny of vaccination pro-choice activists, the alleged fascism of conservatives, etc, leftists can't point to any facts at all. There's not a single thing there that hasn't already been proven to be a lie, and those were all MAJOR stories. In fact, the majority of those stories actually ended up becoming damning indictments of the legacy media. Catherine Herridge just admitted that CBS news is fake BS, and they control narratives, but the other MSM outlets all had the exact same access to information as CBS did, it's just that Catherine Herridge is the first big talking head to outright spill the beans. So now, in order for the leftards to keep talking, they have no choice but to base their new attacks on conservatives based on "what ifs", or pile new slander on their old, previously debunked slander. The template for myata/Radiorum/laftard threads in general is now: "Because we know that conservatives are all fascists and dogs, and they [insert debunked leftist lies and slander here], we also know that they'll do that [insert a new accusation in a mirror here] now that Trump is president. The end of democracy is nigh brothers and sisters! Only drinking this Kool-aid can save you from eternal damnation." If there's a laftard here that can prove Jussie was lynched, or that women in hijabs in North America are the world's most targeted group of innocents, or that anti-pseudovaxxers are racists and misogynists, or that young healthy people needed the jabs, or anything else, go right ahead. I openly invite you to challenge anything I said here.

That's nonsense. Sometimes the courts are right and the provinces can still use the clause. The purpose of the clause was to get the provinces to sign on to something that limited their power, including Quebec, who still didn't.

🤣

So, here's a thing: The US had routinely started new wars under each president. It's predictable. Give a guy a big stick and he'll hit something with it. Jimmy Carter, 1977-1981, was the last US president to not start a war before Trump. Under Obama, war broke out in Ukraine, with Russia. America's involvement in the inner workings of the Ukrainian gov't is undeniable, and that, along with pushing the idea of NATO in Ukraine, played a big role in starting the Ukraine war. It was at that time, 2014, that Crimea was annexed, and the war in Donbas broke out that year as well. Obama's rapid troop pullout is also widely recognized as the reason for the sudden rise of islamic state, which he called a 'jr varsity terrorist squad', and then allowed it to grow unchecked to the point where it was powerful enough to fight against several countries. With all the above as a backdrop, Trump went into the WH with war going on in Afghanistan, war in Ukraine, a large war against islamic state in the ME, and terrorist attacks against the US were quite frequent as well. By the end of the Trump administration: Trump never started a single war, and he's the first US president in 40 years - basically 2 generations - to be able to say that. The Ukraine war went down to a very low simmer. It didn't completely end, but the actual "war" was small enough that whatever fighting was happening went mostly unnoticed from our side of the pond. The biggest development was probably Trump arming Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missiles, but that wasn't a major incident. islamic state was crushed quickly and thoroughly under Trump - they ceased to be landholders a new era of antiterrorism was established, where the leaders of all the biggest terrorist factions were killed, and Iran's two top terrorist leaders were killed by a US airstrike. No one was bragging about taking the leadership of terrorist orgs anymore, and it was at the point where Al Qaeda seemed to have disappeared entirely. Terrorism in the US has been negligible to this day, and that's mainly because of Trump against all odds, after 75 years with no major advances to speak of, Israel was suddenly beginning to establish foreign relations with Arab states. That level of progress was completely unheard of in the 40's, 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, 2000's, and 2010's. 8 decades of nothing, then suddenly normalized relations between Israel and Arab nations. No one even had that on their radar at the time, it was like a bolt of lightning from the blue. So Biden inherited peace on a level that was completely foreign to the world when Trump took office. Then: Biden opened the floodgates of money to Iran, and suddenly terrorists in Gaza were rolling in money and weapons He re-established getting Ukraine into NATO as a priority, putting pressure on Russia to either back down or put a stop to it predictably, war broke out in the middle east and Ukraine, and both wars were escalating right up until the 2024 election. At the beginning of this Nov the North Koreans had just entered the Ukraine war, the US gave Ukraine permission to use US missiles to strike targets deep within Russia itself, the Ukrainians did so, and then Russia started using their own hypersonic (Mach 11) medium range ballistic missiles to hit targets right in Kyiv. In the ME, Iran had just started firing ballistic missiles right into Israel itself. Israel responded by elimination all of Iran's radar installations and anti-aircraft protection along its borders, completely opening Iran up to be attacked from the air with impunity. American bases in the ME were attacked HUNDREDS OF TIMES while Biden was president., and US troops were killed By every account, even on the pro-Biden MSM channels in the US, it was obvious that we were inching closer and closer to WWIII than ever before. Contrast that to the level of peace that Biden inherited and it's quite scary how quickly things blew up. If you made a graph of what global peace looked like under Obama, Trump and Biden, it would look like the topographical map around Kilimanjaro, with the peak occurring right at the end of Trump's presidency. Every word of what I said is 100% true, down to the punctuation marks, with no omissions or exaggerations that bear mentioning. Now, looking at all of that, just remember that Kamala herself said that there were no major steps that Biden took which she would have done differently. Then she doubled-down on that statement. She was adamant that Biden had done all the right things. If you found some big-boy pants to wear, and you wanted to pretend they were yours and that you belonged in them, would you say that Trump should be the one to try to pull the world back from the brink of WWIII, or Kamala? What on earth do Trump and Kamala have in their history that would lead you to believe that Kamala was a wiser choice? And that's just on the issue of global peace. If you compare how American take-home pay soared under Trump to how it plummeted under Biden, you have another solid reason why Trump was the only reasonable choice. I think I made a pretty slam-dunk case, and that you have no actual comebacks, so you'll either run or make a phoney blanket statement like: "Yew jist tolled a buncha lize and I won't reed it oll. Kamala is way mor gooder an yore a rasist if yoo dont admit it 😭" So what do those things have to do with "basest human instincts"? Were you trying to say that wanting peace and economic success constitutes "the basest human instincts"? I mean, it's not unusual for leftists to use big terms completely wrong. Just watch robo try to use "cognitive dissonance" and "confirmation bias" in a sentence lol. It's like watching a chihuahua try to hump a basketball on the side of a hill.

