Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

The businesses being 'ruined' are in-fact on government owned properties and were forced to close...but not by truckers and their friends. Places that are remaining open do great business. Especially Jerrycans...as you can imagine.

From what I've seen, the businesses that bought into the whole "White-supremacist terrorist uprising in downtown Ottawa, death and destruction everywhere, AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!  Run for your lives!!!!" narrative and closed their doors - yes, they lost business.

The ones who recognized the lies from Trudeau and the media and stayed open are doing splendidly.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

From what I've seen, the businesses that bought into the whole "White-supremacist terrorist uprising in downtown Ottawa, death and destruction everywhere, AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!  Run for your lives!!!!" narrative and closed their doors - yes, they lost business.

The ones who recognized the lies from Trudeau and the media and stayed open are doing splendidly.

 

I imagine you've seen the livestreams. My wife was somewhat incredulous until she saw them herself. Especially those massive parties. Too many people having fun and not throwing Molotov cocktails. This can not stand.

BLM riot in Montreal 2020

Age restricted...you know...because of the violence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gifDHJ3wsIg

 

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted
28 minutes ago, Accountability Now said:

Oh...but here's where you're wrong. He prefaced his "tolerate" sentiment with they are misogynism and racism. He wasn't criticizing them for their actions but rather for who they were as people.

He was using inflammatory, sweeping rhetoric and it's perfectly fair to criticize him for that.  His attempt to characterize all the protestors all as racists was stupid and unscrupulous and you can see it for what it was - an attempt to capitalize politically on the presence of a handful of idiots.  

That's what this is about.  Twisting your panties over the word tolerate just makes you look silly.  The Speaker of the House had to scold Trudeau in Parliament the other day for spouting off his hyperbole, and that's what people are listening to and noticing, not the contrived outrage over one dumb word you've blown up to absurdity.  

  • Thanks 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
1 hour ago, Accountability Now said:

I truly love it when people resort to insults as it means they are defeated in the argument.  Just to hammer home the English lesson, comparisons are not comparisons. 

 

 

Keep trying Aristides. One day you just might get there. 

 

One day you might actually learn something about Hitler and realize what an idiot you are. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

 Twisting your panties over the word tolerate just makes you look silly.  

Your opinion and I have mine.  Again...I have quoted the opinions of others out there including Bill Maher who is a notable Liberal pundit.  Stop pretending that this is just me noticing the connection. If its not that big of a deal then why do you and others on here keep responding??? I made the claim once and since then have only responded to other poster's faux outrage. Contrary to what you think, this doesn't strike that big of a nerve for me. I am used to Trudeau saying big boy things in French and then scrambling like a buffoon to deny it in English. 

41 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

 that's what people are listening to and noticing, not the contrived outrage over one dumb word you've blown up to absurdity.  

? How many people do you think watch Parliamentary proceedings in Canada, not just in Canada but around the world?? Now compare that to how many people (around the world) are talking about Trudeau's Hitler like comments.  

Posted
Just now, Aristides said:

One day you might actually learn something about Hitler and realize what an idiot you are. 

Again with the personal insult. Perhaps you need to refresh yourself with the Forum Rules? 

However, I take no real offense from someone who doesn't actually understand the English language. 

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Accountability Now said:

Your opinion and I have mine.  Again...I have quoted the opinions of others out there including Bill Maher who is a notable Liberal pundit.  Stop pretending that this is just me noticing the connection. If its not that big of a deal then why do you and others on here keep responding??? 

because you're going to make a big deal about anything Trudeau does.  I can't stand the guy either but you've lost perspective, though you're far from the worst here in that regard.  At least you can go 3-4 posts without calling someone a Nazi.  

Edited by Moonbox

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)

Has anybody mentioned yet that Trudeau’s prohibition on protests exempts Refugees, Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities.

Because that's interesting. And yeah, really...he actually did that:

trudeau-emergency-exempts-indians-refuge

Edited by Infidel Dog
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Has anybody mentioned yet that Trudeau’s prohibition on protests exempts Refugees, Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities.

Because that's interesting. And yeah, really...he actually did that:

trudeau-emergency-exempts-indians-refuge

So what happens when ethnic minorities come out in droves against vaccine mandates?   Does it mean that right now the police are differentiating among people at the protests based on race?  That’s racial profiling, banned on the Toronto force which is helping with the suppression in Ottawa.  

Edited by Zeitgeist
Posted
15 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Has anybody mentioned yet that Trudeau’s prohibition on protests exempts Refugees, Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities.

Because that's interesting. And yeah, really...he actually did that:

trudeau-emergency-exempts-indians-refuge

What the hell? Trudeau is warped. 

Probably bringing in a bunch of his pals from China as we speak.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

because you're going to make a big deal about anything Trudeau does.  

