Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, BubberMiley said:

I think I have the intelligence to recognize sarcasm. But it would be fun to hear you explain how it wasn't. 

The truckers chased their uninvited Nazi flag guy away.

If they had said, "Thank you for coming, sir".....would you have recognized  it as sarcasm?

I doubt it.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

if that was the case

then Bernier would have won

another Scheer/O'Toole cuckservative incoming

bernier is even worse then pierre . dear god you got terrible taste in picking leaders lol thank god people like you arn't in charge of this country

Posted
Just now, EastCanada90 said:

bernier is even worse then pierre . dear god you got terrible taste in picking leaders lol thank god people like you arn't in charge of this country

says the guy who hates all the least shitty politicians Canada has

and you question my taste in politicians, guy would rather vote for Trudeau?

Posted
6 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

And he's one of THOSE professors. He went down there looking for trouble and he found it.

Ya gits wut ya pays fer 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)

I think that the Liberal Party of Canada should be sued for false advertising.  There’s nothing liberal about the Liberal Party.  That word comes from the French Revolution idea of laissez faire.  It’s the idea that government should not dictate the particulars of one’s life or limit freedoms except where absolutely necessary.  It’s the old Rousseau idea that “Man is born free yet is everywhere in chains.” Vaccination passports to enjoy basic freedoms, restrictions on movement, mandatory face coverings, and other extreme state controls over human behaviour must bear a high threshold of justification to prevent tyranny.

Canada hasn’t been occupied like Denmark.  We didn’t have to have a revolution to gain our freedoms (the Americans did and the Brits had to provide greater freedoms to attract Loyalists).  The history of democracy is one of continuous struggle for rights and freedoms.  We must never slide back into tyranny.  Freedoms are easily removed if we don’t demand their protection.  Protect our Charter rights!

image.jpeg.8e43729c980a49fae0bf1588e91c18f6.jpeg

Edited by Zeitgeist
  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Poor guy. Seems he ran into a couple people who are camera shy. Was he hurt? Was his phone broken?

Is this the extent of the "violence" of these bad ol' truckers?

Lol...a wet noodle and his phone get pushed by what sounds like, a couple agitated Quebecois.

Oh well...

In case you didn't know it, it is illegal to grab people, push them around, or physically force them out of a public park.  It is considered as assault.  He could have laid charges but chose not to, probably because of the hassle involved.  These are thugs who have taken  over downtown and parks and you support that kind of thing.  Supporting illegal behavior is a sign of a problem that needs to be dealt with.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The truckers chased their uninvited Nazi flag guy away.

If they had said, "Thank you for coming, sir".....would you have recognized  it as sarcasm?

I doubt it.

There were lots of Nazi flag guys. I saw several myself with swastikas over the maple leaf as they passed through town. Nobody seemed to be chasing them at all.

You're actually going to pretend you don't think he was being sarcastic? But you're not going to elaborate on how you perceive that to be the case? Why do you think he thanked him? Please express your worldview more clearly.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
7 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Tim Pool is on it now. JT claims that truckers are stealing food from the homeless.

 

The Shepherds of Good Hope homeless shelter made the allegation, not JT. Maybe you can blame the QAnon shaman and say it was Antifa.

  • Thanks 1
"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

I think that the Liberal Party of Canada should be sued for false advertising.  There’s nothing liberal about the Liberal Party.  That word comes from the French Revolution idea of L’essez faire.  It’s the idea that government should not dictate the particulars of one’s life or limit freedoms except where absolutely necessary.  It’s the old Rousseau idea that “Man is born free yet is everywhere in chains.”  Vaccination passports to enjoy basic freedoms, restrictions on movement, mandatory face coverings, and other extreme state controls over human behaviour must bear a high threshold of justification to prevent tyranny.

Canada hasn’t been occupied like Denmark.  We didn’t have to have a revolution to gain our freedoms (the Americans did and the Brits had to provide greater freedoms to attract Loyalists).  The history of democracy is one of continuous struggle for rights and freedoms.  We must never slide back into tyranny.  Freedoms are easily removed if we don’t demand their protection.  Protect our Charter rights!

the real liberals were in Britain

France was filled with commies

and wouldn't know freedom if it slapped them in the face

also fuck Rousseau

and his idiotic idea that man was born free

Hobbes ftw

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted
2 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

I think that the Liberal Party of Canada should be sued for false advertising.  There’s nothing liberal about the Liberal Party.  That word comes from the French Revolution idea of L’essez faire.  It’s the idea that government should not dictate the particulars of one’s life or limit freedoms except where absolutely necessary.  It’s the old Rousseau idea that “Man is born free yet is everywhere in chains.”  Vaccination passports to enjoy basic freedoms, restrictions on movement, mandatory face coverings, and other extreme state controls over human behaviour must bear a high threshold of justification to prevent tyranny.  Canada hasn’t been occupied like Denmark.  We didn’t have to have a revolution to gain our freedoms (the Americans did and the Brits had to provide greater freedoms to attract Loyalists).  The history of democracy is one of continuous struggle for rights and freedoms.  We must never slide back into tyranny.  Freedoms are easily removed if we don’t demand their protection.  

