Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/07/2026 in all areas
-
They don't kill us because they call us NAZIs. They call us NAZIs so they can kill us. @robosmith is one of the reasons why they consider ANTIFA a terror organization.3 points
-
Violations in Three Areas proves Trump fascism. 1. Order to release 2. Order to present detainee in court 3. Order NOT to transfer detainee. https://www.facebook.com/reel/880070624776188 Video2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
It's extremely difficult to get any major projects done in Canada if they require Indigenous approval. The chiefs have to be $atisfied in some way. And all that in spite of the fact that the Indian Affairs budget in Canada has almost TRIPLED since 2015.2 points
-
Male students show more tolerance for political enemies than females show for their own allies The data, taken from FIRE’s annual College Free Speech Rankings, reveals that overall tolerance for opposing views is low among both male and female students — but the males consistently display far more tolerance than females, regardless of their politics. In fact, with the exception of male libertarians, who are slightly more tolerant, men of all political ideologies have roughly the same level of tolerance as each other. The same is true of women. What this graph shows us is that white-conservative-christian-strait-rich males are far superior to everyone else. It's a joke people. But not really. Conservative and conservative men are the most tolerant of all the sexes/ideologies. It is science, so you know the left will attack me.1 point
-
1 point
-
Answer: They are comfortable with deceptiveness and lying, so it's a natural fit.1 point
-
The DOJ is now acting like the Palace Police. They are trying to be like SAVAK or the KGB, Luckily for America they are more like the Keystone Cops.1 point
-
1 point
-
The red hats dont know much about anything, and they love to remind us of it continually.1 point
-
It’s all the trans’ fault. It always comes down to this with these conservative weirdos. It used to be the gays, but now it’s an extreme position to blame the gays. So the trans are the new bogey-man.1 point
-
Let's see. You have been here almost 4 years and won 17 diays.I have been here 2 years and won 53 days. It seems my opinion is almost 7x more appreciated than yours.1 point
-
And don't forget another opportunity thread to stretch the legs of TDS.1 point
-
I think much more of this is coming. Well deserved too... they were warned: https://www.foxnews.com/media/detransitioner-warns-massive-wave-lawsuits-coming-after-landmark-2-million-verdict Before long even the Herbs and Roboturds of the world will grow silent. There will be some nastiness and name calling in the short term to be sure (watch below) but soon it will be like residential schools, interning the Japanese, and eugenics... not to many loudmouth fanboys taking bows over that anymore is there Herb?1 point
-
If you can't define those things then there is something even worse wrong with yourself. A man who lives by a code of ethics and morals should know what those ethics and morals are. If you can't articulate them then how can you possibly say you are living up to them? That might be something you need to think about1 point
-
And a portion of the federal taxes on gasoline. Federal Gasoline Tax The federal government imposes an Excise Tax on gasoline, which is currently at 0.10 CAD per liter. This tax is used to fund various federal programs, but a portion is earmarked for infrastructure, including road maintenance. The paving business in Canada is rather corrupt though, especially with regards to the bidding process.1 point
-
No one gives a shit about ^your gratuitous OPINIONS. There is NO REASON ANTIFA is considered a "terror organization," other than it's DRIVEL Trump believes he can get away with to FOOL MAGAts like you.1 point
-
Nonsense. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12413181/ALAN-DERSHOWITZ-Al-Gore-2000-Donald-Trump-indictment.html ALAN DERSHOWITZ: "Al Gore, his legal team and I tried to find uncounted presidential votes, lobbied officials and fought in the courts in 2000. The only difference now? The candidate's name is Donald Trump... That's why this prosecution is an outrage" "I was one of the lawyers involved in objections to Florida's presidential vote in 2000. A margin of less than 600 ballots determined that Governor George W. Bush rather than Vice President Al Gore won the state and, thus, the electoral college vote. I was convinced then and I am convinced now that this result was wrong. No one was indicted, disbarred, disciplined or even much criticized for those efforts, yet here we stand today."1 point
-
1 point
-
I didn't say they, or some of them (the ones being paid), aren't against pipelines. I said they don't have any kind of control over them, other than those that would actually cross their reservations. Try to keep up. This is a discussion on legal and constitutional powers.1 point
-
1 point
-