Actually if you look at my posts on here, 99% of them are discussing numbers or objective facts. I rarely discuss things that center on opinion which clearly this topic was.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Accountability Now said:

Actually if you look at my posts on here, 99% of them are discussing numbers or objective facts. I rarely discuss things that center on opinion which clearly this topic was.

That's why I'm not singling you out as one of the circus clowns. The "you" was a general reference to all of the people going on about this.  

The argument about Trudeau should be about his cynicism, his double-standards, his lack of moral conviction and his worthless platitudes.  The emergencies act is something actually tangible for which to criticize him and you'll get a lot more mileage out of that than raving about a word folks have chosen to inflate/conflate into some faux-outrage.  It makes his critics look frivolous and reactionary.  

 

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
3 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

  The emergencies act is something actually tangible for which to criticize him and you'll get a lot more mileage out of that than raving about a word

 

Why is it an either or situation? His choice of words sets the stage for criticism about the emergency act. It’s all part of the Trudeau story

Posted
10 minutes ago, Accountability Now said:

Why is it an either or situation? His choice of words sets the stage for criticism about the emergency act. It’s all part of the Trudeau story

Because it's silly, frivolous criticism.  You're taking one word and exaggerating/misconstruing its meaning and then waving it around like it's a declaration of the next pogrom.  By focusing on silly stuff like this you cheapen any tangible arguments you'd otherwise be able to make and people tune you out because you don't appear reasonable to begin with. 

Trudeau's not popular right now but this loud sloganeering and the CPC's cozying up with the dumbest and least articulate among its base is THE path for Trudeau to get re-elected.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
Just now, Moonbox said:

You're taking one word 

Except it wasn’t one word. Misogynists. Racists. He used a number of words to push divide and succeeded because people like you think it’s not a big deal. Again. If that’s your opinion then so be it but it’s not mine

Posted
1 hour ago, Accountability Now said:

Except it wasn’t one word. Misogynists. Racists. He used a number of words to push divide and succeeded because people like you think it’s not a big deal. Again. If that’s your opinion then so be it but it’s not mine

It's kind of what he does, isn't it?

It makes me wonder why Moonbox is getting so hysterical about people noticing. Ok, that's a lie. I know why.

Posted
On 2/18/2022 at 3:49 PM, Infidel Dog said:

It makes me wonder why Moonbox is getting so hysterical about people noticing. Ok, that's a lie. I know why.

Ha.  If there was ever an obvious example of projection, this would be it.  

Considering I started this thread to criticize Trudeau and I've already agreed that Trudeau's rhetoric and hyperbole was idiotic and unfair, it's pretty interesting you come back to say I'm "hysterical" about it.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)

You wanting to criticize Trudeau does not surprise me anymore than the slogan of hardcore socialists, they write on the odd wall...

C3otTkPVMAEBiEb.jpg

I find their and your idea (as you posted in your OP) a little hysterical though. What was it again...? Something about hitting the peaceful protest with something like the G 20 response, wasn't it?

The police were sued for human rights violations after the G 20 police response you would have preferred. They were rioters in that one and they settled for something like $16.5 million dollars from the police, didn't they?

Kind of a hysterical request to repeat all that if you ask me, considering all the organizers of the Trucker convoy were asking for at first was a talk with Trudeau.

I see why you didn't want anybody to know where your pic of the burning police car came from though.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Posted

Where did I request a repeat of the G20 police response? 

I hope you didn't hurt yourself when you mustered the mental energy to type this gem of a response out.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Where did I request a repeat of the G20 police response? 

Right here, hero:

On 2/15/2022 at 5:26 PM, Moonbox said:

I do, however, think he's handling things extremely poorly and we need an explanation forwhy this particular protest couldn't be handled in the same way as others like the G20.  

Sheesh, did you honestly think you could bluff your way out of that?

Nice try, I guess.

Edited by Infidel Dog
Posted
On 2/16/2022 at 7:28 AM, blackbird said:

The imposition of the act has been an obvious necessity for the past 2-1/2 weeks as the occupation of a city became an uncontrollable disaster.

The police never tried to control it.  They barely arrested anybody.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Starting to look like trudeau's brownshirts in the black jackets are getting ready to take your advice though. They're almost ready to go full G 20.

 

This cop should be fired and sued.  A citizen is allowed to film the police.  The cop got in her face, not the other way around.

This is why cops in Ottawa still don't have bodycams.  Tyrants don't like to be filmed.

Edited by Moonlight Graham

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted (edited)
On 2/18/2022 at 12:42 PM, Infidel Dog said:

Has anybody mentioned yet that Trudeau’s prohibition on protests exempts Refugees, Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities.

Because that's interesting. And yeah, really...he actually did that:

trudeau-emergency-exempts-indians-refuge

Unbelievable.  The Liberal gov is racist.

Edited by Moonlight Graham

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,857
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Tony Eveland
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...