Leaderboard

WOW! Mark Carney’s lawyers blink, allow Rebel News into the G7! - Rebel News Well this should be good for a laugh or two I doubt they'll sit back in the corner and respectfully watch the proceedings quietly. At the debates they hustled like crazy and got a few of the questions spots sewn up while many of the other reporters were mingling, and that's what started the fireworks that time.

Buddy, get off the welfare and pot and come back to us when you’re sober and 10 years older.

Canadians need to understand that country will only survive and thrive by winning the ideological war against people with views like Herbie’s. His ilk are destroying the country.

I followed how they were treated in Australia too, especially during COVID lockdowns. Just insane.

Well sir your visionary acumen is lacking a dash of Millet seed

Just crazy how Canadian authorities abuse and mistreat Rebel News folks like David Menzies.

Aww muffin, still so scared of me you're afraid to talk to me directly LOL I swear i didn't mean to scare you so bad, you're just so fragile! And i've already shown why is post was an error

Feel free to respond to my comment coward. The military is being used, according to the law, to help protect federal officers and property.

USAID Official, Three Executives Plead Guilty In $550M Bribery Scheme Everyone was asking for convictions. Well, here you go. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Poor herpes, always going apeshit when he can't control the narrative. OK, let's start here: why don't you go ahead and explain how I am a fascist.

By First Nations own submission in 2012, there were 18 000 000 of them scattered across North America when settlers arrived. That is enough people to moderately populate an island the size of Cuba scattered across North America. They didn't even occupy 1% of North America and there was no country. Now some so called First Nations work with WEF to assist with the dividing and conquering of Canada.

And I see one full of ignorant toads who think smacking people around is a virtue.

"i don't want to see israel harmed because of 'hatred', but it was inevitable because they're AN EVIL BUNCH OF USELESS GODLESS HEALTHENS WHO DESECRATE THE VERY EARTH THEY WALK ON AND IT SICKENS ME TO HAVE TO BREATHE THE SAME AIR AS THEM INSTEAD OF SENDING THEM TO BURN BURN BURN IN THE VERY FIRES OF HELL AS THEY SO RICHLY DESERVE!!!!" - Eyeball, probably. then he passed out.

No such place existed 100 years ago.

Of course not, your fanatsies are your own, whatever they may be. oh dear........ ...........backs quietly away so as not to get involved.........

Yep. But Rebel has been very successful in fighting back in that regard. Fact is whether you like them or not, the moment the gov't gets to decide who is and who is not "the media" your democracy is in trouble.

Yeah, I like Ezra when he was with the sun news network and I liked the sun news network except for the guy with the handlebars mustache which was like having your news read to you by a walrus, but they are difficult to watch now. I catch their occasional story just because like I said every now and then they really hit one out of the park. And I do appreciate that even though I don't agree with them all the time they're out there really pushing hard to legitimize smaller independent news sources. True north and Juneau are a little better. Especially True North, I really find that actually to be a good journalistic medium for the most part

Sure, but they're aware that in the now they can't win a war against the us. IF the us gets fully invested in such a conflict, china will suffer horribly and there is a real chance of a nuclear exchange and that does NOT favour china at all. They do not look so far down the road that they trip on the pebble at their feet, as the saying goes. They certainly WANT to be.... but while they've come up with some advanced designs and such for planes and built a lot of boats, it hasn't changed the balance of power. Their navy ships are no where near as capable as the us, and any major contest will see the chinese lose ships at a horribly unsustainable ratio. their planes are decent, but nothing terribly exciting and they simply can't afford to build enough of them to overwhelm the us. At least not at this time. Their entire posture is 'aggressive defensive', meaning that fighting a war in their backyard would be very expensive in terms of men and materials and even if you won you'd lose, but their ability to project that power very far from their own shores is pretty limited.

You sound like August now.

The Rebel completely lacks finesse and polish. Even when they're saying things that I completely agree with, I find them impossible to watch. Ezra needs a Xanax or whatever it's called.

There's no way to upvote this enough to do it justice

Right? The 'rebel' is this weird duality of an existance where they are simultaneously complete tabloid trash and also extremely good and uncovering real news and poking holes in the establishment veil. "BY CLAIMING OUR RIGHTS TO BE AT THE DEBATES DESPITE EVERY ATTEMPT TO KEEP US OUT, AND BY DOING OUR JOB AND STANDING IN LINE PATIENTLY TO GET THE MOST QUESTIONS OUT, AND ASKING UNCOMFORTABLE QUESTIONS INSTEAD OF THE USUAL DRIVEL, WE HAVE PROVEN THAT SMALL INDEPENDENT MEDIA IS BOTH RELEVANT AND CAPABLE IN THIS AGE AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS CANNOT BE STOPPED!! Also, we're selling conservative memberships from a van out front. "

After that news there isn't a single kernel of popcorn to be found anywhere.😁

Lying like these people you mentioned would in fact be the only truth that you would hear in any given time period. What's more they tell it as it is without Capitalising every other word in a vain attempt to add emphasis......and......without any Duh's or LMAO's. So.......given that information, any truth from me must, by example, be a lie. Therefore the ignore function is beckoning like the Sirens to Odysseus, you must submit, or forfeit the Zucchini.

