Leaderboard

Because they work for the WEF divide and conquer you will own nothing and be happy agenda always conspiring against the the well being of the majority of Canadian citizens (with exception of especially liberal insiders) and so they continue to screw Canadian citizens while robbing us blind. When Justin Trudeau and his party of Liberal liars claim to believe something why would the majority of Canadian citizens even entertain the idea that they are not lying when they claim to believe the rubbish they feed everyone when they prove to lie and deceive so very often? Every time they claim to be doing something for the citizens of Canada, they simply leave out something "bad" for the citizens of Canada "for the WEF sick agenda." Why would anyone trust liars who value a climate hoax used to rob Canadians of a decent future more than they value the well being and safety of Canadian citizens? The majority of Canadians never voted for anyone to rob Canadians of a decent future and value a climate hoax more than they value the lives of the majority of Canadian citizens. To even imply that the majority of Canadian citizens ever did is an oxy m0ron. Again, of the entire Earth's surface area, not even 30 percent of the surface area is land. Humans only occupy 10 percent of that land which means that humans only occupy 3% of the entire Earth's surface area and not one person globally has ever proven with even so much as a shred of validity that 3% of the entire Earth's surface area occupied by humans raises the Earth's atmospheric temperature even so much as 0.000001 degree yet they keep lying compulsively and obsessively of a climate crisis caused by humans and use such lies to rob us blind while detouring businesses from being successful as their asinine motives drive businesses out of Canada I find quite obvious to deliberately further rob Canadians of a decent future. Let alone caused by humans, I have never even seen any proof of a climate crisis over the years but instead I saw Catherine McKenna when Minister of the Environment remove over a hundred years of Canadian climate recorded history citing it as unreliable and again I state all these years later they cited it as unreliable because it exposes that their climate crisis is a hoax used to suit their sick WEF divide and conquer with lies and deceptions agenda. Sure Trudeau's carbon tax reduces carbon emissions because it kills Canadian citizens who otherwise live a breathe Just ask the current Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault who swears up and down it works and now you know why quite factually. They value a climate hoax more than they value the lives of Canadian citizens and for this, yet another reason, have no business holding office betraying the well being and safety of Canadian citizens. The Liberal and NDP coalition have worked so hard to rob Canadians of a future how is it not the duty of Canadian citizens to make sure Canadian citizens rob Liberals and NDP of everything that they and their families have in the near future when they so very eagerly without hesitation are robbing the general population of Canadian citizens including our children of everything especially of a future for years now while distracting with their lies and deceptions fabricated as what they claim to believe? Why shouldn't Canadian citizens feel obligated to thrown them in prison while labelling them haters for speaking against Canadian citizens robbing them blind when they have so eagerly been doing such to Canadian citizens for years now?! I am against the Liberal NDP coalition and their rubbish that they push upon Canadian citizens and our families but perhaps the way to end their madness is by placing the threat that they put on the majority of Canadian citizens upon them and their families! How would they like for themselves and their families to have no future while they starve and go homeless as they are doing to us Canadian citizens and our children under many pathetic lies and deceptions they use as guises to screw us all in every way they appear to be able to think of now? It's my pleasure to give you all something to think about as I continue to stand strong for the well being and safety of the citizens of Canada as I have for 24 and ½ years now! Again, I love and care about everyone but that doesn't mean your actions do not disgust me and nor does it mean that your ignorance doesn't infuriate me and nor does it mean you shouldn't pay the price for destroying the well being, sanity and decent future of Canadian citizens like the Liberals and NDP deliberately have for years now in multiple ways as I have pointed out multiple examples time and time again for almost a decade now! This title and release was inspired by Pierre Poilievre's YouTube channel's video titled "Why would Trudeau raise tariffs on ourselves?" which Pierre Poilievre released Nov. 6th 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ_qxFj1TW4 love Primary Factual Fundamentalist World Class Activist David Jeffrey Spetch Owen Sound Ontario Canada Ps. Be good, be strong!

