Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 hour ago, eyeball said: You broadcast yours and people unfortunately listen to it at risk of getting sick and dying. Since it was an experimental injection, no one knew how long the spike would stay in the body. We have to keep up with the latest. The biggest reason why mRNA products were never brought to market before was because they did not know how long it persisted and there is no "OFF" switch to tell your body to stop producing spike. This paper, published yesterday and I just found it in my emails tonight, so I haven't had time to review it yet or check much out. Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination 55 yr old male, dosed X3 developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction Conclusion: This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. If you remember from the Trickle thread, I explained that ONLY people who have had the covid infection have the N-protein. The nucleocapsid protein. It's one way they can tell whether the adverse event is from the virus or from the vax. Notice this man did not have the N-protein, so he did not get multi-organ dysfunction or persistent spike from the virus. Also note that they REPRODUCED the results by using multiple labs. All the labs found the same results. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Politics1990 Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 most of ab is on treaty land anyway lol it would never be allowed to leave canada 1 Quote
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 17 minutes ago, Goddess said: Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination 55 yr old male, dosed X3 developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction @eyeball And every time someone says "Well, I've had 6, 7, 8, 9 shots and I'm ok!" I just hear "Well, I drive drunk all the time and I've never killed anybody!" Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Army Guy Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, Politics1990 said: most of ab is on treaty land anyway lol it would never be allowed to leave canada Thanks capt obvious, Most of Canada is on treaty land, but it has not stopped any separation group from trying to separate.... .....Just a question, if Alberta becomes the 51 st state do you really think the US will honor those treaties....Or better yet do you think Alberta will honor those treaties...and who is going to enforce any of it.... Your under the assumption that what ever is left of Canada because (i think once one leaves it will start to snow ball) will enforce Indian rights that the British signed with them and Ottawa said it would uphold...Or maybe the US or Alberta signs new treaties...But i don't think it is going to stop any separation from happening....Indigenous people never have had full control on any of their lands.... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 14 minutes ago, Politics1990 said: most of ab is on treaty land anyway lol it would never be allowed to leave canada It's not actually relevant. The charter doesn't allow Alberta to leave regardless, however it is internationally recognized that if the majority of a population wants to leave then that should be supported. So if they actually want to leave as in completely leave the first nations claims become irrelevant. What would be relevant Would be a free and clear vote showing a strong majority of people supported it. The exact number that represents a strong majority is, of course, a hotly debated subject in Canada. But for example if 65% or 70% of Alberta voted to leave then that would probably happen regardless of any first nations land status. As we saw with Quebec Canada would much rather enter into negotiations for a sovereignty association where more power is given to the province but they remain a part of Canada. It's hard to say which version the people of Alberta would go for Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 29 minutes ago, Goddess said: @eyeball And every time someone says "Well, I've had 6, 7, 8, 9 shots and I'm ok!" I just hear "Well, I drive drunk all the time and I've never killed anybody!" And you're suggesting that a vaccine hesitant person considering their next jab should put more weight on this one unfortunate case than the 5.6 billion fortunate cases where the vaccine was both safe and effective? I mean it sounds like it sucks to be this guy but seriously? Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 minute ago, eyeball said: one unfortunate case You think it's just one out of 5 billion people? You seriously think he's the only one in the entire world that was injured by the covid vax? Seriously? Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Goddess said: You think it's just one out of 5 billion people? You seriously think he's the only one in the entire world that was injured by the covid vax? Seriously? No it's apparently over 150 thousand reported out of 5.6 billion. Even slighter than a rounding error in comparison. The amount of disease and death prevented outweighs the suffering from side-effects to a degree that does not justify discontinuing it's use and it's only going to get safer as we learn more. Edited February 4 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, eyeball said: No it's apparently over 150 thousand reported out of 5.6 billion. Even slighter than a rounding error in comparison. The amount of disease and death prevented outweighs the suffering from side-effects to a degree that does not justify discontinuing it's use and it's only going to get safer as we learn more. As usual, you just spout out numbers with nothing to support them. Neither the WHO, nor Our World In Data report a global number of covid vaccine deaths. Frankly, we don't know how many people have died from it. As you said, we will learn more as we go along in the experiment. We also don't know the total number disabled by it. Yet. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 2 hours ago, Goddess said: Frankly, we don't know how many people have died from it. Worldwide? Probably less than the ones you've reported inside your own circle. 2 hours ago, Goddess said: We also don't know the total number disabled by it. Yet. According to spikeopathy close to 5.6 billion would be my guess. We're all gonna dieeee. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 10 hours ago, eyeball said: Worldwide? Probably less than the ones you've reported inside your own circle. Well, your knowledge level consists of CBC headlines and "I always do what I'm told to do without questioning anything", so your opinion doesn't impress me much. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 2 hours ago, Goddess said: Well, your knowledge level consists of CBC headlines... Which you say are informed by psyop dudes (Fauci, Gates and... that's it?) as ordered to by the PMO. 2 hours ago, Goddess said: and "I always do what I'm told to do without questioning anything", so your opinion doesn't impress me much. I've certainly heard various experts and medical professionals on CBC and other media sources advise me to consult my GP and other doctors and such. It's not unusual to get similar advice if the topic or story is about finances or legal issues. But you seem to think this advise is tantamount to a command or a fatwa or something directly from Gates, Fauci or Rosemary Barton... What's really impressive about your opinions is how truly bizarre they are. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 50 minutes ago, eyeball said: What's really impressive about your opinions is how truly bizarre they are. No. You just twist them into pretzels. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 19 minutes ago, Goddess said: No. You just twist them into pretzels. You twist yourself into a pretzel trying to account for your opinions, especially when you're called on your psyop nonsense. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 hour ago, eyeball said: You twist yourself into a pretzel trying to account for your opinions, especially when you're called on your psyop nonsense. Hey, believe what you want to believe, my dude. I personally don't believe billionaires and Big Pharma have my best interests at heart. Bless you, that you think they do. You're a special kind of stupid. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
eyeball Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Goddess said: Hey, believe what you want to believe, my dude. I personally don't believe billionaires and Big Pharma have my best interests at heart. I don't believe it either. And, as evidenced by countless posts, like you, I clearly believe governments routinely tilt playing fields towards billionaires. And yet despite that... 6 minutes ago, Goddess said: Bless you, that you think they do. You're a special kind of stupid. The discussion at this point belongs in your The "Left" & The "Right" thread...see my comments on misguided thinking and misplaced concreteness. You clearly should have titled it The "Right" vs "The Left" because it's the only way you really know how to frame anything you say. This always leaves you in a position where the only way to get thru to you is with a 2 x 4. You're so impervious that it actually gets easier to not give a fùck if the government is forced to just push it's way through and over you. The oft-repeated question what did you think would happen comes to mind. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 I remember this 🤣 We were all like, "WTF??" Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
TreeBeard Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 23 hours ago, Army Guy said: if Alberta becomes the 51 st state do you really think the US will honor those treaties....Or better yet do you think Alberta will honor those treaties...and who is going to enforce any of it.... They are Canadian jurisdiction and those lands will remain with Canada. Canada has the obligation to manage and enforce those treaties. Quote
eyeball Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 On 2/3/2026 at 5:47 PM, Army Guy said: Thanks capt obvious, Most of Canada is on treaty land, but it has not stopped any separation group from trying to separate.... The distance between trying and accomplishing is vast and the steps required to span it are uncountable. On 2/3/2026 at 5:47 PM, Army Guy said: if Alberta becomes the 51 st state do you really think the US will honor those treaties....Or better yet do you think Alberta will honor those treaties...and who is going to enforce any of it.... First Nations insurgents would be my guess. For sure they'll garner enormous support from around the world too. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 1 hour ago, TreeBeard said: They are Canadian jurisdiction and those lands will remain with Canada. Canada has the obligation to manage and enforce those treaties. That is not necessarily true. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Army Guy Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 12 hours ago, eyeball said: The distance between trying and accomplishing is vast and the steps required to span it are uncountable. First Nations insurgents would be my guess. For sure they'll garner enormous support from around the world too. If it was easy it would have been done a long time ago, see Quebec....but it is not mission impossible Ya sure...how did the US first nations make out during their spat with the US government....and who is going to intercede again...the same ones that were going to defend Greenland or Canada if trump took them....at most you would have sanctions...and strong words at the UN if it has not collapsed by then....I'm sure there would be a lot of unhappy indigenous people, even protests, maybe a few wingnuts to take action, but it would be more about the taps being shut off, and having the same rights and privileges as everyone else... and having to look after themselves...than anything else... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 13 hours ago, TreeBeard said: They are Canadian jurisdiction and those lands will remain with Canada. Canada has the obligation to manage and enforce those treaties. Key words in that statement is "Canada" has that obligation....not newly created country or the US...What do you think will happen if the US tells them no...what is Canada's next step...prepare for war !!! or sit back down and relocate all those indigenous people into Canada proper...And if one province goes do you actually think that's where it stops....and if other provinces follow suit, Canada will come apart at the seems....then the question is what or who is going to enforce those treaties.. Britain....maybe the UN....will anyone really care , it will be everyone for themselves... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
TreeBeard Posted February 6 Author Report Posted February 6 13 hours ago, Army Guy said: not newly created country or the US That’s why Canada would keep that territory. Quote
eyeball Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 13 hours ago, Army Guy said: ...And if one province goes do you actually think that's where it stops....and if other provinces follow suit, Canada will come apart at the seems....then the question is what or who is going to enforce those treaties.. Lefties. If Canada's fate is to be absorbed into the US it's right wing would soon be a thing of the past. The merger will ultimately destroy both countries. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Moonlight Graham Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 Legally I doubt it's treason. But if you conspire against the security interests of Canada with a foreign government, especially one that is hostile towards us and has recently threatened annexation, then IMO it's treason at least in spirit. They should change the law. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.