Are Alberta Separatists Committing Treason?

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You could well be in-line for a Nobel...millions for research... probably a statue...high schools  named after you...scientists would be throwing underwear at you...

I know you think you can shame me into blindly accepting information spoon-fed to me by the media or gov't, as you yourself do, but you cannot.

You cannot shame me for asking questions or wanting to understand the WHY? of things or thinking critically or evaluating competing information.  You just..... cannot.  Because I have zero respect for you.  You're one of the most intellectually stupid people I know.

The real shame is people like you.  Who question nothing, easily manipulated, willingly led, believe everything the TV says.

It's OK to use your brain, you know.

Edited February 3 by Goddess

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I know you think you can shame me into blindly accepting information...

That's the exact opposite of what I said. I think you should be ashamed of yourself for denying  the world the fruits and results of your analyses and conclusions.

It's criminally negligent actually.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

fruits and results of your analyses and conclusions.

It's a testament to your stupidity that I even have to point this out because it's obvious to everyone but you, apparently:

I haven't shared anything that I authored.  I always provide cites, so it's obvious they are not MY analyses and conclusions.  This is no different than what anyone else here shares and gives their thoughts on.

I only say this because I'm not sure if you are genuinely a very stupid person, or just pretending to be.  So I will explain the obvious to you, giving you the benefit of the doubt, that you are just genuinely......stupid.

[CdnFox]

On 1/31/2026 at 6:00 PM, eyeball said:

To oppose Tar Sands development not Alberta. 

To oppose Alberta. They were far more worried about Alberta gaining additional financial and political power than they were about bitumen

 

On 1/31/2026 at 6:00 PM, eyeball said:

Good.

Keep that in mind. No matter how long it takes the pendulum always swings. And just like how we told democrats in the states before trump came that their behavior would be used against them in the future and they would have no right to complain and would receive, i'll say the same to you now..

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I haven't shared anything that I authored.  I always provide cites, so it's obvious they are not MY analyses and conclusions. 

It's your meta-analysis of all the science you've followed that's at issue. You told me yourself a meta-analysis is a more comprehensive review of individual studies, papers and research of a broad issue into a more conclusive summary.

Why are you just sitting on that summary instead of putting it up for peer review?

[Goddess]

As the Milgram & Ashe experiments showed, it's a minority of people who are immune to manipulation - about 20% of the population.

To me, if you couldn't figure out early on in covid that they were trying to scare the ever-loving pi$$ out of everyone, you're in the larger group.  If you still couldn't figure it out after the first year, the second year, the third year, the fourth year.......Well.

It was obvious they were saying things that were 100% against established science.  No such thing as natural immunity?  the shots stay in the arm?  How was that even possible when the whole point of encasing the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles was to ensure it travelled?  And when it travels, what does it do to other major bodily systems?

The same goes for the climate thing.  We've been subjected to decades now of extreme fearmongering, prediction after prediction after prediction that have not even come close to being true.

This is why you cannot shame me into stopping asking questions or trying to figure things out.

I'm not like you.  And I'm quite proud of it.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's your meta-analysis of all the science you've followed

No it isn't, that's not what meta-analysis is, at best it's just the cites of her logical argument. I know you're not a scientist or even particularly educated but don't use words if you don't know what they mean.

Her mistake was thinking you could follow logic. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm not like you.  And I'm quite proud of it.

  And rightly so. 

[eyeball]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No it isn't, that's not what meta-analysis is,

It's precisely what I said it is.

A meta-analysis is a quantitative, statistical method that combines data from multiple independent studies to identify patterns, resolve conflicting findings, and draw more precise conclusions than any individual study. Often part of a systematic review, it increases statistical power, improves accuracy, and provides a comprehensive, objective assessment of a specific research topic. 

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's precisely what I said it is.

 

But it's not what she did. I get that you looked up the definition after the fact, but it doesn't fit the circumstance. When did she use a quantitative statistical method?  In fact when did she draw more precise conclusions?

I get that you are able to look up dictionary definitions.  I said don't use words if you don't know what they mean, and clearly you don't. 

LOL Nice try kid.  Hard fail.  

[Goddess]

16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's precisely what I said it is.

A meta-analysis is a quantitative, statistical method that combines data from multiple independent studies to identify patterns, resolve conflicting findings, and draw more precise conclusions than any individual study. Often part of a systematic review, it increases statistical power, improves accuracy, and provides a comprehensive, objective assessment of a specific research topic. 

And I've posted many meta-analyses and many individual studies.  The links to all of them.  

If you click on the links, the papers say the authors right on them.

I'm curious why you believe that I authored them all?

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, Goddess said:

And I've posted many meta-analyses and many individual studies.  The links to all of them.  

