Leaderboard

In 1992, there was no such thing as "East Germany," The country had already reunified. Gorbachev was not in power, and had retired. Boris Yeltsin was the leader of Russia. The rest of the claim is completely unsubstantiated. This is ridiculous, and untrue. Once again, the Ukrainians chose who they wanted to lead their nation in elections. America did not appoint anyone. You spelled Zelenskyy wrong. This is such BS, that I cannot ever take any of your posts seriously. You ahve been saying that Boris Johnson told Ukraine to "rip up" a non-existent peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Now you change the name to Tony Blair, who was not even PM at the time. Sometimes I wonder if you and your wing-man CdnFox are even from Canada. You both have spent the last couple of years parroting Russia misinformation.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/all-15-arizona-counties-sued-for-failing-to-remove-illegal-aliens-from-voter-rolls?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand All 15 Arizona Counties Sued For Failing To Remove Illegal Aliens From Voter Rolls America First Legal filed a lawsuit today against all 15 Arizona counties for failing to remove illegal immigrants from the state’s voter rolls. The conservative legal organization initially told the counties in July that it would take legal action if they failed to remove illegal immigrants from the voter rolls, but now America First Legal said that the counties have failed in their obligation to safeguard the election. “We are taking emergency action to secure our elections. In addition to Maricopa, we are now suing 14 additional counties in Arizona for refusing to remove illegal aliens and non-citizens from their voter rolls,” America First Legal President Stephen Miller said. “America First Legal will do everything in its power to fight mass illegal alien voting and foreign interference in our democracy.” “Every county in AZ is flagrantly defying its duty under state law to expunge illegal voters,” America First Legal said in a post on X. Are you libs just plain dishonest or flagrantly STUPID?

robodrone is losing his shit over the ridicule his hive queen is getting. lol

Some interesting comments from one Nicholas Biase, chief spokesman for Manhattan US Attorney's Office. (Alvin Bragg's colleague) “Every real estate person in New York does what he [Trump] did. Nobody’s ever been charged with this … You know, it’s a perversion of justice,” he was filmed saying. https://nypost.com/2024/09/05/us-news/top-spokesman-for-manhattan-us-attorneys-office-caught-on-secret-recording-blasting-da-bragg-over-trump-prosecution/ This is what we've been saying all along.

No. I follow the facts.

Why are the little girls wearing perverted costumes? 🤔

Trumpo once again saying the quiet part out loud.

There's some truth to it, much time was lost in coasting, while the reality of life was changing at unprecedented pace. The place and involvement of citizens has to evolve with the reality of their lives not at the last resort possible and if the stars align. There's nothing wrong with the technology if it's serving the right purpose and the citizens are interested and involved. And in the opposite direction, we're bound to run into the old tried and trodden bread and circuses thing, it's only a matter of time, not if. There was an experiment with rats, where having learned to press the lever that released a dollop of sugar they couldn't stop doing that until it lost all sense and was doing them harm, still couldn't stop. Animals, who humans originated from evolved in a natural environment where scarcity was common and abundance, rare. Continuous, ongoing abundance of everything confuses and baffles them to the point where the entire system based on rational perception of the reality may fail. Look I have this button and if I need anything I'll just push it again and then, more. Is there a quicker way to extinction?

I assume that was a large part of the decision. Along with trembling in fear that if DonOld won he would personally do anything in his power to personally destroy the Judge, his family and all others involved. As he almost specifically pointed out he will do to anyone that doesn't kiss his ass.

I suspect Trump would have benefited from sentencing before the election. It would have fed into the martyrdom narrative and given a boost to the followers.

Just like his partner ComradeFox, WestKremlinMan keeps up with the Russian propaganda, like clockwork.

That's why I identify as an Earthling. Please get your silly countries and nations off my planet. Thanks.

