Obama goes to jail!?

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

IMMUNITY for that OFFICIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT. Duh

Does not apply to treason.

Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Russia is our enemy. Russia wanted to sew discord and destroy confidence in our electoral system. Obama's actions furthered those goals. Obama gave aid and comfort to the enemy. Material aid and comfort. Actual help. 

[Boges]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Does not apply to treason.

Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Russia is our enemy. Russia wanted to sew discord and destroy confidence in our electoral system. Obama's actions furthered those goals. Obama gave aid and comfort to the enemy. Material aid and comfort. Actual help. 

Good luck proving that in court. LOL 

 

[Boges]

This is all a "Way the Dog" situation to distract from the Epstein scandal. 

Trump is trying everything he can to make people care about something other than the fact he's named in the Epstein files and will refuse to release them. 

There's no way his team has the attention span to actually obtain an indictment, let alone a conviction on Obama. There are bipartisan rulings from the Senate that, YES! Russia did try to influence the 2016 election. Trump's own Secretary of State was leading the committee. 

[Aristides]

Desperately throwing crap against the wall to distract from Epstein. 

[Michael Hardner]

9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Desperately throwing crap against the wall to distract from Epstein. 

Also top story on FOX News website.  I regularly do CTRL-F to find "Epstein" on that site.  Usually results in some TINY PRINT story about a probe continuing... until yesterday when in big font they announced triumphantly that the Clintons are being subpoena'd ....

[West]

5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Also top story on FOX News website.  I regularly do CTRL-F to find "Epstein" on that site.  Usually results in some TINY PRINT story about a probe continuing... until yesterday when in big font they announced triumphantly that the Clintons are being subpoena'd ....

Yes!!!!!

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, West said:

She's an eye witness to Barry's coup d'etat

Investigating Trump's CRIMINAL exploitation of Russian campaign aid is NOT any kind of coup.

An HONEST candidate would not have touched the HACKED confidential DNC info let alone conspired with Russian agent Kilimnik to target districts with Russian troll and bot ATTACKS.

You keep mistaking investigating ILLEGAL Russian aid with VIOLENCE because you got NO REAL EVIDENCE of "coup."

[Michael Hardner]

14 minutes ago, West said:

Yes!!!!!

I guess Trump was trying to protect the Clintons until now.  Understandable because they were at his (latest) wedding.

[robosmith]

8 hours ago, West said:

There was no peaceful transition of power between Barry and Trump. Barry cooked up a conspiracy theory agsinst Trump and his supporters in an attempt to overthrow an election result. He committed treason

Trump cooked up EXPLOITATION of ILLEGAL Russian aid, lDIOT. Those were CRIMES and CRIMES always get INVESTIGATED. Duh

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Barry will likely never be charged. Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Clinton...they likely will be charged.

As for ol' "Suck Me Off" Barry...he'll be destroyed. The first black POTUS...who simply couldn't resist breaking the law. By the time this is done, Barry will be cast as nothing more than common ghetto trash.

What law was broken (besides Trump exploitation of ILLEGAL Russian campaign aid)?

We KNOW YOU'RE LYING and have BUPKIS AGAIN.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Venandi said:

And more to the point.... the sort of people who REALLY don't like him but don't believe the "Russian plant / agent" thing for a single second.

My only frame of reference here is people who have actually spent lots of time pouring over intelligence assessments as a matter of course. There's a disconnect here between those folks (and they dislike Trump as much a Roboduh does) and the garden variety TDS species found on political forums. The latter group is rabidly inclined to jump on anything that screams orange man bad without actually sniffing it first.

This entire effort was sloppily done, like one of those cheater recipes for the "special sauce" at your favourite restaurant. One taste and you know it's not even close... it only fools people who have never eaten at the restaurant and are unwilling to actually drive there and see for themselves. 

Hand the list of ingredients to a chef and he'll laugh... just like intelligence chefs did at the Hunter Biden laptop memo signed by 51 retired analysts.

I even laughed as I typed that because (to me) it's like a lime green Harley Road King... my question is "was it like that when you bought it or did someone vandalize your bike?" I might follow you (out of curiosity) for a bit to see if you drop it at the next light but that's about the extent of my interest. 

If you're wearing a lime green jacket and matching helmet though I'll probably follow a little bit further out of a sense of "shock and awe." This is that...

Sorry, it's the best analogy I can come up with before coffee.

YOUR DENIAL of the Senate Intel Committee Report on the EXPLOITATION of ILLEGAL Russian campaign aid is not going to make it go away.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Does not apply to treason.

Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Russia is our enemy. Russia wanted to sew discord and destroy confidence in our electoral system. Obama's actions furthered those goals. Obama gave aid and comfort to the enemy. Material aid and comfort. Actual help. 

It was Trump who EXPLOITED ILLEGAL Russian campaign aid.

Investigating those CRIMES was the JOB of Obama's DoJ. Duh

You do know that HACKING the DNC computer was a CRIME, don't you?

Mueller indicted the PERPETRATORS. Duh

[robosmith]

41 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Desperately throwing crap against the wall to distract from Epstein. 

Don't forget the stripping of O'Donnell's citizenship. Another of several desperate distractions. 

[TreeBeard]

Supreme Court has ruled presidents are immune from prosecution.  

[Legato]

41 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Supreme Court has ruled presidents are immune from prosecution.  