If you click on the links, the papers say the authors right on them.

I'm curious why you believe that I authored them all?

He doesn't, he's playing a little game where he's basically saying if you're so smart and you've analyzed all these papers why aren't you publishing it.

It's childish. And he doesn't understand the difference between a logic chain and a meta-analysis. You can read a bunch of papers and reach a conclusion but that the conclusion does not represent a meta-analysis and that's where he got confused.

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

why aren't you publishing it.

Ah, I see.

I guess I haven't published my covid "findings" for the same reason he hasn't published his climate "findings".

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Ah, I see.

I guess I haven't published my covid "findings" for the same reason he hasn't published his climate "findings".

The only difference is that you can point to people who have and he can't   

[eyeball]

11 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm curious why you believe that I authored them all?

I don't, but you did compile them. Now I'm not a scientist so the details look like this to me and like most people I recognize the limits of my knowledge.

I'm quite capable of following the science broadly speaking however but I have to place my faith in the veracity of institutions and such that can make sense out of the gritty details and put them in a more easily digestible context and format.

I don't trust you because you call people names for doubting you and screech at them in all caps and such but maybe you're just a little quirky. I get it, that just seems to go with science. 

[Goddess]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

I have to place my faith in the veracity of institutions

Well, for me, when they outright lie about things that are obvious, my feeling is that they have not earned my trust.  When they censor and silence scientists who point out they are lying, my trust is eroded even more.

The scientists I've followed throughout have been right about everything.

When these institutions told you it stays in the arm, they lied.  ALL of the mRNA testing in the decades before showed it did not.  The studies showed it settled in all major systems, mainly the reproductive organs and the heart.  They knew this.  They lied deliberately.

Do you not understand the magnitude of just that one lie?  Or do you think toxic spike protein is GOOD for your heart?  Good for your ovaries and testes?

When these institutions told you that the jabs were NOT causing myo/pericarditis, they were lying.  ALL of the prior studies showed it did not stay in the arm and one of the main organs it traveled to.....was the heart.  They lied deliberately.  After denying and denying, they were forced to now put a black box warning on the product.

Holy  💩 , dude!  2 of the 4 products they forced people to take have been removed from the market for safety issues!!

Do you really need to be hit over the head with a 2x4?

Now, Canada has sealed its vaccine injury records for 15 years.  That is unconscionable and medically unethical.

If you are the type of person who allows themselves to be lied to over and over and over and is ok with that, that's fine.  That's on YOU.

I am not like that.

It's not me who should be ashamed.  It's you.  You're a gullible fool.

Edited February 3 by Goddess

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Well, for me, when they outright lie about things that are obvious, my feeling is that they have not earned my trust.  When they censor and silence scientists who point out they are lying, my trust is eroded even more.

It's just a little suspicious when you say all of them do this all the time in concert with one another and governments and media around the world. Especially when you chalk it all up to just a handful of psyop dudes.

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Do you not understand the magnitude of just that one lie? 

I get the implication if the danger is true but...

Spikeopathy Speculative Fiction Contaminates the Blood SupplyThe spike protein encoded in the COVID-19 vaccines has been the subject of much alarmism from anti-vaxxers. None of it is actually worrisome.

and...

"The sudden appearance of a new kind of vaccine has generated concerns ranging from the spurious to the undeniable." Spike-proteins generated by the mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 — while their lack of toxicity may not be absolute (they could in principle still bother neighboring cells, for example) — are a good bet to be a lot less toxic than the spike proteins produced during the viral infections the vaccines prevent.

and...

The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) estimates that the spike proteins that were generated by COVID-19 vaccines last up to a few weeks, like other proteins made by the body. The immune system quickly identifies, attacks and destroys the spike proteins because it recognizes them as not part of you.

No doubt we could carry on an on like this till the cows come home. As the article in the first link I provided says...

Brandolini’s law states, the amount of energy required to refute nonsense is an order of magnitude bigger than was needed to produce it. As we slide down this rabbit hole, you will see why scientists have had to write multiple 10,000-word refutations on this subject.  

At the end of the day I'll take my doctor's word they're on top of things. I'm quite certain if some staggering new trove of knowledge emerges that changes everything they'll let me know.

Notwithstanding of course the possibility the psyop dudes get to them first.

This vast conspiracy is the premier extraordinary claim that you make and like everyone else who does it you fail every single time you're challenged to produce the extraordinary evidence such a claim requires. Interestingly enough and almost in spite of Brandolini's Law you put such minimal energy into the effort ie its just a handful of psyop dudes that a roll of the eyes is all it takes to refute it.

