Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/02/2025 in Posts

  1. While the FBI was lying and committing crimes regarding Russian collusion, J6, the laptop, Whitmer, etc, terrorists, presidential assassins and school shooters were getting out ahead of them. The FBI is a joke. Terrorists are winning while the FBI is on their various crime sprees.
    2 points
  2. 2 points
  3. I agree. That's why trump keeps trying to troll even harder with more outlandish nonsense. I'm done with caring about what he says since 100% of it is low-information horse shit. My intent is to only react to actual policy actions and outcomes.
    2 points
  4. My theory is that the bar for shocking comments has been raised. People don't react anymore as they did. Do you agree?
    2 points
  5. "BAN GUNS! THE KILLER WASN'T A MUSLIM! THIS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM!" - Trudeau, Hillary, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, the Ayatollah, @robosmith, @Hodad, @Michael Hardner, @Aristides & Co.
    2 points
  6. I would like to thank "Team Canada" for their good faith arguments based on knowledge and factual information. It certainly has not been easy in 2024, to debate with a bunch of MAGA Hyenas, but you were all up for the task, and I commend you for it. Team Canada is composed of: @Michael Hardner @myata @robosmith @BeaverFever @Hodad @Moonlight Graham @eyeball @Moonbox @Black Dog @Queenmandy85 @Politics1990 @herbie @Radiorum Sorry if I forgot anyone. You made 2024 much better. Thank you for believing in democracy.
    1 point
  7. A terrorist ran over 15(?) people in New Orleans and planted IEDs near the scene ahead of time, and terrorist rented a CyberTruck and detonated a bomb outside the Trump tower and the FBI caught a guy planning to shoot up the AIPA office in Florida. So how will the press make this Trump's fault?
    1 point
  8. It was THE AUTHORS OF THE STUDY THAT YOU QUOTED SAYING THE STUDY WAS IN INCLUSIVE. So your retort to you have no substance and can't respond with anything other than personal attacks, is to respond with no substance and make more personal attacks? Prove me right much?
    1 point
  9. Ahhh - you mean back when the fbi agents were caught texting each other about how they'd do what it took to 'stop' trump? gotcha
    1 point
  10. The FBI does not work for Congress. It works for the Justice Dept of the Executive Branch which at that time was led by *checks notes* Donald Trump. 🙄
    1 point
  11. I posted an article that completely refuted your homophobic study (including quotes from your study that refuted your study) and all you did was cut the stuff that refuted your baseless assertion and make personal attacks on me. Now you try to say I lack emotional maturity, while you behave like an child.
    1 point
  12. you could try an old school manual tranny 6 forward and no reverse. Or would you prefer Manuel.
    1 point
  13. Don't get your hopes up. Even if he was you couldn't afford him
    1 point
  14. 1 point
  15. Once you've described exactly WTF the Biden Crime Syndicate that you made up is and WTF "crimes" it supposedly committed I will be happy to provide you links to the Court documents about the crimes Trump has been convicted of. You seem to be totally unaware of the difference between conspiracy rumours and factual truth, That's a well known side effect of cultism.
    1 point
  16. Kind of like the guy that pretends to be a girl making fun of the guy that dresses up and pretends to be someone else for fun? You literally did that same thing twice.
    1 point
  17. I dressed like this for a show once... People on one side of me thought I was dressed up as Trudeau.
    1 point
  18. You mean like democrats blaming every mass shooting on the NRA?
    1 point
  19. Dude, the dems literally coined the term "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste". THat was R emanuel in the 70's i believe, democrat politician and then diplomat. The republicans rarely behave that way, the dems ALWAYS do, so you're kind of calling the kettle black there.
    1 point
  20. If someone says "We should kill the Jews "and you turn around and say "Yes I think we should kill the Jews for sure", then you are absolutely helping to create the problem. You can't turn around and say that you were just pointing out that we should kill the Jews and therefore you're not involved.
    1 point
  21. How frustrated you must have been during the last 4 years. Good thing Trump will be back in the WH later this month.
    1 point
  22. I would not blame Trump nor Biden on this one. It is unlikely that either knew about this individual before the attack. Possibly someone at the FBI, CIA, or Homeland Security did and did not act upon solid intel but there is no way to know about that.