The Democrat cult tells you Cheney is now a good guy and after years of calling the guy a war criminal the Democrats all love him now

The evidence is pretty overwhelming. Which is why every single way @Black Dog Is trying to argue this tends to come to a dead end in a hurry. The problem when you have violence in a society is never the tool. The Ugandan genocide took place with machetes, 9/11 took place with planes, oklahoma city which is one of the other great mass killings was with a bomb. And there are a number of mass murderers who operated for years killing hundreds of people with nothing more than a knife. The one common denominator is always humans. Whether it's rocks or knives or fire or guns or pushing people down a flight of stairs, all murders involve a human. You address murders by addressing the humans. There are ways to do this, some countries are much more successful than others. But that's how you do it.

Do you not get that the numbers of all mass shootings include those that take place in schools too? You asked for evidence, I gave it to you. That site compiles a ton of examples of SRO's stopping school shootings. I have studied response to active shooters and trained in the response to active shooters. One of the classic examples we reviewed is the Columbine shooting. Neither Klebold or Harris had unfettered access to firearms. They were a straw purchase by the girlfriend and an illegal private sale. Firefights in hallways... as opposed to whatever slaughter the bad guy wants? Seriously, yours is such an absurdly ignorant position. You are more afraid of a firefight... so just let the bad guy kill as many as he wants to? Do you want the police to sit outside and wait like Columbine too now, for fear of them going in to stop the bad guy and create a firefight? People like you have no damn clue about guns or tactics. Just pure fear of guns built on ignorance. Again, there are more suicides in Japan... Yours is also a bit of a sexist care for suicide too... not that you even understand that term or care.

Yeah, there are actually 4 levels of information classification: Confidential Secret Top Secret Kennedy

It's a legitimate question. The party that is supposedly "defending democracy" has actually put up a candidate that no one has voted for. With that being the case what must the level of intelligence be of someone who actually believes Democrats are the defenders of democracy? And if they'll believe something that stupid what other stupid crap will they believe?

Dweebles...FOX is 100% behind this war. Gawd you're stupid. Whatever man. I have no intention of engaging in pedantics with you.

Under orders from the government or is it the other way around? It's never entirely clear who you people believe is in control of who. I'm assuming you understand me to be under their spell...whoever they are. Maybe it's you?

Jon Stewart made fun of the dnc convention. The guardian is questioning Kammy. Other cracks are appearing. After basically being told to toe the line and provide free propaganda over the convention the media is starting to push back a bit and they've basically said it's ok to be a LITTLE critical of kammy. And now she's slipping in the polls. She's got to do well at tomorrows debate and that's just not her wheel house. She's probably playing for a tie and that's probably not going to be good enough.

it ain't going to get better as this goes on i suspect. LIke i kept saying previously, August was probably the best it was ever going to get for Kammy. After that it gets harder and she will have very few opportunities to increase her polling. Kammy was up over trump by 1.9 points, and now over the last several days has fallen to 1.3. AND most of those losses happened in the battlegrounds. Look at the trend lines Trump hit bottom and is now climbing back up. Kammy peaked at the dnc and is now barely holding steady with trump hot on her heels. Realclear is already showing trump as the most likely winner again if the election was tomorrow. He's got the momentum - and tomorrow there's the debate. So if she starts to slide or trump gets ahead, where does she get the chance to correct that? What's the next opportunity moment? There's no more debates other than the vice presidents and I don't see that going well for them. She can't do media press conferences. She doesn't draw well enough for mass rally events. So where does she pick up the energy to climb? She can't. If she slides it's over for her unless trump does something stupid. The only thing the dems could do to win at that point would be to fire biden entirely and install her as 'princess kamala, first black female president' and try to ride that momentum till the end, but i doubt biden would go along with it willingly.

No, the war your Russian talking point providers started. The one you desperately want the West to concede because your loyalties are elsewhere.

Hussein Obama is probably the biggest pile of shit in all of the democrat shithole. Slightly smarter, but so much more devious.

People who believe in limited government want to give the state power to kill its citizens? Maybe they don't really believe in limited government at all.

If I filed a lawsuit against Arizona for failing to stop republican voters from pooping into the voting machines, that would definitely mean republicans are doing that, right?

GOP logic targets dupes like reason10. You don't have to prove shit,you just claim it repeatedly. Witness years of DonOld's 'Crooked Biden' slander. As for claiming that merely filing a lawsuit 'proves' dick shit..... but then again you are the deplorables backing a criminal pervert proven liar and fraud for President.