I hate to think of myself as being severely affected by external forces, so it is kind of bugging me that I'm so optimistic about the fact that Trump won, because the flip side of that is that I would have been miserable if he lost, and I think that's weak. That being said, I know that there are a lot of people who are sad that Kamala lost, but I'd just like to say to you all that I'm certain that if you just relax and try to stay optimistic for a while, you'll see that none of the horrors that Kamala spoke of will come to pass. This isn't the start of another reich and minorities won't be fed to sharks. It's good to see that in some states that voted for Trump, the abortion votes went the way that leftists would have hoped. That's a win for everyone, because a democratically-arrived-at abortion policy has now been adopted in those states, and the men and women who care about it deeply have achieved very real victories. Honestly I can't think of a stronger sign of a healthy democracy than people getting to vote 1 way on a major issue and vote another way along party lines. I'm certain that Trump will be able to get the Russia-Ukraine war ended on decent terms, although it won't be what Ukraine might have hoped for. I just want that war to end ASAP. The Israel-Hamas war is gonna be like brain surgery for Trump. You gotta make sure that you get the whole tumour out but you don't want to take out any extra or you might end up with another Dubya voter on your hands. Still, I think that the focus on getting that war over just ramped up 1,000%. The economy was getting better under Biden recently, which is good, and the stock markets have responded extremely positively to trump's return to the WH, which is good for everyone. Renewed faith in the economy means more investment and in turn more jobs. Today's 1,500-point jump on the Dow represents a bigger jump than the average year of Biden's presidency lol. Good news for leftists is that Trump can't win again, and there are some strong Dem candidates that emerged during this election cycle, such as Josh Shapiro. A lot of people feel like Kamala would probably have won if she chose him as a VP. He will be a force to be reckoned with in upcoming elections. We can't all win the election but we can all win if the world becomes more peaceful and if our economies start rolling. Thanks to all of our American cousins who voted for Trump and helped him win, and I hope that the next 4 years make all of the Kamala Harris supporters A-OK with this election result, however grudgingly that may be. Cheers!

This is a contradictory statement.

Wow. Trump really broke you. Explain, in your own words, how a President that decentralized power (abortion is now a state issue), reduces regulations, reduces taxes and doesn't start any new wars is like a strong centralized government, that demands adherence to one party rule and has imperialist goals? There is a party that is far more like a fascist government but it doesn't start with Rep.

The Christian thing would be to turn the other cheek. Trump already did that and still the Dems went on full attack. When he announced he was running again the Dems went on full attack. No more cheeks left to turn. It's the Democrats who have no idea how or the desire.

Reduce regulation and turn the oil and gas industry loose will not only drag the US economy up, but will drag the global economy back to life as well.

And because you start your post with Alex Jones talking points, the rest can just be ignored. But aren't you worried that Soros will read this and come after you?

Transgenders make up 0.5% of the American population. Most people never even work with a Transgender person. There is no evidence Transgenders are "grooming" our children, or encouraging them to get gender reassignment surgery. So why is this even an election issue. I remember the old days, when things like jobs, the economy, etc. would take precedent.

The above does not go on to mention article 7 which states.. Please take all the above articles with a grain of salt as we do not have the mental capacity to recognise and accept Trump winning the election.

The right has spent the better part of the last 8 years calling everyone left of Trump a communist pedophile traitor and now you're whining about reconciliation? Go f*ck yourself.

Too bad you have ZERO evidence for ^these OPINIONS. Do you even know that MOST ALL STATES authorize their election officers to MANAGE THEIR ELECTIONS? AKA make decisions about PROCESS. That means what they did was AUTHORIZED by the STATE LEGISLATURES and that's why all the challenges were THROWN OUT. WTF are you getting ^this BULLSHIT?

You said multiple times that she outright she called them Nazis. Not that she implied or hinted they were by association. You said she used those words. You lied. None of this has anything to do with my original comment which had nothing to do with the specific video, you pathetic little turd. Ahem: Leaving aside your egregious and hilarious misuse of the one particular term, is this not you using the same video as a source of information to confirm your theory about mental health issues? You are really not very bright, huh?

There's nothing disjointed about the platform that the information is posted on. Whether it's YouTube, or blogs, or newspaper articles, or whatever information is information. It has to be verified and checked same as always regardless. It is a cheesy cop out in the extreme to pretend that just because something he's on a visual platform that somehow it's not relevant

DUI is a pathological liar. This was him in Dec 2023 on here: "I am sure Biden will win in 2024. Trump's mental decline continues, and I no longer think he is mentally stable. Losing the 2020 election broke his brain." Holy crap, dude, you are pathological. This was you in Dec 2023: "I am sure Biden will win in 2024. Trump's mental decline continues, and I no longer think he is mentally stable. Losing the 2020 election broke his brain."

