Leaderboard

I don't even understand where they get off thinking this was a legitimate case. "We, The State of New York, are ignoring our own state legislation, and acting as federal prosecutors, to try Donald Trump for something that we can't really identify as a specific crime, and which has passed the statute of limitations for all of our own nearly applicable laws. We are hoping to set a precedent for other states to use nearly applicable laws from the federal gov't and relatively nearby states to indict people that they don't like in the future."

Trump held a rally for 80,000 to 100,000 people this weekend. One of the people there was Lawrence Taylor, endorsing Trump and his whole family will never vote Democrat again, according to LT. https://youtu.be/EgeLzZk4InE

The next Trailer Park Boys movie should have the son of a former president in it. This fictional character could be banging his widowed sister-in-law, cheating on her with hookers, he could be on the "hunt" for crack, and have an out-of-wedlock child that he's rejecting. He could also be involved with family crimes with his his dad, who's an old kid-sniffer that showers with his young teen daughter. The son, "Tracker", could be Mr Lahey's lawyer, and "the smartest guy that anyone knows" Are those guys too "white trash" for the a wholesome show like the Trailer Park Boys?

No, they would have just claimed it was 'classified' and arrested him for not turning it in when he left puberty when he was supposed to LOL

Interesting. Snopes changed its rating on this claim after Ashley Biden's testimony. If you do not recall, she questioned if she was molested and said she took showers with her dad (Biden) that were probably not appropriate. Claim: A diary authored by U.S. President Joe Biden's daughter, Ashley Biden, describes actions taken toward her by her father when she was a child as "probably not appropriate." Rating: True https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ashley-biden-diary-claims/

OMG you are actually defending this. If I were you I would just let it die because a grown man showering with his daughter is kind of creepy and you defending it in that way makes you seem kind of creepy. I guarantee you if the kid went to school and told their teacher that they shower with daddy, CPS would be called to investigate. Wait 6' 3" a genius and all the women love you and you seem to be into robots. Was this SNL skit based on a true story

Maybe not illegal but certainly weird by any stretch of the imagination. Now swap Biden for Trump and all the slack jawed lunatics would be howling from the rooftops, along with year long 24 hour coverage from the MSM.

Right! Tomorrow, maybe I’ll get in my car and it won’t work, because science was wrong and gasoline cannot burn! Here’s your problem: “I don’t want climate science to be right, because my “team” is against it.” Your skull is a mile thick because no science could possibly change your mind. A few years ago, New York City was stacking bodies into refrigerated trucks because so many were dying from Covid, and your “team” wanted to deny it. So why play for Team Stupid? It’s the team that China and Russia are supporting, because Team Stupid makes Russia and China stronger.

I went back to look at how this thread started, and your post was the most relevant and first... that went unanswered. Imagine that. Like the claims of genocide, those who claim war crimes are never quite able to support their assertions and explain themselves.

That's only part of the story. The FBI actually went across the country, raiding people's homes, to retrieve it. Just think about the fact that the federal "police" force in the US went Rambo just to get a little girl's diary. If the FBI retrieved Trump's kid's diary, we all know that they would have lied about what was in it, and even fabricated a few pages, just to start another smear campaign against him.

There's no "if". Israel was completely out of Gaza since the beginning of 2007. All the Gazans did that whole time was stockpile rockets and bombs and plot terrorist attacks. You're new to this, so you think that this is a one-off and that maybe things will be different a few years from now, but it's not. It's a continuation of the exact same thing for 75 years. These people are serious enough about genocide against Israel that they opt to leave children in the line of fire to be used as propaganda pieces after they die. Buddy, why are there 75 yr old refugee camps? Is that really a thing? Shouldn't those people be living normal lives by now? This is dragging on because the Iranians and others want it to drag on. It's dragging on because the Khartoum resolution simply says "Let's make this drag on." No peace, no negotiations, no recognition of Israel as a state. Go look it up ffs. It will take you ten seconds. 1) The Palestinians lost that territory in a series of wars to eradicate Israel and kill as many Jews as possible. It's lost. It's not Palestine's territory anymore. 2) The 1948 map was indefensible. The country was only a few miles wide, from east to west, making it easy to divide the country in two during a war, and making it impossible for Israeli troops to support each other.

