CBC bias at work: two papers, same story, VERY different headlines

[CdnFox]

The CBC will always pull hard to the left. 

[Michael Hardner]

This meshes perfectly with your inability to conceive of subjectivity. 😄

[herbie]

Exposes Nazional Post bias in an attempt to discredit CBC straight news story. Dumb enough to think he's doing the opposite.

[CdnFox]

25 minutes ago, herbie said:

Exposes Nazional Post bias in an attempt to discredit CBC straight news story. Dumb enough to think he's doing the opposite.

with those kind of mental gymastic skills you should try out for the olympics  

The guy is identified by everyone else as a terrorist leader but only herbie and the cbc knows better!!  

42 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

This meshes perfectly with your inability to conceive of subjectivity. 😄

This meshes perfectly with your inability to contribute to a conversation and try to passively aggressively pursue your own agena without attempting to actually put forward an argument   

[Legato]

43 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

This meshes perfectly with your inability to conceive of subjectivity. 😄

So is yours chain driven?

[Moonlight Graham]

Israeli government claims he was a Hamas terror leader.  Al Jazeera and human rights groups deny this.

The problem here is that i'm not naive enough to believe the Israeli government, Al Jazeera, or human rights groups without evidence.  Same with the National Post or CBC News.

Who even has credibility any more?  Not many.  We live in perilous times.

[Michael Hardner]

Just now, Moonlight Graham said:

 

The problem here is that i'm not naive enough to believe the Israeli government, Al Jazeera, or human rights groups without evidence.  Same with the National Post or CBC News.

 

Exactly.

[TreeBeard]

7 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Exactly.

 

9 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Who even has credibility any more?

 

Because human rights NGOs are known for their fake news?

[Moonlight Graham]

3 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Because human rights NGOs are known for their fake news?

They're filled with political activists.  They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt without evidence.

[paxamericana]

I’ve been warning this forum about the cabal of banking globalist elites in Davos for close to a decade now. They bought out the traditional media. You can understand the news better if you understand that their agenda is tied to financial markets. It’s a heavy price to go against the establishment narrative. Most of the forums members did just that when confronted with this reality. A Trumpian spirit is what you need. Damn the cost, you bring truth to power. 
 

The consequences of mass immigration was met with ridicule by some of the members on this forum but have nonetheless came true for all to witness.

Edited August 13, 2025 by paxamericana

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Israeli government claims he was a Hamas terror leader.  Al Jazeera and human rights groups deny this.

The problem here is that i'm not naive enough to believe the Israeli government, Al Jazeera, or human rights groups without evidence.  Same with the National Post or CBC News.

Who even has credibility any more?  Not many.  We live in perilous times.

I thought the proper right wing response was to default to the view the CBC is left wing, Al Jazeera is a terrorist propaganda organ so ergo the 'journalist' must obviously a Hamas terrorist leader.

 

[CdnFox]

15 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

 

 

Because human rights NGOs are known for their fake news?

Yup. 

[CdnFox]

15 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

They're filled with political activists.  They don't deserve the benefit of the doubt without evidence.

Sure. And without a doubt there is no group out there now that has a great reputation when it comes to being perfect with credibility.

 So you either have to corroborate or look at the 'balance of probability' (What seems plausible). 

Israel doesn't have much reason to randomly accuse people of that, and they're not saying any of the other journalists were connected to terror cells.  so why would they pick on this one guy? They've said it about him for some time. ANd it's understandable that they don't provide a lot of evidence as it would likely compromise their information sources. 

So we can't be sure either way and we aught to be very open to changing our opinion if more data comes along but the logical position initially is that if a gov't organization that really doesn't have much reason to randomly pick out one journalist over many says they  believe he was a terror cell leader that's more credible than the known bias newspaper saying he isn't. 

 

 

[herbie]

In plain words, the CBC reported the news, that an Al Jazeera correspondent was among those killed.
The post reported the claim by Israel he was a Hamas leader.

Those are two different stories.
One about a group of people killed by an Israeli strike, one about a targeted execution disregarding all the others killed in the process.

[Moonlight Graham]

16 hours ago, eyeball said:

I thought the proper right wing response was to default to the view the CBC is left wing, Al Jazeera is a terrorist propaganda organ so ergo the 'journalist' must obviously a Hamas terrorist leader.

CBC is left wing, Al Jazeera is a terrorist propaganda organ, but there's evidence yet (that i've seen) about the journalist.  This is neither a leftwing or rightwing response, these are simply the facts at the moment.

Edited August 13, 2025 by Moonlight Graham

[eyeball]

5 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

CBC is left wing, Al Jazeera is a terrorist propaganda organ, but there's evidence yet (that i've seen) about the journalist.  This is neither a leftwing or rightwing response, these are simply the facts at the moment.

There you go it's as black as white.

[Legato]

7 minutes ago, eyeball said:

There you go it's as black as white.

Flat, satin or gloss?

[eyeball]

Just now, Legato said:

Flat, satin or gloss?

Eggshell.

[Shady]

On 8/12/2025 at 2:08 PM, Michael Hardner said:

This meshes perfectly with your inability to conceive of subjectivity. 😄

Be subjective without tax dollars.  

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

There you go it's as black as white.

You can’t argue that CBC isn’t left wing.  I have no problem with them being left wing, but do it without tax dollars.

[Shady]

20 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

 

 

Because human rights NGOs are known for their fake news?

Stepped on a rake! 😂😂😂

[TreeBeard]

21 minutes ago, Shady said:

Stepped on a rake! 😂😂😂

That’s not an argument. 

[eyeball]

41 minutes ago, Shady said:

You can’t argue that CBC isn’t left wing.  I have no problem with them being left wing, but do it without tax dollars.

You can't argue that Canada isn't a progressive country. It seems entirely natural that the CBC would reflect that and I have no problem with tax dollars funding it.

[herbie]

56 minutes ago, Shady said:

You can’t argue that CBC isn’t left wing.  

Yes I can, I do, and I will. Until you can rationally prove otherwise.
Otherwise I will contend every instance of simply repeating dogma and slogans over and over claiming that makes them true.

[Aristides]

So far 234 journalists have been killed in Gaza, I suppose they all must have been Hamas operatives.Very disappointing that the NP would just accept Israel's word with no corroberation. Shit journalism.

The guy was a Pulitzer Prise winner.

Edited August 14, 2025 by Aristides

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, herbie said:

In plain words, the CBC reported the news, that an Al Jazeera correspondent was among those killed.
The post reported the claim by Israel he was a Hamas leader.

 

In plain words CBC reported the propadanda.  This was an 'innocent victim tragically killed' despite knowing that he most likely had ties to a terror cell.