Jump to content

Trucker's Convoy


West

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

It's pretty hard when the majority of the population is snoring and completely obedient to absolutely anything the  government tells them to do, without any critical thinking or investigation.

Well yes if it takes conscious and critical examination of pretty much anything of importance in our lives every day, no pauses and holidays easy to see how it can be such a tall order. Possibly even unattainable by us as a species.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's another name for the gesundheitspass/pseudovax passport. 

And 3 idiots sitting in cells for it Ha Ha Ha.

It's all over except for the whining which some of you are so good at Ha Ha.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

And 3 idiots sitting in cells for it Ha Ha Ha.

It's all over except for the whining which some of you are so good at Ha Ha.

 

How small, amoral, and bitter does a person have to be in order to feel joy when they see someone sitting in jail just for defending the freedoms of others? 

Not everyone is stupid enough to believe in the Pflacebo now that all the data is out.

Even if the jab is partially effective, and they can put an end to the damaging side-effects, it should still just be a choice. No one should be forced to take it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No one should be forced to take it. 

Notwithstanding the odd child I suppose, no one is being forced to take it if they don't want it. Not one single Canadian has been physically restrained and stabbed with a needle against their will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

How small, amoral, and bitter does a person have to be in order to feel joy when they see someone sitting in jail just for defending the freedoms of others? 

Not everyone is stupid enough to believe in the Pflacebo now that all the data is out.

Even if the jab is partially effective, and they can put an end to the damaging side-effects, it should still just be a choice. No one should be forced to take it. 

Neither small, amoral or bitter, just stating facts.

How small and pitiful you are if they are your martyrs.

The issue is long gone and only those with nothing more in their lives still live in that long gone past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Notwithstanding the odd child I suppose, no one is being forced to take it if they don't want it. Not one single Canadian has been physically restrained and stabbed with a needle against their will.

I get it. You don't understand the definition of the word "force". You can add that to the laundry list of simple, basic facts that are commonly understood by the vast majority of Canadians over 8 but which are over your head.

Still, the fact remains that hundreds of thousands of Canadians were forced to take the Pflacebo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Neither small, amoral or bitter, just stating facts.

How small and pitiful you are if they are your martyrs.

The issue is long gone and only those with nothing more in their lives still live in that long gone past.

FYI you don't "state facts", you post stupid opinions with comments like "hehe" after them. 

That's why I stated that you were small, amoral and bitter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI you don't "state facts", you post stupid opinions with comments like "hehe" after them. 

That's why I stated that you were small, amoral and bitter. 

Nope, facts. 3 fools in Ottawa jail and 3 more fools in Alberta jail.....FACT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I get it. You don't understand the definition of the word "force".

Off course I do, what you stubbornly refuse to get is that context is just as important as the definition of a word, even more so when you insist on applying the harshest context possible - that the force you're talking about is being applied by a totalitarian state.

When you do that and consistently fail to come up by with even a single example of physical restraint being used to forcibly inject vaccine into people you look utterly stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I get it. You don't understand the definition of the word "force". You can add that to the laundry list of simple, basic facts that are commonly understood by the vast majority of Canadians over 8 but which are over your head.

Still, the fact remains that hundreds of thousands of Canadians were forced to take the Pflacebo

Yes and I am one of those. I was told I would be terminated from employment, and no other employer would hire me.

Next the government quickly saw to it that I would be ineligible for EI, despite having paid into it all my life. Also that welfare would be denied. I would lose my home and have to live in a cardboard box under a bridge.

As there were no suitable cardboard boxes, I relented. I had to do it entirely against my better judgement. But now after seeing what transpired I’ve decided there is no way I’m going to take a third shot, come mandate, hell or high water. If they do it, I am ready to descend into that hell, and take you people with me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the vaccine mandates, removal of business licences, freezing of bank accounts, and public humiliation from federal government leaders, we saw a new form of coercion that allowed the state to claim that no one was beaten or forced to follow the government health program.  The government inflicted devastating economic damage on those who didn’t comply.   When thousands of protesters spoke out, the government declared martial law and used totalitarian measures, including physical force, against citizens who would have little legal recourse, especially after the pile-on against them by state-funded mainstream media.