God will have his way. They accused his faith advisor of boning Benny Hinn.

I can do Star Wars memes too:

Bullshit.

There is no problem here, except the one you are creating.

You can't even keep the terms of this discussion straight. The issue isn't their existence; it's that I reject them and their nonsensical definitions. The issue here is that you are pushing for their acceptance and use, making awful arguments that are nonsensical gibberish. Nope. I have truth, logic, common sense, and reason on my side. Feel free to explain what it is you think is relevant.

.. or the evolution takes care of the consequences. We can choose whatever we like. We can even convince ourselves to not think of them. One thing that isn't in our power is to cancel the reality. It always catches up. America's choice will define it for a long, long time now. If it finds a decent way our of here, then... wow. Not many in the long long history managed to though. Only for the objective record.

I read today that Kamala outspent Donnie some 5-1. I would argue that spending that much money peppering people with ads can have an adverse reaction IF your messaging isn't on point. People can actually be repulsed by your candidate. Abortion is one such issue. Touting your abortion likely turns the average person off. Just my two cents as to why Trump could be badly out spent but still destroy Harris.

I have already addressed the absurdity of what you are trying to argue here. There is no need to play any of these games. Men are males, women are females. If someone is trans... they are trans.

And I can't wait! It's great, I feel better about this country every single day!

Reagan and Trump were responsible for huge increases in debt. The last president to balance a budget was Clinton. Republican fiscal responsibility is a myth.

We are just political junkies. And we don't count as foreign interference either.😉 Your assumption that all we watch is FOX is also way off the mark.

So because you start your post with WEF talking points, the rest can be ignored. Soros already has you bought and paid for.

Which one could make the argument that the republican administration had to reign in the spending of the previous Democrat administration.

As much as I am with of the homeless crazy dude yelling "The End is Nigh" on the street corner, so not at all You on the other hand said you "couldn't agree more" with a post that began with WEF, globalist nonsense, effectively encouraging the aforementioned crazy dude on the corner. Do you think Alex Jones (who claims to get downloads directly from god, explaining the globalists plots) is in any way, shape or form credible?

Agreed, I do not feel down at all. Nor do I blame trump people for their gullibility. The trump movement is the culmination of short-sighted decisions made by democrats in the 90s to shift toward the right and mostly abandon their primary focus on the labor movement. Republicans this time around will either improve things, or far more likely, further damage the country and repudiate themselves. So either way I look forward to seeing what they actually do to help anyone's lives get better, given how much they lied to get there.

I couldn't agree more. Good post.

Poor @myata. Poor poor @myata.

Democracies can vote to end themselves. That is an easy, entropy-friendly option that's always there and on by default. Freedom is a choice, and responsibility. To keep it, is work, responsibility and vigilance. And we are too far down the highway of Time to pretend that we didn't know or understand the consequences.

My view of this is entirely different. I am not just getting french fries but all these chemicals, too. That's a steal. How do they do it? How do they pack all that stuff into that skinny little french fry?

The message of those ads really highlights one of their great weaknesses. Are we having trouble with a certain demographic? It must be something wrong with them. Working class people aren't supporting us? Well, they are just uneducated anyway. Our numbers with men are not good? That's because of toxic masculinity and misogyny. Let's put out an ad presuming we know what men all think and make a childish attempt at manipulating them. You guys are just to chicken to vote for Kamala. Bawk Bawk Bawk.

This is it. You can't expect a change on this level to have zero unintended effects.

I bet you The View had really high ratings with all the additional conservative viewers today.

What I think would be hilarious is if we hire a mob to burst in and demand that she certify trump as president regardless of the vote. I mean... she won't want to cooperate but she cant' say no... Then, victorious, they announce that they've successfully defended democracy and head out for some well earned mcdonald burgers and fries.

Yes America elected an imbecile and a convicted felon to boot. You can fly south blackbird and join the madness.

By what measure are you referring to? Trump refused to confirm US commitment to article 5 of the nato treaty, which is something all presidents do. Failing to do this itself weakened the alliance. Its the US saying "we may not have your back." After Trump, the US has once again coordinated support among NATO allies in support of Ukraine, and actually helped expand the alliance to include Finland and Sweden. Meanwhile Trump's inner circle proposed a "dormant nato" policy idea, suggesting that the US take a back seat role and only ever help if it becomes an emergency, which again is akin to weakening the actual power of the alliance that we lead.

