Leaderboard

"potentially deadly"? Crossing the street is "potentially deadly". I fear there are now a lot of people psychologically addicted to fear.

So you need a smart phone and to download government spyware now to, say, go visit your grandmother who lives in the US? You are seriously warped

It's amazing watching leftists bend over backwards to justify the WEF. A group made up of ultra rich nut jobs.

Covid has an IFR of 0.5% higher than the seasonal flu. Depending on the year, the flu IFR would be a fraction of a percentage higher than normal, which means Covid would also be even LESS of a fraction of a percentage higher. Covid even affected the same demographic as the seasonal flu. Yet, we were fooled into thinking this was an actual pandemic. A lot of people are waking up to this. Some woke up sooner than others. Some will never wake up. I think it's partly, as you say - they don't like to admit they've been fooled. And partly, because they behaved so atrociously towards their fellow citizens. Facing that shame means you're not the "good person" you thought you were.

Yeah. Their opposition tells me he’s on the right track.

On point of fact: I did not name call you, you are trying to slime me with your drive by postings instead of carefully reading. And the Sheeple of the Year Committee apparently likes your ‘liberal moxie’, but there are many contenders this year. Lots of people get the Gold Star, don’t let it go to your head. To get noticed maybe you could claim that you are actually a conservative! Oh, wait…

I'm not the one who wants "power" here. You are. You want power over the choices other people make. The only "power" I want is to be able to make my own life decisions and my own medical decisions. It's not up to me to judge others' reasons for doing anything. Even if I think it's "frivolous", it's their decision to make, not mine. That's the point you're missing. You want power over women to make their personal life and medical decisions for them, and you want to force women to make their decisions based on YOUR personal beliefs.

Hey, Brian Stelter just got canned by CNN. Wow, when they don’t even want you it’s time to re-evaluate your life.

Again, you are lying. South Carolina had a 6 week fetal heartbeat law in effect.....until only yesterday when the South Carolina Supreme Court temporarily blocked it. The exceptions for rape or incest did not apply here. The exception for a medical emergency, also did not apply as the woman was not in a medical emergency - yet. This is the problem with your hard-nosed laws - the woman has to wait and suffer and risk death until her life is such grave danger - then doctors can act. So the doctor and lawyers in this situation were not misunderstanding the law. You do not see how ridiculous that is? You do not see how women are going to suffer and die under your beliefs?

Damn straight it's government trying to control the populous with a vaccine. We just seen them do it.

Vaxtards. Simple, yet all encompassing. Almost elegant in execution.

Ahem... Liz Cheyney is f'in history!!! Thanks for tuning in...

I saw the Canadian government beat Canadian veterans at their own war memorial. That was enough to convince me the worm needs to turn.

What did Harper promise he didn't follow through on?

Oh FFS cut the replies. Anyone who believes no one died of Covid or the deaths were all faked and from something else is a total pinhead not worth responding to. They've already caused enough damage to public health measures and the only people they'll ever convince are more mentally challenged fools. The same small group of complete liars and imbeciles has dragged every thread in this forum beyond belief with their utter nonsense.

What we never knew before COVID was how expendable people of advanced age with co-morbidities were. Now that we know we can fine tune our vote away from you punks accordingly.

Critical thinking will be resisted at all costs.

Or they can stop acting like communists and scrap the ridiculous app

Your argument that because nobody died in the streets there wasn't a pandemic is remarkably stupid.

Don't you love it when the Liberals feel they need to approve of the Conservative leader? ? We don't like him...harrumph.

Geez. They actually did this in The Handmaid's Tale. Blessed be the fruit.

Pierre: Justinflation. You: Justinfatuation. Hardner, Excessive, others: Justinflagellation.

Jeez, that's kind of dumb. If anyone died on the way to the hospital, they'd end up there in the morgue. Would the bodies have been dropped off at the train station or Tim Hortons?

An irony I've heard about is that something in nicotine renders the spike protein that makes you 'catch it' inert. Something attaches to or coats the spike gumming it up. So perhaps this could have all be solved with cigars and good scotch. ?

You've got a long track record of interpreting things irrationally, so fill yer boots MH. For the record, the protest was extremely anti-Trudeau in nature, because the mandates came from the village idiot directly, but protesters weren't there to force him out of office. You're projecting a crime on them that they didn't commit.

Exactly. And if there was a deadly epidemic, along with a vaccine that prevented it, there would be lineups for the vaccine, not protests against it. I don't expect that I'll ever see anyone carrying a placard that says "DON'T SAVE US!", unless maybe it's a bunch of leftists staging a die-in after Trump gets re-elected in 2024.

1. High covid death rates, failed healthcare reform, deficits in good times, rampant disunity. Results. 2. Globalist is as relevant a term in politics as Leprechaun. It's a conspiracy theory crafted for dupes. Every corporation is globalist, I hope you know...

