Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/27/2024 in all areas
-
Isn't it amazing how much they are going save democracy by making sure there isn't any. They fixed the primary to make sure Biden won, then forced him off the ballot and installing a candidate that was never voted for. Are doing everything they can to get people off ballots. They are trying to put their number one political opponent in jail by making sure he is tried in the most Trump hating district.4 points
-
When you think about it, for all the criticism of Donald Trump, he never pressured social media to remove covid posts he didn't like. Marion Gruber and Phil Krause at the FDA, who, after seeing the data, resigned because they couldn't go along with young people getting boosters, did not resign under Trump's administration, but when the Biden administration wanted to push boosters for all.2 points
-
2 points
-
People like Hodad heard the WHO and Dr. Fauci say don't wear masks, so like good robots, they obeyed, and then the next day, when the WHO and Dr. Fauci said, "OMG, Wear Masks!" even if it is just a piece of folded cloth over your face, the folks like Hodad folded up their old shirts into masks and obeyed. They also stood behind Plexiglass in the crowded Lowes, thinking that protected them... never wondering how it was safe in Lowes, but their local restaurant that went out of business because they were ordered closed was not safe... and then they cheered on California leaders as they filled in their skate parks with sand, but then went out and had their own private dinners without wearing masks at exclusive wineries... Never once did it occur to folks like Hodad to question any of this... nope. Pelosi can get her hair cut, but they must all be good robots and obey.2 points
-
See, that's just a partial sentence. The full sentence that you're trying to say is one of these: American POV: "CNN told me that Canadians hate Trump." Canadian POV: "CBC and CTV told me that Canadians hate Trump." The truth is this: "People who like America know that Trump is by far the best option in the 2024 election."2 points
-
Trumped Again?: 66% of Canadians say a second GOP presidential term would be ‘bad’ or ‘terrible’ for Canada https://angusreid.org/trump-harris-canada-2024/ Wow. WCM is so wrong that even I am embarrassed for him. Even most Conservative voters (63%) don't think a second Trump term would be good for Canada. I may ahve to take another dump in his mouth, to humble him...2 points
-
That is baloney and you know it. Paying off a judge $4 million is “different”? In what nation, state or county is it legal to give a judge $4 million? Hate to say it, but you’re corrupt as Nationalist.2 points
-
You sure are trying very hard to defend Clarence Thomas, aren’t you? Here’s your problem: You are a corrupt individual. You believe that if someone is on your “team,” then laws and rules don’t apply to them. A judge cannot accept a gift if it creates the appearance of impropriety. You don’t see the impropriety, because he’s on your “team.” But that doesn’t mean impropriety doesn’t exist, and as soon as you saw the precise exact same thing with Harris, you immediately agreed that it was impeachable. “They’re all the same,” you say. False! Democrat Senator Robert Menendez was just convicted of receiving “gifts.” Not one Democrat leader protested this prosecution. Not one. He’s out of the Senate and he’s convicted. Just like that. No Supreme Court interference, no Federal judges claiming that assigning Federal prosecutors is unconstitutional. Democrats are far from perfect, as Menendez proves, but the Republicans are teeming with corruption right now and you are a part of it, whether you believe it or not.2 points
-
I'll refresh your 10 minute memory. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/06/supreme-court-justices-millions-dollars-gifts-clarence-thomas.html2 points
-
No I didn't surrender anything. The Democrats have targeted their political opponents with bogus lawfare tactics. This is a fact. Why do you feel the need to defend it? It's disgraceful2 points
-
Yes, with the Trump campaign, at least. Trump campaign manager, Paul Manafort, met secretly multiple times (along with multilayered communication obfuscation) to deliver sensitive internal polling data and campaign strategy to Russian agent Konstantin Kilimnik. Kilimnik, in turn, took that information directly to Russian intelligence services that were running the troll farms that were distributing targeted misinformation intended to help Trump win the election. ^^None of this is conjecture or supposition. It's all a matter of public record documented in various reports. There was no written agreement to conclusively establish intent (of course) but Manafort knew all of the players well. It was elaborately contrived and hidden and clearly neither innocent nor accidental. The net-net, with only the most minor inference, is that Manafort was providing targeting information to Russian intelligence so that the Russian misinformation campaign knew exactly what to say, when, and to whom in order to align with the Trump campaign. Now, as for Trump, he claimed that he had no knowledge of his campaign manager sharing sensitive campaign information with the Russians. Which would mean that he later discovered that Manafort had been going behind his back and taking actions that caused a HUGE amount of friction and pain for Trump and seriously jeopardized his agenda. We all know that Trump is obsessed with loyalty. He rewards the loyal and throws away campaigners and cabinet staff at the first sign of disloyalty. Manafort had (allegedly) betrayed him. However, instead of cutting him off for his damaging clandestine activities, Trump defended Manafort. Manafort was convicted of many crimes that he unquestionably committed. But he did not roll on Trump regarding Russia. He was loyal. And he was rewarded with the pardon he was promised. You can draw your own conclusion about how Manafort earned that pardon and whether Trump knew what his campaign manager was doing on his behalf.2 points