I'm just thinking... Is there any centrist or Liberal supporter in here who has suggested that right of centre folks enjoy seeing violence done to their countrymen? We may have found a 'tell' here...

The Purple Helmet Men's Only Pub. From what I heard, the lead singer usually wore leather chaps. However, I don't judge so if Nationalist had fun, it's all good.

...or some Thorazine.

Well here is one of the more fundamental truths about the left versus the right as we know it today. The predominant feature of the left is socialistic viewpoints. Often drifting into actual socialism but I'm using the term socialistic to include left of center moderates who may not be part of the woke Revolution. But at the end of the day it's all about elevating society's needs and reducing the individuals rights. For the lefts policies to work they absolutely have to have government control over society, and the more socialistic they want to be the more they have to exercise that control. If you want everybody following the same rules and living their lives the same way and focused on doing the same things for the betterment of society, then you must control what they do and remove the individual self-determination. The more left you go the more you need to do that. Whereas the right can exist with virtually no government interference in people's rights or decisions, the government is there to protect or enforce individual rights and because everybody's individual rights are enforced society finds its own path and tends to flourish. So of course Hitler was more socialistic. He was absolutely prepared to set aside individual rights at the drop of a hat if he felt it benefited the society as a whole as far as his vision as of what the society should be like and what is goals should be. He controlled people, he controlled business, he controlled the agenda. None of this is controversial or difficult to prove and this is the inevitable result of strong left-wing governments

Don't act like leftists are all that far from just loving an all-out fascist gov't. You're 85% of the way there, so why stop now?

Ok so fu ck them too, but if you think the left regards these nasty thoughts as some sort of collective excuse to rape and kill you people you're completely nuts not to mention paranoid.

I am just stating the obvious. The ultra right MAGA people do not get laid much.....unless the woman in question happens to be underage, especially 16.

Check that. Libbies don't like @CdnFox because he has truth on his side and uses it to corner you saps constantly. That and the fact that I believe he was voted poster of the year?

Oh Gawd! I'm bursting at the seams! Resist the temptation Nationalist...just resist. Lol...

I liked this post because an academic posted it. 🥰

Course I know. Don't you even read your own stuff? Of course you were lying so perhaps you just forgot what FIB you were making up at the time. And his childish to say that in a system that requires people pay for their medical services that requiring people to pay for the medical services restricts access. It's obviously complete and utter bullshit. I get that you realized you were lying and are trying to come up with some angle to make it less of a lie but I'm sorry that's just not going to cut it. Access is restricted to virtually every medical procedure then in America and this is no different .And yes Kamala talks about gender affirming care. I grabbed the first thing that we had a clip of her talking about it but you can go back and find the entire interview. It was just worth grabbing something to prove you're a lying sack of crap when you said that there was nothing out there. There was and she's on the record for it And I love that you keep having to redefine things " A 12-year-old is not a child!!!!" Yes a 12-year-old is a child. "Well it's not a terribly SMALL child" LOLOL kid, You are so fond of digging yourself deeper that I can only assume you own a shovel store . They are children. So we know with 100% certainty that children do get mutilated. That's a simple fact and trying to pretend that 12 year olds aren't children is beyond, well, childish. And the rest is just your usual hissy fit meltdown when you're wrong. You get all upset and start foaming at the mouth and freaking out. Sorry kid. Children were being mutilated in the states. Happened in Canada too. Nobody tried to restrict gender affirmation surgery for adults Kamala police supported helping anyone in prison including illegal aliens transition at the cost of the taxpayer and even in the 2024 election said that she would continue that because it's currently law. Rather than change the law and make it so that illegal aliens didn't get gender transformation surgery. And as they started from the very beginning, people aren't against gender surgery, they're against having to pay for it. Straight losses across the board for you this time. You didn't get anything right. Try harder next time

LOL, you clowns can't even be honest about what a real **** is. Your pal Black Dog thinks a dude with a fake **** makes him a real woman.

