Leaderboard

In 1992, there was no such thing as "East Germany," The country had already reunified. Gorbachev was not in power, and had retired. Boris Yeltsin was the leader of Russia. The rest of the claim is completely unsubstantiated. This is ridiculous, and untrue. Once again, the Ukrainians chose who they wanted to lead their nation in elections. America did not appoint anyone. You spelled Zelenskyy wrong. This is such BS, that I cannot ever take any of your posts seriously. You ahve been saying that Boris Johnson told Ukraine to "rip up" a non-existent peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Now you change the name to Tony Blair, who was not even PM at the time. Sometimes I wonder if you and your wing-man CdnFox are even from Canada. You both have spent the last couple of years parroting Russia misinformation.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/all-15-arizona-counties-sued-for-failing-to-remove-illegal-aliens-from-voter-rolls?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand All 15 Arizona Counties Sued For Failing To Remove Illegal Aliens From Voter Rolls America First Legal filed a lawsuit today against all 15 Arizona counties for failing to remove illegal immigrants from the state’s voter rolls. The conservative legal organization initially told the counties in July that it would take legal action if they failed to remove illegal immigrants from the voter rolls, but now America First Legal said that the counties have failed in their obligation to safeguard the election. “We are taking emergency action to secure our elections. In addition to Maricopa, we are now suing 14 additional counties in Arizona for refusing to remove illegal aliens and non-citizens from their voter rolls,” America First Legal President Stephen Miller said. “America First Legal will do everything in its power to fight mass illegal alien voting and foreign interference in our democracy.” “Every county in AZ is flagrantly defying its duty under state law to expunge illegal voters,” America First Legal said in a post on X. Are you libs just plain dishonest or flagrantly STUPID?

robodrone is losing his shit over the ridicule his hive queen is getting. lol

Some interesting comments from one Nicholas Biase, chief spokesman for Manhattan US Attorney's Office. (Alvin Bragg's colleague) “Every real estate person in New York does what he [Trump] did. Nobody’s ever been charged with this … You know, it’s a perversion of justice,” he was filmed saying. https://nypost.com/2024/09/05/us-news/top-spokesman-for-manhattan-us-attorneys-office-caught-on-secret-recording-blasting-da-bragg-over-trump-prosecution/ This is what we've been saying all along.

No. I follow the facts.

Why are the little girls wearing perverted costumes? 🤔

Trumpo once again saying the quiet part out loud.

It's too bad that Vance didn't get to debate the cackling id10t when they were both just running mates. Vance would have run circles around her, and the Dems would have been stuck running with Biden.

There's some truth to it, much time was lost in coasting, while the reality of life was changing at unprecedented pace. The place and involvement of citizens has to evolve with the reality of their lives not at the last resort possible and if the stars align. There's nothing wrong with the technology if it's serving the right purpose and the citizens are interested and involved. And in the opposite direction, we're bound to run into the old tried and trodden bread and circuses thing, it's only a matter of time, not if. There was an experiment with rats, where having learned to press the lever that released a dollop of sugar they couldn't stop doing that until it lost all sense and was doing them harm, still couldn't stop. Animals, who humans originated from evolved in a natural environment where scarcity was common and abundance, rare. Continuous, ongoing abundance of everything confuses and baffles them to the point where the entire system based on rational perception of the reality may fail. Look I have this button and if I need anything I'll just push it again and then, more. Is there a quicker way to extinction?

No, no, no. They FILED a lawsuit. That’s all they did. So the fact we know is that they filed a lawsuit. We cannot conclude anything except that they filed a lawsuit. I read their suit. They did not provide any evidence that one single person is unlawfully registered to vote in Arizona. Not one person. Their argument is very complicated because Arizona law conflicts with a Supreme Court ruling forbidding election officials from demanding proof of citizenship. They are demanding that the state law supersede the federal Supreme Court ruling, which election officials have been reluctant to do… because the U.S. Supreme Court said they can’t Given the fact that the Secretary of State of Hawaii issued a statement that he had personally inspected the original birth certificate of Barack Obama, yet MAGA continued to insist he was not an American citizen, how can an ordinary American citizen “prove” they are a citizen if MAGA insists they aren’t? You guys have proven that you absolutely cannot be trusted to determine who is who is not a citizen.

True story. Those retards want illegals stealing in ALL 50 states to make it fair and equitable.

Brookletards: "These people should be stealing in Texas! THIS IS NOT FAIR!" 🤣

Well done. You have done the Western Canadian chapter of the Incel movement proud.