The bigger story here is just how many people in NJ went to the rally. 80-100k is huge. This isn't like he's some new figure or that he's got some major announcement. It was a fund raiser/campaign speech. Have you seen Brandon get more than 100 people at a campaign speech? The "leader of the free world" can't even get a handful of supporters. If he ever got to 100, there probably would be 50 Palestinian protesters there.

You failed miserably. 1. Hope Hicks said: "He liked to call himself 'Fixer' or 'Mr Fix-it'," Hicks said. "And it was only because he first broke it." She did not say the Stormy Daniels story was important to the campaign. She did say the Karen McDougal story in the Wallstreet Journal was something they tried to delay. However, that story isn't relevant to this case Deadline.com 2. No, they bundled laws from NY, that have all had the statute of limitations run, into some unnamed federal election law/regulation to bypass the NY statute of limitations. Washington Examiner 3. Dude quit: PBS You lied shorty.

Maybe you should stop being a bigot? Then people won't call you a bigot.

Ivison's column today contains references to Trudeau's performance as PM by those who know it best - his cabinet. And just like those who once worked for Trump, few of them have much flattering to say. But this paragraph particularly caught my attention: Trudeau has no apparent interest in the banalities of government, including the management of his cabinet or caucus. Ministers — senior ministers — report that they rarely talk about their portfolios with their boss. In the 2018 book, Un selfie avec Justin Trudeau, Jocelyn Coulon, a former adviser to Stéphane Dion, said the relationship between prime minister and his then foreign affairs minister was “glacial” and the only private meeting the two men had was when Dion was fired. “The prime minister is a man incurious about the affairs of the world,” Coulon remarked. The word 'incurious' has often been used to describe Trump. So has his lack of interest in the 'banalities of government'. Both men are, of course, narcissists. Both lie quite frequently and both hold grudges. Both are are divisive and more interested in scoring political points than governing effectively, as ex-Finance Minister Morneau says. Both were born with silver spoons in their mouths, went to private schools, and seek the attention and approval of the wealthy while claiming to be a 'man of the people'. Trump pretends to be religious while Trudeau affects a desperate wokeness. I equate his taking the limo to a BLM demonstration (in the midst of a covid lockdown) to take a knee to Trump hugging the flag on stage. They were both performative and cringe-inducing. Another paragraph that so aptly describes this government is this one: The sage of Baltimore, Henry Louis Mencken, once satirized a government that sounds remarkably like Trudeau’s as a “a broker in pillage”: a collection of individuals whose only talent was getting and holding office and whose principal device was “to search out groups who pant and pine for something they can’t get and promise to give it to them. Nine times out of 10, that promise is worth nothing. The 10th time it is made good by looting A to satisfy B.”

Why is everyone in that family in rehab?

The covid hoax, the climate crisis hoax and the EV hoax are all just but three of the evil and satanic WEF globalist ilk plans that want us to eat bugs while they can still eat steak. Inflation and the high cost of everything is just more bullshit being created by the scumbags that control the creation of money and the manipulation in the stock markets. JFK was assassinated by the globalist banksters because he wanted too pretty much get rid of the federal reserve. That just shows us all as to what power they have over our controlled politicians and what they can get away with. Right on. All this mass hysteria is all just the evil and satanic globalists trying to convince we the sheeple that there is a crisis everywhere going on in the world and only they will have the answer to fix their created crisis. Try and pay cash for everything that you buy, and above all, avoid a cashless society that those evil and satanic WEF globalists want to put on us all. If it happens, we will all be phkd. Just my opinion. 😇

The prosecutor has a liar(Cohen)and a hooker(Stormy)as their witnesses. How can the procecution lose their case? LOL. Trump needs to arrest Garland, Bragg and Merchan. They have all become Marxist Traitors to America. Just saying. 😁

He ignored the part about the FBI lying and committing crimes, and the part about proving that creepy, kid-sniffing Joe actually did take showers with his young teen daughter, and then pretended that Trump's kids can't read. Essentially he's countering utterly damning facts with his own sarcastic fantasies. That's got "cornered rat" written all over it. Let's cut the poor little guy some slack. His lying, conniving, criminal psychopaths are taking a beating in the court of public opinion right now.