    1 point
  23. I just pasted some of the funnier ones. Good times. HAPPY NEW YEAR!
    1 point
  24. Except, by my own evidence, in this one instance they don't. I have no idea. That's why I'm asking.
    1 point
  25. Except, by your own evidence, they sometimes don't. So what do you think is happening then ?
    1 point
  26. The FBI seems pretty uncomfortable about calling out the motivation for this attack. https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2025/01/01/fbi-spokeswoman-this-is-not-a-terrorist-event-initial-claim-backtracked-by-agency-hours-later/
    1 point
  27. I'm actually heartened by the fact you recognize it (in principle) as an information management technique. The next step is applying this newfound skill across the board in a manner that makes you look deeper into the cause / effect factors and discerning any possible agenda/ideology contamination that may be in play. Doing that over a period of time will refine the process for you, you'll begin to anticipate likely "wag the dog" scenarios before they happen, you'll recognize the walk back clauses deliberately incorporated (pre-deployment) and you'll even start to anticipate the unintended consequences of ill advised actions before they manifest themselves. Finally, you'll begin to distinguish between the efforts to mitigate damage done (after the fact) from the self serving efforts requiring mitigation in the first place. At that point you'll become appalled by the fact others don't do it as a matter of routine. You may even come to realize who indulges in these actions the most, why they do it, and the negative consequences that result from it.... caution though, that's when real disappointment will set in. Like any skill it takes time and effort to develop... I hope you resolve to continue your personal growth journey, it is New Years after all.
    1 point
  28. The Mossad catches 1,000 of those guys a year, but in America, guys with sniper rifles can just wander within 200m of a presidential candidate...? How was the FBI completely unaware of the entire J6th "insurrection"? Don't they have access to 4chan? Didn't they have access to Donald Trump's Twitter feed? How hard was that? How did the US Gov't almost get overthrown (Chutkan's words, and she's a Wash DC judge, so she must know) by a few hundred unarmed guys? They didn't even have 1 gun and they almost "overthrew the US gov't"..... How did the FBI miss that? How was Pelosi unaware, and unprepared? "Uh, let's get 20,000 Nat Guard t protect congress after the insurrection!" Honestly, she's that dumb and yet she's still one of the most powerful Dems in the country? The FBI couldn't find their ass with both hands.
    1 point
  29. Of course they were, you clown. Their pre-crime unit normally would have picked up on something as coordinated and sophisticated as "guy in a truck." The paper trail and chatter must have been off the charts. Something must have gone wrong. Possibly there was a minority report?
    1 point
  30. Hold on Herb, that doesn't go nearly far enough for those of us committed to keeping Canadians safe. If it has an automatic transmission you can't drive it at all, you must lock all of the doors and store it in a locked garage at all times until we decide to confiscate it (without compensation BTW)... and no, we aren't going to tell you when that will be or how it will be undertaken. Unless randomly decreed by OIC, you can still legally retain a truck with a standard transmission unless it has racing stripes measuring over 24.5 inches... that will convert your stock truck into a "stunting style truck," your gas tank must then be modified to hold no more than 10 litres of fuel. In addition, all gas must be drained daily and stored in a separate area. You can keep the gas in a separate container inside the garage though as long as it isn't in physical contact with the truck and is contained in a locked receptacle. Caution though, this has turned a number of law abiding citizens into criminals...., if your granddaughter doesn't have her drivers license yet she can't have access to the garage key, the truck key, or the gas container key. You will also be required to join an authorized "truck club" and provide evidence of membership with any application for registration renewal. Since you've retained the trucks original colour you're OK for the moment but should you decide to paint it red you will have to store it in a locked garage anytime it's not in use, in addition you can only drive it to and from work by the most direct route and are restricted to specially approved parking lots. We haven't even begun to consider time of day restrictions, driving through wilderness areas or even the distance between your truck and the nearest neighbour... you will have to move the garage 6 inches to the left if you want to keep it. Should you be needing a new truck I should probably warn you that we're planning to table engine displacement restrictions on all new/used truck purchases... we won't tell you what that displacement limit is going to be either, we want you to guess. Should you guess wrong, please ensure there is enough space next to the truck with the automatic transmission, you won't be able to drive the new one either.
