Leaderboard

Liar.

I am proof that your claim is untrue. The terrorist supporters who want to get themselves arrested are succeeding at getting themselves arrested. Then, like you, they protest the fact that they managed to get themselves arrested.

BULLSH1T! You freaking liar. She wasn’t “peacefully protesting”, she was physically blocking access to a healthcare facility. That’s illegal, she knew it was illegal, they asked her over and over and over and over again and again again to remove herself. She wanted to get arrested and “prove her point,” so… FINE. If you want to get yourself arrested to “prove your point,” then don’t complain about the repercussions.

@eyeball You've peddled misinformation for years now about what happened in New York at the beginning of covid. Cuomo finally was forced to testify at the Select Subcommittee on Covid on June 11. They know he killed "THOUSANDS". They died from his evil mandates, not from covid. Here is the press conference held after his questioning. You owe it to everyone now to stop the lying. Find his actual testimony on YouTube and see for yourself what REALLY went on. It's all coming out. And you my friend, have taken the evil side throughout all of this. I've provided you already with the testimony of nurses who were serving in NYC at the time. Many quit because they couldn't kill people under his mandates. This went on all over the world. It was a culling of the elderly. In the UK, they killed them with overdoses of Midazolam. That came out at the UK hearings. It's all coming out. And you are still shilling for the murderers.

Now, you are back to the same original stupidity as before. That is not the definition of a machine gun. Functioning similar to a machine gun, doesn't make something a machine gun. Words have meanings. You can run people over with a car, too; that doesn't make a car a machine gun.

The judge and/or jury found her guilty of blocking access, not the prosecutor.

One man killed 86 people and wounded of 434 in France using a truck. It's about time YOU started being honest. You don't care about how many died or suffered in the slightest. You care about virtue signaling. And no he didn't kill anyone with a bump stock. He killed them with a rifle. And would have killed them with a rifle without the bump stock.

More attacks on people. The left are seriously evil people

Didn't biden start to wander off and have to be helped back by other attendees when he lost his way?

These bright lights who instantly believed Jussi, and who instantly believed every ridiculous covid10t promise and statement during the plandemic, and who instantly believed in hookers being paid to pee on beds, all of it with no evidence, and then refused to let go of any of that BS in the face of all evidence, can't for the life of them think of anything wrong with what Hunter and Joe used the VPOTUS office for. When you look at how quickly they'll latch onto absurd BS that tickles their confirmation bias, and how long it takes them to absorb facts that cause a little bit of cognitive dissonance, it's clear that they're cultists. Now that they can no longer pretend that Joe wasn't involved in any of Hunter's dirty business dealings in China and Ukraine, they are pretending that it's all a-ok. "WHAT'S WRONG WITH ENTERING INTO A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE GOV'T OF CHINA? WHAT'S WRONG WITH USING THE OFFICE OF THE VPOTUS TO GET HUNTER AN $83k/mo JOB???? THOSE THINGS ARE NORMAL." Cultists

Supreme Court strikes down Trump's federal ban on bump stocks In REALTY a bump stock does convert a semi-automatic weapon into a machine gun.

They got their marching orders from Garlan in WaPo. This is exactly why he wrote that oped.

He is free to staunchly oppose entirely imaginary allegations. Like exemptions for Democrats on the Alien Lizard Overlord's food menu.

Yep...clip on is the correct term.

More anti Christian hate crimes that won't be punished

Biden can't even rally his free thoughts.

Shut it chud (mike hardner ... STAAAAAAAARE )

Again doesn't care about the truth or the deaths, cares about his echo chamber talking points. You're not going to get anything else out of him

Well this is what Tom Mulcair was saying, and what many others have said. ESPECIALLY for the leader of the opposition. The liberals desperately want him to read the report and to limit himself. That's why you see his supporters here demanding that if PP doesn't read the report it means he's unreliable, and it means he cant' be prime minister etc etc etc. Yeash.