You could have stopped right there and actually told the truth for once in your misbegotten whoreson life.

He functions as one, perhaps just out of sheer bumbling ignorance. His siding with Putin at the Helsinki 2018 conference was revealing. He distanced us diplomatically from every one of our democratic allies. He weakened NATO. He weakened our position against Iran. He weakened our position against North Korea. He's come down as being essentially anti-Ukraine. These are all things Russia wants. I'm sure there are a few things he did that they disliked but overall Trump's foreign policy last time was more than Putin's wildest wet dream.

Our national policy between 1991 and 2014 was to try to get Russia to align with us by incorporating them into the capitalist liberal-democracy realm. It failed because Putin wanted authoritarianism and imperialist expansionism. Trump is functionally a Russian asset and part of their own national policy of trying to get the US to align with them by abandoning our democratic values and our powerful post-WWII military alliance. Once Trump reduces NATO and thus marginalizes US power abroad, then China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran will be better positioned do whatever they want. I gaurantee you these leaders are popping corks today.

Its only not a contradiction if you are completely ignorant of the degree to which the American economy depends on immigrant labour and the fact that tariffs are inherently inflationary. You mean one of the best performing economies in the G7 and the entire world? Huh, I guess you are completely ignorant of the degree to which the American economy depends on immigrant labour as well as the extent to which they contribute to the economy through taxes and spending.

Protecting NATO countries and others against Russian aggression is more important than ever, especially with Russian infiltrating citizens of Democratic countries and spreading misinformation. In canada the leader of the Conservatives, and independant "journalists" have been compromised. It's time to increase criminal penalties against people working for Russia, and counter Russian misinformation with hackers and computer experts. We have to join together to defeat the Russian menace, as it is worse than ever.