The simple fact is is that it's not a matter of intelligence. Your intelligence level is not relevant when considering voting for harris or not. Even a cursory glance based on intellect and reason would mean you would not be that interested in her. Even if you felt trump was worse you would not be excited about her at all. Instead she appeals to people who put their feelings before their reason. That is what she is running on, joy and happy feelings. Wouldn't it feel great to finally break that glass ceiling and have a black woman president? Wouldn't it be great if we could all laugh as much as I do during press conferences and speeches? You should vote for me because it'll make trump angry. For every vote for me and angel gets its wings. Etc etc Voting for harris appeals to those who have set reason aside and are judging based on other things.

What answer were you fishing for?

There's at least one thing we know about Harris, and that's that she won't invoke the insurrection act to stay in power AFTER the voters vote her out. Not even your ILLUSIONS about Trump will guarantee he'll ever leave once he becomes the dictator he's promised to be.

Well of course that's exactly what he's trying to negotiate right now, I'm sure. Jaggers is trying to have his cake and eat it too. He's trying not to bring the government down while looking like he's not propping the government up. We'll see how that works out for him

and robosmith says FOSLIES DUNNINGKRUGER COGNITAVE DISSONENCE NO FACTS OPINION DOESN"T MATTER NAKED LINK TROLL!!!!!!! Pudding. So there! I just saved us all having to read his next 12 posts.

They know it. But the dems and their work allies absolutely want it to be over the line. When it's over the line it creates conflict. Without conflict the democrats have nothing to sell. And The Wok who make money peddling this crap don't get any buyers. I wish there was some way to know how the trans actually felt about these things. But I suspect they are too afraid of the liberals and woke to speak their mind freely without fear of repercussion.

Innocent people say they didn't do it. Guilty people say you can't prove it.

YOU just DESTROY what little credibility you have when you blame Joe Biden for PUTIN'S INVASION. It's like you KNOW NOTHING about the Budapest Memorandum. LMAO Memorandum on security assurances United Nations Treaty Collection https://treaties.un.org › Pages › showDetails Budapest, 05/12/1994. EIF information. 5 December 1994 by signature. Authentic texts. Ukrainian. Russian. English. Attachments. ICJ information. Depositary ... Budapest Memorandum at 25: Between Past and Future Harvard Kennedy School https://www.hks.harvard.edu › publications › budapest-... On December 5, 1994, leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Russian Federation met in Budapest, Hungary, to pledge security assurances to ... Budapest Memorandum Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Budapest_Memorandum The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises three substantially identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, ... Content History The Budapest Memoranda Sequels Ukraine's Territorial Integrity and the Budapest Memorandum Wilson Center https://www.wilsoncenter.org › files › publication PDF by M Budjeryn · Cited by 60 — In 1991, Ukraine inherited the world's third largest nuclear arsenal as a result of the collapse of the. Soviet Union.2 By mid-1996, all nuclear munitions.

40% of dems voted in favour of it, and as for the rest, most of them would have voted against anything a Republican put forth. Over the past 10 years 99% of Dems have voted against every single Republican bill. Oh wise one, do you support the war in Ukraine right now?

Filing a lawsuit doesn't prove the rolls contained non-citizen registries, nor that they voted. Let us know when you find PROOF of YOUR CLAIM. Duh No cheating proven. Duh

if the Russians don't got it on paper, they got nothing if America signed some sort of agreement with them, they could produce those documents where is the treaty wherein America agreed to prop their empire up for them ? the Soviet Union and assoicated Warsaw Pact collapsed under its own weight when was the summit wherein America agreed to cut them slack, and what is that treaty called ? because the last time America met with the Soviets was at Iceland in 1986 and the Soviets did in fact reject America's proposals therein to wit, if the Soviets wanted to cut a deal, they had their chance, but simply refused to take it the idea that America is in any way bound to some "promise" made to the Soviets ? that's an urban myth the Soviet Communist dictatorship blew itself up America doesn't owe the KGB one single thing if they want to have a nuclear war about it ? let them come, the TRIAD will retaliate as necessary same old, same old Balance of Terror at 15 minutes notice to launch on warning if the Russians escalate to the high seas, perhaps America will want to parley but so far they are just beating up on the Ukrainians no reason for America to capitulate in any way at that juncture it's not like America is forcing the Ukrainians to fight we know from Vietnam that America can't actually force anybody to fight if / when the Ukrainians want to sue for an armistice, let's cross that bridge when we get there frankly, a stalemate is entirely to America's advantage