Dude you WERE pussies in your 20's

Guns and phones? I see a huge difference: The State can control the use of guns; it cannot control the use of phones. The US first amendment makes sense; the second does not. A civilised state should restrict who has a gun.

No one ignored Clinton, he was impeached for his behaviour. He hasn't been president for over 24 years.

The north and coast of New Brunswick is Acadian - but the west and south is anglo, protestant. New Brunswick is the most f*d up province in Canada. (Manitoba is a close second.) I reckon that Ontario should be divided in two: Sudbury/North Bay can fight over capital city of the new province. (By rights: I would give it to Thunder Bay.) Canada, this place of rocks and trees, the people and what we've done, will exist well after a woman or man on our money.

Probably? More like definitely. Libbies have lost almost everything because of their silliness and hatred, yet they double down on their insanity.

When a leftist sees a conservative do that, it's proof of a rape. There are probably judges who would have convicted Trump of rape for that if they got tht video while Biden still had 2 years left.

You have no time for people who tell you inconvenient truths, Gaétan. It's called "confirmation bias".

The point is that you silly arseholes would be no less partisan, combative and libelous if we were talking about daylight savings time. You people have been this way for decades now. It started with comsymp and gotten more juvenile since. Fu ck off and grow up.

I wasn't aware of her until you brought her up. Why don't you make a thread about her?

CBC at their finest lol: 1:00 in, a protester makes a Nazi salute, and says "A final solution is coming your way!" At 4:21 the CBC narrator says "The riot was denounced as anti-Semitic", then they flash to a Trudeau speech denouncing anti-Semitism, and CBC chimes in with "but police say that they have no reports of anti-Semitic incidents directly linked to the Friday protests." LOL. So just because no Jews stuck around to get their teeth kicked in, there was no anti-Semitism...? I dunno, isn't making a Nazi salute and then saying "A final solution is coming your way!" kind of anti-Semitic? CBC is such a f'ing joke, they need to be flushed down the toilet today.

The point is that the left was defending Riley's killer when he was here illegally and caught several times breaking the law... instead of deporting him like he should have been. And now the open borders liberals continue to ignore this and don't care.

You might consider getting a journal or something. You clearly do not understand how an online forum works. Also, it is amazing how you have more concern with people posting towards you on an online forum than you do with a woman getting brutally murdered.

You must not be a Taylor Swift fan.

That kind of proves their point though doesn't it? The left really does want to see us all eating bugs according to you

It's funny that in a place full of mentally ill right wingers, this Dougie guy stands out as the biggest rat in the shithouse. Completely bugged out.

Bullsh!t....she came to canada expecting a better life, and this country gave her that, plus paid her various benefits to set up her business, etc...instead she repays Canada by being an arehole as you called her....intimidating other peaceful Canadians in the process..Note i said Canadians...She has brought her problems,her beliefs, her hatred here to Canada...It is not wanted or asked for....It is time to get rid of your Arseholes....send them back to Gaza with a couple of blankets and a thermos of hot coffee....and a thank you note stapled to their foreheads...

Whatever... You fashion yourself as a bizarre new tint of Globalist or vagabond and pine for war against the hippies or whatnot. It's not fodder for discussion. You want a megaphone, not a chat. I'm a blood enemy and you would be glad if I were blugeoned if I had a Liberal sign on my lawn. I long ago stopped being frustrated by this phenomenon but I still don't get it. Have a truly fine evening ...

Thank you for so eloquent laying this out

lulz the most failed strategy in Democrat party history remember when they called Dick Cheney "Hitler" ? Dick Cheney Hitler having just endorsed Kamalla Harris while they all cheered meanwhile, Donald Trump is the most liberal Republican of all time he literally has just stolen the Democrat party protectionist platform from the New Deal while the Democrats completely abandoned the centre in order to embrace Marxist Leninism 2.0

Canada made some bold moves and sacrifices. It has so much potential, but it no longer feels like our governments are serving Canadians, especially the federal government. We’ve woken up to overcrowded cities with rising violence and governments pushing ideology that most sensible people would never want for their families or communities. It’s as though some group took Trudeau into a room at gunpoint and said, “You’re going to bring in millions of people, raise the cost of living, make it impossible for young people to buy homes, make people ashamed of Canada, and shame people who try to maintain a sense of human dignity. Give everyone that which is destructive: drugs, poverty, promiscuity, suicide, and shame. Make sure the country shuts down the development of its greatest strength, resource development. Saddle everyone with so much debt that our safety net becomes unaffordable. Ban protests and backstop it all with increased government powers and looser rules for the application of martial law. We’ll make sure you stay in power by stoking fear and manipulating the public, and when we return you can step aside so we can take what we want.” These are the effects of a naïve activist government that’s totally disconnected from most people’s reality and needs. It increasingly feels like Canadians are on the losing end of a mad social engineering experiment.