Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/18/2022 in all areas

  1. "potentially deadly"? Crossing the street is "potentially deadly". I fear there are now a lot of people psychologically addicted to fear.
    3 points
  2. So you need a smart phone and to download government spyware now to, say, go visit your grandmother who lives in the US? You are seriously warped
    2 points
  3. It's amazing watching leftists bend over backwards to justify the WEF. A group made up of ultra rich nut jobs.
    2 points
  4. Covid has an IFR of 0.5% higher than the seasonal flu. Depending on the year, the flu IFR would be a fraction of a percentage higher than normal, which means Covid would also be even LESS of a fraction of a percentage higher. Covid even affected the same demographic as the seasonal flu. Yet, we were fooled into thinking this was an actual pandemic. A lot of people are waking up to this. Some woke up sooner than others. Some will never wake up. I think it's partly, as you say - they don't like to admit they've been fooled. And partly, because they behaved so atrociously towards their fellow citizens. Facing that shame means you're not the "good person" you thought you were.
    2 points
  5. Yeah. Their opposition tells me he’s on the right track.
    2 points
  6. On point of fact: I did not name call you, you are trying to slime me with your drive by postings instead of carefully reading. And the Sheeple of the Year Committee apparently likes your ‘liberal moxie’, but there are many contenders this year. Lots of people get the Gold Star, don’t let it go to your head. To get noticed maybe you could claim that you are actually a conservative! Oh, wait…
    2 points
  7. I'm not the one who wants "power" here. You are. You want power over the choices other people make. The only "power" I want is to be able to make my own life decisions and my own medical decisions. It's not up to me to judge others' reasons for doing anything. Even if I think it's "frivolous", it's their decision to make, not mine. That's the point you're missing. You want power over women to make their personal life and medical decisions for them, and you want to force women to make their decisions based on YOUR personal beliefs.
    2 points
  8. Hey, Brian Stelter just got canned by CNN. Wow, when they don’t even want you it’s time to re-evaluate your life.
    2 points
  9. Again, you are lying. South Carolina had a 6 week fetal heartbeat law in effect.....until only yesterday when the South Carolina Supreme Court temporarily blocked it. The exceptions for rape or incest did not apply here. The exception for a medical emergency, also did not apply as the woman was not in a medical emergency - yet. This is the problem with your hard-nosed laws - the woman has to wait and suffer and risk death until her life is such grave danger - then doctors can act. So the doctor and lawyers in this situation were not misunderstanding the law. You do not see how ridiculous that is? You do not see how women are going to suffer and die under your beliefs?
    2 points
  10. Damn straight it's government trying to control the populous with a vaccine. We just seen them do it.
    2 points
  11. Vaxtards. Simple, yet all encompassing. Almost elegant in execution.
    2 points
  12. Ahem... Liz Cheyney is f'in history!!! Thanks for tuning in...
    2 points
  13. I saw the Canadian government beat Canadian veterans at their own war memorial. That was enough to convince me the worm needs to turn.
    2 points
  14. Why should I have to give government apps any space on any of my devices to access something that's an inalienable right, such as access to my own country? Read the inside of your passport. Says something to the effect of the holder of that passport should not be hindered from reentry. Now you are saying you support me needing a $1500 laptop to return back to my own country? Shameful
    1 point
  15. Yes...variola major and minor. Commonly called small pox. But as you say...a lot like Ebola in some forms. And it spreads wickedly fast.
    1 point
  16. I didn't know that's what variola was. It looked like ebola, with the blood in the eyes and pores. I hate to think about it, but it's why I don't trust the Americans/Ukrainians when they say that they were just working on "cures" in their labs. They can't release those things until they have a cure that they can use for themselves.
    1 point
  17. No it wasn't. He was a real estate developer. And actually, since he went bankrupt he wasn't even doing much of that any more. Instead he was licensing his name on stuff other people owned because back then that meant something. Of course, the 'name' he got was derived entirely from a television show as opposed to his own business abilities. Servants and employees. Dude, I look down on him. He's a putz. He's got no class and it's quite clear he bought his degree. Oh, boy. Of all the garbage associated with Trump that's the most laughably insane! Trumps' dad rented apartments to the working class. Trump wanted nothing to do with such people! He sold them all off and his entire life story has been of him trying to find things to cater to the wealthy: multi-million dollar condos, elite golf clubs, an airline that only had first class, high class casinos with seven kinds of marble in the floors and walls. The only working class people Trump ever wanted anything to do with were his servants.
    1 point
  18. Ebola is indeed a killer. Too good a killer to spread very far without special assistance from us it would seem. I mention variola as 'monkey pox' is a variation of it. What are these fkrs cooking-up in their labs?
