Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/25/2022 in all areas

  1. Watching Freeland on the stand today was nauseating. Does she have some kind of mental problem that she can only say one.....word......every.......five.......seconds? Watching her break down and cry, saying she only invoked the Emergency Act because she cares about Canadians sooooo much.......just nauseating.
    4 points
  2. Someone's pissed that their spouse got some money? Is that what this thread is about?
    3 points
  3. Back in the day, we had our CO vist our outpost while on exercise , were we had two prisoners from our own BN chained up to a tracked APC, chained up becasue they kept escaping, we had taken off their boots and socks so they could not run very fast, refused to take them to the bathroom becasue they kept trying to escape while taking a leak, we had led them in their t shirts and taken their belt so they would have to run and hold up their pants at the same time. it was fall with frost on the ground, let's just say these guys were cold as shi* Anyways it pissed off the LT Col, he lined us up and shouted if your willing to do this to someone in our own BN what would you do to an enemy soldier that had just killed some of your comrades...this point stuck with me the rest of my career. sometimes compassion is the virtue that is the first one we forget.. I think compassion is dead today. My point is this those in this convoy were Canadians, yes, they were pain in the asses, but still they were Canadians no more or less than any one of those that lived in Ottawa. and if we are willing to treat Canadians this way, how do we treat others. i remember the vaccine arguments when there were talks about arrests, sending people to camps, with no compassion or total disregard to who these people where and what made them different than the rest of us... The event is over, but it should invoke discussion until we take away some lessons learned.
    3 points
  4. Her actions just scream psychopath
    3 points
  5. That is a vaccination record. Not the same as a vaccination passport. No one has ever needed their vaccination record to eat in a restaurant, have a job or buy groceries.
    3 points
  6. I know i have seen the article posted by someone else, i don't mean to steal your thunder i just thought it could use its own topic of discussion. Today as they the committee was reviewing amendments, for the handgun ban bill. they conservative make a brutal discovery. Catching the liberal/ NDP is an act of deception and lies. but first i want to dial it back, a bit first. i remember a discussion i had on here about what was to be included in the original "assault gun ban" and the discussion revolved around what that included, rumors had it it included airsoft, replicate guns, pellet guns and BB guns, there was many articles out there about how large this airsoft industry was, so the liberals/ NDP back tracked on these few look a likes, the liberals are getting very good at this deception, today i found out that those were included in the amendments and are now part of the ban. if it looks like, feels like smells like a real military weapon it is gone, banned, history. skippin forward, today the committee was looking at all the proposed amendment when they came upon an Amendment G4 , which goes on to state all semi-automatic weapons that have the ability to have a magazine attached are now classified as Banned, this includes shot guns, bolt action rifles, .22 cal bolt actions, thousands of different types, that's not all, becasue it is an amendment it cannot have any Finacial means attached to it, meaning NO buy back is planned, just that they are going to be illegal hand them in thank you very much. The liberals promised they would not attack Hunters or their tools in any way, and here we sit, with thousands of new rifles attached to the "handgun bill". and what is really scary this amendment was backed by liberals / NDP/and Block. most of these banned weapons don't even look like anything the military has, they are banned becasue most are magazine feed, or could be modified to hold more than 5 rounds, or they are semi autos...like duck guns, or deer hunting rifles. It has nothing to do with safety and more about division. I wonder why they have to resort to deceiving the nation into believing this huge lie of keeping Canadians safer. And we wonder why Canadians have little faith in our experts who have been bought and paid for by the government to promote another boondoggle like this one. instead of pouring resources into preventing criminal activities, we as a nation like to punish ourselves by sticking it to law bidding gun owners. the point is that while nobody really cares about a few gun owners, but this could be about any personal property we own, and how easy it is for the government to take it away, with or without compensation. you have no property rights, And it is already happening in some cities as they ban fossil fuel powered tools like lawn mowers, leaf blowers chain saws etc.. Canadians will continue to stick their heads up their asses until someone slaps their and says you're going to feel some slight discomfort for a few seconds... Anyways there is some good news Alberta has already told Justin none of this is going to happen in Alberta, they would not use RCMP to confiscate or managed this gun grab and have joined the legal case against the feds to challenge if this is legal. in the first-place rumor has it Saskatchewan is also joining the fight. I am so done with this liberal / NDP/ leftist movement we need an election... and on this front there are rumors, that the liberals might be preparing for a spring election... It's coming from the conservatives, but i can't imagine why, it makes no sense to me, they have nothing to gain. unless they are cutting ties with the NDP maybe...anyways one can hope...
