Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/29/2025 in all areas
-
I've said it before. Almost no one in Canada would dispute that Trump stacked the U.S. Supreme Court to get the decisions he wanted and that this has worked well for him. Yet the left in Canada outright refuses to believe the Liberals have done the same with Canada's Supreme Court. Yes, the SC is now hopelessly biased, not to the liberal left but to the far left on social values and views. That's particularly so over native treaties and 'reconciliation' matters. The idea of even allowing, much less giving credence to 'oral history' is absurd, just as a start. And the SC has no problem at all with politically biased lawyers. It encourages it. All the law schools insist on it for admission and hiring. The law societies are now starting to demand strict, formal adherence to the left's social justice views, as well. No, the SC is okay with politically biased lawyers as long as they share that bias. It just doesn't want lawyers who might be conservative-minded. Unless, of course, they're 'ethnic'. No one thinks the social views of immigrant Muslim lawyers aren't completely governed by their own religiously inspired social values, but that's okay. The SC just doesn't want Christians whose views might be colored by their religious values.4 points
-
Holly fck. Those lying bastards got me. I will admit, they did a good job with this photoshop. But they've been caught. I found the website with the original Tshirt the shooter wore. It is not available in camo. https://teetshirts.net/product/election-liberals-cry-again-shirt/ It is only available in black. This T company doesn't offer anything in camo. Screenshot: Alright, so that is were the design came from now, notice the background of the logo. Keep that image handy. Here is the actual photo before it was photoshopped: Ok, I photo shopped the little girl's face out because they don't need that. Notice that this picture is bigger. The details in the background would take forever to create without AI and this is determined to not be AI by https://fotoforensics.com/. This is the real Pic. Here is the photoshpped version: Notice how the background pf the logo is still there, but much much lighter? They used a blending tool. The most obvious area is just above the fist and below the 2020 but it is evident the entire way around. They also used a tool to give the photo depth similar to the shooter's chest. That tool distorted the are between the fist and face and emphasized the brightness of the knuckles in a wider area than on the original logo. My last piece of evidence is her hair. It disappears behind the logo, under the TR of Trump. Whatever program they used to place the logo was confused by the similarity in color of her hair and parts of his shirt. Consequently, his logo blocks parts of her hair and face. In total, this lynch pin for the MAGA killer argument is thoroughly proven a fake. Reports are that the first posting of this photo came from Eric Swalwell. His office likely faked the photo. Well, that's a good assumption any way.2 points
-
There has to come a time in every society, and I think we've about reached it, where compassion for the history that led to the creation of the individual who now exists has to give way to compassion for his victims and protection of society. We have seen the courts show compassion repeatedly towards sexual and violent offenders, which has led directly to unspeakable violence against innocent people. It's not even clear whether this compassion is helping the criminals that the Liberal party courts extend to them. Perhaps a series of easy slaps on the wrist simply solidifies an offender's belief that the criminal lifestyle is an acceptable one for them. It certainly seems to function that way with their harm reduction strategies towards the illegal use of narcotics. But then, one of the problems with the Liberal party over the past decade is a lack of interest in the results of their policies vs how they can make them seem noble and virtuous before their tame media.2 points
-
2 points
-
Bullshit. First Trump DID commit the crimes he was convicted for the only republican complaint was that he should be exempt because he is a politician Second, prosecutors took those cases under their own authority and discretion, Biden didn’t order them to Amd Obama didn’t order any “faked” intelligence reports on Trump Third as Ive pointed out before your argument of “now it’s OUR turn to be corrupt” has no moral or legal basis. Even you claims of Biden/Obama corruption were true (which they’re not) the only solid is to END the corrupt and govern with integrity, not make corruption the permanent “new normal” by perpetuating it. Fifth, neither Obama nor Biden had to fire a prosecutor for refusing to bring charges against Trump and then replaced them with a completely unqualified INSURANCE LAWYER with ZERO criminal experience in order to bring charges against Trump2 points
-
Speculate. He did something crazy, so he must be "left". So say all the crazy persons here.2 points
-
Other forum is complaining that Trump is weaponizing the DOJ, even though Democrats did that on a federal and state level for years against Trump.2 points
-
Calgary man who sexually assaulted a 12-year-old girl gets reduced sentence because he's Indigenous How does this help anything? Giving him additional time off is basically saying "it's less of a crime to rape children if you're indigenous', it won't stop the guy from assaulting children when he gets out, and nobody is going to think that the kid and the family got proper justice so it undermines faith in our system. This is just getting out of hand.1 point
-