Sigh. original hodad argument - "just because you raise tarrifs doesn't mean the local competitors will be able to compete more". Everyone else - "it literally means they'll be able to compete more'. Revised Hodad argument " uuhh. .weeelllll THATS because there WAS no local competators in the first place! Ha HAAA! Charade you are!!!!! " Double sigh 1) - many trade goods do. So there you go. 2) - if they don't, that's probably because it wasn't worth it to set it up due to the low cost of foreign products. But if those products cost more now, there's a good chance it IS worth tooling up to serve the market. As i mentioned. ANd that's before the 'other trade concessions' argument. Your argument is like a little neon sign to the world - 'blink blink, i'm stupid as hell".

Using Federal agencies for social engineering started when the Big Turd was in power. Little Turd has taken it to an all time high, but so-called "conservative" governments did little to reverse this trend. Further, many large companies have HR departments that do exactly the same thing. Hiring is often no longer by merit alone, but "qualified" usually means meeting some ridiculous minimal qualification but meeting some totally irrelevant minority preference trumps merit almost every time. I have watched this in one of my closest friend's career. He is a P Eng nearing the end of his career (so highly qualified and experienced) and landed a job with one of the most sought after employers in Canada. He got dumped into a department with....uh....a distinctly Asian racial profile (i.e. the one where most Cdn immigrants originate). He reported to one manager and had a half dozen co-workers. Once my buddy landed there, other department heads soon found out they had someone who could actually DO the engineering and on top of that deliver a project. He was kept insanely busy, but then he was required to write endless reports to his manager while the rest of the entire department did little more than hold meetings all day and write pointless reports about the meetings. He finally had his fill of literally doing EVERYONE else in the department's work and simply refused to write any more reports to his boss. HR sided with the useless tit and fired him - over protest of several other department heads. Worked out fine in the end because some Yanks picked him up at damn near double his previous best salary. Something about information from other department heads at his last job seems to have had a lot to do with it. I have heard many similar stories from others in the Engineering profession. Countries with a culture based upon privilege and corruption simply do not fit nor IMHO do they in any way belong inside of our borders. As some Humboldt SK families why.

Lol. The "chess with a pigeon" admonition has come home to roost. I should have known better. You are as far from being able to sufficiently understand climate science as you are from doing your own bloodwork or monitoring your own food supply. I don't mean that you'd be incapable of learning those things, but no one can become expert in all things, so we rely on the expertise of others--on knowledge gathered and shared--to make better decisions. We trust our doctors to help us make better decisions because they have training and expertise and specific knowledge. We trust engineers and our FDA monitors for the same reasons. Relying on that expertise is NOT an appeal to authority fallacy. That's a misapplication of the term. An appeal to authority is only fallacious if it's an attempt to use an authoritative endorsement in lieu of a logical argument. It does not apply to invoking actual experts sharing actual knowledge of a subject. And it's certainly not fallacious when proposed actions are backed by an overwhelming scientific consensus. Now you can stick with your bogus claim--and ignore the FDA warnings about contaminated lettuce, or take up smoking, or drive a car with a recalled fuel pump because "Whadda those experts know?!?"? Or you can crack open a philosophy reference and brush up on what an appeal to authority actually means, and why it's a logically sound to rely on expert information and recommendations to make more informed decisions.