You and many others. If you are bound by rules in the act and thus unable to comment as journalist, politician or whatever then all discussion ends. Really, you've answered your own question and made my point in the process. I want political leaders asking questions, I want journalists asking questions and seeking answers. I want them to ask the same questions I would ask if I had the venue to do it. And that's why I don't want them read in. Simple eh?

Someone give me a justification for the ridiculous level of DEI and racist hiring, promotion and grants giving employed by the government. Go ahead. Try. In the latest development, about 40 Canadian university professors have recommended to the House of Commons that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in federally funded research be abolished. Such policies have multiplied within the three agencies responsible for funding research, known collectively as the Tri-Council, since the Liberals took office. “These policies disproportionately punish small institutions, are not supported by evidence, employ flawed metrics with no end goal, and are unpopular with the public who funds the research,” they wrote in a brief filed to the House science committee on May 24. Aside from the Canada Research Chairs, other federally funded research initiatives have been bogged down with diversity requirements at the direction of the Liberal government: some undergraduate funding programs have recently been restricted to Black applicants only. Researchers are asked to disclose their diversity status (i.e., whether they are members of preferred groups), and sometimes, they are required to file diversity statements with their grant applications. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jamie-sarkonak-the-academics-against-dei-movement-comes-to-life-finally

Garland didn't break the law, goofus. Once it's claimed, executive privilege is presumptive. You'd need a court to reverse it. Nothing illegal. I'm sure you'll change your opinion now and retract your vitriolic remarks. Because you're a person motivated by facts, not someone just randomly spewing crap to justify your biases, right? 🤣

I recognize you as being a Loyalist of Upper Canada from the Toronto the Good thus I would defend you to the hilt, in the name of my Colonel-in-Chief, Elizabeth Windsor

America REALLY dodged a bullet when the Senate refused to allow Saddam Hussein Obama to replace Justice Scalia with this Nazi.

Can't dispute a single item. You clearly have thought this out. Too bad there are !diots with closed minds who want to turn this place into Nazi Germany.

Homosexual lifestyles and non-biological gender are in direct contradiction to Catholic doctrine. Defending that doctrine and ensuring that mixed messages are not sent to followers is the mandate of the Catholic Church and Catholic schools, because Catholics believe that the salvation of souls is the core mission of life. You don’t have to be Catholic or religious, but it’s absurd to say that one has a right to be religious without adhering to the beliefs of the respective faith. Secular pressure is overriding longstanding democratic rights like religious freedom and freedom of speech, even women’s and children’s rights, in unprecedented ways. It’s not about being mean to people. We don’t say the serial killer is good because God made him that way. We as Christians say God loves everyone but doesn’t approve of all behaviour. That’s the major fallacy and ideological creep underway: I can tolerate or even love someone in a universal God loves all His children sense, but that doesn’t mean I have to support how everyone lives or the choices people make. We are not only entitled to moral perspectives; our society would break down in significant ways without the aspiration toward leading the good life, even if the details might vary among the best moral perspectives. People are being asked or even required to violate their morality and conscience in significant ways. Not only is that likely to receive a political backlash; it must be challenged. You don’t get to make me pretend that blue is orange or that what I believe is wrong is just fine. If you start pushing dubious values on kids in schools, you’re inviting extreme cultural and political war, which is what we have. The Christians didn’t start this; the LGBTQ2S+ lobby did, even after receiving the legal rights supporting lifestyles or self-proclaimed identities that many people think are wrong or dubious. Fly your flag of choice, but don’t make others fly it.

It is the same thing if the "risk" is that you'll break your trust. 🤡 Put more marbles in your mouth and try again.