I think RFK is a very knowledgeable person. As a Kennedy, he is privy to inside info. His family are devout Libbies. The Libbies screwed RFK. I think I'll give more credence to RFK...thank you very much.

1. An extreme claim. "Anyone" who "said anything" was attacked mercilessly ? At best you are exaggerating. 2. Two cruise ships isn't proof. I just looked up Ionniddis. One guy, a gadfly, who says that the official approach is wrong. So why do you believe him versus the consensus ? He sure seems to have been wrong in a few of his statements too. Was he attacked ? I think his ideas were pretty risky and, well, they weren't picked up. To say he was 'attacked' seems to imply that he had good ideas but they went against him personally. I can't see it. He seems like a gadfly with risky ideas which may be interesting... but the public officials erred on the side of safety and went for lockdown. I still think it was the right approach. 3. That sounds like it would have been an interesting exercise, were it not for a mounting emergency that was taking place - with its own logistical challenges, and requirements for experts to make quick analysis, decisions, and - yes - tradeoffs. 4. I know some people who are experts in these things and they're pretty brilliant and also caring people. I am not dismissing you, but I do think you're wrong. It's good to be skeptical of institutions, but you are second-guessing them and throwing them under the bus for how they reacted during the biggest health emergency in 100 years. It's your right to do so, but when you post about difficult topics like this and throw people who you don't know under the bus, call them liars, and decide that Public Health shouldn't be in charge of public health emergencies well... I make my decision to not agree with your opinion, I guess.

They can collect. How much energy they put into it is another question. They know how much money you're making, so they're not going to spend effort chasing you down for tens of thousands if they know you're broke and can't pay. If you're screwing them around and it's a decent amount of money, they'll come, and they'll make you miserable.

I read two sentences of what you said, and realized "damn this dude adds nothing to the forum except hatred of Jews, and should be blocked.

The Canadian homicide rate is 3 times lower than the American rate, in spite of America having the death penalty. The death penalty is not a deterrant to murder. The USA is a perfect example to this. The same thing happens in the United States, when the inmate appeals or tries to overturn their death sentence. Ths situation is not "out of control." The crime rate peaked in 1991 in North America, and declined until the mid 2010s. Currently, the crime rate is about what it was at in the late 1990s. And of course, Canada has a much lower violent crime rate than the USA. Winnipeg, the most violent city in Canada, would barely make the top 100 most violent cities list in America. We copied much of our law from the UK, which is a relatively safe country. We should be looking looking towards Europe, where the justice system is superior to America, which does not work. We need to focus on what is best for society. That would affect due process, and the right to a fair trial for the accused. There ahve been countless examples of people being wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not do.

I think we should try to understand where some of the resentment against experts comes from, and also how they themselves are not always above politicizing issues. Doris Grinspun didn't just come out and say that safe injection sites save lives - an objective analysis she's qualified to offer. She went political and came out swinging with an accusation that this was a death sentence (by Conservatives). There's an implied maliciousness to the decision, with no acknowledgement or analysis of the costs or the repercussions these sites have on their communities (something she's probably not qualified to offer). It's definitely not helpful when you have dinks like Poilievre doing everything he can to undermine experts for cheap political points, but out-of-touch academics and biased/self-affirming public sector reps do a lot to undermine their own positions.

The appeal to authority fallacy is all too prevalent in society. We live in a time where experts are weaponized to strip away basic fundamental freedoms.

Is it possible for you to provide a cite for this brewing conspiracy that you're about to enjoy your anger about? Is it only me that are the people who complain but complainers starting to run out of complainers to complain about? Have a complaint about that! 😂