Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/21/2024 in all areas
-
4 points
-
What do you mean aren’t probable? He did or attempted all of these things mentioned n 2020. This article just describes how they’ll be refined for the current election.4 points
-
3 points
-
Another lie. The ice cream machine is always broken.3 points
-
What a good man. I hope he contributes to that employee education fund that McDonald's has.2 points
-
Apparently NBC didn't show it? They'll show Taylor Swift every time Kelce is in the game, but they can't show Trump?2 points
-
2 points
-
It is a federal crime to pay people with the intention of inducing or rewarding them to cast a vote or to get registered, an offense punishable by prison time. The prohibition covers not only monetary expenditures, but also anything of monetary value like liquor or lottery chances, a Justice Department election-crimes manual says.2 points
-
Funny how you people are all about "law and order" until it's your guys doing crimes.2 points
-
On election night he will declare himself the winner regardless of the vote count. Do you deny it? Do you honestly believe he will not do exactly what he did in the past, like he learned his lesson last time and is sorry and promises to never do it again? He and his minions are already spreading 2024 rigged election conspiracies. Amd they’ve already placed 2020 election deniers and some of his 2020 fake electors in key positions. You think that’s all because they plan to concede on election night if they don’t win? I didn’t say he would declare himself king. If he doesn’t win he will do everything to make people believe the election results are illegitimate and Kamala Harris is an illegitimate president, regardless of whether that results in Trump being named president or not. Conspiracy-fuelled constitutional crises, insurrections, government obstruction etc that plague the Harris presidency would be a suitable consolation prize because Trump’s fragile ego can’t admit that he’s not god-like perfection incarnate And it doesn’t require “everybody” to go along with it, just enough people in the right places Again I challenge any one of you MAGAs to put your money where your mouth is. Join me in a bet. Is every one of you a coward?2 points
-
2 points
-
Everyone knows what would happen when he looses: in the first month, three, six and so on. No need to guess anything because we have memory and the brains. Now the only decision one has to make is: do they want it to become the new normal, of the proud U.S. democracy? Indefinitely and for the posterity. A simple question.2 points
-
Yes, Trump absolutely will try to seize power if he loses the election. This isn't even a question--or even new information. They've been laying the groundwork for 4 years. And all of the MAGA "patriots" who pay lip service to the Constitution and to democratic principles are ready--eager--to let it happen. They will applaud it just as the lionize the Jan. 6 insurrectionists. They have no honor, no decency and value nothing above power. I'm sorry, but how is this "a little much"? It's exactly what he already tried to do once. Why wouldn't we expect him to try again?2 points
-
Oh dear, the crying and wailing and gnashing of teeth.2 points
-
It's only a matter of time. Certainly Team Trump tried to pull some major shenanigans last time and they didn't succeed. But someday a state run by a Republican Legislature and a Republican governor will oversee a presidential election in their state won by a Democrat. Instead of allowing the Democratic Party electors to go vote for them, they will pass a new law to make it so that their state legislature will assign a slate of republican electors to go instead. Constitutionally there is nothing upholding the state elections for President. When this happens the Republican voters will get behind this as obvious and reasonable and pretend that democracy was never very American after all, and that freedom is best upheld by not allowing people to vote for the president.2 points
-
The only grade above the odd C either of you have ever received in your life ….of course it’s for being an internet troll.2 points
-
Both of your statements are lies. There was a McDonalds in Alameda California in 1983 and her campaign stated she worked the register, as well as the french fry and ice cream machines there.2 points
-
1) There is ZERO evidence to the claim that Kamala never worked at McDonalds this claim appears to he another thing that Trump randomly made up 2) Trump has never heated a scrap of food in his life or been able to focus on a single task for more than few minutes let alone “work a full shift” at a restaurant 3) As pointed out, the entire event was staged while the restaurant was closed. Remember the fake republican outrage when a restaurant closed for a staged Kamala event recently?2 points