It must really bother you that someone like me can make you look stupid and childish regularly.

And at best, it's a "White Boy Herb" idea that has nothing to do with reconciliation. Actually, it's a cheap deflection that tends to annoy people who weren't previously annoyed, it even has the potential to create backlash among those who actually support legitimate action toward rectifying legitimate problems. Just ask a native, there are far more pressing issues. FN folk that I know are more torqued about things like fishing rights, water supplies and medical access than they will ever be about what townies name their roads. Got that water thingy sorted out yet? No... but we renamed your road, it's now called "Manwhosipsalot." It's the same as thinking veterans are deeply moved by renaming a road "The highway of Hero's." Most could care less, in fact, they see it a cheap form of placation that actually backfires (at least it does with me). Want to impress veterans? Give that retired gunner the hearing aids he needs and stop jerking him around....you know damn well why he's deaf. And so do we! Who do the Herbs of the world think they're fooling with this stuff?

Only to other cult members

I take it Einstein is one of the voices in your head that you've named?

Oh no, a guy named Bob who I met in the grocery store agrees with me and disagrees with you. BOOM! Just like that, you are wrong!

That was over in less than 3 hours. You think Marines are just sitting around in drop ships that can hit the ground in a moment's notice or something? I mean, really, what other ignorant observations do you want to make?

Emergency,,,, what's your address....... 666 šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm Street Stop swearing, this is a crank call...."click"

This morning. When they went all say without announcing another stupid Crime Bill.

How's the name change from Icarus to Herbivore working out?

What is Fascism? It's what Einstein witnessed right-wing conservative Israelis inflicting on Palestinians.

Natives aren't native, they were the 1st of many waves of people that came here. They lost it fair and square. Just like the whites are losing it now.

Lol conservativapdia is a joke It is literally created to provide conservative-biased information, aka disinformation, it’s right there in the name. And what they said is just false and made up. Contrary to your claim, I explained exactly what is not correct and then posted a video from a top expert. Secondly the video is not some “no name useless twat” obviously you didn’t watch the video. He is one of America’s foremost experts on the subject, a professor at Yale university (now at U of Toronto) who has written and has written 5 prominent books on the subject. So to be clear, the “no name twat on the internet” is whoever wrote that conservapedia article. This is that opposite-of-reality thing you do like when you tried to claim that an article titled “Debunked 2000 mules video contains no evidence” was actually trying to tell readers 2000 mules video offered compelling evidence, and when you tried to claim a snopes article title “Yea the Trump shooter was Republican” was try to argue that he was a democrat. That is a ridiculous thing to say I literally laughed out loud when I read that and Im sure anyone else would if you said that to them. Do I really need to explain about Hitler and Mussolini? The official formal greeting of the German military and much of society at large was doe people to literally to say “Heil Hitler” to each other. Sorry that is gibberish you’ve made up and is simply not true. Nazis viewed Marx, Marxism, socialism, communism, etc as a cancer eating away at society that must be cut out, not something that is good in principle to improve and perfect. Nazis celebrated and promoted a class system and social hierarchy, which is what Marxism specifically sought to eliminate. These were central core beliefs of the Nazis that they proclaimed loudly and often. 1) Hitler Putin and Mussolini are not socialists 2)Non-socialist models also susceptible: every non-socialist dictatorship in the world for example: most of Africa and the middle east, southeast asia, much of Latin America past and present. 3)The Scandinavian countries are successful “socialist” democracies but I am half inclined to argue that they’re not really “socialist” countries as most people understand the term, they’re simply capitalist countries with higher levels of taxation, public services and regulation than most. I don’t know what this means. Hitler and Mussolini literally wrote the book on fascism although they had many differences between each other ams they wee literally at the opposite end of the political spectrum from communism, socialism etc. Any regime left or right can be authoritarian that’s not unique to communism/socialism etc.