-
2 points
-
It's crazy how leftists believe this lawfare isn't happening. RFK Jr, Donald Trump and Jill Stein have all felt the wrath of the DNC lawfare machine. Just trying to dry up their resources.. most vile thing I've seen in politics in my lifetime2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
At the very least it's half true, which is still bad enough. If the FBI didn't go to Zuckerberg directly this time, on account of the fact that he already ratted them out once, no doubt they leaned on some of his minions to do it without telling him. I doubt Zucky would notice.1 point
-
I heard that WestCanMan is one of the only Canadians banned from the Auschwitz site, after he screamed at the staff that the Holocaust was "fake" since there were never 6,000,000 Jews in Germany." When the staff pointed out the most Jews were killed in Eastern Europe, in the wake of the German invasion, he screamed "DONT LISTEN TO THE WOKE MEDIA!"1 point
-
You keep saying I'm getting my information from Fox, but I don't watch fox. I don't watch news. I read it. “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter Biden groused to daughter Naomi in January 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.” Pop is Joe Biden. The NY Post broke the news that Hunter had archived a text message on the laptop he left in Deleware that said they were all giving Joe half their earnings. That is solid evidence. If you didn't know that, it has to be willful ignorance. There is no other explanation. It was all over the news. It was reported by every major news outlet. Joe is guilty as sin.1 point
-
LOL again just repeating that doesn't make it true I posted the specific laws and cites. Sorry kiddo you're in the wrong here. The gov't says so, the dictionary says so, common sense says so. Hard fail on your part So now you're butt hurt and the only thing you have left is posting little down arrows to make yourself feel like somehow you can fight back against the mean person who beat you up so bad. It's like hearing you wimper every time you do it ? And i see you're in denial with @User and sticking your head in the sand with your fingers in your ears with @WestCanMan So denial, whimpering subservient behavior, and refusal to face the facts. LOL God you're a mess Now give me my downarrow you subservient biatch1 point
-
1 point
-
And just like that Democrats use the illegitimate prosecutor Jack Smith to file another phony indictment to change the headlines.1 point
-
Oh, he's already been shown that data. He doesn't need data. Fark data. He's got his feelings!1 point
-
Actually, Pew Research and Angus-Reid gave me the data. Take the "L" and sit down.1 point
-
So you never posted that valid statistical analysis, or at least have NO CONFIDENCE IN IT. I already had to find ONE of your threads only to discover you had misinterpreted the data you posted. Not going on your fool's errand again.1 point
-
1 point
-
You weren't talking about "died with covid" you lying piece of sh1t. You were talking about "killed by the covid vaccine". It's a fact that the overwhelming majority of people who died with COVID during every month of the pandemic were in the 80+ age bracket followed by the 70+ group. Are you f'ing retarded? Did you honestly think that just happened in 2022? There's not a single second of 2022 on that chart, dunce. That goes from the very first death in Canada that was attributed to covid, in January or February(?) 2020, right until the 344th day of 2021. So nearly 2 full years. There were less than 20 deaths in the under 20 group, which is probably about 1/4 of our population, and over 18,000 deaths in the over 80 group, which is about 4% of the population. The correlation between age and covid deaths was blatantly obvious to everyone who was paying attention. The only stronger risk factor for covid mortality was co-morbidities: things like diabetes, COPD, heart disease, etc, that usually get worse as people age. About 96% of the people who died of covid had a pre-existing condition. Usually more than 1 of them. I knew back in spring of 2020 that young, healthy people didn't need the vax. And not just from conspiracy theorists. I saw Dr Oz talk about it on TV, so a lot of people knew. And unlike you I don't just believe everything I see on TV, so I looked for stats to either prove or disprove it, and it turns out he was correct. Did it really take until 2022 for you to learn that? Are you honestly that f'ing clueless, and disconnected from reality? You know that the vax-rollouts started with the seniors, right? Did you think that was just chosen randomly?1 point
-
I think the saddest thing I saw because of the censorship was the groups of vax injured people on Facebook getting deleted. Some of these groups were 300,000 people. This was when anyone who got Guillian-Barre, Bell's Palsy, myocarditis, pericarditis, neuro disorders, tremors, vertigo, tinnitus, miscarriages, menstrual issues, etc, after the jabs - it was all being denied. They were called "anti-vaxxers" and they had TAKEN the jabs!! These people were just trying to get help, being ignored and slandered by the gov't, the media, the health care providers, told they were crazy or just "stressed". Many were close to suicide. Now, we know, of course, that these are all documented adverse events from the jabs and that governments and Big Pharma collaborated with the media to hush up adverse events so that other people would continue taking the jabs. This can never happen again.1 point
-
You gotta let up now. His tears are real.1 point
-
That's just a BS talking point, dummy. Everyone knows what the US and the rest of the world looked like when Trump was president vs Biden and Kamala. JFK was a patriotic American and would have chosen 2019 over 2024 in a heartbeat. Kamala is campaigning on fixing America after 4 years of Bring Back Inflation. Dems were in the WH for 12 of the last 16 years. Now they're in a position where they need to "fix" what they just "fixed".1 point
-
Their throne of lies is crumbling. The COVID lies they told us continue to warp our lives | National Post Got that? FAKE experts.1 point