Do you even know what that article means? Sweet FA - that's it. It's from April of 2021. Do you know the significance of that? The world was just coming out of flu season and we were just at the very start of having double-vaxed people on the planet. There was no real-world data in yet on the success or failure of the vaccines. It wasn't until Aug 19th of that year that we saw the report come out of Israel saying that 50% of the people in their ICUs were double-vaxed. Do you get it Flyer? You're using old, discredited vax propaganda as a proof of something which almost everyone around you knows to be completely false. Did you honestly just read an article from spring of 2021 declaring the vax a smash hit and then cram your head up your ass for over a year, only popping out to regurgitate that aged false narrative? You gloat about what happened to the protesters, and even at the end of that paragraph you said that "they got what they deserved", so yes you are signalling to the world that you're happy with what happened to the protesters. Do you think we don't know that? And people got beaten ruthlessly by police after they surrendered peacefully on their knees you repugnant little man. They obviously never deserved that when they were there to stick up for YOUR FREEDOMS and THE RIGHTS OF YOUR CHILDREN! You're an absolute disgrace to the Canadian Forces and to anyone anywhere who fought for peace and/or freedom. Yes, you absolutely should be sheepish. Almost everything that you say in this thread is either stupid or a lie, and the cite from the post I'm quoting is a perfect example of your abject stupidity. I'm posting the most recent data that's available from medical health professionals in this country, from May and then June of this year, you're citing the exact type of bullshit from spring of 2021 that convinced billions of people to take the worthless and dangerous vax. My falsehoods buddy? When the dust settles on this topic you'll ditch your current account and start a new one here or leave the site altogether, because everything that you wrote here has already aged really badly. Your posts are like 12 yr old cheese.

Cuz Nazis? You forgot that part…

I don't blame them.

Yes it is. You can't fine somebody or refuse them access for not downloading government Spyware onto their personal cell phone. It violates freedom of mobility and private property rights among other things

Trump has a moral compass?

Chinese Communism is a failed experiment and their "success" is an illusion of the naive as is the case with Russian Autocracy you keep pointing fingers at the West while ignoring the faults of everyone else leading to truly terrible analysis

Thanks for that, I was wondering what the controlled news was projecting about this. What are they saying about Hunter Biden, Old Joe’s mental capacity and the economy these days? Gold stars all around I bet...

It was reported that she voted with Trump more than 90%. A hard right legacy Republican, she stood up to his lies about the stolen election ("Come on guys, I only need 11,000 votes...") and has been rewarded by the cult with utter vilification for having principles. It's not a Republican Party, it's Trump, right or wrong now.

I know! The Rino Republicans are going down one by one. It’s a signal if things to come in the fall. Trump is having great effectiveness at backing certain real conservative candidates who then win.

Obviously Boges likes him, as does MH, I believe. So did the member named Argus. All of them just old, decrepit liberals.

It is highly curious why Torontonians hold such a love for Rob and Doug. Neither had good credentials or experience in political work. Must be the attraction to criminality that is inherent to people living in big cities.

The Nazis were busy convincing themselves they were being humane when they did it to the mentally ill. By the time they were shooting people in pits, they had to keep the executioners blind drunk to hold up morale lest they commit suicide. The evil men do as Shakespeare says...

"NP View: The truly awful cost of Canada's permissive doctor-assisted death program" NP View: The truly awful cost of Canada's permissive doctor-assisted death program | National Post Canada is on a slippery slope with the medically-assisted death law.

Doctor-assisted death is being offered and being done to all kinds of people who should never receive it. Roger Foley is prime example. The hospital ethicist felt $1500 a day was too much money to spend on a guy like Roger Foley and saw a way how he could do the ultimate money-saving measure if he could convince Roger to take the lethal injection. quote The story comes only days after a widely circulated Associated Press feature broke revelations about a patient in London, Ont., who was similarly given an unprompted offer of euthanasia. Roger Foley suffers from a degenerative brain disorder and claimed he was being offered euthanasia so regularly that he began secretly recording hospital staff. In one recording obtained by AP, a hospital ethicist tells Foley his care is costing the hospital “north of $1,500 a day” and asks if he has “an interest in assisted dying.” The two incidents add to a growing list of controversial cases in which Canadians with chronic conditions were offered death in lieu of treatment. B.C. woman Donna Duncan was approved for a medically assisted death last year after years of declining mental health exacerbated by a chronic inability to access psychiatric care. Duncan’s death in an Abbotsford hospital so blindsided her family that they reported the case to the Abbotsford Police. “While we have been advocates of death by Medical Assistance in situations where there is a terminal diagnosis or death is imminent, we had no idea that Canada’s laws leave considerable room for interpretation by activist doctors,” they wrote in a statement at the time. Another British Columbian, Alan Nichols, was euthanized only days after his family brought him to a Chilliwack hospital to recover from a psychiatric episode. Despite Nichols’ history of severe mental illness and suicidal tendencies, he was approved for death by health authorities after only four days in the hospital’s psychiatric ward. unquote Another case of a sick Canadian offered death instead of treatment — this time, a veteran (msn.com) Those of us who don't believe in this kind of thing must never concede to any part of it and must continue to expose the evils that are happening in a calm, collected way.

So are you saying Trump was too stupid to notice or too lazy to do anything about it?