-
It’s Putin’s, you gullible dumbass. More lies, you gullible dumbass No, putin puppet. You’re just repeating kremlin propaganda again. Euromaidanwas prott against the Kremlin-installed brutal and corrupt puppet who had his opponents and journalists jailed, beaten up or killed, and unilaterally vetoed the EU Association Agreement which had been supported by Ukrainian parliament and most Ukrainians, replacing it instead with an association agreement with Russia and its shitty satellites, all of whom have backwards corrupt economies. Most Ukrainians want to travel and trade with the advanced economies of Europe not fuking Kyrgyzstan, outer Siberia and the Russian mafia. The whole rest of your diatribe is pathetic copypasta from the Kremlin. Hilarious when I first educated YOU about the recent history of Ukraine you admitted that you didn’t know anything about it and didn’t care. Now you think you’re some sort of expert. Typical of your type: dumb and ignorant > gullible > self-taught expert > even more dumb and ignorant. You self-lobotomized mor0n do you not recall that in Feb 2022 Russia invaded Ukraine on multiple fronts and was on the outskirts of Kyiv before they got their asses handed to them and that summer they were pushed all the way back across the Dnipro or into Belarus? That was definitely a heavily reported event and heavily discussed on this forum that you were definitely aware of at the time. Your ability to delete inconvenient facts from your memory is astounding. As for the rest of your diatribe, where you not only get wrong what I said but also basic facts about the war: While Russia is recapturing very small amounts of territory in Eastern Ukraine - largely thanks to help from pro-Putin Republicans in congress who choked off military aid - they are losing an enormous amount of liberal doing so: human wave after human wave. Russia has suffered thousands of casualties per square mile gained, 1,200 per day. 675,000 casualties to date. These casualty rates aren’t sustainable. Russia still holds significantly less Ukrainian territory than they did at their peak of the 2022 invasion BTW Bakhmut is a village, not a city. While Russia barbarically and deliberately targets civilians by bombarding cities, it hasn’t flattened any actual cities, only villages. Putin started this war. This is his war you ignorant brainwashed dope.2 points
-
Oh, good, more conspiracy theorists who have crossed the line from harmless kooks to malicious actors spreading disinformation that will literally cause children to die. That is NOT a news website. Jeebus, just leave medicine to the smart people with 11-14 years postsecondary education in the field.2 points
-
To see through your nonsensical nonsense.2 points
-
It's only open to swing state voters and you have to register to vote to be eligible, what the f*ck do you think this is about dumb. dumb.1 point
-
Don't you understand that Republicans are not bound by the law is part of their fundamental platform?1 point
-
The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.1 point
-
Maybe they paid him in benzos.1 point
-
‘I have to ask my husband for literally everything’: How a warmer climate is changing gender roles. The left is absolutely nuts.1 point
-
He isn't a booster but he is definitely an apologist for what Putin is doing in Ukraine. https://www.thedailybeast.com/jordan-petersons-astounding-ignorance-on-russia-and-ukraine/ https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/07/jordan-peterson-youtube-video-russia-ukraine/676560/ Putin's invasion of Ukraine is the equivalent of the US invading Cuba.1 point
-
It's very sweet they let Grandpa do his little Make a Wish thing before they put him in the care facility.1 point
-
1 point
-
Why are you so obsessed with sex? Three percent of American teens identify as trans. I am not convinced that simply telling them they aren’t will remedy their situation. We certainly know that people cannot “pray the gay away.” Trans people freak me out. And they probably freak you out. But that’s our problem, not their problem. They aren’t the way they are because they want us to be offended or disgusted or whatever.1 point
-
1 point
-
Such a simple question that Libbies have warped and now can't answer because it exposes their stupidity.1 point
-
Good question Maybe, that's why he should back up such a statement or not make it at all. Peterson is a Putin apologist but that doesn't mean he is on their payroll1 point
-
