Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/04/2024 in Posts

  1. So high speed rail is such a priority to you that you would put it before investing in critical infrastructure required to meet our future energy demands? The government has estimated that our energy demand for clean energy could double or even triple by 2050. I don't know about you, but I don't want to see anybody freezing in the dark. I don't care who's running the country. It's time to get our priorities straight.
    4 points
  2. The construction of the first of four SMRs will be completed by the end of 2028, and the unit will be online by the end of 2029. Media release | Capital Power and OPG partner to advance new nuclear in Alberta – OPG This is already in place. It's already moving forward with two other provinces working together to make sure that technology is available and delivered Even if they green lit a fast train tomorrow it would not likely be finished before the first nuclear reactor is online Once again, you choose Muh FEEELS over facts. Alberta absolutely needs clean energy moving forward. It cannot get by on the energy supplies it has. So a nuclear reactor actually is a viable economic necessity A bullet train would deliver nothing. It would not improve cargo capacity in any meaningful way, there are not enough commuters who would benefit from it significantly to make it worthwhile But of course that's where you and the left would rather see the money spent.
    3 points
  3. So… why is he Tweeting about it? If a rule or law was violated, why doesn’t he enforce it? And if no violation occurred, why doesn’t he STFU?
    2 points
  4. I'm Canadian, so obviously. Do you have any evidence of this? Of course you don't, you never do. lol are you gonna sit here and pretend that the sentiment isn't mutual? No: I'm saying Trump supporters are garbage.
    2 points
  5. He did not 'stack the court'. There were vacancies, and he filled them. Trump never talked about adding more seats to the SC as the Democrats may likely do.
    2 points
  6. Yes, Trump, being the weakest president ever, watched as the Dems stole the election from him while he was in power. To further demonstrate his weakness, he hired a bunch of incompetent lawyers who couldn't produce a shred of evidence, even before Trump-appointed judges. Not only did they outplay him, they made him look like a craven liar. He is a victim of those crafty libbies!
    2 points
  7. I can no longer take you serious @WestCanMan. After ranting about "the left" for years, you now are publishing far left articles, to back your positions. I think you secretly are a left of centre socialist. This should be your new avatar.
    2 points
  8. PS....counterpunch.org is literally Communist, it is extreme left, and backed by Russians: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/counterpunch/ For several years, you ahve been going on about "The left" and "libbys," yet you are too lazy to check your sources. You just posted a far left, pro-Russian website article.
    2 points
  9. All this bltching and moaning about 90 seconds of airtime on a comedy show? Jeebus. As if Trump doesn't get enough media attention? They let him HOST SNL in 2015, FFS. But now Kamala is on for 90 seconds and the MAGA cultists are crapping their pants about how unfair it is? Bullshit. It's just another excuse for faux outrage at established media. No one actually cares or finds this meaningful.
    2 points
  10. There is a thread for this subject. Stop cluttering up the forum with duplicate threads.
    2 points
  11. Why? Hatred. They'd nuke their mother's if they thought it would hurt Trump. They're sick.
    2 points
  12. Brendan Carr is NOT the Chair of the FCC, so yet another thread you've started WITH A LIE. Who is the current head of the FCC? Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications Commission. Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications Commission
    2 points
  13. Sadly, the real joke are the voters that elected this clown . . . "Elect a clown, expect a circus"
    2 points
  14. 2 points
  15. No president "runs the economy." Trump's foreign policy weakened the US. The biggest foreign policy strength the US has is its leadership over the biggest military alliance in human history. Trump weakened our connection to our european allies and instead debased himself before dictators. His policy in these wars will obviously be to side with the authoritarian fascists and further weaken the pro-democracy alliance. Trump was literally willing to make the border worse rather than allow immigrantion reform legislation to pass through congress. He only uses the issue for marketing himself rather than actually fixing anything. His only policy is to be harsh and inumane rather than working towards realistic nuanced policy. Mexico is our biggest trade partner and migrant workers travel seasonally and harvest most of the food in the country. Half of illegal immigration is people who enter legally (mostly through airports) and overstay their visas. The US expels millions of people every year regardless of who the president is. So Trump's cartoonish immigration policies are purely meant for political consumption rather than effective governing.
