Leaderboard

So how long have wreaths of flowers and leaves been able to speak? Unless you're referring to that lying weasel Merrick Garland.

You can't call it a lie without EVIDENCE, just like your middle school remedial math tells you show your math.

*giggle* The Tweenkies are all up in arms over flags being flown. Yet say nothing about their terrorist wing (BLM and ANTIFA) burning the Stars and Stripes. These emasculated little fops are, once again, showing off their obvious hypocrisy. Too bad, so sad, Tweenkies.

Yeah. It's kind of sad. In the nearly two years he's became CPC leader, he's only managed a 4% improvement, and that's with literally the worst and least popular PM in Canadian history playing the heel for him. No, they really don't lol. The polls say Canadians don't trust him, with him scoring almost as low as Trudeau on credibility, and over half the country views him unfavorably. That's no surprise either, because he was one of the most highly disliked MPs in Harper's government even going back 15 years. It doesn't seem much has changed. Over Trudeau and Jagger? Sure. Anyone would beat those two buffoons on that. Nobody here is trying to argue that Trudeau is likely to win the next election, or even that he deserves to.

Yeah only 3500 could attend the rally itself but there were far more outside the rally. Before thinking you got us now, actually research enough to know what you are talking about.

Popularity and confidence in Pierre is going up...kind of...sort of...barely? With the most unpopular Prime Minister ever and Canada at large completely souring on the government, you're impressed that Pierre's favorability ratings have nudged up a teeny weeny bit in the last year? The man is still as unpopular as ever, still deeply mistrusted, and still seen as the annoying, BS'ing shrill that he always was in the Harper government.

So you're a republican and a monarchist? 😂 You have no loyalty to the monarch of Canada if you seek to break up their country. A Canadian by convenience it sounds like.

Canada has no symbols which are not British in origin the Maple Leaf is the symbol of the Canadian Corps of the British Imperial Army in the Great War

I appreciate your fiery Scots Irish Protestant zeal Ian Paisley would be proud of you Dextera Dei

Yeah, they had a warrant and executed that warrant. None of that was any kind of attempt to kill or shoot Trump or as you claimed "ordering a hit" Give me a break. That is nonsense. No one was authorized to murder anyone, let alone a political leader or Trump.

Are you part of the solution? Or part of the problem?

Harper had some scandals, like proroguing Parliament to silence debate and accountability. He had increasing issues with heavy handed control on his party. A reason he had to go. Martin inherited Chretiens scandals, those Liberals had to go. Trudeau had to go a couple of elections ago. With 24/7 news and social media it usually seems to take a true narcissist to want to be leader now. Who else would want all that attention? Some people want to be rock stars.

You don't reward a terrorist massacre and ongoing hostage crisis with calls for statehood. This only incentivizes that activity. Nor do you ever give statehood to a government bent on Israel's destruction. Has nothing been learned from Israel's deoccupation and elections in Gaza in 2005? Calls for restraint in Rafah are fine.

The SCOTUS has been intentionally politicized. That's why only 25% of Americans think it is doing its job.

Yes, by illegally protesting in the streets. They certainly did stop him. It is a road, meant for driving on. He was forced to stop because those people illegally taking over the streets were in his way. There is some video, and you can see after he comes to a stop, many in the crowd start running to swarm the vehicle, including Foster, who approaches him with a gun. Had they simply walked on past him and left him be, none of this would have ever happened. Had Foster simply walked on by and let him be, none of this would have ever happened. These are facts, trying to insult me doesn't make your case any better.

Whether one agrees with the decision or not is irrelevant. The point is, a court was intentionally stacked by politicians to achieve a political goal. That is not what a supreme court is for. Judges like Thomas couldn't do more to destroy the court's credibility if he was actually trying.

ROFLMAO - things like this have zero to do with the low opinion of the courts. Democrats claiming that any ruling they don't like is proof that the courts are bias is what degrades support for the courts. Claiming that roe vs wade was NOT overturned based on law but was JUST personal politics is what has lead to that. When roe vs wade was handed down a lot of people said " I don't like that decision, i think legally it was a bad decision and here's why but the courts have made their decision and we must respect that". When it was overturned i was "some trump judges and a handmaiden who's not a REAL woman made this decision because they were told to or because of personal religious bias and we've been screwed!!" THEN - you get dem supporters using the courts to go after trump on total witch hunts and local justices try and keep him from the ballot in an anti-democratic attack. And now everyone thinks that the dems have weaponized the courts against their political opponents. That is why we have a record low trust in the courts. Not because of a flag. Nice try.

The SCOTUS is not supposed to be political, its job is to interpret the constitutionality of the laws made by politicians. Its credibility depends on it and things like this is why their public credibility is at an all time low. It is supposed to be one of those checks and balances that Americans like you no longer believe in. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/21/favorable-views-of-supreme-court-fall-to-historic-low/ https://theweek.com/instant-opinion/1014690/attitudes-toward-the-supreme-court