Western leaders are socially engineering a White genocide that will ultimately spiral out of their control and destabilize their societies, devolving into barbarism and ethnic violence. True evil or beyond stupid. Either way they pose the greatest threat to the future of Western civilization.

That's why I identify as an Earthling. Please get your silly countries and nations off my planet. Thanks.

The Democrat cult tells you Cheney is now a good guy and after years of calling the guy a war criminal the Democrats all love him now

There is no "military alliance that is hostile towards Russia." That's phony nonsense. NATO is a military alliance for mutual defense.

Do you not get that the numbers of all mass shootings include those that take place in schools too? You asked for evidence, I gave it to you. That site compiles a ton of examples of SRO's stopping school shootings. I have studied response to active shooters and trained in the response to active shooters. One of the classic examples we reviewed is the Columbine shooting. Neither Klebold or Harris had unfettered access to firearms. They were a straw purchase by the girlfriend and an illegal private sale. Firefights in hallways... as opposed to whatever slaughter the bad guy wants? Seriously, yours is such an absurdly ignorant position. You are more afraid of a firefight... so just let the bad guy kill as many as he wants to? Do you want the police to sit outside and wait like Columbine too now, for fear of them going in to stop the bad guy and create a firefight? People like you have no damn clue about guns or tactics. Just pure fear of guns built on ignorance. Again, there are more suicides in Japan... Yours is also a bit of a sexist care for suicide too... not that you even understand that term or care.

I will agree but with one caveat. Folks who are obsessed about a topic (gays, trans) either are fearful or are one themselves. Just having an opinion when pressed about it is not the same. In my early 20's, worked with a guy at a bar and grill and he could not help himself. We could be not talking about anything and he would start spouting off about f_gs and how this person or that one was a f_g.. and so on. Well.. found him on facebook and guess what? he is "bi-curious"..

Yeah, there are actually 4 levels of information classification: Confidential Secret Top Secret Kennedy

It's a legitimate question. The party that is supposedly "defending democracy" has actually put up a candidate that no one has voted for. With that being the case what must the level of intelligence be of someone who actually believes Democrats are the defenders of democracy? And if they'll believe something that stupid what other stupid crap will they believe?

Kamala is such a joke

Under orders from the government or is it the other way around? It's never entirely clear who you people believe is in control of who. I'm assuming you understand me to be under their spell...whoever they are. Maybe it's you?

Jon Stewart made fun of the dnc convention. The guardian is questioning Kammy. Other cracks are appearing. After basically being told to toe the line and provide free propaganda over the convention the media is starting to push back a bit and they've basically said it's ok to be a LITTLE critical of kammy. And now she's slipping in the polls. She's got to do well at tomorrows debate and that's just not her wheel house. She's probably playing for a tie and that's probably not going to be good enough.

It's the one thing we noticed again and again and again. The left absolutely has to lie and misconstrue and misrepresent what was said. They do it about this, they do it about the so-called blood in the streets comment, they did it about the I only care about your vote comment and about a dozen others. Apparently nothing he actually says upsets them enough or they feel that they can't argue against it. So they have to pretend he said something else to give them something to be shocked about. When we talk about Kamala we talk about things she actually did or said. She talks about a $25,000 gift to all first time home buyers, we correctly point out that that will increase inflation. We don't need to pretend she said something else. But for some reason they always have to pretend that trump said something else. It's pretty obvious that they know that they are in the wrong here and just desperately want to promote their tribalism.

No, the war your Russian talking point providers started. The one you desperately want the West to concede because your loyalties are elsewhere.

They suddenly love darth Vader But I wouldn't pee on a leftist if they were on fire even if you paid me.

People who believe in limited government want to give the state power to kill its citizens? Maybe they don't really believe in limited government at all.

Progressives do not like Dick Cheney. But we don't mind seeing the previous generation of right wing criminals bash the current generation of right wing criminals.

What answer were you fishing for?

There's at least one thing we know about Harris, and that's that she won't invoke the insurrection act to stay in power AFTER the voters vote her out. Not even your ILLUSIONS about Trump will guarantee he'll ever leave once he becomes the dictator he's promised to be.

They know it. But the dems and their work allies absolutely want it to be over the line. When it's over the line it creates conflict. Without conflict the democrats have nothing to sell. And The Wok who make money peddling this crap don't get any buyers. I wish there was some way to know how the trans actually felt about these things. But I suspect they are too afraid of the liberals and woke to speak their mind freely without fear of repercussion.