Nobody has freedom to spread Covid to other people.  That's what the health restrictions and mandates are all about.  If you can't agree with the basic premise that freedom has it's limitations maybe you should be living in Alabama or some southern state that more closely aligns with your idea of freedom.  Lots of them hate government, don't trust any authority, and think they should be able to spread Covid to anybody.

Posted
2 minutes ago, blackbird said:

In case you didn't know it, it is illegal to grab people, push them around, or physically force them out of a public park.  It is considered as assault.  He could have laid charges but chose not to, probably because of the hassle involved.  These are thugs who have taken  over downtown and parks and you support that kind of thing.  Supporting illegal behavior is a sign of a problem that needs to be dealt with.

And yet...no arrests.

Oh and now it seems this nerdy professor is in the habit of agitating. 

The poor nerd...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

The Shepherds of Good Hope homeless shelter made the allegation, not JT. Maybe you can blame the QAnon shaman and say it was Antifa.

My goodness these young adults are enemies of the state.  Demanding food from a homeless shelter?  What next, vaccine passports?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Nobody has freedom to spread Covid to other people.  That's what the health restrictions and mandates are all about.

no it isn't

the mandates are about compliance

not science

science is not on the side of these mandates

Edited by Yzermandius19
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

the real liberals were in Britain

France was filled with commies

and wouldn't know freedom if it slapped them in the face

also fuck Rousseau

and his idiotic idea that man was born free

Hobbes ftw

Well Hobbes’ Leviathan needs to be constrained to prevent despotism.  Trudeau is an unconstrained despot.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Zeitgeist said:

My goodness these young adults are enemies of the state.  Demanding food from a homeless shelter?  What next, vaccine passports?

I didn't bring it up. I'm just correcting deliberate misinformation.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Well Hobbes’ Leviathan needs to be constrained to prevent despotism.  Trudeau is an unconstrained despot.  

true

but Rousseau hates constraints on government

and thinks an unrestrained Leviathan will usher in utopia

as long as the "right" people are in charge of Leviathan

hence the French Revolution going so badly and being extremely illiberal

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted
9 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

There were lots of Nazi flag guys. I saw several myself with swastikas over the maple leaf as they passed through town. Nobody seemed to be chasing them at all.

You're actually going to pretend you don't think he was being sarcastic? But you're not going to elaborate on how you perceive that to be the case? Why do you think he thanked him? Please express your worldview more clearly.

I would have expected him to do whatever you think the truckers should do with uninvited Nazi flag guys.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
6 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Nobody has freedom to spread Covid to other people.  That's what the health restrictions and mandates are all about.  

If that was in anyway true then EVERYONE would have the same restrictions since EVERYONE can spread it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Goddess said:

I would have expected him to do whatever you think the truckers should do with uninvited Nazi flag guys.

Ultimately he did. You just didn't mention that part.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Don't tell me you're another science denier.

you're the science denier

the mandates have nothing to do with science

that's just the pitch to sell to the rubes who don't know science

but want to be seen as pro-science while those who disagree with them are condemned as anti-science to make the rubes feel smarter

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted
Just now, Accountability Now said:

If that was in anyway true then EVERYONE would have the same restrictions since EVERYONE can spread it. 

I'm not sure what you mean by everyone.  The restrictions were targeted where the Covid spread is the most likely to occur.   

Posted
4 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Nobody has freedom to spread Covid to other people.  That's what the health restrictions and mandates are all about.  If you can't agree with the basic premise that freedom has it's limitations maybe you should be living in Alabama or some southern state that more closely aligns with your idea of freedom.  Lots of them hate government, don't trust any authority, and think they should be able to spread Covid to anybody.

You’re talking about enslavement of the population to satisfy the selfishness of hypochondriacs who have unprecedented ample protections: vaccination, masking, antiviral treatment…No, you don’t get to shit all over our Charter rights.  We’ve endured two years of lockdowns and restrictions.  Mental health and businesses destroyed.  Education badly compromised.  Families kept apart.   It’s insane.  If it was ever warranted it most certainly no longer is.  90% of our population is vaccinated.  People have lost jobs because of mandates.

People must accept state-dictated healthcare and show proof to access basic freedoms.  No no no!!!!!!! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...