You're taking about being vaguly represented via intermediaries. I'm taking about voters having a direct say, which they do not. Factually untrue. There are only 538 people in the electoral college and their votes do not equally represent the same number of citizens. Yes, nobody wants their vote to count less than someone else's vote. Yeah, but it's not just that California has more people. The electors are disproportionate. A California elector is worth hundreds of thousands of more people than a wyoming elector. Proportional would be all 538 electors represent roughly similar numbers of Americans. Well you seem unaware that seats in half of the US congress are not based on state populations.1 point
-
Like, why bother posting something like this and not tagging who you are responding to? Beats me...1 point
-
To his credit, the reframing is much more balanced and relevant. Trudeau going after an individual is, at best, odd1 point
-
I never said you have short posts. I said you demand OTHERS have short posts. Because you have a short attention span and think your opinions are more important than that of others 1) The article does not “radically embellish” anything. Give an example of what’s been embellished The article basically says he will do everything the did last time, with some tweaks since republicans have had 4 years to prepare this time, which includes having positioned some 2020 election deniers as county election officials, in state legislatures etc 2) The article clearly states that if he can get a state legislature to endorse his electors regardless of the vote results, then Kamala may have no choice but to certify them as there is constitutional requirement that the state honour the results of the popular vote. Furthermore he’s had 4 years to groom and pressure Republicans in congress to refuse certification just as he did in 2020 3) Even if he can’t convince Kamala or congress to certify him as the winner he will of course say that the certification is “rigged” because Kamala in her role as VP is overseeing her own certification. Even after it becomes clear he can’t become president will continue to delegitimize the election results and sow chaos…if he can’t be president nobody can. Do you honestly believe if he loses on November 5 he will gracefully concede defeat and support a peaceful transition of power? If so let’s bet money on it. I’m serious…loser donates money to the GoFundMe account of the winner’s choice. Last election I got sharmkan to donate $100 to Breonna Taylor’s GoDundMe over election denier bets. You wanna be next?1 point
-
Ok so your next homework assignment is to go learn about what each state's number of electors is based upon. Don't worry, it's very simple.1 point
-
Ding Ding Ding!!!! Like clockwork, User falls back on whining about dishonesty when he can't refute a point. If this forum got a nickel for every time you tossed this wet rag out into a debate, it'd be the richest website on the interweb. 🙄1 point
-
Let's make it as simple as possible for everyone. Voting will be like driving a car. Pick D to go forward Pick R to go backward1 point
-
I see that more as a badge of honor than a condemnation of your opinions.1 point
-
That was serious. You keep playing this dishonest game and I am making a point to illustrate that. If he is going to make public accusations about a person of this serious nature, he better have the proof with him and respond to questions. He is hiding. We have every right to criticize a world leader for making such serious allegations about a private citizen without any evidence to back them up and then running and hiding from questions after.1 point
-
Considering where you're posting this you might have at least considered putting an option like "No because I'm Canadian"1 point
-
TIL that when another country invades you it's YOUR fault for 'starting a war'.1 point
-
Peterson has taken aim at woke capitalism and DEI programs within corporationa which hire people based on sex and gender and push leftist dogma to their employees through various trainings and programs. This is basically a religion. And challenging any of it is akin to blasphemy by folks like Trudeau. There are many sacred cows within it. Peterson has trampled on the sacred cows, has a large following which is why cult leaders like Trudeau are making up nonsense to try and discredit. It's just unfortunate that Trudeau is mixing his religion and politics while attacking a private citizen in the process1 point
-
Why does anyone care about Jordan Peterson. He hasn't said anything of substance since, clean your room1 point
-
It really is bizarre to see elected officials target private citizens. These Marxists are pretty sick1 point
-
Based on time in the workforce? You need to dig deeper into the research than superficial media talking points.1 point
-
Yet their gullible followers will eat it up. Liberals are a disease to society1 point