So what??? The only new thing about the poll is that Jagmeet is withering LOL Everyone knows and is fully aware Trudeau is toast (except Trudeau himself). The Liberal party has to boot this guy out in the next few months or they will totally collapse like the Ontario Liberals did. The will lose regardless but, they have to have a new leader to move them forward. If they wait till they get obliterated, they will have far too much and too long to re-build.

What hypocrisy.

You're the one who's pretending to be an expert on this case and FAILING MISERABLY. Next time CITE an EXPERT if you want to be believed.

You're pretty ignorant of de jure huh? Please show the original document signed by god granting Jews sovereignty over Israel. If God's mandate was truly eternal, surely this document will still exist in perpetuity.

Treaty with who? This might come as a surprise to you, but Israel does not need a treaty with anyone. God gave them the land several thousand years ago. Read the King James Bible or Holy Scripture. That is inerrant and infallible. That is far superior to any kind of piece of paper or treaty. They don't need a treaty. What the heathen say about it is irrelevant. quote 7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. 8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; " Genesis 17:7 KJV There is no debate. It all ends with what God said. He is sovereign.

I inserted nothing. If there were links, I didn’t know about them. End DEI. It’s racist garbage.

Now that contamination of the DNA packaged into the lipid nanoparticles has been confirmed many times over (including by Health Canada), a few may be asking "How does this affect those who got jabbed?" In spite of the alphabet authorities assurances that it is **shrug** "no big deal", other researchers and scientists decided to find out. MPs | Free Full-Text | Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty® (mdpi.com) According to the researchers, it turns out that Pfizer may have slightly under-reported the amounts of DNA contamination in its magic spike protein elixirs. Behold my shocked face: And by "slightly" under-reported, I mean by orders of magnitude. Their conclusion included the alarming determination that contaminant DNA enters patients’ cells. In the study authors’ own words: Haha, “unexpected introduction of mRNA” into the global market. See, what you really DON'T want in a vaccine is a cellular delivery system for random bacterial DNA. What could go wrong? One thing that could go wrong is cancer, or ‘oncogenesis’ in public health’s dialect. Speculation: Could be why Pfizer and Moderna are switching focus to cancer meds and why cancer rates are rising.

"Government funded" scientists... how about having private fundings from Gates, Bezos and all the guys you love to hate people ? If you hate objectivity, then science is understandably the #1 enemy.

Federal Politics ? How about "who cares" ?

I can say with my experience, of many years in the public service and living in the burbs in Ottawa, and have many family members and friends and hundreds of colleagues in the public service there was no "crap" in what I say. I dare say to you that productivity is not up. What is up is the ability to do many more things dealing with the government online. The public service has grown more than 10% since working from home (pandemic) began. That is not more productivity, that is more people to do the same work. There are no "stats" proving productivity is up. That is union BS. No horseshit, I see it every day. You, wherever you are, just like to make shit up as you have no idea beyond your basement.

This is the thing. At the end of the day the payoff is not illegal at all. The only thing that makes it illegal, and I use that word sparingly, is if it was an election expense and he didn't declare it. You know, like Obama and Hillary didn't declare expenses and got into trouble And if he can argue that the reason he was paying her off was to keep it from his wife then there's no crime here. And the fact that she was pushing for it at that time believing that the election was what made it have monetary value Allows him to argue that it wasn't him, he would have paid the same amount at any time but she was pushing for it right then This case just is not strong.

well you're objectively wrong. Period. They have had many chances. Well then the Texans would have a choice. Build a life for themselves for the next 20 years and learn to peacefully co exist and prosper or get turned to dust, cause china ain't gonna put up with that crap. Now lets go over a few of the differences. China "invaded" a 100 years ago, and if you'd handled things better then you'd already have a strong soverign nation - so is wasting another 20 years wise? China didn't "invade" - they were told to go live there and they did. And this is what you need to understand - no matter how they got here, no matter how fair or unfair you or they think it is, this is where it's at. And TODAY, you have a choice. They made the wrong choice. Nope. It's just Gaza. If the Palestinians put down their weapons permanently tomorrow, they will have peace and their own nation in a short time. If the Jews put down their weapons tomorrow, they will have a second holocaust. Gaza could end this tomorrow. They don't because they don't want to. They don't because they want war and violence and they want their people to die in large numbers for political points. They are going to have to live with the consequences of those choices