    2 points
  7. I bet it hurts more than a tank.
    2 points
  8. I thought his comment was very astute. Cheers, Eyeball.
    2 points
  9. Your spouse keeps HALF while she doesn't contribute HALF to the expenses ? WHO IS THE COMMUNIST NOW... Anyway, your misuse of language disqualifies you except during times of boredom. Carry on with your mislabelling...
    2 points
  10. Trudeau will be on the stand tomorrow. I'm finding him to look very psychopathic, too. The unblinking, bug eyes, the constant repetition of "Get. Vaccinated.", the obvious excitement he has with having power over the lives of the "little people".......really starting to creep me out. One of my friends in the US said to me "I think we're in trouble. Our president has dementia and your prime minister is insane."
    2 points
  11. Do you, like Trudeau does, admire Communist China for their basic dictatorship? Trudeau wants what they have here in my country. You'll support it.
    2 points
  12. The source is an expert. White Privilege does not exist. Neither does Asian Privilege, (since Asian Americans are richer, have better jobs and more college degrees than white people.) You may not like the facts, but they exist whether you like them or not. And yes, there is such a thing as inequity, but today in America, RACE is neither the reason for it nor an excuse to whine about it. Some people are stupid. Some are smart. Some people are lazy. Some people work hard. If you want to RIGHT HERE AND NOW make the racist contention that being stupid and lazy is a matter of race, take your best shot. THIS person is smarter than THIS person. Race is irrelevant, except to racists.
    2 points
  13. You still haven’t explained how a climate change scheme unaccountably became a socialist wealth redistribution scheme. Both are bad central planning schemes.
    1 point
  14. In comparison, AOC is a relative newcomer to the world of politics and is a media rock star. She has not shown any signs of great intelligence or even that she is of average intelligence. She is like an amoeba compared to Clarence Thomas. I have yet to see any real examples of white privilege either. It doesn't help the argument when certain wealthy, people of colour who happen to have a platform to speak on talk about white privilege. Like Joy Reid for example.
    1 point
  15. I'm way ahead of you in my little dinghy. It's got a new 15hp Merc with an electric starter. Perfect little one man crabln' and jiggin' boat. Works fine for taking grand-kids out to look for bears at low tide too. It's so quiet you can hear the bears rolling rocks over and crunching back the little crabs they're after. Every now and then they catch a big one. In any case to bring it all back to the topic...
    1 point
  16. I find this hard to believe, we may have different perspectives due to elements or postings, I retired in 2015, and it was uncommon to find someone without at least 4 medals on their chest, and a good number with more than 8 most of them from conflict areas. I've also attended Brigade parades in Petawawa ont, and seen nothing but a sea of medals with the exception of the rookies. , while in Afghanistan there were lots of air force guys there i say lots maybe a couple hundred per tour. not to mention the navy guys ships divers filling in for Combat engineers EOD guys...and support guys from all 3 elements, considering the amount of people rotated in and put of Afghanistan was in the 40 k or more, not to mention all the other.
    1 point
  17. 1 point
  18. Actually, the concept of using a gun to settle disagreements was OUTLAWED in the United States. It was called DUELING, and was outlawed in 1859. Dueling is legal in Texas but with fists only. Whoever says that half the firearms in the US are owned by 3% of the population is high on meth. Pretty much EVERY violent criminal has a gun. In states that cherish the Constitution, (Texas, MIssissippi, West Virginia, Florida, etc) a lot more than 3% own a firearm. Legal gun owners are not a threat, except to the animals who try to mug them, car jack them or commit a home invasion. Yes America and Canada have different cultures. Some are good; some are not. But Canada still brews the best beer.
    1 point
  19. Q Why do Canadians do it doggie style? A So they can do it and watch the hockey game. (Sorry. I couldn't resist.) In the state of Florida, there is a Stand Your Ground law, where someone defending his/her life with lethal force does not have to retreat before opening fire. Seems to have a chllling effect on scumbag animals who want to invade homes or mug people on the street.
    1 point
  20. Whoa there. The actual lyrics of the song is.. "I don't give a d**M for all the rest of Canada, All the rest of Canada, All the rest of Canada. I don't give a d**n of all the rest of Canada, I'm from Saskatoon." As for the email joking about tanks, have we forgotten about the Winnipeg general strike so soon. The protest continued for 3 weeks. It was a street party for the participants who had 3 weeks to make their point. It was hell for the citizens of Ottawa and could have had dire ramifications on the country, but when the police acted, nobody was seriously hurt and everybody went home. It was a textbook crowd control. Some people chose martyrdom and got arrested. People who had their bank accounts frozen were those who chose to refuse to leave. They were given the choice and they made it. Former Prime Minister Trudeau was told a few years after the War Measures act was declared, that had he not beem PM, he would have been one of those arrested. To which he replied, "Yah, but I wouldn't have b*****d about it. My greatest admirantion goes to a man like Ali. He refused to join the war in Viet Nam. Rather than run to Canada like some others, he stayed and proudly went to jail. He accepted the consequences of his actions.