These events taught me that Canadian liberal-democracy isn’t very strong and we’d be freer without a federal government.  Americans have more rights than Canadians.  Having a lower death rate isn’t a virtue if a population is highly controlled or enslaved.  China has a lower death rate than Canada, yet most Canadians wouldn’t want to live there.

I’d like to think that Canadians have learned from these events about the importance of constitutional rights and limited government, but I don’t think they have yet.  The media and public are starting to question asinine totalitarian bureaucracy like the ArriveCan app, but it’s still in place and Trudeau continues to be propped up by the left.

Add our woke-green leader’s assault on Canada as colonial and the imposition of carbon taxes during high energy inflation and you have a population facing a level of pressure that I haven’t seen in my lifetime.

Change can’t come fast enough, yet we likely have at least three more years under these conditions.  Maybe by then most Canadians will be outraged.  Many already are.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Next the government quickly saw to it that I would be ineligible for EI, despite having paid into it all my life. Also that welfare would be denied. I would lose my home and have to live in a cardboard box under a bridge.

Horseshit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, eyeball said:

Off course I do,

You don't understand the meaning of the word, because I used it correctly and you said that the word force would only apply if they were pinned down physically. 

You're just completely unaware of the proper usage of the word.

It's an absolute fact that people were forced to take the vaccine. Losing one's job, especially when they work in a field where they'll never get hired if they're not vaccinated, is not an option. Threatening people with the loss of their jobs absolutely counts as forcing them. 

If you don't get it, pout. Whine, Snivel. Whatever. 

Quote

what you stubbornly refuse to get is that context is just as important as the definition of a word, even more so when you insist on applying the harshest context possible - that the force you're talking about is being applied by a totalitarian state.

What you stubbornly refuse to understand is that not everything is binary. It's not a case of "this is a democracy so everything that happens here is, by definition, democratic and fair in nature."

This is not a completely totalitarian state, but the needle has moved a long way from democratic towards totalitarian. 

Forcing people to take the pseudovax was totalitarian all the way. Hitler would have loved that idea.

Quote

When you do that and consistently fail to come up by with even a single example of physical restraint being used to forcibly inject vaccine into people you look utterly stupid.

Look up the word force ffs.

99% of adults have a thorough understanding of the word, and I already posted it here, yet for some you still don't have a clue what it means. 

If you threaten someone with consequences that they can't accept, in order to get them to do something, that's "forcing" them to do it. 

If Andrew Scheer put a gun to your head and said "Bark like a dog or I'll shoot!", and you decided to bark like a dog because you didn't want to take a chance on getting shot, it would be 100% accurate to say that he forced you to do it. 

I'm not going to use a softer word just because you're too stupid to learn or because you choose to remain ignorant. 

Hundreds of thousands of Canadians were "forced to vaccinate". - correct.

You're confusing that with "forcibly vaccinated" which is a term that means something else entirely. It's a term I never used. Y'all larn up nahhw, boiiii!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You don't understand the meaning of the word...

I understand the different meanings of the word force perfectly.

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

and you said that the word force would only apply if they were pinned down physically. 

What I said is that you don't understand the importance of context.

 

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Look up the word force ffs

I don't have to, I understand it perfectly, you need to bone up on the word context and demonstrate you know how to apply it.

You can't even bring yourself to address the word because you know exactly what I mean. You're just too pig headed stubborn I guess.