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Now, Canada has sealed its vaccine injury records for 15 years.  That is unconscionable and medically unethical.

Yeah, I saw this in the article you posted on that....

The agency blamed the backlog on the volume of material moving through senior offices during COVID-19, the need for extensive consultations, parliamentary motions, and what it described as the requester’s refusal to narrow the scope of the request.

What did you do, dump your trickle to a flood thread on them? 

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Goddess said:

As the Milgram & Ashe experiments showed, it's a minority of people who are immune to manipulation - about 20% of the population.

And it only took 4-5 guys to bamboozle the other 80% not to mention the vast VAST majority of experts around the planet. It's phenomenal. Christians would probably love to learn how to do that.  It's taken them centuries not to mention millions of co-conspirators to do what your psyop dudes accomplished overnight in comparison.

In any case we talk about similar experiments when running safety drills at work and how authority, group pressure, individual behavior and judgment are affected in an emergency.

We can count on 6 out of 10 passengers doing as they're told, two will freak out or curl up in the fetal position and a couple will ask if they can help. 

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

do this all the time in concert with one another

I'm going to say this one last time to you - There are people at the top who "know".  People like Gates.  People like Fauci.

They instruct their underlings.  Most go along or say nothing.  Remember the rare 20% of people who are immune to manipulation?  Those are the ones who speak up and get vilified and/ or fired.  Or they quit - like the 2 FDA executives who went along with it all, until they wanted to jab children.  They couldn't go that far.  They knew it was wrong.  Gruber and somebody, I can't remember right now.

11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

governments and media

Govt and media repeat what they're told.  You really think the drama teacher knew enough about whether the mRNA travelled to teenager's hearts or not to be making decisions for Canadians?  Wise up, dumba$$.

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

You really think the drama teacher knew enough about whether the mRNA travelled to teenager's hearts or not to be making decisions for Canadians?

Not medical decisions.  I think he had the sense to recognize he was way out of his league and he let the experts direct his decisions.

You can see that clearly reflected in the difference in death and sickness rates between Canada and the US.

[Goddess]

17 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No doubt we could carry on an on like this till the cows come home.

No doubt.  It's so much easier when you just quickly Google opinion pieces that say what you want them to.

You go with your opinion pieces.

I'm going to go with the actual medical studies and data sets and autopsy reports.  

 

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Not medical decisions.  I think he had the sense to recognize he was way out of his league and he let the experts direct his decisions.

You can see that clearly reflected in the difference in death and sickness rates between Canada and the US.

No you can't. The provincial leaders were in charge of the actual response in Canada and the state leaders were in the states.

Trump delivered his vaccines. That was his job. Trudeau had the same job but somehow managed giving hundreds of millions to the Chinese for a vaccine we never got. As a result we were months late getting the vaccines which was supposed to be his gig

Unless you're suggesting the vaccines make no difference to the death rate

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I'm going to say this one last time to you - There are people at the top who "know".  People like Gates.  People like Fauci.

And not even amongst 20% of you....that's well over a billion human beings, you still can't produce a smoking gun? That's really pathetic.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

You can see that clearly reflected in the difference in death and sickness rates between Canada and the US.

You just keep repeating talking points you heard on TV, but you don't actually understand anything.

You hear two opposing views and invariably, without any thinking - choose the one you want to believe, rather than think about what is actually true.

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You hear two opposing views and invariably, without any thinking - choose the one you want to believe, rather than think about what is actually true.

You broadcast yours and people unfortunately listen to it at risk of getting sick and dying.

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You broadcast yours and people unfortunately listen to it at risk of getting sick and dying.

You broadcast yours and it killed children.  And young adults.

RE:  persistence of spike after vaccination.  This is just ONE study.  And it doesn't even cover all the autopsies that have confirmed.  I believe I covered frameshifting in the Trickle thread.

Long‐lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID‐19 vaccination - PMC

 

In reality, clinical studies now report that modified SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA routinely persist up to a month from injection and can be detected in cardiac and skeletal muscle at sites of inflammation and fibrosis, while the recombinant spike protein may persist a little over half a year in blood. 

As an example, a highly significant increase in heart muscle 18‐flourodeoxyglucose uptake was detected in vaccinated patients up to half a year (180 days).

Translational and clinical studies have established that decay modeling of injected mRNA wrapped in liposomes and that of the deriving spike protein is extended beyond what was expected from in vitro culturing and animal studies. Analytical efforts described above indicate significantly longer decay times of both the injected mRNA and its recombinant spike protein in tissues and the circulation.

The persistent nature of mRNA coding for SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein provides a dangerously long exposure to an unlimited dose of this pathogenic protein, and thus, it needs re‐evaluation for continued human use.