If you want to be a fascist, you can say that. But you don't understand that is how people from places like central and south America have immigrated to the U.S. probably for the last 50 or 100 years or more. They are not well educated. Maybe very little education and don't know anything about American federal law. So you are talking into thin air. That is not how the real world worked for the past 100 years in the U.S. I have told you many times, they place the safety and well-being of their families first and don't know anything about the technicalities of laws in Washington. You really need to get educated. Millions came to America in the past 50 years, not in the last four years under Biden. They have worked and filled jobs in agriculture, hotels, etc. that nobody else would take. That's just how they survived. This happened under previous Republican and Democratic governments for many decades and no real solution has been found.

No, I am quite familiar with the ignorant arguments folks like you make.

Any proof of proxy, hmm...? "SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group." https://freepress.org/profile/lulu-friesdat Lulu Friesdat: Founder. "She's had assignments with NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, CBS, Fox News Channel" FOX NEWS CHANNEL!!! Someone who participates in their seminars: Laura Pressley https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2012-05-11/the-gop-friends-of-laura-pressley All you Cons can do is lie, fabricate, insinuate, and flood social media with misinformation.

They have to prove it in court. Trump lost every lawsuit.

The law says they have the right to request asylum before a judge. MAGAT's have no use for laws that might get in their way. A lot of these people are already in the immigration system and had actual court dates, It is MAGAT's who are ignoring the law.

Probably behind the arson forest fires if I had to guess. The pattern being used is the same as the China virus to garner sympathy, attack the government. Very sick

Kill them graveyard dead..... good old fashioned PIG speaks

Unfortunately it seems you don't understand that people, documented or undocumented, have certain rights in the U.S. and Canada. Those are Constitutional rights and legal rights. What you are supporting is something like Hitler's Naziism or Stalin's Communism. Those systems did not recognize human rights of any kind and just crushed everyone they wished. BE CAREFUL FOR WHAT YOU WISH FOR. Loss of human rights and Constitutional rights may be coming sooner than you think.

If trump is allowed to bypass the immigration courts entirely, as he has been trying to do for months, then who is to know how long someone has been in the country? With no judicial oversight of their process, what's to stop them from next sending US citizens to these foreign concentration camps?