    2 points
  16. His father was a good guy. I remember David Lewis. I remember Pierre Trudeau. Lewis created the term: "Corporate Welfare Bum". ==== Their sons are awful.
    1 point
  17. Uh... they're both private citizens. And I don't think Chelsea ever hung out with Epstein as a child. The fact that Trump raped women and hung out with Epstein and his children at the same time is why you support him. He's your type of guy.
    1 point
  18. Once they are proven real, they will shift to how Epstein is a liar and it doesn't matter and nobody cares that he raped women anyway.
    1 point
  19. I was laughing because no one could be so stupid as to believe that was serious
    1 point
  20. Again: you haven't presented any evidence to support your claim that Harris called Trumptards Nazis. Sorry, but that's on you for being shit at this and not reading your own sources. Again: nope! Neither of the links you provided had any evidence of Harris saying that. Irrelevant! Harris has not compared Trump supporters to Nazis. If she had and it was, in fact, "all over the news" then you'd have some proof, but all you've mustered are two sources that don't support your claim at all. Pathetic stuff, but that's the norm for you. Good thing the opinion of a lying piece of shit like you is worth absolutely nothing.
    1 point
  21. Except neither link did that. You either didn't read them or read them and are lying about the content. And what's funny about you lying about it is it's so easily proven to be a lie because the links are right there! No I'm stating the fact that you're a liar. Harris has not compared Trump supporters to Nazis. Nope. The NY Post one quotes some chud making that claim, but doesn't actually quote Harris saying anything about it and only quotes Clinton and Walz. The second specifically points out she didn't: So Clinton said it. Walz alluded to it. But Harris did not compare the rally to the Nazi one, nor did she call Trump supporters Nazis (which, again, was your claim). Time to change your diaper buddy, you done shit yourself again.
    1 point
  22. No its because you never post proof. Here's perfect example: See? If it's "all over the news" then it should be very easy and quick to post a link. But you can't do it because it's not actually all over the news. Because you're lying. Which is what you always do because you're a lying little twat who is incapable of supporting his arguments. Not only am I denying it's happening, I'm calling you a liar for claiming it is. Cite (still) required. I've never seen anyone more deluded about their own behaviour and intellectual capabilities than you. All the emojis in the world won't make up for your mental shortcomings.
    1 point
  23. If He were honest you wouldn't be having this conversation
    1 point
  24. I base that on the fact that he didn't do it when he had the chance. If you are being honest, you have to acknowledge this fact.
    1 point
  25. The only "cramming" that's taking place here is your tranny activism. That's why it's best to keep things right, and as they've always been: you're either a biological male, or you're a biological female.
    1 point
  26. 1. Then you weren't agreeing with me. lol There's no such thing as "sex assigned at birth" in a sane and normal world. You're either a boy or a girl at birth and everyone sees it. 2. People need to be accepting without bending to the trans agenda, which is possible. The problem is that trans activists have gotten overly aggressive. They want more than just acceptance; they want full compliance with their agenda.
    1 point
  27. Only if you want to help someone fuel his fantasy. In the REAL world, we go by biological sex. The person is either a man or a woman.
    1 point
  28. Gee, maybe we should have an enquiry to look at those claims and see if they are valid and if some are, how we can do better in future. It doesn't matter where it started. Whether it was a lab or a wet market had no bearing on how we had to deal with it once it arrived. Well stay in your conspiracy rabbit hole, you feel most comfortable there..
