Legato Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 27 minutes ago, herbie said: Just like Saudi oil...... "Canada" is not preventing Alberta gas (or oil) from being supplied to the East Coast. Perhaps if Danny Dimwit would put half the effort promoting a pipeline East as she does forcing a pipeline through BC to ship it to Asia there wouldn't be such a situation. So put the blame on who it belongs rather than incessantly attempt any method you can to trash Ottawa. Hell, if we had an East Coast pipe and terminal we could sell it to Cuba as a bug F-ck You to Trump. Pipeline? Nova Scotia sits on 7 trillion cu ft of natural gas. Who needs a pipeline. So why import it? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 1 hour ago, herbie said: Just like Saudi oil...... "Canada" is not preventing Alberta gas (or oil) from being supplied to the East Coast. Perhaps if Danny Dimwit would put half the effort promoting a pipeline East as she does forcing a pipeline through BC to ship it to Asia there wouldn't be such a situation. So put the blame on who it belongs rather than incessantly attempt any method you can to trash Ottawa. Hell, if we had an East Coast pipe and terminal we could sell it to Cuba as a bug F-ck You to Trump. Attorney said he won't go into provinces that don't agree. Quebec does not agree. Carney could force them but he won't 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
paxamericana Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 3 hours ago, herbie said: So put the blame on who it belongs rather than incessantly attempt any method you can to trash Ottawa. A 1000 IQ solution you all aren’t using. Become 51st and the pipeline would be built overnight. Guaranteed. Quote
eyeball Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: Attorney said he won't go into provinces that don't agree. Quebec does not agree. Carney could force them but he won't So instead you support Carney forcing it through us. That's good enough reason to say fùck that right there. Full stop. I've seen what happens when Ottawa holds all the cards before thanks. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 30 minutes ago, eyeball said: So instead you support Carney forcing it through us. That's good enough reason to say fùck that right there. Full stop. I've seen what happens when Ottawa holds all the cards before thanks. But he isn't. He directly said that both the First Nations and British Columbia get a veto. That was directly after he did enough to stir them up that there's no chance they would agree to it Carney won't be forcing a pipeline through anywhere 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 18 minutes ago, CdnFox said: But he isn't. He directly said that both the First Nations and British Columbia get a veto. That was directly after he did enough to stir them up that there's no chance they would agree to it Carney won't be forcing a pipeline through anywhere You figure Poilievre could/would/will? Then why not Quebec too? 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 3 hours ago, eyeball said: You figure Poilievre could/would/will? I think that Poilievre will strip away the anti-pipeline laws and laws preventing companies from even bidding. At that point if he can get someone to bid or make a proposal I think he'll do whatever he has to get the proposal through. I don't think that north south east or west will matter overly much Carney on the other hand won't let a project go through no matter what. He's deliberately standing in their way 3 hours ago, eyeball said: Then why not Quebec too? I think if someone proposes a pipeline that makes sense through Quebec then Quebec is going to have to live with it if Poilievre were in charge. I don't know that anybody would think that was the best choice, but if they did that's what would happen And once again I see you're here defending the liberals, trying to suggest the Carney isn't the problem. Tell us all again how you don't support them or vote for them 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 11 hours ago, CdnFox said: I think that Poilievre will strip away the anti-pipeline laws and laws preventing companies from even bidding. At that point if he can get someone to bid or make a proposal I think he'll do whatever he has to get the proposal through. I wouldn't be surprised to find it was Poilievre lobbying Big Oil instead of the other way around. He couldn't talk anyone into it - that must be why he said lobbying was so useless. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted February 27 Report Posted February 27 23 hours ago, Legato said: Pipeline? Nova Scotia sits on 7 trillion cu ft of natural gas. Who needs a pipeline. So why import it? Cuz my sister there converted her home to run propane instead of oil the year before I visited. LNG was 'coming'. That wa in 2014.... she's still waiting for it in 2026. Obviously cmpared to the quadrillions of tons or LNG in Western Canada the money goes where the market and supply is. Like 1000 X the supply and 3000 X more buyers. Difficulties comprehending how capitalism works? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 8 hours ago, eyeball said: I wouldn't be surprised to find it was Poilievre lobbying Big Oil instead of the other way around. Well that's what carney is claiming he himself is trying to do but so far no dice Quote He couldn't talk anyone into it - that must be why he said lobbying was so useless. Sorry did you mean carney? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 54 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Well that's what carney is claiming he himself is trying to do but so far no dice. Sorry did you mean carney? Not even a bit. And I'm also not the least bit surprised Carney isn't swiping Poilievre's ideas on useless lobbyists. Boy, I'll bet that caused a few guffaws around the old patch. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Not even a bit. What are you talking about? It's his entire pitch. 1 hour ago, eyeball said: And I'm also not the least bit surprised Carney isn't swiping Poilievre's ideas on useless lobbyists. Well that part is true, carney thinks lobbyists are great 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Boy, I'll bet that caused a few guffaws around the old patch. You mean the voices in your head? well..... 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: What are you talking about? It's his entire pitch. Nice try. Not. LMAO! 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Well that part is true, carney thinks lobbyists are great Just like Poilievre. 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: You mean the voices in your head? Nope, the lies coming out of Poilievre's mouth. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 12 minutes ago, eyeball said: Nice try. Not. LMAO! I accept your surrender And he's been quite clear, he's been lobbying the pipeline companies (or claming to) and the oil patch to 'build baby build'. This is the simple truth, Read it and weep: This pipeline agreement is a document of betrayal | Canada's National Observer: Climate News "For months, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s courtship of Alberta and the oil patch has been the subject of conspiratorial interpretation by his friends and foes alike." Mark Carney courts oil industry in push to Trump-proof Canada’s economy I mean, there are dozens of stories on it. He's nbeen upfront about it since the get go Sorry to break your heart big guy but yeah. He's been lobbying big oil for ages now. Or - at least he claims to be. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 12 hours ago, CdnFox said: What are you talking about? It's his entire pitch. Guffaw! 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Legato Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 20 hours ago, herbie said: Cuz my sister there converted her home to run propane instead of oil the year before I visited. LNG was 'coming'. That wa in 2014.... she's still waiting for it in 2026. Obviously cmpared to the quadrillions of tons or LNG in Western Canada the money goes where the market and supply is. Like 1000 X the supply and 3000 X more buyers. Difficulties comprehending how capitalism works? Try reading it does help. No home based gas supply is because of your sister? Quote
ExFlyer Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 On 2/26/2026 at 3:58 PM, Legato said: Pipeline? Nova Scotia sits on 7 trillion cu ft of natural gas. Who needs a pipeline. So why import it? You have to wonder why is is not being exploited? Nova Scotia also had a fracking ban till 2025 but it has been removed yet, no commercial companies seem interested. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Legato Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 18 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: You have to wonder why is is not being exploited? Nova Scotia also had a fracking ban till 2025 but it has been removed yet, no commercial companies seem interested. I would say it's the requirement for fracking being the main set back. Building a safe natural gas industry The standard approach in North America to extracting natural gas is called hydraulic fracturing. As of 2025, more than 200,000 wells have been hydraulically fractured in Canada and millions in the United States. Nova Scotia’s geology is similar to places in the western United States where hydraulic fracturing is done safely. There’s good reason to believe it can be done safely here. Any natural gas project in Nova Scotia would require rigorous review, including an industrial approval. An industrial approval can require community consultation and outlines terms and conditions for the project, including ongoing monitoring and reporting. In December 2025, the government launched the Subsurface Energy Research and Development Investment Program. Administered by Dalhousie University, the program will offer financial investments for operators to explore Nova Scotia's gas potential as part of a controlled research initiative. This work will advance scientific understanding of subsurface geology, new energy potential in geothermal or carbon capture utilization and storage and modern drilling technologies in the Nova Scotia environment, helping shape future energy policy and economic development. Program participants agree to share their data and environmental impact findings with project research advisors for inclusion in published research papers. Projections commissioned as part of this program will produce financial returns for the people and the province. Since the provincial financial contribution includes conditions, the Province can hold equity in successful drilling ventures or earn a share of profits of production in a number of ways, such as royalties. Nova Scotians should receive economic benefits, and each project will produce a return in both jobs created and new source government revenue. https://novascotia.ca/onshore-natural-gas/ 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Guffaw! Except i just posted proof i was right Awwww kiddo, i know how it must hurt to see your hero is the one behaving the way you said your hated enemy PP would behave but its true But i see you've got to keep denying the truth and defending the liberals at all costs. Tell me again how you don't support the libs 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 42 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 2 hours ago, Legato said: No home based gas supply is because of your sister? I need to read? OMG that's the best dumbf*ck response possible. You build the plant and infrastructure, you got $20 billion or so for a half million customers? Better return than for 3.5 billion customers? Great defenders if laisse faire capitalism that don't even know the basics...... 1 Quote
Legato Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 3 minutes ago, herbie said: I need to read? OMG that's the best dumbf*ck response possible. You build the plant and infrastructure, you got $20 billion or so for a half million customers? Better return than for 3.5 billion customers? Great defenders if laisse faire capitalism that don't even know the basics...... "Cuz my sister there converted her home to run propane instead of oil the year before I visited. LNG was 'coming'. That wa in 2014.... she's still waiting for it in 2026". You should not listen to your sister. Yeah, why build the infrastructure when you can get it for twice the price with umpteen times the pollution after shipping 25.000 kilometers. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, eyeball said: LOL did the simple truth confuse you again old man? Couldn't think of what to say? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: ...nothing ...right Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 5 hours ago, Legato said: Yeah, why build the infrastructure when you can get it for twice the price with umpteen times the pollution after shipping 25.000 kilometers. Because of MONEY you bleeding dimwit. R.O.I. it's amazing how the one you call a commie has to teach you the basics of business economics, On top of the bozoidal lack of comprehension that makes a statement pointing out how no one's made one step towards that goal in 12 years you're retarded enough to think it's my sister's fault. Duh! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.