Well tell him that even if he's got his big rubbers on he has to watch where he points his hose (a firefighter friend of mine told me that joke years ago. I've never forgiven him. )

Well they don't actually - what he's referring to is ALL of israel - israel and gaza and the west bank, all of it is considered to be 'occupied' by israel because some of it is conested land and yet israel controls it all currently. And even by that definition its' not - they very clearly had no control over gaza. So that's why he was trying to say it's not occupied in the normal sense of having boots on the ground but its a "Kind" of occupied. LIke a bathroom is kind of 'occupied' i guess Either way it's a shitty argument

But don't consider gaza to be occupied. just that they have control over the entire region in generally in a military sense. So - occupied land but 'not an occupation'. Thanks for proving my point LOLOL And? He's not a professor not a judge, he's some loser with an agenda. Colour me shocked that a university professor from a left wing learning institute said something negative about Israel. At the end of the day they had peace, there was no occupation. Then they chose to deliberately slaughter innocent women and children for terror and genocide in order to start a war. Then they chose to hide behind their own children and women to fight the war knowing the IDF would have no choice but to kill them to get to them. Everything thats happening right now is 100 percent the responsibility of Gaza, it's gov't and it's people. Hopefully they'll learn from it and this will never happen again.

Why not? It matters. Palestinians are human. Kids are always innocent. What Hamas does to them matters. People like you blame Israel for things that Hamas does to their own children.

I agree completely. We have too many public servants at all levels of government.

Nobody makes that many errors. You are either a liar or a complete unmitigated fool. I chose to give you the benefit of the doubt. And this isn't a mistake. This was just you breaking your word. Dishonestly mike - it shines through in so many of your posts. And you wonder why people are predisposed to thinking your errors are 'intentional'?

I do. As it turns out, treating every chain email, tweet and random YouTube video as if they are as credible as experts is a very fast way is a good way to form bad judgments--and look like a complete fool to boot.

Lol ..ok..whatever you say shorty.

His pronouns are Dur/Duh

It was targetted...at the yen. China manipulates their money to make their products cheap at the expense of their and our workers.

Yes, yes... of course. You don't care so much that you have to come here and argue about not caring and trying to convince others not to care... LOL

Within Gaza, Palestinians had freedom of movement. You just admitted Israel did not have boots on the ground... so they can't enforce movement restrictions if no one is there to enforce them. What was restricted was travel to the West Bank, as that required passage through Israel. People in Gaza could fish, the limit was on how far out, because they would smuggle weapons otherwise. Israel was not going to just sit there and let Hamas import as much weaponry as they could so they could kill even more Israeli people. Duh. No, Gaza was not 100% free, but they could control much of their own destiny and chose to squander billions in aid given to them on building tunnels and military infrastructure to wage war against Israel. They could have lived in peace, but chose instead to constantly probe and attack Israel, to dig tunnels to try to kidnap Israeli people and to conduct terrorism on Israeli people.

If it takes foreign boots on the ground to drive Russia out, that would be preferable to a peace deal that makes wars of conquest legal again. The consequences of such a peace deal are just too great. And it'd be way cheaper to defeat Russia now than to let Russia get any kind of victory and than pay for all of the wars that will follow. So arguing about the cost is shortsighted and you should shut down anyone who chickens out about defeating Russia because of the cost for how short sighted such arguments are.

And again - dishonesty. He asked if there was any entity - not just private businesses. And you know very well there is. But you have to be dishonest about it and answer a different question. This is why people think you're disreputable. You could have just answered him honestly.

well sending some bullets at the cartels would certainly be different than Obama's policy which was just to send them guns.

Then why do we need passports?