    1 point
  29. No, that's not actually accurate. The "voters" were real, but they weren't the original voters elected/appointed by the state process. However the trump lawyers were relying on a law that said the vice president has the right to appoint or accept an 'alternate' slate of voters under various circumstances. So the theory was, if pence accepted those voters without verifying and certified their results, then in fact he has accepted them as alternate voters which IS within his power and therefore they would become legitimate voters and the count would be entirely legal. That was the plan. Whether that would have stood up to legal scrutiny after the fact is another discussion entirely, but the voters weren't 'fake', even tho that's what the left likes to call it. They were real and had pence accepted them as the voters there would have to have been a legal battle to test their legitimacy.
    1 point
  30. They do. And in fact so does gender. The problem is these definitions frequently get in the way of the ideologues and their agendas. So they are constantly redefining words to suit their narrative, and often changing them back and forth. We've seen many times how gender is directly tied to sex, then gender is completely independent of sex, and then gender is back to being part of sex again. This guy seems like he's a lot more up and up and straight talking than a lot of the nut bars we've seen, but again here we're back to There's no such thing as a definition, definition can be many things, it depends on who's talking, and all of that is absolutely utter bull crap. If words have no meaning then there's no point in talking
    1 point
  31. Good luck with that. At most it's a slap on the wrist type transgression. All NBC has to do is offer Trump some free air time. Duh
    1 point
  32. Always liked Ujjal even though I wasn't a fan of his party. He has done nothing to change that.
    1 point
  33. I'm pretty sure the oil and gas companies were happier with the carbon tax because without it the alternatives default to them. A carbon tax helps them shift the responsibility from fossil fuel companies to customers, voters and elected officials. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923003087#:~:text=This paper has shown that,78% support a carbon tax. Okay, this is happening everywhere around the world and in the meantime PP is still going to be under pressure to maintain Canada's international emissions reduction commitments. I doubt our peer nations who are actually making progress and reducing their emissions are going be any more forgiving about our backsliding than they are towards our military commitments. I suppose PP could simply be honest and admit he just doesn't give a damn about climate change. That would make everything a lot easier don't you think?
    1 point
  34. Misses point. ==== We Canadians get along. We are like Europe in 1910 or so.
    1 point
  35. Like I said, you've made up your mind and aren't interested in anything that might not agree with it. You fear an inquiry because it might actually answer some of your questions.
    1 point
  36. And what is the benefit of this project? It creates jobs for Ontario and Quebec voters! No economic benefit to the country at all but the libtards have amply demonstrated they only care about power the country be damned!
    1 point
  37. OMG he's trying to do something that should've been done 30 years ago! The shameless progressive! PP will revert the GO Trains beck to steam locomotives and put the coal miners back to work!
    1 point
  38. To what end, dummy? You degenerates don't care that he's a philandering, amoral piece of shit. You didn't care about his fraud. You didn't care that he steals from his charities. You don't care that he lies. You don't care that he commits sexual assault. You don't care that he's a rapist. ^^All of that established as fact in court So why would anyone go to the trouble of using AI (which you bumpkins apparently think is MUCH better than it is) to make up a story about him just being sleazy. Which everyone already knows anyway.
    1 point
  39. He was like a Canadian Russell Brand - a speaker with eloquence beyond our time who's sharp as a tack - but while Russell can go way off on a tangent, Rex was stoically grounded left-of-center in the mainstream (not left of today's center lol).
    1 point
  40. Success is the perfect word for the very beginning of her political career: 👋🍆💦👅$$$
    1 point
  41. Seriously, when Harris supporters are asked to name any of her accomplishments, they draw a complete blank. They just mumble about how she is a woman, a person of color...and that's it.
    1 point
  42. Weird, when i google it I get the same result as i do for "French military victory"
    1 point
  43. So if he killed a man and went to court for it it's just political lawfare? lol He tried to defraud voters in several states. His ego is so oversized he can't handle or admit losing. You're part of a cult. This is a lie. Trump has taught you well.
    1 point
  44. And down the home stretch, Trump packs 'em in at MSG...AND Kamala calls him NAZI. Every time she opens her mouth, all people hear is Liar and B1TCH!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...