    1 point
  21. You are a very disgusting human being.
    1 point
  22. I agree with a lot of what you say except the part about the extreme right in the conservative movement. These days, being pro-life can be considered extremist when it is not. I think of the Chretien/Martin era when they were very aggressive in trying to balance the budget, and they were successful. Many of us didn't like how they did it at the time, but it did work. Currently, any Conservative politician that would propose these same kinds of measures would immediately be labeled a right-wing extremist People and the MSM have always been far more forgiving to the Liberals than they would to the Conservatives, even when both governments are enacting virtually identical policies. Liberal energy policy drives me nuts. The same can be said for the majority of democratic leaders world-wide. They are moving way too fast without a reliable alternative in place. Yes to more hybrids, yes to nuclear powered container ships. Yes to more nuclear energy. I think it makes more sense to adapt to the climate than to squander trillions while China and India sit back and laugh. John Robson had a good article years ago suggesting that Conservatives might have more success if they actually were more conservative and not emulating the Liberals.
    1 point
  23. Moonshine and ExFlyers were creaming themselves at the thought of tanks being turned on people they disagree with
    1 point
  24. Why do you think it’s fine for government to take this money earmarked for fighting climate change from those who earned it and give it to people who didn’t earn it? Yes it’s communist because it’s state redistribution of wealth through central planning. You don’t understand it because you think you’re a conservative when you’re actually NDP in your policy perspective.
    1 point
  25. Because Canadians don’t deserve to decide within their own families how their earnings should be spent?
    1 point
  26. I’ve known a lot of Jew haters in America and every last one of them was a right wing f*cktard just like you. Nobody’s fooled by your racist BS.
    1 point
  27. It doesn't matter what you "say". It only matters what you will stand up for. Or against. So far, I don't see that you will stand up for, or against anything. You've been a willing participant. A History of the Persecution of the Unvaccinated in Covid Era Canada | by Koen Swinkels | Medium
    1 point
  28. Could be this. https://fb.watch/h0uuDdOoUL/ Some people are just stupid. Some are high. And cops can't depend on stupid or high when there are animals that shoot cops. You people have a problem with tough cops? Don't leave your car when pulled over.
    1 point
  29. CrackHo actually disappeared for a whole week. Found out, someone told her to go into a round room and sit in the corner.
    1 point
  30. The Nazi regime (pro abortion, anti Semite, gun grabbing, anti free speech) is almost a mirror image of Woke liberals in America today. The only stupid American is one who actually thinks there is a difference.
    1 point
  31. No it’s not a “dumb” discussion. Canadian governments routinely steal money from those who earn it and hand it to those who don’t in some ideological “We know who deserved what” form of redistribution. That is exactly the kind of unaccountable interference one would find in an extreme left-wing country, because Canada is an extreme left-wing country. You’re just so totally indoctrinated in the idea that government should decide how you should live and how much of your money you should keep that you think all this is fine.
    1 point
  32. How would YOU know about how "studies" are done. Pretty sure you just made ^this up, based on your proclivity for believing you "KNOW" things WITHOUT EVIDENCE.
    1 point
  33. The "leftist" Nazis, eh? Well ya can't ditch the label of stupid American regarding politics can ya? and I warned everyone about speaking up and removing all doubt. Just can't stop yourself can ya?
    1 point
  34. That's not the point. The point is: whether unvaxxed people should be allowed to buy groceries or not, was discussed seriously. As was taxing them, fining them, denying them healthcare and jailing them. Check this out on the WEF website: ‘My Carbon’: An approach for inclusive & sustainable cities | World Economic Forum (weforum.org) This was not about health. It was a test to see how obedient you would be and what kind of atrocities against other humans you would find acceptable. They're preparing us for acceptance of deprivations in the name of climate change.
    1 point
  35. Army Guy knows 4 CMBG was the best troops in NATO better than the Americans, better than the British 4 CMBG was the finest most professional military formation in the world
    1 point
  36. I have had a fascination with the long con for years, ever since I saw The Sting. I have to hand it to President Trump. A long con is complex when aimed at a single victim but to con tens of millions of people at the same time takes real talent. The problem is, a long con requires precise timing. There comes a point when the grifter and his shills have to blow off the mark and disappear. In this case, that moment should have been on Nov. 7, 2020, when the networks called the race for President Biden. If President Trump had stuck to that timing, it would have been the scam of the century. He fell into the trap that falls on many grifters, they get greedy. Hubris is the hero that foils more villains than the Lone Ranger. I say this as an interested observer, and I am not trying to tell Americans how to vote.