    1 point
  19. Oh FFS cut the replies. Anyone who believes no one died of Covid or the deaths were all faked and from something else is a total pinhead not worth responding to. They've already caused enough damage to public health measures and the only people they'll ever convince are more mentally challenged fools. The same small group of complete liars and imbeciles has dragged every thread in this forum beyond belief with their utter nonsense.
    1 point
  20. 1) the Spanish flu hit hardest among 28 yr old men and pregnant women, two of the healthiest population demographics around. Their Spanish flu deaths were actual Spanish flu deaths, they weren't just walking on the edge of their grave when the flu gave them a nudge. By contrast, over 60% of covid deaths are among people over 80, and they only represent 4.4% of the Canadian population. In total, over 96% of people who died from covid had one or more co-morbidities. On average it was around 3. Their deaths were partly from covid and partly/mostly from other things. For all intents and purposes, Covid doesn't kill 28 yr old men at all. They'd have to be obese and on chemo to be at risk of death from covid. Comparing Spanish flu deaths with covid deaths is like comparing being raped by a Pakistani militia unit that kicked in your door while you were having dinner with your family to getting raped by your boyfriend after you were both totally naked but he only had permission to use his fingers and you didn't actually say "no". Sure, they're both rape at some level, but there's no actual meaningful comparison between the two events. That's an if.. dog... rabbit study. They're saying that "If the vaccine actually worked as promised, 620,000 people would have lived." It's not a case of: "Based on this real world data comparing covid death rates, 620,000 people would have lived if they got vaxed." It's like if I said that drinking my tasty, refreshing lemonade cuts covid deaths down by 80%, and then I just projected my bullshit numbers across every covid death that ever happened. That's a completely worthless "study".
    1 point
  21. What we never knew before COVID was how expendable people of advanced age with co-morbidities were. Now that we know we can fine tune our vote away from you punks accordingly.
    1 point
  22. What were medical care and hospitals like in 1915? Were there ambulances and taxis? Who was left to try and deal with it when many of able bodied men were overseas fighting? Was the virus deadlier than COVID?
    1 point
  23. Critical thinking will be resisted at all costs.
    1 point
  24. So many experts, politicians, heads of State, medical personnel and families of dead people are in on the conspiracy - amazing!
    1 point
  25. Or they can stop acting like communists and scrap the ridiculous app
    1 point
  26. Canada has the most lenient euthanasia in the world. We’re becoming known for some very dark things. Doesn’t reflect well on our healthcare or government.
    1 point
  27. People died in their homes. Nobody would be walking to hospitals to die in the street because you know, cars, taxis and ambulances. Anyone who died en-route to hospital would be counted as dead at the hospital. Anyway, this isn't some fast-acting virus like you see on TV - people dying within minutes of getting it, frothing from the mouth. This is reality.
    1 point
  28. Geez. They actually did this in The Handmaid's Tale. Blessed be the fruit.
    1 point
  29. Jeez, that's kind of dumb. If anyone died on the way to the hospital, they'd end up there in the morgue. Would the bodies have been dropped off at the train station or Tim Hortons?
    1 point
  30. 1. Best economy ever. Secure borders. A Vaccine. Destruction of ISIS. Energy independence. NK refraining from firing missiles. Tough on China. Lower COVID RELATED death rate. 2. Utter horse pies. But hey...I know you are a cheerleader for the Globalist agenda. So ya...maybe you should go try fooling someone who doesn't know your goals...
    1 point
  31. An irony I've heard about is that something in nicotine renders the spike protein that makes you 'catch it' inert. Something attaches to or coats the spike gumming it up. So perhaps this could have all be solved with cigars and good scotch. ?
    1 point
  32. Who cares? People wanted to protest the vax mandates. They didn't read the entire Freedom Convoy constitution or whatever it was, they just needed to join the largest protest going. How many people that marched with BLM knew about their communist leanings, or the fact that they were against the nuclear family? And just think about how odd all of that is when you consider the fact that BLM's original leader now owns 4 houses and she has them because she wants to leave something for her kids..... What a god-damned farce that whole thing was. But again, 99% of the people who protested the blatantly stupid mandates had no clue who the hell Pat King was. I still don't know much about the guy. I don't really give a rat's arse. All I care about is the extremely legitimate and necessary protests against Pfascism.
    1 point
  33. Oh, aren't you merciful in the power you wield over women. Pat yourself on the back there.
    1 point
  34. Omicron = flu 5:00 in https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=1212209369513557
    1 point
  35. I know! The Rino Republicans are going down one by one. It’s a signal if things to come in the fall. Trump is having great effectiveness at backing certain real conservative candidates who then win.