With all due respect, the videos you have provided in the past have never featured speakers that were qualified in the field they were pontificating on, so they should not be considered as educational tools and honestly not worth my time. Here's why. The goal of the scientific process and therefore scientists in general is to try and disprove everything we think we know. The websites you link to, such as creation.com admittedly do not use the scientific method, they approach to topic with a fixed conclusion and try to find evidence to support their presuppositions. Do you know Professor Dave explains? It's a YouTube channel, take an honest look at him then we can continue this conversation

This is a blatant lie

"There is no more effective way to enslave a man than to be the one who provides for his every need".

Because you grew up with that experience, just like I did. I sat at the back of the bus cuz the cool kids did, I never once handed in a resume and thought 'I wonder if they hire white people?" Never once entered a night club or restaurant wondering if I'd be treated differently, which I know all of my Asian and black friends (very few) did. That must be unsettling. She lived the experience. Not heard of or read about, lived. I know even having Italian blood and hearing the star player with the football team's name pronounced wrong on the TV for 2 decades and if you said it right to your cuz the whole room looked at you like you were weird was unsettling. Even having to spell your last name for hundreds of people your whole life to people that can't figure out one more than 5 letters is. As are traditions like the 1st son get the father's name, the 1st daughter the mother's name and they're referred to by their 2nd name their whole lives is annoying when you're f*cking retired and some minion claims the name is not your 'real' name... That's how all people of colour will be better off with Harris than another rich old white guy.

My wife and I went to her 20-yr reunion thinking it would be no big deal - just old friends reacquainting - it was the biggest meat market I've ever seen. I think everyone was just running around trying to boink all the people they wished they woulda hooked up with when they were younger. We braced ourselves for shock before we went to the 30-yr and it was the exact opposite. All the mojo was completely gone, and people were so unhealthy it was just insane. It was before covid too, so that's no excuse. 2017.

1. An extreme claim. "Anyone" who "said anything" was attacked mercilessly ? At best you are exaggerating. 2. Two cruise ships isn't proof. I just looked up Ionniddis. One guy, a gadfly, who says that the official approach is wrong. So why do you believe him versus the consensus ? He sure seems to have been wrong in a few of his statements too. Was he attacked ? I think his ideas were pretty risky and, well, they weren't picked up. To say he was 'attacked' seems to imply that he had good ideas but they went against him personally. I can't see it. He seems like a gadfly with risky ideas which may be interesting... but the public officials erred on the side of safety and went for lockdown. I still think it was the right approach. 3. That sounds like it would have been an interesting exercise, were it not for a mounting emergency that was taking place - with its own logistical challenges, and requirements for experts to make quick analysis, decisions, and - yes - tradeoffs. 4. I know some people who are experts in these things and they're pretty brilliant and also caring people. I am not dismissing you, but I do think you're wrong. It's good to be skeptical of institutions, but you are second-guessing them and throwing them under the bus for how they reacted during the biggest health emergency in 100 years. It's your right to do so, but when you post about difficult topics like this and throw people who you don't know under the bus, call them liars, and decide that Public Health shouldn't be in charge of public health emergencies well... I make my decision to not agree with your opinion, I guess.

They can collect. How much energy they put into it is another question. They know how much money you're making, so they're not going to spend effort chasing you down for tens of thousands if they know you're broke and can't pay. If you're screwing them around and it's a decent amount of money, they'll come, and they'll make you miserable.

Here you are going on about how Canada should essentially copy the US justice system, and when i point out how bad that system is, you resort to saying "we are two different cultures, so we cant be compared!" LOL.

I read two sentences of what you said, and realized "damn this dude adds nothing to the forum except hatred of Jews, and should be blocked.

One theory favoured by Nick Lane is that life may have arisen in a particular type of ocean floor vent with an alkaline pH that would have favoured the development of chemical and electric gradients seen in cells. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292978084_The_Origin_of_Life_in_Alkaline_Hydrothermal_Vents

You can't use the bible to prove the Bible, this is primary school logic. You continue to show you have no interest in truth.

I think we should try to understand where some of the resentment against experts comes from, and also how they themselves are not always above politicizing issues. Doris Grinspun didn't just come out and say that safe injection sites save lives - an objective analysis she's qualified to offer. She went political and came out swinging with an accusation that this was a death sentence (by Conservatives). There's an implied maliciousness to the decision, with no acknowledgement or analysis of the costs or the repercussions these sites have on their communities (something she's probably not qualified to offer). It's definitely not helpful when you have dinks like Poilievre doing everything he can to undermine experts for cheap political points, but out-of-touch academics and biased/self-affirming public sector reps do a lot to undermine their own positions.

Is it possible for you to provide a cite for this brewing conspiracy that you're about to enjoy your anger about? Is it only me that are the people who complain but complainers starting to run out of complainers to complain about? Have a complaint about that! 😂