Just The News: FBI Bombshell: 274 agents sent to Capitol for J6, many later complained they were political ‘pawns’ ... The most persistent complaint was that the bureau during the James Comey and Chris Wray era had become infected with political biases and liberal ideology that treated the protesters from the summer 2020 Black Lives Matter riots far differently than those arrested in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 episode. ... "Currently, the US Attorneys office is dictating what it is that gets investigated. This is a dangerous precedent because we can barely get them to prosecute investigations that clearly meet thresholds needed for Federal prosecutions," ... The document has proven a bombshell to lawmakers, revealing for the first time that the FBI had a total of 274 agents deployed to the Capitol in plainclothes and with guns after the violence started but with no clear safety gear of way to be recognized by other law enforcement agencies working in the chaos of the riot. https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2025-09/FBI-HJC119-J6IG-000001-000050.pdf ********** What these documents prove is that the FBI was acting politically, they were at J6 (why they didnt admit it is beyond me) and that they did treat J6ers more harshly than BLM rioters and used FBI agents for low level crimes that could and should have been handled by local police. That last one implies the brass at the FBI didnt trust the local police room be political enough to charge J6ers with petty crimes.1 point
-
Watching her media blitz and the complete lack of the DNC media lackeys even questioning her obvious lies. My favorite was her telling multiple interviewers that she lost the closest election in the 21st century. Can someone show me what metric she pulled that load of BS from. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/rachel-maddow-nods-along-kamala-180527173.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACEbU8Z-F1gEOkZERrBO1M3VJOAal7rjzBys7OuxamuIRChKmYWMRFojgvd76_AMh0v1mDSHaWu-grbbdIalE-REPn2fHozN9b1XEgMMir3tGhF_V2MHwcbfzxThe2k49SRvsD5C97m16fMCYjM5kVekEOYeYHMLwknb4anO2omk She lost the popular vote and every swing state by enough of a margin there was no recount.1 point
-
You and your gay son are horrible victims of this anonymous person! You shouldn't stop at spreading this post here! Make it a wider social media campaign about your gay son!1 point
-
Note that the US can get by with high debt due to being the world currency, and they have all manner of ways to increase revenues if they choose to. Also note that Singapore's high debt rate is an illusion. So Canada's is probably more like 8th highest in the world with few ways to increase revenue other than going against government policy and developing and exporting our natural resources.1 point
-
Over the past few elections, the Liberal party has gotten by on running a campaign against another country's leader, Donald Trump. The result of the left wing rage against Trump has now led to election of a party who recognizes a terrorist state in Palestine, destroyed the country with inflation due to poor decisions during the "pandemic", has eroded basic civil liberties such as a Christian's right to hold an outdoor worship event, and have imported a bunch of degenerates who have no problem uttering threats or using hecklers veto to remove peoples right to peaceably assemble. Like a lobster in a boiling pot of water, so are Canadians consumed by hatred toward Trump who have sold out our interests because of delusional rage. Sad1 point
-
Lmao...ok...sure: "The federal form to register a voter requires a unique identification number such as a Social Security or driver's license number and that voters check a box attesting that they are a citizen, " All they needed to do, after getting a DL or SSN, is lie and say they are a citizen. Thats it. Without a DL or SSN they couldn't register. With one or the other, it was easy.1 point
-
1 point
-
Was in the library to peruse the Harris book, took me a while but I found it in the fantasy, fiction and comedy sections. In one paragraph of the book she complains that Biden kept getting his left and right socks mixed up. In another Biden's staff were always complaining about his inability to balance an ice cream cone.1 point
-
1 point
-
Yes, I am quite aware of the IMF numbers, but the real story is not what China is about to reveal. Could tell you how I come to that conclusion, but then I might have to shoot you. Have to leave it as nothing you see in or from China is likely true or accurate. Here is but one analysis (there are many that support this) https://www.fidelityinternational.com/editorial/article/how-china-keeps-its-debt-in-order-e1feea-en5/#:~:text=If growth slows further%2C LGFVs,effectiveness when implementing support measures.1 point
-
Rome's homeland had people and infrastructure, but not much in the way of resources - so reaching out and conquering other states is how they financed their orgy of growth. China is another example - huge population and very short on resources to exploiting the productivity of the people financed by massive debt (300% debt/GDP - but their GDP may be very inaccurate). The US managed to build their empire from that rare combination of resources, productivity and financial base, but as they grew their empire just as did old Rome their productivity slid to where no longer self sufficient to went very, very deep into debt financing. While Canada may be a G7 member, we live so close and are/were so integrated with the US economy we foolishly think we are doing something to be in that position. Well, it's not so much what we do as what we still have = resources. Our productivity has been ignored except by US car companies so our real economy has never been internally developed. The only reason we have come this far is by drawing water and hewing wood. Problem is: even a ruling city full of absolute m0rons can look at other countries and learn to play the debt game. You might notice the new captain of that ship thinks we can just develop more of our resources and everything will be just fine. But it won't. We rip ore out of the ground and sell it for a few hundred bux a tonne or in decreasingly fewer cases process it into base metals and sell it for a couple grand a tonne they buy it back as manufactured goods at 10x to 100x the value (with value added offshore). Simple answer: the socialist consumer/rape and pillage resources model of Canada is NOT sustainable.1 point
-