No, just this Republican president: Patel, Noem, kennedy, Bondi, et al... The most incompetent cabinet ever. What do they have in common? Total fealty and blind obedience to the most incompetent, corrupt president ever. You know you don't have to kiss the ass of every right-wing politician. That's just your choice.1 point
-
1 point
-
No. I criticize Trump when deserved. But I dont do it out of spite or hatred like you. So what? The Democrats have gerrymandered every state they can already. Stolen? I dont know yet. Were Democrats cheating? Absolutely.1 point
-
Do you think Trump cares? If white rural people tended to have ID less often than others do you think he'd want ID as a requirement? The man tried to steal an election using fake elector ballots he wanted to give to Pence, but Pence refused to do it. Then he threw Pence under the bus. Do people have short memories here or something? Lol1 point
-
Looks like the woke judges had their pathetic attempts to interfere in the rule of law overturned.1 point
-
Not by Quebec's First Nations. During the last sovereignty referendum 96% voted against separation.1 point
-
I am well travelled. I have stood on the blocks in Africa where they'd load the ships, alot of east Indians, to sell into slavery. I know it was black people who were often very involved in the slave trade taking other tribes and selling them. I know North America was not harmonious before whitey came. Native tribes often got into tribal wars over land, and captured other people's women. I know many white people were fleeing from Islamic persecution during the time of the Ottoman empire. I have visited southeast Asia and seen where Asians took and killed other Asians to bring in communism. I have visited genocide memoeials where blacks murdered other blacks. I also know that Democrats have made memes about Trump being an orange orangutan. I know Democrats are regularilu on television blasting out hate propaganda on whirs. Yet you are mum. Why?1 point
-
Taxes? Without representation? How does that work again exactly? The Romans used swords I believe.1 point
-
Robert Reich former Cabinet Secretary for Bill Clinton on Melania (Panned big time of course) Robert Reich dsproenoStaa3F1g24u3168 4 1:608ueyr54A9 irlmgatbt citmat24Mu · Friends, I haven’t seen the Melania documentary. I hope you don’t, either. This, from one of the kinder reviews: “Across some 104 minutes, the first lady delivers these blatantly scripted and meaningless narrations with all the conviction of someone who just woke up from a two-hour nap and can’t remember what day it is.” Manohla Dargis of The New York Times sees a “glossy, curiously impersonal” portrait of a woman who “rarely drops her Sphinxlike deadpan.” Nick Hilton of The Independent calls the first lady a “scowling void of pure nothingness in this ghastly bit of propaganda.” Guardian critic Xan Brooks says it “doesn’t have a single redeeming quality” and compares it to a “medieval tribute to placate the greedy king on his throne.” Not since The Washington Post music critic Paul Hume observed that Margaret Truman’s singing voice in Constitution Hall in 1950 was “flat a good deal of the time” has a performance by a member of a sitting president’s family generated such averse reviews. Yet because the The Washington Post is now owned by the man who spent $75 million on the movie ($40 million to make it, $35 million to promote it), I somehow doubt The Post will crap on it. (At least Monica Hesse, in her review for The Post, had the honesty to confess that “if you suspect I have come here today to trash a movie about the wife of a notoriously thin-skinned, anti-journalist president, which was bankrolled by the company owned by the man who also pays my salary — NOT TODAY, SATAN. Do you think I’m a m0r0n?”) My purpose today is less to highlight this inane excuse for a film than to talk about its real excuse — allowing Jeff Bezos to give a big fat bribe to the president of the United States. Why would Bezos bribe him? Please. Bezos, one of the richest men in the world, owns Amazon and many other businesses that depend on the whims of the sociopath in the Oval Office. (Trump sold the idea of the documentary to Bezos when he dined at Mar-a-Lago in December 2024, just after the election, according to the The Wall Street Journal.) Bezos’s Amazon Web Services has a $1 billion agreement with the General Services Administration for cloud services, which presumably Bezos would like renewed. His rocket company, Blue Origin, has over $2.3 billion in contracts from the U.S. Space Force. Several of Bezos’s companies are subject to potential tariffs on goods from China. Amazon is under the cloud of a major antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission (when the FTC was still independent — before it came under the putative control of the Oval Office). The trial is expected in 2027. And so on. Friends, when the history of this sordid period of America is written — assuming it’s not written by historians trying to curry favor with a future fascist regime — I hope the leaders of American business are condemned to the hellfire they deserve for helping destroy American democracy. The outer ring of hell will be reserved for CEOs who stayed silent so as not to rile the narcissist-in-chief. Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase will reside here because, notwithstanding his assumed role as spokesman for American business, Dimon has uttered no criticism of Trump other than to suggest, in the vaguest possible terms, that Trump’s attack on the Federal Reserve’s independence “is probably not a great idea.” The middle ring will be reserved for business leaders who surrendered to Trump’s extortionist demands for personal payoffs. The Ellisons, père Larry (the world’s third-richest person) et fils David, will be there, along with Shari Redstone and the board of Paramount, for paying Trump $16 million to settle his utterly baseless lawsuit against CBS. Also in this middle ring will be Bob Iger, CEO of Disney (which owns ABC) and Debra OConnell, the president of ABC News Group and Disney Entertainment Networks, for giving Trump $15 million to settle his equally spurious lawsuit against ABC News. In the inner ring, where hell fires burn especially hot, will be business leaders who went beyond acquiescing to Trump’s extortion and decided to pay him big fat bribes. Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, will have pride of place here, after spending a quarter of a billion dollars getting Trump elected. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, will get a spot here for lavishing on Trump a custom-designed glass plaque mounted on a 24-karat gold base. We’ll also find here the CEOs who coughed up $300,000 each for Trump’s ballroom — including crypto magnates Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, oil tycoon Harold Hamm, Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman, and every Big Tech mogul. But Jeff Bezos, with his $75 million bribe of Trump, will deserve a special place in the innermost ring of hell. The $40 million he paid Melania Trump’s production company is at least $35 million more than the cost of typical high-end documentaries. (By way of comparison, Magnolia Pictures and CNN Films produced “RBG,” a documentary about the late Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for around $1 million.) Melania Trump pocketed more than 70 percent of that $40 million — or more than $28 million — the Journal reported. The additional $35 million Bezos shelled out for marketing “Melania” is 10 times what other high-profile documentaries spend on marketing. The promotional budget for “RBG” was about $3 million. (To be sure, Melania Trump is no Ruth Bader Ginsburg, so I suppose you might argue that Melania needed a larger promo budget. But this much larger?) All this, at a time when Bezos is slashing the newsroom at the Post — it’s heart and soul — in order to “economize.” Forget the inner ring. Bezos deserves to be at the center of the inferno. The promo money apparently worked, at least in the U.S., where opening-weekend ticket sales for “Melania” totaled $7 million. But let’s be realistic. A $35 million promotional budget will get people into theaters to see paint drying. If all goes well — given that opening weekend is usually about 25 percent of total box office and that movie houses pocket half — Amazon could end up with about $14 million on its $75 million investment. A pittance. Yet this was never a financial investment. It was an investment in kissing Trump’s derriere. As Ted Hope, who was instrumental in starting Amazon’s film division, wondered aloud to The New York Times: “How can it not be equated with currying favor or an outright bribe? How can that not be the case?” Of course it’s an outright bribe. If America still had a Department of Justice, Bezos would be indicted for bribery of a public official pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 201, which criminalizes offering or giving anything of value to a public official with the intent to influence their official actions. Penalty: imprisonment for up to 15 years. (Also note: The U.S. Constitution lists taking a bribe as an impeachable offense for a president.) There’s a statute of limitations for criminal prosecution of such bribes: Prosecution must begin within five years of the deed. So, my friends, if America gets a true Justice Department starting in January of 2029, Bezos’s inferno may become a reality.1 point
-
There is no evidence that we need immigration. And if we are going to have it, we should be carefully vetting those who come in and refusing religious fanatics entry. The person who wants a minimum wage job at a fast food shop faces more scrutiny than immigrants or refugees. Or even citizens. When you decide to become a ctiizen, all you have to do is pass a 25 question true/false/multiple choice test. You can do it online. There is no interview. And no, it doesn't matter if you've been on welfare since you arrived. Nor does it matter if you're an Islamist or a Sikh Khalistani. We do not care.1 point
-
Finding a master (in any discipline) is usually a challenge. I see you've capitalized your own particular area of expertise to make it easier for those so inclined to find you... there was no need though, your reputation proceeds you.1 point