    1 point
  36. Do you honestly still think that the vaccines even work Boges? What stats do you have to back that up? I could point out that 86% of covid deaths in Canada between May 1 and June 19 were among the dbl- and triple-vaxed. Between June 19 and July 24 it was at 86% again. FYI there are already 475 quadruple-vaxed deaths, and 4xers have only been around for a couple months. Again - what is it that makes you so certain that the vaccines actually do anything? Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt and say "the vaccines help a little bit", do you think that's enough to justify forcing people to take the vaccines? Or forcing them to vaccinate even though there are known side-effects which are very serious? What is your "very good reason" for thinking that anti-Pflacebers are so bad? Say something aside from "Trudeau said so!" ffs.
    1 point
  37. Doctor-assisted death is being offered and being done to all kinds of people who should never receive it. Roger Foley is prime example. The hospital ethicist felt $1500 a day was too much money to spend on a guy like Roger Foley and saw a way how he could do the ultimate money-saving measure if he could convince Roger to take the lethal injection. quote The story comes only days after a widely circulated Associated Press feature broke revelations about a patient in London, Ont., who was similarly given an unprompted offer of euthanasia. Roger Foley suffers from a degenerative brain disorder and claimed he was being offered euthanasia so regularly that he began secretly recording hospital staff. In one recording obtained by AP, a hospital ethicist tells Foley his care is costing the hospital “north of $1,500 a day” and asks if he has “an interest in assisted dying.” The two incidents add to a growing list of controversial cases in which Canadians with chronic conditions were offered death in lieu of treatment. B.C. woman Donna Duncan was approved for a medically assisted death last year after years of declining mental health exacerbated by a chronic inability to access psychiatric care. Duncan’s death in an Abbotsford hospital so blindsided her family that they reported the case to the Abbotsford Police. “While we have been advocates of death by Medical Assistance in situations where there is a terminal diagnosis or death is imminent, we had no idea that Canada’s laws leave considerable room for interpretation by activist doctors,” they wrote in a statement at the time. Another British Columbian, Alan Nichols, was euthanized only days after his family brought him to a Chilliwack hospital to recover from a psychiatric episode. Despite Nichols’ history of severe mental illness and suicidal tendencies, he was approved for death by health authorities after only four days in the hospital’s psychiatric ward. unquote Another case of a sick Canadian offered death instead of treatment — this time, a veteran (msn.com) Those of us who don't believe in this kind of thing must never concede to any part of it and must continue to expose the evils that are happening in a calm, collected way.
    1 point
  38. So are you saying Trump was too stupid to notice or too lazy to do anything about it?
    1 point
  39. No. He's said enough stupid shit over the last few years to preclude himself from being described as "bright". You can say whatever you want about him, and he has a manic sort of charisma that even I find appealing at times, but he's not living in a fact-based world. Yes, I know you think that. The GoP isn't even a party anymore. It's a joke. It's a Donald Trump personality cult.
    1 point
  40. I do follow both left and right, and until Donald Trump subverted the right I would have considered myself firmly conservative and a staunch Trudeau hater. Alex Jones, Donald Trump and the conspiracy parade are not right wing. They’re just a combination of stupid and/or completely and shamelessly amoral.
    1 point
  41. What a dishonest false comparison. Hillary conceded and acknowledged Trump’s victory. She didn’t claim the election was rigged or that votes country were illegitimate or fraudulent. She did not foment the lie the that the VP (Joe Biden at the time) had the power to unilaterally ignore and throw out the election results at his sole discretion and declare Hillary the winner and her supporters didn’t storm the Capitol trying to lynch him when it didn’t happen. She didn’t launch dozens of baseless amd frivolous lawsuits that cost taxpayers millions and threatened to destroy democracy. She did not pressure state election officials to falsify their vote counts in her favour She did not forge false certificates of electors and try to file them with officials in DC.
    1 point
  42. He's obviously really smart with excellent historical context. I talked to him as I've mentioned. He has a winning personality that people gravitate towards and his wife is both stunning in her own right and very supportive of his goals. Yeah, he's a BIG threat to all these globalist fascists running around in jackboots.
    1 point
  43. When presented with a plausible emergency, the average human reacts a certain way. Be aware that these mthrfkrs know this all too well. Want power? Have an endless emergency. Don't have one? Make one! What the flavor this month? Let's draw an emergency out of a hat... Ukraine? Climate? Energy? Another virus? Inflation? Nuclear weapons? Meteor? Solar flare???? As Neil Oliver cleverly said: "We are being herded like sheep from one deadly precipice to the next." It will only end when we take back what is ours. 1776 style if need be. But, if the worst case scenario is true, that this was all planned...billions of people will be simply gone in x number of years. Then our literal betters can enjoy the beaches again.* The vanity of thinking one gets to enjoy the fruits of these efforts by simply complying. This is Brave New World thinking. The Alphas see themselves as exclusive. You'll never be in their club...even if you survive. ----------------------------- *Did you hear about the expat that hired a plane to haul a F**K TRUDEAU banner around the Costa Rican beach where Justin was trying to play? No more of that he hopes...