That is the stupidest thing I think I have ever heard from you. quote What is due process? A core principle of the U.S. government is that all people have the right to fair treatment under the law. Due process of law, enshrined in the Fifth and 14th Amendments, requires the government to provide a person with notice and an opportunity to make their case in court before depriving them of life, liberty, or property. Due process protects us from the arbitrary exercise of government power. It is the reason that police and prosecutors must prove that they had probable cause to arrest a person, that the government cannot arbitrarily cut off someone’s public housing or food assistance, and that civil court processes must be followed before the state can terminate a parent’s rights. Are immigrants entitled to due process when facing deportation? Yes. The Fifth and 14th Amendments’ due process clauses protect every person within U.S. borders, regardless of immigration status. The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed this, ruling that immigrants facing deportation under the Alien Enemies Act are entitled to the opportunity to challenge the legality of their detention before removal. The Court cited its ruling in Reno v. Flores, a 1993 case where Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, “it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles [immigrants] to due process of law.” This means that a person accused of being in the country without authorization should have the right to a fair trial in immigration court. People should have a chance to see and challenge the evidence against them. This can prevent harmful injustices and the unchecked use of government power to detain, deport, and disappear people—many of whom are seeking safety and may have the right to stay rooted in their community. Has the immigration system ever ensured immigrants due process? Unfortunately, in practice, deprivations of due process have long been routine and have occurred on a massive scale in our immigration legal system—leading to many examples of gross miscarriages of justice. People facing deportation are not entitled to a court-appointed attorney if they cannot afford one. This differs from criminal court, where the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees all people the right to an attorney whether they can afford one or not. Legal representation is expensive, and far too many people in immigration court face deportation proceedings without an attorney to protect their rights. In fact, an estimated 70 percent of people held in immigration detention on deportation cases opened in the past three years are unrepresented in their proceedings. Because immigration law is notoriously complex, many people who could have established a legal right to remain in the United States with the help of an attorney are instead deported to countries where they face real danger. Legal representation is fundamental to delivering due process. Lawyers serve as a critical check on claims made by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), ensuring that the government is following the rules and accurately interpreting the law. For example, lawyers frequently find that U.S. citizens have been unlawfully detained by ICE or that green card holders may face detention based on ICE’s erroneous application of the law. They identify when someone has legal relief from deportation and help people—including children, people who have mental health conditions, and Indigenous language speakers with limited translators available—present complex claims for the judge to consider. In a new threat to due process, the Trump administration is bypassing immigration courts to deport people without a fair hearing. President Trump’s mass detention and deportation agenda significantly escalates threats to due process by claiming that immigrants are not entitled to due process or a hearing at all. Trump has gone so far as to say that “you can’t have a trial for all of these people,” referring to immigrants facing separation from their families and expulsion to countries where they may face dangerous circumstances. President Trump issued executive orders early in his second term that bypass immigration courts in many instances by expanding expedited removal, a process that allows the Department of Homeland Security to detain and deport someone without a hearing before an immigration judge. Although past administrations also used this policy, the Trump administration has supercharged the harm by expanding who is subjected to it and deploying significant resources to deport people without going through the court system. In mid-March, President Trump invoked the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to allow his administration to deport people who are accused—oftentimes with little or no evidence—of being associated with the Venezuela-based Tren de Aragua gang without giving them the opportunity to appear before a judge. Hundreds of people, most with no criminal record, have been sent to Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT)— a Salvadoran prison with a history of human rights abuses—without the opportunity to defend themselves against the accusations or to prove they have the legal right to remain in the United States. In many cases, the government’s accusations rest on nothing beyond innocuous tattoos honoring family and soccer. Andry Hernandez Romero, an asylum seeker from Venezuela whose tattoos depict crowns over the words “mom” and “dad,” was deported to CECOT with no chance to defend himself in court. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland father with protected legal status, was also wrongfully deported and placed in CECOT. Although the Trump administration has since admitted Abrego Garcia’s deportation was an “administrative error,” it has made no effort to return him to his family. Frustrated by the Supreme Court’s affirmation that immigrants targeted under the Alien Enemies Act have a right to challenge their detention through a writ of habeas corpus, the Trump administration is reportedly considering suspending access to habeas corpus—an extraordinary measure that is only permitted “in cases of rebellion or invasion.” For those in immigration court, the Trump administration has made it even harder to access legal counsel. Even people who are not subjected to expedited removal will face an immigration court system with a significantly undermined ability to provide even a minimum of due process. The Trump administration’s expanded use of detention and rapid deportations will drastically reduce the likelihood that people will be able to secure legal representation to help them navigate their case. Lawyers and the immigrant defense infrastructure that has grown over decades to protect immigrants’ rights has also come under attack. Trump has issued an executive order accusing immigration attorneys of fraud and threatening them with investigations and sanctions. He has also gutted funding for critical legal services that help people facing detention and deportation. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) ordered legal service providers to cease work on critical programs including the Legal Orientation Program, the Immigration Court Helpdesk, the Family Group Legal Orientation Program, the Counsel for Children Initiative, and the National Qualified Representative Program—which represents people in detention who a judge has determined cannot competently represent themselves because of mental illness. The Office of Refugee Resettlement has also canceled the Unaccompanied Children Program, which was representing 26,000 children who arrived to the United States without a parent. The cancellation of these bipartisan-supported, longstanding, and successful programs is being contested in litigation. Nevertheless, threats to these programs leave hundreds of thousands of people—including children—without access to the basic legal information and representation necessary to navigate complex court processes. It has also forced layoffs of hundreds of committed and experienced nonprofit legal services staff, weakening a growing field that has already struggled to meet the overwhelming demand for services. The Trump administration has further proposed record funding for an unprecedented expansion of immigration detention by using federal prisons, military bases, the detention facility in Guantánamo Bay. None of these facilities are set up to house people who need routine access to counsel to prepare for court proceedings, adding even greater barriers for people targeted for deportation to find and communicate with an attorney. Finally, Trump has fired or laid off dozens of immigration judges and court staff at a time when the immigration court backlog is at historic highs and he seeks to put even more people through deportation hearings. The remaining judges face even larger dockets, with directives from DOJ requiring them to terminate certain asylum claims without a hearing and consider more cases at a faster pace, resulting in an expedited process that deprives people of a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Due process is essential. The Constitution and our constitutional system apply to all people in the United States, regardless of where they were born. At a bare minimum, people facing deportation should be able to understand what they are accused of and be able to examine and challenge evidence, in a language they understand, alongside a trained advocate who can decipher complex immigration laws. Due process is essential to safeguard our country’s fundamental democratic values as we work to advance immigration policies that respect fairness, family unity, and human dignity. unquote What Does “Due Process” Mean for Immigrants and Why Is It Important? | Vera Institute

Maybe the stupidest thing you've ever said, which is a mighty high bar.

Due process means you get to go in front of a judge, not get arrested and deported when you show up at the appointed time.

He is a real person, he is just responding to your cryptic posts with one just as cryptic...you should really use full paragraph's and give context to what your trying to convey, you might get more responses...