I was going to let this go - but i think i've had enough. @Goddess was not far off the mark. You called them 'babies' here and say they only have themselves to blame for getting locked up "Ridiculous. Convoy babies who couldn't work with their lawyers to get sprung on bail have themselves to blame." babies You frequently suggested that the convoy lacked principles "Meh... the 'truckers' demand a change in government based on 17% support of their vague cause. What exactly is the principle here ? I like popular uprisings, but principled ones..." no principles And thst was a very common theme for your posts - "I like popular uprisings but this isn't popular so..." And you did in fact support the cbc's refering to the convoy as racisst. When people said you an't say the convoy is racist you would say that the leader sure is soooo is it really unfair for cbc to suggest others are? And i would guess that's where her impression comes from. You were pretty ok with the convoy being falsely accused of a lot of things from the looks of it To be completely fair I didn't see anywhere where you actually personally called them Nazis. Or racist or the like even though you kind of came close a few times. And you certainly spoke disparagingly of them on numerous occasions. But disparaging is not the same as accusing them of being Nazis or racists. If you're going to do things like defend the CBC as labeling the entire Convoy as racist or suggesting that a large percentage of them might be then you are going to have to accept that people are going to believe that you agree with that assessment. You frequently defend Trudeau when the comments against him are perfectly reasonable and utterly defended. And when you can't defend him you turn to the old "Why are we even talking about this" routine. Here's the thing Mike. It doesn't and dozens of people wind up having the same impression about you then it's probably not them, it's you.

Russian bullshit.

Sure they can, they just don't want to.

I am referring to the original migration at the time, New York was mostly wilderness the seat of power and centre of the colonies was in Pennsylvania the very place that George Washington initiated the Seven Years War upon the Americans winning the War of Independence, the Loyalists were forced to flee actually led by Benedict Arnold himself and the place that they fled to is now called Ontario

but with all due respect, you are mirroring blackbird here you are saying the same thing which he is saying, in that your belief system is correct and his is not all I am saying is that Canada is an entirely British construct, rooted in Christianity, particularly the Protestant Enlightment it is literally written into the Constitution Act tho the founders of Canada did not actually come from the British Isles they were Americans whom came from Pennsylvania ; United Empire Loyalists in terms of the First Nations, Christian Britain was their only and most stalwart ally the Americans were bent on ethnically cleansing the natives off the land the British Crown was the only thing standing in their way and that is why the Americans went to war against the British Crown defending the First Nations is how Britain lost America

Go ahead and quote "waving around." Not even a single witness testified that he so much as raised the weapon, let alone brandished.

I hope to be the exception...

He was never accused of brandishing, AFAIK.

Well they say a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. There's a lot of people who believe in the ideology of the NDP party but when they actually experience it they realize that maybe it's not such a good thing. Of course it's also possible that he's a bit of an opportunist. Perhaps he thought it would be easier to win as a liberal in the last election and now that that's not an option he's hoping to fly under the CPC banner. Going 100% alone is a tough roe to hoe and you're more likely to win as a CPC than you are as an NDP right now in Ontario. I don't know much about this guy other than his name seems familiar and I can't remember why

If the government doesn't think it's a priority, and if the population doesn't think it's a priority, why on Earth are you complaining that he's not making it a priority?

That's Biden. Trump is the lying fraud rapist "P*ss me off and i'll blow you up because my button is bigger than yours' guy. And of the two that is definitely preferable I think that we're all missing that the real danger here is that if trump gets elected the democrats may suffer severe mental health issues trying to figure out how to claim that the next republican candidate is even worse somehow

And thank God for that. Really, who in the f*ck wants to live in an anti-Constitutional Republic? I mean, besides you border erasing reprobates?

@eyeball The NIH, run by Fauci, is also currently under fire in the US Subcommittee for lying to Congress about all things covid. You might want to consider that.

Here's why you should pay more attention to me: From your link: When you click on the link, you get this: The reason the link (and your article) is "not correct or out-of-date" is because AS I TOLD YOU AND LINKED YOU TO - the FDA and CDC recently lost a court case against the FLCCC Frontline doctors who sued them over their misinformation about Ivermectin and won. The FDA and CDC were ordered to remove the misinformation. That article was also debunked in my Trickle thread.

Cite on IVM dosages, please. Sorry, but I'm beyond sick and tired of you shit-posting garbage with no links.

There is a movie coming about about the technology, here's the trailer: It’s a real David & Goliath story about a whistleblower revealing Merck’s decades of fraud with the MMR vaccine. It’s been buried in the courts for the last 14 years but an appeal in June may kick it up to the Supreme Court. Based on real-life events, comes the corporate thriller, Protocol 7. Alexis Koprowski, a devoted mother and small-town family lawyer, Adrian Jay, a renegade doctor exiled from the medical profession, and Steve Schilling, a virologist at a prominent vaccine laboratory turned corporate whistleblower, work together to hold a large pharmaceutical corporation accountable for allegedly fraudulent test results behind a failing mumps vaccine. Protocol 7 takes us behind the corporate curtain, exposing a chain of command that devolves responsibility, prioritizes profits over people, and fosters an amoral mindset of “just following orders.”

The question was rhetorical with comment following. My entire comment was "How can PP be a problem? He has no authority, no power and no (or few) plans. He is just b;owing smoke. So far he is ineffectual, inert and powerless and can say and do anything without consequence. What he may be or do in the future has yet to be seen or felt." The problem with waiting too long is he becomes irrelevant. Smoke and mirrors and no content. Like crying wolf once or twice too often...no one listens any more. He has to be more concise, precise and relevant and ....not too often

Friendly fire is something that unfortunately happens in most wars. But friendly fire is very different from one side using their own people as human shields. It's been pointed out that during WW2 the Einsatzgruppen often numbed themselves with alcohol before executing civilians, Hamas of today LIVESTREAMED what they did on Oct 7. They were proud of what they were doing, and they wanted the world to see it. What does that tell you about Hamas?

Trudeau/Singh are Canada's problem . . . . the most appalling federal government in Canada's history.