    1 point
  44. I already agreed that I do not evaluate the life of a zygote or preborn POTENTIAL child as signficantly worthy in contrast to the living person. I do not believe that life before birth are persons in light of the inability to define whether they have a common sensation of things like pain (or pleasure) and that terminating them is not 'murder'. I compared this to other animals in which you need to address. Isn't eating eggs literally eating aborted chicks? At what point does the life being developed within the egg turns from being one that lacks sensation to one that does? If the animals we eat are invalid relative to us, are we not invalid in our treatment against them in kind? This is not a question of whether I prefer other animals over humans but whether they are not 'naturally' equal in their 'right' to live relative to themselves. And if so, Nature itself does not care whether we eat other animals or if other animals eat us. Nature does not specify life as 'superior' nor 'inferior'. As to whether an unborn entity is or is not worthy to justly YOUR 'right' to respect, if Nature favored your view, .....if God favored your view.... then the death of a validly worthy being would be saved regardless of what we could do. So why is it YOUR right to impose limitations about others where the question still exists about whether it is signficantly valuable to Nature that is at question? If Nature apart from human intervention should be preferred, then NO form of civilization matters and should be 'aborted'. That is, if you think that our direct technological capacity to abort seems 'unnatural' to you, then why are you accepting the benefits of any technology. [This assumes you may be dubious of the act in the way one might feel if they had to choose to kill one man to save many. The positive act psychologically affects your perception to chose to kill another even if the nature of it is just.] You dehumanize the grown human person opting to abort over the mere potential life of a baby because you prioritize a belief that the potential child's life is paramount over the actual certain life of the woman as a host to it. Note too that while my own belief about life is more nihilistic, this is NOT the case for the vast majority of those believing in a right to abortion. Most do not believe, for instance, in abortion close to birth (within the last trimester). The degree of life for most is based upon structure of the lifeform (its 'stage' of development) with the added assumption of sufferring as pre-existing. My stonger position would even place question upon babies born as having a capcity to suffer (or find pleasure) but require LEARNING to feel as they develop past birth. So it is unlikely that the unborn baby would even 'care' whether it exists or not. It is ONLY a religioius belief to assume so. I DO favor at least a need to defend life post birth regardless. But the likely reason we lack memory of these times with more force than we do later is because our early memory is 'anethetized'. A baby has unnecessary networked links in the brain that would probably be as potentially halucinogenic and uncomfortable to us if we were to experience it consciously as adults. A similar factor of nature that hunters should know is that when an animal is killed, if it isn't killed quickly, its meat tastes 'wild' due to reactionary chemistry that pain amplifies where it suffers longer. This points to the anesthetizing capacity of living things to evolve mechanisms that reduce the suffering more siginficantly to the younger creatures that tend to become victims of another predator. It is unlikely then that an unborn baby 'feels' suffering under the operation of abortion. As to anything that you may otherwise BELIEVE about souls being implanted by God into the zygote, there is no real suffering that remotely compares to the nature of death we ALL eventually succumb to at some point in our lives regardless.
    1 point
  45. "murder is not a right" Neither is the dircect opposite: life is not a right independent of how we define it! ...Or do pigs, cows, and other animals we eat not require being 'murdered' for consumption? If humans killings are only what one can 'murder', how does the definition get defined? What defines 'murder' outside of government legislation mean? Is war not murder on a massive scale? How do you DEFINE murder outside of a convention of different people negotiating what it means?
    1 point
  46. Just another poll The Poilievre divide: Ontario MP preferred leader for Conservatives but not Canadians "The poll suggests Charest is considered the best option for the Conservative leader's job by 22 per cent of all Canadians, while Poilievre is supported by 16 per cent." "However, more than one in four people polled said a Poilievre victory would make them less likely to vote Conservative, compared with one in five who said that about Charest." https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/the-poilievre-divide-ontario-mp-preferred-leader-for-conservatives-but-not-canadians/ar-AA10vkJF?ocid=EMMX&cvid=de01acf15e184abc8ff6fc5fceb89343
    1 point
  47. I think it's fair to question the Trudeau Liberals' overreach (especially with the Emergencies Act and how that played out with the truckers). What you're saying about politicized monetary policy, however, is exactly what I'm talking about with Pierre and his "platform". You don't actually know what monetary policy is (and that's fine - 90% of people don't even have a basic understanding), but people talk about it a lot and you know it's a powerful tool. The mechanics of it all are a mystery to you, but you know that it's DOING THINGS, that Trudeau-man is BAD, and it's part of his PLAN. Pierre understands the central bank. He doesn't believe what he's saying about it. He just knows that you're vaguely mad about all sorts of things you don't really understand and he'll channel that if he can.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...