    1 point
  37. You are such a piece of racist trash.
    1 point
  38. 1. "Correlates" but isn't known to be caused by. The relationship between variables is unknown, at least from this summary. 2. Why not ? Was that proven ? How would one do so. Once again, the totally USELESS nature of sociology classes. Every single one I took in college (not that I took a lot, just a couple to satisfy the science thing) links IQ to crime, as if the two were Siamese twins. And you know how Sociology types are: They say on one hand that they are right about everything and yet they also are the first to point the finger to the lack of proof for anything they don't like. It's kind of amusing to watch the same people who deny climate change put on a whole new set of clothes when they try to use science to prove racism doesn't exist. I'm pretty sure American Thinker is not suggesting that racism doesn't exist. It sounds like they are trying to leave race OUT of this discussion, or at least point to factors other than race. And the important question is - 'why?'. Why are we engaging in this exercise. I don't think anybody should discuss the matter until we explain why we're here... Why do we engage in this exercise? At this forum, that's like asking me why I would take a sub assignment of ESE pre-K kids. Why deal with retards? The why seems obvious: The subject of the white privilege lie. So far, you seem to be the only one on the other side willing to discuss it, or at least ask some intelligent questions why.
    1 point
  39. As I read your mouth-crap I notice that you can't see the similarity between a "vax app" and a "vaccine passport" and the gesundheitspass. Shocker. FYI the vaccine passport and gesundheitspass were both tools used by the government to justify discrimination against a specific group of people based on false pretences. The fascist government in Canada scrapped the vaccine passport, but it seems like we might have a new vaccine-tracking app coming to our phones in the future, and there's probably nothing preventing the government from adding pseudovaxes to the list, which will enable them to discriminate again.
    1 point
  40. Ukraine uses the S-300. With Russia, the S-400 has replaced it putting their remaining S-300s into reserve units. Everything we hear about Ukraine and S-300s comes FROM Ukraine. So when the Ukrainians say that the Russians are now using a surface to air missile (with a small 150kg warhead....and relatively short range) as an ad hoc ballistic missile by simply attaching a 'GPS unit', it sets off my BS detector, alright. The S-300 requires multiple support vehicles just to shoot. The SAM itself is very expensive per round. Why do that when one has plenty...thousands...of dirt cheap reserve Scuds just waiting to be fueled-up and launched? Those have HUGE warheads and very long range. Ukraine is shooting-off the S-300s in this fight. Lots of them. They have aircraft to shoot down. Russia...not so much if any at this point. The Ukrainian air force is essentially non-existent. A tiny fraction of all the S-300s being fired will actually hit a Russian aircraft. The rest will impact onto Ukrainian territory...or Polish as we've seen. S-300s impacting onto civilian targets we can assume is the problem here...bad for moral when your own forces are killing the civilians they're supposed to be protecting. So invent an outwardly plausible story about the Russians doing the shooting...only a few missile junkies like DOP will go "Huh??? No way!" I'll believe it...literally...when I see it in action. ATM all we have is Ukraine claiming it...and they want money.
    1 point
  41. What's funny is now your denying empirical evidence. You do know what empirical evidence is, right?
    1 point
  42. So, once you've gotten your wish and vax passports have gotten rid of unvaccinated people in society, and covid STILL is circulating (because we know it will).......what's your next move, maniacs? Get rid of those who don't want jab #3? And down the inevitable line, what will you do with those who finally say "Enough!" around jabs #5 or 6? Get rid of them, too? Do you not understand that this is not about health, it's about obedience?
    1 point
  43. Well when it comes to diseases we've largely removed from society, due to vaccinations, like the Measles, I won't care if you oppose them. Teach your own kids then.
    1 point
  44. He said NOTHING that could be construed as racist. Racism is YOUR woke goose stepping side of the aisle.
    1 point
  45. https://rumble.com/v1wac7i-world-premier-died-suddenly.html Died Suddenly Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them. The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer.
    1 point
  46. A History of the Persecution of the Unvaccinated in Covid Era Canada | by Koen Swinkels | Medium
    1 point
  47. My opening post presented a study and data that was co-authored by Sander Greenland, who wrote more than a few epidemiological textbooks. You came on this thread taking about microchips.
    1 point
  48. In this entire thread, you are the only one talking about this. If you want to talk about microchips, please start a thread of your own. This thread is to discuss the science and data that is coming out regarding the vaccines.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...