    1 point
  31. No, you did not. Why? Because you are an ignorant a$$hole. You want to keep pushing making irrelevant personal comments, the gloves are off. I gave you plenty of opportunity to back off and then you resorted to making it personal with me.
    1 point
  32. Absolute balderdash. RFK has been a beacon of light when it comes to shedding light on the corruption in regulatory agencies for health in the U.S. Even those who aren't a fan of his research regarding vaccines recognize his benefits: https://cepr.net/rfk-jr-physicians-pay-schedules-and-the-elites-big-lie/ As for those of us who have been admiring the work of the web site he founded, Children's Health Defense, in regards to the vaccine research they've been doing during what I'll call the Covid times, I can't think of a better candidate. They're constantly coming out with new articles on the subject. This one came out in December: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/university-of-california-covid-vaccine-lawsuit-moves-forward/
    1 point
  33. "Deep State" is a loaded political term like "gravy train". It is simultaneously true and false. Meaningful and meaningless. You can use it to campaign forever since the problem can't be fixed, the swamp can't be drained. This Fitts person alleges some extraordinary things, namely that the security apparatus secretly steals massive amounts from other departments' budgets. True? Well she supported Trump before, and apparently nothing about this was found to be reported. So, show me the goods.
    1 point
  34. Well without a doubt this is obviously one twisted individual no matter how you slice it. WIth that much prep he will have been sick for a while. There should be a trail to follow to try to figure out some motivation for this.
    1 point
  35. Gabbard has ZERO experience in intelligence and RFK knows NOTHING about the science he's trying to RUIN. Gabbard was a military colonel in the Army reserve and has shown that she knows quite a bit about American foreign policy in interviews she's given. John Kiriakou, a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, wrote an article about her in September that was fairly positive in regards to her becoming the Director of National Intelligence. Quoting the introductory summary and conclusion of the article below: ** We need someone in the post willing to rein in the neocon intelligence and foreign policy establishments when they urge the president to double down on military action based on phony or incomplete intelligence. [snip] The bottom line in my view is that Trump appears to be serious in his desire to change the country’s foreign and intelligence policy. He appears to be serious about shaking up the intelligence community. He appears to be serious about bringing foreign conflicts in which the U.S. is involved to a close. Those are all good things for those of us who support a change to the pro-war status quo that is the military-industrial complex. We can certainly disagree with Donald Trump on a thousand other issues. But on Tulsi Gabbard, he got it right. ** Source: https://consortiumnews.com/2024/11/15/john-kiriakou-gabbard-could-help-change-us-foreign-policy/
    1 point
  36. "The deep state" is what makes government work. AKA the brains and expertise that ^you don't have. I think that in order to discuss the deep state, we're first going to have to define it. I have a brief article that I think does a good job of it. Quoting the relevant section: ** In the midst of election season, conversations revolving around the levers of power become more frequent, and in the case of a U.S. presidential election, that often includes debates around the so-called “deep state.” Joining host Robert Scheer on this episode of Scheer Intelligence, Professors Charles Derber and Yale Magrass discuss their new book, “Who Owns Democracy?: The Real Deep State and the Struggle Over Class and Caste in America.” There are many interpretations of what the ‘deep state’ actually represents in government, but Magrass offers a clear definition, breaking it down into two parts: the official state and the deep state. The official state, according to Magrass, consists of the elected officials people know very well, who are always in the media spotlight and soak in the blame for the issues that arise from their perceived rule. Meanwhile, the deep state operates largely unnoticed, with the official state serving as cover. “It gives free reign to corporations, free reign to the very rich, and they can more or less do whatever they want, with the official state carrying almost all the blame for what happens,” Magrass says. ** Source: https://scheerpost.com/2024/09/27/how-deep-does-the-deep-state-go/ By this definition, I think it's clear that it's not a good thing.