The counter is that political performance, especially in opposition, becomes impossible once you're read into the information itself. Once read in, you are forever legally bound by the security classification emblazoned on the file docket and at the top and bottom of every single page the docket contains. It doesn't enable conversation / debate.... it ends it with finality. The legal duty to preserve the integrity of the classified material applies to all parties, it applies across the board, and it applies until such time as the contents are declassified by lawful authority. In the realm of things that might be characterized as non political, if you've ever wondered why ex-military members (who choose to participate in public forums) never comment on the specific details of specific operations they were personally involved in, this is that. The duty to protect the classified information you were once privy to outlives the careers of those read in so resigning and singing isn't an option either. It's pretty simple...

You really are a pathetic little POS! I hope you get everything you deserve.

Here's an example of activists trying to force Catholic school boards to adopt a position contrary to their religious beliefs on that very subject. https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/forcing-pride-on-catholic-schools-isnt-diversity Putting aside the question of who's right, who's wrong, and who will eventually prevail, I think the public optics here are just horrid and any potential win comes at a such a high cost that it renders the fight itself wildly counterproductive. This is what creates backlash, fuels division, creates polarization, leads to winner take all elections, and causes previously tolerant and good natured people to make hard right turns in the search for a return to common sense. A lot of gains have been made here so why not just take yes as an answer and avoid the looming backlash altogether? All that's required is extending the same tolerance and good will that enabled those gains to many of the people who supported them in the first place. All you had to do to lock in those gains was not be crazy... and you couldn't do it. I call it bad tactics when the worst thing for your cause is a win.

Well sure but presumably there's a distinction between influence and interference here where the latter merits more concern than the former. What gives me pause to consider is why I should be any more or less concerned if its foreign or domestic. In any case it's all potentially rotten when it's a secret.

As Republicans are so fond of saying (when it's convenient) "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime." I have zero sympathy for zealots who go out of their way to harass women seeking health care. This is functionally the same principle as violating a restraining order. The only thing you have to do to follow this law is to be a decent person and leave the poor women alone. It's not an accidental slip-up. You have to go out of your way to deliberately break this law. Well, she got what she wanted. Probably should have thought about her husband's feelings before she made that choice.

It's the same thing. 🤡

You guys are wasting all your time debating an aspect of this case that was ancillary. The ATF did not have authority to create law [Full Stop]. Machine guns have nothing to do with this because this isn't a machine gun like device. If anything, it simulates full auto. There's a difference and it is very important. Like them or hate them, the law must be made by congress. The ATF did not follow the law.

This isn't just about that one day, I've been saying all along that the NDP were only propping up Trudeau to get their pensions, and not at all because they were working for Canadians. The NDP are entirely there for themselves.

Well foreign influence is something that does happen, everywhere. But the Gov got caught with its pants down, and the Gov did nothing to pull them back up. Imo.

If they wanna move it back a week, then fine. But they should also pass an amendment that they still lose their pension if they don't get re-elected. Easy peasy. They could do it. But they likely won't.

Seriously, how many threads have you started today? You can't even keep up with the garbage you posted in the others.

What a novel concept! 🙄 Like Sweden trusted their people during coronamania, instead of flip-flopping non-scientific rules all over the place and shutting everything down? Geez, trusting the public is what some of us were advocating for during the last 3+ years and you were AGAINST it then.

Uh-huh. 🙄 This sounds exactly like, "No one is forcing you....but you'll lose your job, your house, your career if you dont' do what we tell you to do." Fuquein' gaslighters.

That's not even a meme, it's a screenshot of an actual CBC article, showing the nazi and confederate flags that MH and others 'saw' at the Freedom convoy.

Well we don’t seem to know yet whether this particular fire was intentional, but the cultural loss for Toronto and Canada is enormous. If this was arson and part of the revolutionary fervour unleashed after the “ground-penetrating radar” press event that turned out to be nothing of substance, we’re watching the continued rapid elimination of Canada’s culture. It’s absolutely terrible that our own government refuses to stop it.

How? How is admitting a truth from history somehow giving approval to people doing something similar in the future. If I say the Nazi started world war II does that somehow make it that I'm advocating someone starts a war in the future? You're getting to that magical point where you start blathering like a fool. Make sense.