Not sure Rome's a good comparison. They were an empire staying rich by conquering and 'taxing' others. And apart from a military pension, they didn't have a social safety net like we have. But I'll bet they had some epic Toga parties!1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Huh? The idea that your prayer will change anything in the world/universe is absurd. ===== As I say, prayer is a person (you) talking to yourself.1 point
-
So you’re certain that there is a circuit breaker that controls JUST that one escalator and someone was down there standing by and somehow still able to see the president approach the escalator ? Must’ve been the UN flew in some kind of A-Team specialists with cameras and walkie talkies to get that timing down that somehow even the secret service didn’t detect just so they could execute a covert mission to…make him walk up steps? LMAO do you know how dumb it sounds? A photographer in Trump’s entourage at the top of the escalator accidentally bumped the button, genius. Yeah the staff of the person speaking, aka another unqualified Trump employee hired solely for their undying cult loyalty to their Dear Leader (if male) or their superhuman ability to tolerate sexual harassment (if female)1 point
-
I’m in a madhouse of Trump fans. In Canada which is even more reprehensible. Are you not able to read and understand any of the evidence I have presented here? Raising false fears about Tylenol will discourage women from using it who would have benefited from it. You will reduce the quality of health care for those who believe you. Drugs have enough genuine risks without inventing more.1 point
-
1 point
-
Erring on the side of caution doesn't make sense when you are wrong about the risks.1 point
-
Whatever else you think Castro was like any other leader he had a wing to his right and to his left and he distributed power and privilege as conservatively as any. You don't have a clue what I mean do you? France...post revolutionary...right wing left wing. Go figure out the rest yourself.1 point
-
Any pictures of these demons? And what on Earth is a biblical survey?1 point
-
Ridiculously partisan right wing conservatives - people who don't want to get it.1 point
-
They're welcome to quit if they like. But if you're doing low skill work, you get low skill wages. That's just the way it works.1 point
-
1 point
-
Maybe. I don't really know, and TBH, it's not really a topic I care about. Kamala was a total loser and dunce, and the reason she lost is because 100% media bias 24/7 wasn't enough to carry her unworthy arse over the finish line. It was a sad day for Iran and China.1 point
-
Your infatuation with a cognitively declining and make-up wearing 79 year old narcissist borders somewhere between comical and embarrassing. For the sake of argument we'll call it a comical embarrassment.1 point
-
It's very true. You're doing it now.... Your Trump Deification Syndrome is acute.1 point
-
Trump is wrong. Of course, I never said anybody should be ‘eating Tylenol’. I actually pointed out in a post that political arguments can lead to such extremism. There is no good evidence of that. Talk to the local experts in your province if you don’t believe me. Contact the dept of OBGYN in UBC and ask the head of dept if they agree that Tylenol causes autism. Contact anybody in authority in health care. Of course, as if I need to say this, I do not encourage the use of any medicine in pregnancy beyond the minimum needed. You’ve spent page upon page spreading misleading information about Tylenol and you think that mightn’t put women off using it? Enough. I think I’ve made my case which of course is not my case - just what the experts are saying. I happen to believe in science.1 point
-
Nobody expects women to read the latest medical journals and interpret the studies. And surely nobody expects our dim POTUS to read medical studies--and indeed, clearly, he'd never read the word "acetaminophen" before deciding to offer medical advice on it's usage. Women get that guidance from their doctors. It's standard guidance in prenatal care--inclusive of proper detail and nuance. Go to your medicine cabinet, take out a bottle, look at the dosage and it will tell you right there to talk to your doctor if pregnant. Great damn advice. Unlike Trump's rambling, bumbling adventure into heterodox TV medicine. It's nuts. Never should have happened.1 point
-
Why not make it 80? Think of the "savings" if you didn't have to replace workers. You could remain un/under employed until you were 30. That would go over well, wouldn't it? Maybe we could get rid of stats, maternity, unions, 40 hour weeks and paid vacations like the USA because every idea out of that dump is just so good.1 point
-
Well, shit. Turns out this degenerate is also an Olympic athlete. This is an elite and apparently excellent human being. I can see why the Trump administration is targeting such model non-citizen citizens for removal. Makes 'em look bad. I don't know what his immigration status was when he acquired a gun or how he got it--or why he thought he needed one--but it does seem pretty likely that it was illegal to have one. And yes, a functional gun tracing system could radically reduce the number of illegal guns.1 point
-
1 point
-
Left wingers like we have here will never bring up the summer of love George, the criminal, Floyd and the many crimes that he committed. The left chose Floyd as their hero, mentor and martyr. This just shows us as to how much of a bunch of lunatics these lieberals are. Their hero's are criminals li Floyd and Kirk is their enemy and never committed any crimes. Lieberalism is truly a mental disease. ☹️1 point
-
1 point
-
They just talk about leftwing stuff and harass anyone with non-leftwing views. Plus the crazy drunk Coolio/Luigi, who is probably paxamericana here, likes to troll and be a drama queen. Anyways, if you have mental illness or you're a eunuch or you just hate yourself you may find a home there. I left months ago.1 point
-
'May' and 'more research is needed' is enough for me. The professor of maternal-fetal medicine at UC San Diego Health Sciences is not good enough for you? And it's not a blind hatred I have for Trump, it's a very strong eyes wide-open dislike I have for him.1 point
-
1 point