-
It's absolutely amazing to me how when the democrats are in power it is absolutely impossible for them to exert any influence over the FBI or any court or any other branch of government. And the moment of republican gets in they're all absolutely corrupt and not a single person in there can be trusted1 point
-
Sophie Scholl was the exact opposite of a leftard. She was intelligent, and she was able to recognize the growth of fascism all around her. She recognized that at a time when the word "Nazi" was just the name of a respected political party with a lot of control over the media, it wasn't a pejorative yet, just like Dem is the name of a popular political party with full control over the media but whose name isn't yet universally considered a pejorative yet. Sophie saw the Nazi's militia, the brownshirts, for what they were, she didn't buy into a catchy Nazi-party slogan like "mostly peaceful protests", or "Brownshirts don't exist". She wasn't fooled by a vaccine passport, or gesundheitspass, and she recognized the danger of the government freezing the bank accounts of people who disagreed with them. It's an insult to Sophie to have Leftards invoke her name to promote their own brand of fascism.1 point
-
You're failure to remember what Trump has done ONLY means you don't know. Do you even understand the Impoundment Control Act of 1974? LMAO Seems you don't understand all the spending appropriated by Congress which was redirected/cut without Congressional approval. LMAO1 point
-
They were very much alike because they both hated their country's FASCIST leadership. Remember when Trump promised to be a dictator on day one? And then FAILED to ever STOP. Remember when I predicted that would occur.1 point
-
Don't get me wrong joining the US does have lots of benefits, but it also as some draw backs, Mass shootings, crime, immigration, the left are extreme...and the far right is worse....and as with both nations have issues with health care, massive drug use, housing costs, major social issues....i have family that live in the US, who are American citizens... I would much rather see things stabilize and go back to where they once where, in many issues....others I'm glad trump kicked our asses on and we started to take our responsibilities seriously....not sure on how this joining would work out, i have a good military pension, our Old age pension, and CPP is another factor, who takes over on all that....1 point
-
1 point
-
I don’t know why Canadians even bother. Literally their money would be worth more, pay less taxes and be a part of the greatest empire since Rome. All the benefits without ANY downsides.1 point
-
They are many in Iran for example who are born into it and later in life they leave it as they realize what it is and what it stands for. They are not Muslims even if their passport says so. They may even hate it and be more westernized than any westerner. They should be allowed to come and live a life and contribute positively and become a tax payer. Most of them are highly educated. Most are women leaving the oppressive Islam. I know some who left Iran after Women Life Freedom uprising was crushed and they were more westernized than me who grew up in the West. That is why I am against a regional ban on immigrants not to mention it is not practical (against international laws) so how do we distinguish? In my view should be at the discretion of immigration officers. Those who interview applicant. If I see a hijab wearing woman or bearded guy from a known muslim dominated country who would answer undesirable to my specific questions , I will reject their application as scoring zero on adoptability.1 point
-
In my lifetime: Nietzsche, Derrida, Lacan, Marx, Abstract Art, Communism, Socialism, Capitalism, Feminism, Rock n Roll, Television, Comic Books, Violence in films, Violence on TV, Dungeons and Dragons, Death Metal, Hip Hop, Gangsta Rap, Video Games, The Internet, Facebook, TikTok... From the top of my head.1 point
-
I don't like the Liberals. But unlike Trudeau, Carney is a normal, boring politician who is economically literate and not obsessed with tribal identity politics or his own self-image. He seems consistent and reliable. So far I'm happy with Carney. He makes PP and JT look like childish amateurs, and he's barely been on the job long. His decision-making ability has been solid. Every PM since at least Chretien (sans Martin, too short) has been quite arrogant. Hopefully Carney doesn't let the power go to his head.1 point
-
1. I'm helping. Pointing out unclarity and passing the baton back. 2. You're welcome. 3. I'm helping. Pointing out unclarity and passing the baton back. 4. I don't know what the poster meant. Pointing out unclarity and passing the baton back. 5. I'm a conservative. Crackho hates me, for example. You're welcome.1 point
-
It's still Trudeau's party and Trudeau's policies. Carney has essentially changed nothing except to double the deficit Freeland resigned over because she said it was too big and would destroy our economic future.1 point
-
1 point