-
we should get a sarcasm sign.1 point
-
He said that earlier, that this was a waste and they should have been sent to the front. (paraphrase) I just don't understand why he would be so against this as a waste, like sending them to the front like business as usual would have been better. Especially when his entire shtick on here is to harp on how much land Russia is grinding for... but now that Ukraine takes more land than Russia has done all year, that is a waste. But Russia taking another 10 meters somewhere is proof Russia is winning and will certainly win.1 point
-
I don't really know what he thinks. The stuff he's saying here has been nonsense. Ceding ground, inflicting heavy casualties and stretching an attacker's supply lines and logistics is another time-tested strategy. I guess these sorts of concepts are taught only to the officers and planners in Canada's military...evidently not the enlisted.1 point
-
Weird you keep posting this study led by a guy who had his work on the subject retracted for lying about data and has had his credentials revoked and not any of the 80 studies that have shown no evidence of a clinical benefit for ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19.1 point
-
Biden and Harris have been breaking immigration law for the past 4 years. It's time to throw their raggedy asses into prison.1 point
-
Great, you quoted my post where, indeed, I said nothing at all about voter ID. And, for those particularly slow people playing along at home, you can't "sue" to create voter ID laws. That would be the purview of the legislature. Jeebus.1 point
-
Rebound...a "gift" is not a donation. It's a "gift". If "wealthy doners" gave "gifts" to Kamala, then 2 things should be true: 1. The "gifts" were NOT political donations to any campaign or cause. 2. The person giving Kamala the "gift" should be expecting nothing in return. Your warping of that sentence is a silly attempt to make a point, where none exists. A "doner" donates to promote a political cause. A "gift" is given to celebrate friendship. But nice try. Man...these faux-Liberal slimeballs just can't seem to fly straight. Yet they think people should trust them. Such huberous.1 point
-
Dear Lord... did you even read the article for crying out loud? Talk about a 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon hit piece.1 point
-
Sigh. Nobody is even talking about voter ID in this conversation. Try to keep up. And no, Republicans are simply engaging in gamesmanship to curate and optimize the voting pool to their advantage. Which both parties do to some extent, but Republicans are particularly invested in disenfranchising eligible voters.1 point
-
Ahem... "Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/ Ya know, when your stupidity only makes you look...stupid...it's comical. But when your stupidity produces threats to life and health, it's well beyond comical and becomes destructive. You Libbies are destructive. From treatments for The Rona, to economics and security, you Libbies are a walking disaster.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
In my town we’re rapidly heading for a fully foreign-trained group of family practitioners. The locals can do just as well money-wise doing shifts in walk-in clinics and ERs where they don’t shoulder the full-time burden of caring for a practice load of patients. In addition most of them want to live in the big city, something that they and the medical school aren’t exactly anxious to advertise to the general public. The incentives to work as a small town GP are grossly inadequate here. I think the future of community care outside the city will be nurse practitioners and Zoom. Hell, ultimately, private NPs by Zoom. We’ll just need to palpate your credit card first.1 point
-
There literally is. a vigilante is someone who enforces the law without lawful authority. Here's the definition: vig·i·lan·te /ˌvijəˈlan(t)ē/ noun a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate. If you have the legal right to defend yourself or property, then you are WITH legal authority, not WITHOUT legal authority. Very simple. You cannot be a vigilante if you're acting within the law.1 point
-
Russians did interfere with the 2016 election. Russia is in the forefront in the disinformation campaign, and it is tearing the fabric of American society away, and people do not even realise it as they ahve been brainwashed for so long by Kremlin propaganda.1 point
-
True as far as it goes, but I don't even think it's relevant. In Canada we choose the number of MPS we have based on population rather than land mass. For every approximately 100,000 people (I can't remember the exact number) we have an MP. That's in our constitution The premise is that this is the number of people that a single MP and his staff can reasonably service and be available to. Thats as many people as you can have and still have the time to meet with the ones who want to meet, have staff read the emails, meet with businesses or other groups that have concerns etc. So in order to say "thats too many", you'd have to demonstrate why or how if we expanded that to 150 or 200 thousand people per mp that people would still be adequately served. You can't just say 'because Australia!" And the us is a disaster right now and obviosuly a republic is different than a westminster democracy so it's not even a sane comparison.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
They ARE EVs. Burning hydrogen in and ICE is, because that is an inefficient technology, more than 60% loss to heat and friction. Fuel cells deliver almost 100% of the fuel into electricity, and electric motors almost up to 90% of the energy to the drive wheels. Hydrogen injection into diesel engines increases mileage and reduces emissions, similar to ethanol increasing the octane rating and lowers emissions in gas engines. Fuel cells have a way to go yet in cars, give them 10 years they'll be a little more than BEVs. They're already in server rooms and broadcast sites all over the place.1 point