Potential for Prosecution:

The ruling has the practical effect of potentially delaying criminal trials of former presidents for official acts, but it does not preclude prosecution for actions taken outside of their official capacity, or after they have left office. 

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

It wasn't "Dems," it was NY DA Alvin Bragg who CONVICTED Trump.

It was the dems.

Biden sent one of his own lawyers to help him. And his daughter raked in insane amounts of money from democrat donors based on what her daddy was doing

We told you. This is what's going to happen. You were too stupid to listen. Now you get to sleep in the bed you made

[TreeBeard]

11 minutes ago, Legato said:

Potential for Prosecution:

The ruling has the practical effect of potentially delaying criminal trials of former presidents for official acts, but it does not preclude prosecution for actions taken outside of their official capacity, or after they have left office. 

Obama is immune.  From what, I have no idea.  But the timing seems awfully convenient.  
 

“You’re on the list of your good friend who was a child rapist”. 
“OBAMA!  TREASON!!  LOCK HIM UP!”

[CdnFox]

12 minutes ago, Legato said:

Potential for Prosecution:

The ruling has the practical effect of potentially delaying criminal trials of former presidents for official acts, but it does not preclude prosecution for actions taken outside of their official capacity, or after they have left office. 

Well and this is the thing. There's a very real chance that if they can show he in any way shape or form was involved after he left office they can claim that it's a continuing crime even though part of it happened when he was in office and go after him for the whole thing. Now he might be able to dodge some of that by saying it was when he was in office but frankly it's going to cost him millions to defend it, which is exactly what trump went through so he'll be happy to do the same to Obama.

And of course it makes the Dems look bad in general as well

Just now, TreeBeard said:

Obama is immune.  From what, I have no idea.  But the timing seems awfully convenient.  
 

“You’re on the list of your good friend who was a child rapist”. 
“OBAMA!  TREASON!!  LOCK HIM UP!”

Oh look who showed up to lie again to try and make a point that he doesn't have

Edited July 24, 2025 by CdnFox

[robosmith]

48 minutes ago, Legato said:

Potential for Prosecution:

The ruling has the practical effect of potentially delaying criminal trials of former presidents for official acts, but it does not preclude prosecution for actions taken outside of their official capacity, or after they have left office. 

Nope. Completely immune from prosecution for actions related to core Constitutional duties LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT.

Investigating Trump campaign collusion with Russia is purely LAW ENFORCEMENT. 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Trump cooked up EXPLOITATION of ILLEGAL Russian aid, lDIOT. Those were CRIMES and CRIMES always get INVESTIGATED. Duh

What law was broken (besides Trump exploitation of ILLEGAL Russian campaign aid)?

We KNOW YOU'RE LYING and have BUPKIS AGAIN.

No robo...the cat's been outta the bag for a couple years now. All thats left is to clean-up.

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope. Completely immune from prosecution for actions related to core Constitutional duties LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT.

 

Not if those activities continued past his term. If it can be shown in any way shape or form that he continued to participate in an effort to prop up the Russian hoax, then he can wind up being nailed for the whole thing.

To put it in perspective if he was torturing someone for the entire time he was in office he might not be able to be attacked for that, but if you continue to torture them for 6 months after he left office then he might face crimes for the whole thing

In addition, well he may not be tried in court the ruling was clear that such a person could still be impeached. So even if he dodges going to court he may still wind up having to face impeachment

You need to read a little more

[robosmith]

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

No robo...the cat's been outta the bag for a couple years now. All thats left is to clean-up.

^BUPKIS as USUAL.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

^BUPKIS as USUAL.

No, he's right

And worse more and more information is coming out that the FBI kind of hid the fact that they knew there wasn't a problem. They actually stayed in their documents we now know that they had a very low probability of there being any chance of the Russians hacking hillary trying to help trump win.

 

Honestly from all of the evidence we've been able to see so far and more is coming out every day I don't think the Russians actually wanted trump to win. I think they wanted Hillary to lose. I think they hated Hillary, I don't think they gave a Flying Fig about trump

Sorry buddy, turns out you were wrong all these years. In fairness we did try and warn you

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

It was Trump who EXPLOITED ILLEGAL Russian campaign aid.

What illegal campaign add existed in your fantasy world?

 

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Investigating those CRIMES was the JOB of Obama's DoJ. Duh

The intelligence report that Obama ordered to be changed said there was no collusion and not material interference. So what crime do you think existed in your fantasy world?

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You do know that HACKING the DNC computer was a CRIME, don't you?

You do know they tried to hack the RNC as well? Its just that the RNC wasn't stùpid enough to click on the phishing attack?

James Comey testified in January of 2017, when he was still FBI director, that Russians tried to targeted the Republican National Committee in 2016. “There was evidence of hacking directed at state-level organizations, state-level campaigns, and the RNC, but old domains of the RNC,”

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Mueller indicted the PERPETRATORS. Duh

Based on fake intelligence. Are you proud of that? 

[Legato]

44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope. Completely immune from prosecution for actions related to core Constitutional duties LIKE LAW ENFORCEMENT.

Investigating Trump campaign collusion with Russia is purely LAW ENFORCEMENT. 

You need more rope?

[herbie]

The Pedofuhrer scrambles to distract.

So senile he doesn't even realize his own Court manipulations that made him immune from prosecution make Obama immune too.

Yet he merely clamps his arse tighter and drags his followers along by their tongues.