Ah, I see. I guess you know more than Sander Greenwald, who wrote most of the epidemiology textbooks. Carry on.

What a dishonest false comparison. Hillary conceded and acknowledged Trump’s victory. She didn’t claim the election was rigged or that votes country were illegitimate or fraudulent. She did not foment the lie the that the VP (Joe Biden at the time) had the power to unilaterally ignore and throw out the election results at his sole discretion and declare Hillary the winner and her supporters didn’t storm the Capitol trying to lynch him when it didn’t happen. She didn’t launch dozens of baseless amd frivolous lawsuits that cost taxpayers millions and threatened to destroy democracy. She did not pressure state election officials to falsify their vote counts in her favour She did not forge false certificates of electors and try to file them with officials in DC.

He's obviously really smart with excellent historical context. I talked to him as I've mentioned. He has a winning personality that people gravitate towards and his wife is both stunning in her own right and very supportive of his goals. Yeah, he's a BIG threat to all these globalist fascists running around in jackboots.

I already agreed that I do not evaluate the life of a zygote or preborn POTENTIAL child as signficantly worthy in contrast to the living person. I do not believe that life before birth are persons in light of the inability to define whether they have a common sensation of things like pain (or pleasure) and that terminating them is not 'murder'. I compared this to other animals in which you need to address. Isn't eating eggs literally eating aborted chicks? At what point does the life being developed within the egg turns from being one that lacks sensation to one that does? If the animals we eat are invalid relative to us, are we not invalid in our treatment against them in kind? This is not a question of whether I prefer other animals over humans but whether they are not 'naturally' equal in their 'right' to live relative to themselves. And if so, Nature itself does not care whether we eat other animals or if other animals eat us. Nature does not specify life as 'superior' nor 'inferior'. As to whether an unborn entity is or is not worthy to justly YOUR 'right' to respect, if Nature favored your view, .....if God favored your view.... then the death of a validly worthy being would be saved regardless of what we could do. So why is it YOUR right to impose limitations about others where the question still exists about whether it is signficantly valuable to Nature that is at question? If Nature apart from human intervention should be preferred, then NO form of civilization matters and should be 'aborted'. That is, if you think that our direct technological capacity to abort seems 'unnatural' to you, then why are you accepting the benefits of any technology. [This assumes you may be dubious of the act in the way one might feel if they had to choose to kill one man to save many. The positive act psychologically affects your perception to chose to kill another even if the nature of it is just.] You dehumanize the grown human person opting to abort over the mere potential life of a baby because you prioritize a belief that the potential child's life is paramount over the actual certain life of the woman as a host to it. Note too that while my own belief about life is more nihilistic, this is NOT the case for the vast majority of those believing in a right to abortion. Most do not believe, for instance, in abortion close to birth (within the last trimester). The degree of life for most is based upon structure of the lifeform (its 'stage' of development) with the added assumption of sufferring as pre-existing. My stonger position would even place question upon babies born as having a capcity to suffer (or find pleasure) but require LEARNING to feel as they develop past birth. So it is unlikely that the unborn baby would even 'care' whether it exists or not. It is ONLY a religioius belief to assume so. I DO favor at least a need to defend life post birth regardless. But the likely reason we lack memory of these times with more force than we do later is because our early memory is 'anethetized'. A baby has unnecessary networked links in the brain that would probably be as potentially halucinogenic and uncomfortable to us if we were to experience it consciously as adults. A similar factor of nature that hunters should know is that when an animal is killed, if it isn't killed quickly, its meat tastes 'wild' due to reactionary chemistry that pain amplifies where it suffers longer. This points to the anesthetizing capacity of living things to evolve mechanisms that reduce the suffering more siginficantly to the younger creatures that tend to become victims of another predator. It is unlikely then that an unborn baby 'feels' suffering under the operation of abortion. As to anything that you may otherwise BELIEVE about souls being implanted by God into the zygote, there is no real suffering that remotely compares to the nature of death we ALL eventually succumb to at some point in our lives regardless.

"murder is not a right" Neither is the dircect opposite: life is not a right independent of how we define it! ...Or do pigs, cows, and other animals we eat not require being 'murdered' for consumption? If humans killings are only what one can 'murder', how does the definition get defined? What defines 'murder' outside of government legislation mean? Is war not murder on a massive scale? How do you DEFINE murder outside of a convention of different people negotiating what it means?

I think it's fair to question the Trudeau Liberals' overreach (especially with the Emergencies Act and how that played out with the truckers). What you're saying about politicized monetary policy, however, is exactly what I'm talking about with Pierre and his "platform". You don't actually know what monetary policy is (and that's fine - 90% of people don't even have a basic understanding), but people talk about it a lot and you know it's a powerful tool. The mechanics of it all are a mystery to you, but you know that it's DOING THINGS, that Trudeau-man is BAD, and it's part of his PLAN. Pierre understands the central bank. He doesn't believe what he's saying about it. He just knows that you're vaguely mad about all sorts of things you don't really understand and he'll channel that if he can.

I am sorry..... my boss asked me to stay late at work that day. Not everything is a conspiracy.