America Makes a Perilous Choice By The Editorial Board The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom. American voters have made the choice to return Donald Trump to the White House, setting the nation on a precarious course that no one can fully foresee. The founders of this country recognized the possibility that voters might someday elect an authoritarian leader and wrote safeguards into the Constitution, including powers granted to two other branches of government designed to be a check on a president who would bend and break laws to serve his own ends. And they enacted a set of rights — most crucially the First Amendment — for citizens to assemble, speak and protest against the words and actions of their leader. Over the next four years, Americans must be cleareyed about the threat to the nation and its laws that will come from its 47th president and be prepared to exercise their rights in defense of the country and the people, laws, institutions and values that have kept it strong. It can’t be ignored that millions of Americans voted for a candidate even some of his closest supporters acknowledge to be deeply flawed — convinced that he was more likely to change and fix what they regarded as the nation’s urgent problems: high prices, an infusion of immigrants, a porous southern border and economic policies that have flowed unequally through society. Some cast their votes out of a profound dissatisfaction with the status quo, politics or the state of American institutions more broadly. Whatever drove this decision among these voters, however, all Americans should now be wary of an incoming Trump administration that is likely to put a top priority on amassing unchecked power and punishing its perceived enemies, both of which Mr. Trump has repeatedly vowed to do. All Americans, regardless of their party or politics, should insist that the fundamental pillars of the nation’s democracy — including constitutional checks and balances, fair-minded federal prosecutors and judges, an impartial election system and basic civil rights — be preserved against an assault that he has already begun and has said he would continue. At this point, there can be no illusions about who Donald Trump is and how he intends to govern. He showed us in his first term and in the years after he left office that he has no respect for the law, let alone the values, norms and traditions of democracy. As he takes charge of the world’s most powerful state, he is transparently motivated only by the pursuit of power and the preservation of the cult of personality he has built around himself. These stark assessments are striking in part because they are held not just by his critics but also by those who served most closely with him.i We are a nation that has always emerged from a crucible with its ideals intact and often toughened and sharpened. The institutions of our government, hardened by nearly 250 years of disputation, turmoil, assassinations and wars, held firm when Mr. Trump assailed them four years ago. And Americans know how to counter Mr. Trump’s worst instincts — actions that were unjust, immoral or illegal — because they did so, over and over, during his first administration. Civil servants, members of Congress, members of his own party and people he appointed to high office often stood in the way of the former president’s plans, and other institutions of our society, including the free press and independent law enforcement agencies, held him accountable to the public. Mr. Trump and his movement have all but taken over the Republican Party. Yet it is also important to remember that Mr. Trump can’t run for another term. From the day he enters the White House, he will be, in effect, a lame-duck president. The Constitution limits him to two terms. Congress has the power — and for some ambitious Republicans, perhaps the political incentive — to set a course away from Mr. Trump’s antidemocratic agenda, if it chooses to pursue it. Governors and legislatures across the nation have spent months shoring up their state laws and Constitutions to protect civil rights and liberties, including access to reproductive and gender-affirming health care. Even states that voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Trump, including Kentucky, Ohio and Kansas, have rejected the most extreme positions on abortion. Other institutions of American civil society will play a crucial role in challenging the Trump administration in the courts, in our communities and in the protests that are sure to return. The rest of the world, too, has no illusions about the leader who will soon again represent the United States on the world stage. The countries of the NATO alliance were shocked, during the first Trump administration, by his willingness to undermine that long and valuable partnership. But European nations, defying Mr. Trump’s predictions, not only came together with the United States in the face of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine but also expanded their ranks right up to Russia’s border. For the Democratic Party, rear-guard action as the political opposition will not be enough. The party must also take a hard look at why it lost the election. It took too long to recognize that President Biden was not capable of running for a second term. It took too long to recognize that large swaths of their progressive agenda were alienating voters, including some of the most loyal supporters of their party. And Democrats have struggled for three elections now to settle on a persuasive message that resonates with Americans from both parties who have lost faith in the system — which pushed skeptical voters toward the more obviously disruptive figure, even though a large majority of Americans acknowledge his serious faults. If the Democrats are to effectively oppose Mr. Trump, it must be not just through resisting his worst impulses but also by offering a vision of what they would do to improve the lives of all Americans and respond to anxieties that people have about the direction of the country and how they would change it. The test for members of this new Congress will begin soon after they take their oath. The president-elect has promised to surround himself in his second term with enablers prepared to pledge loyalty to him, who will be willing to do whatever he commands. But a president needs the Senate to approve many of those appointments. Senators can stop the most extreme or unqualified candidates from taking cabinet positions like defense secretary and attorney general, as well as seats on the Supreme Court and the federal bench. They can act to keep clearly unfit candidates from holding any powerful position. The Senate did that in 2020, when it blocked Mr. Trump’s attempts to seat unqualified people on the board of the Federal Reserve, and the chamber should not hesitate to do so again. Perhaps the most important responsibility lies with all of those who will serve in a second Trump administration. Those he appoints as attorney general, as secretary of defense and to other top leadership roles should expect that he may ask them to carry out illegal acts or violate their oaths to the Constitution on his behalf, as he did in his first term. We urge them to recognize that whatever pledge of loyalty he may demand, their first loyalty is to their country. Standing up to Mr. Trump is possible, and it is the duty of every American public servant when appropriate. But the final responsibility for ensuring the continuity of America’s enduring values lies with its voters. Those who supported Mr. Trump in this election should closely observe his conduct in office to see if it matches their hopes and expectations, and if it does not, they should make their disappointment known and cast votes in the 2026 midterms and in 2028 to put the country back on course. Those who opposed him should not hesitate to raise alarms when he abuses his power, and if he attempts to use government power to retaliate against critics, the world will be watching. Benjamin Franklin famously admonished the American people that the nation was “a republic, if you can keep it.” Mr. Trump’s election poses a grave threat to that republic, but he will not determine the long-term fate of American democracy. That outcome remains in the hands of the American people. It is the work of the next four years. The editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate from the newsroom. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/06/opinion/trump-wins.html

This type of thing reminds me of the old "blood libel" accusations against Jewish communities in Europe, for centuries. Nevermind the fact that there was zero evidence of Jews kidnapping Christian or gentile children to perform blood sacrifices on them, antisemites with a platform worked up the local population into a frenzy that ended up in pogroms, or other forms of violence targeting the Jewish community. So this type of thing isn't new by any means. People will believe anything, if they fear a group of people that are different.

Why? How does that even make sense? how would this policy be bad for the gta or lower mainland? No WONDER he keeps saying he needs more 'proof' even when we give him plenty, he's just hungry for pudding! It all makes sense now!