    1 point
  37. "The deep state" is what makes government work. AKA the brains and expertise that ^you don't have. Gabbard has ZERO experience in intelligence and RFK knows NOTHING about the science he's trying to RUIN.
    1 point
  38. I know If Trump wasn't elected by your MAGAT losers none of this stuff would of happened just his existence creates violence. Or It was a Cybertruck so Elon having access to them and know how they work used a remote control to drive it to Trumps Hotel and blew it up so that people think we are under attack and Trump can immediately take office and put us under martial law and destroy democracy and be a dictator
    1 point
  39. Everyone else calls them tie-wraps or something else. You just made me realize the 2 main jobs I worked at that only called them zap straps both employed many ex Air Force people. Even asked an employee once to order more zap straps to dress computers and he came back saying he couldn't find 'such a thing' online. Should've made them all learn to 'lace' cables with waxed string like the phone companies did in my day.
    1 point
  40. I'll see your buffoon and raise you two doubloons.
    1 point
  41. It's Ramaswamy who's trying to convince you. Sure but how many are willing to work for peanuts?
    1 point
  42. This is just silly man. He loves people as long as they praise him. The instant they disagree he's looking for childish, pejorative terms to throat at them. He fired most of his first term cabinet simply because they disagreed with him because he was going by FOX news and 'his gut'. His respect is based on how much money/ power a person has. He's always been like that. That old "What's good for GM is good for America" thing hasn't been taken seriously for many decades.
    1 point
  43. Your mileage may vary. But they aren't being brought over because they're good. They're being brought over because they're cheap. If they were better than the local alternative they'd be paid more, not less.
    1 point
  44. No one in the city needs a pickup truck and no civilian should be allowed access to automatic transmissions: See, I can do it too.
    1 point
  45. I don't claim how bad Trump is. If you're behind what he is, you're as deplorable as he is. The morals of a pig in heat.
    1 point
  46. Some people are sp lacking in class they go out of their way to speak ill of the dead. The orst President ever was just re-elected by people like that.
    1 point
  47. Stockwell Day was a cabinet minister in PM Stephen Harper's government. In spite of left wing, liberal criticism of Stephen Harper, he was one of better PMs in Canada's history He served nine years. No PM is perfect and no PM can satisfy everyone, especially the opposition Liberals and NDP (and Bloc) who are always opposed to everything the conservatives do. Here is short summary of PM Harper's time as PM. There is a long history of his life on Wikipedia. "Stephen Harper, Canada's longest-serving Conservative prime minister, led the country through a decade of complex geopolitical, economic, and security challenges2. Under his leadership, Canada reduced federal taxes, created new jobs, balanced the budget, and made critical investments in health care and infrastructure1. He also helped found the Reform Party and served as head of the National Citizens Coalition and leader of the Canadian Alliance Party3. In addition to his political accomplishments, Harper is an accomplished musician and has written a book on the early days of professional ice hockey in Canada4.
    1 point
  48. Millie is about to have a "come to Jesus" moment. Trump's gonna can his fat arse so fast it'll make his cavernous head spin. He'll go on to do commentary on MSNBC or CNN...give speeches to saps who will pay to hear him whine and lie...and will go down in history as a fool.
    1 point
  49. A good video for anyone inclined to say "wait a minute now, let's just think about this for a second." https://www.rebelnews.com/gun_violence_surges_as_liberals_aim_at_the_wrong_target_rod_giltaca The sort of easy, strait forward discussion that could have taken place anytime, on any network or news outlet... but never did. Through painful, often deadly experience, it's become obvious to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear that innocent people are getting hurt simply because of a systemic failure to address real issues. It's also obvious that the issues which are being addressed are nothing more than cynical political expediency designed to create wedge issues. I think people are beginning to resent being duped and the more liberals double down on nonsense, the more people (with a kitchen window to look out of) begin to resent it. As an aside, I'd like to see a similar discussion about the deliberate statistical manipulations that went into the "domestically sourced crime gun" scam a few years back and the police collusion that enabled and supported it. The fact that more people aren't utterly appalled and outraged by all this is a testament to the information management techniques that were deployed against them. For those interested in such things, it's been a truly fascinating journey.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...