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Forcing people to take the pseudovax was totalitarian all the way. Hitler would have loved that idea.

it all depends really

if Hitler surmised that vaccine opposition was destabilizing to the Anglo-American Hegenomy

he might take a position that it was all part & parcel of the Jewish Bolshevik Conspiracy

Herr Hitler was always looking for cracks in the Entente, eager to exploit those to his advantage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was actually disease which incited the Holocaust

the concentration camp prisoners had tuberculosis, it was running rampant in the camps

it was spreading from the prisoners to the guards

and from the guards to the army on the Ostfront

but Hitler's solution was not mass vaccination

instead he directed Heydrich to implement the Final Solution

get rid of the prisoners, all of them, by liquidation

kill the virus at the source

Hitler's final solution to the disease problem, was rat poison

Zyclon-B

wipe all the contaminated people out, start over

then it would just be an Aryan Master Race frolicking in a pristine wilderness

the Nazis were in fact the world's first Green Party

National Socialism was all about the purity of nature vs. the degeneracy of the modern world

Vokswagens upon Autobahns to escape the contamination of the cities

the urban vaccine mandates vs rural social isolation

no doubt the Nazis would have sided with rural isolationism as the solution

the cities themselves, full of Jewish Bolsheviks, was the only threat to them

Nazism is a monomania

you bend all solutions to your preconceived dogma

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I understand the different meanings of the word force perfectly.

What I said is that you don't understand the importance of context.

 

I don't have to, I understand it perfectly, you need to bone up on the word context and demonstrate you know how to apply it.

You can't even bring yourself to address the word because you know exactly what I mean. You're just too pig headed stubborn I guess.

If you know what the word force means then you understand that hundreds of thousands of Canadians were forced to take the pseudovax, period, because that's the exact proper usage of the word force in that context. 

If I said that they were forcibly pseudovaxxed that would be wrong, because there was no physical use of force that I'm aware of. Those peons had the option of financial ruin available to them.

Do you understand the difference between "forced to pseudovax" and "forcibly pseuodvaxxed", eyeball? That's the actual 'context' that you're looking for. And FYI you can look that up too, eyeball. The information is there in front of you, but my guess is that you will continue to wallow in ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

prior to the Nazis however, the Kaisereich was the most progressive empire on earth

defenders of the Jews even, from the Russian polgroms

the world's first welfare state, with full pensions & whatnot

unlike Hitler, Kaiser Bill did not desire to be feared

the grandson of Queen Victoria just wanted to be loved, like his grandmother

so no doubt the Kaiser would have provided a vaccine if available

whatever the masses wanted, so long as they did not want to overthrow the Prussian Crown

and of course, Kaiser Bill despised Hitler

he said of Hitler

"There is a man alone, without family, without children, without God... He builds legions but he doesn't build a nation."

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Horseshit.

https://www.benefitscanada.com/human-resources/hr-law/unvaccinated-employees-may-not-be-eligible-for-ei-feds/

Workers who lose their job over a refusal to vaccinate against the coronavirus may not be eligible for employment insurance benefits, according to updated guidelines from the federal government.”

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

https://www.benefitscanada.com/human-resources/hr-law/unvaccinated-employees-may-not-be-eligible-for-ei-feds/

Workers who lose their job over a refusal to vaccinate against the coronavirus may not be eligible for employment insurance benefits, according to updated guidelines from the federal government.”

The "heroes" who worked on the front lines, back when we all thought that covid might be dangerous to young healthy people, were thrown under the bus when our fuhrer started his vax mandate campaign. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

it was actually disease which incited the Holocaust

the concentration camp prisoners had tuberculosis, it was running rampant in the camps

it was spreading from the prisoners to the guards

and from the guards to the army on the Ostfront

but Hitler's solution was not mass vaccination

instead he directed Heydrich to implement the Final Solution

get rid of the prisoners, all of them, by liquidation

kill the virus at the source

Hitler's final solution to the disease problem, was rat poison

Zyclon-B

wipe all the contaminated people out, start over

then it would just be an Aryan Master Race frolicking in a pristine wilderness

the Nazis were in fact the world's first Green Party

National Socialism was all about the purity of nature vs. the degeneracy of the modern world

Vokswagens upon Autobahns to escape the contamination of the cities

the urban vaccine mandates vs rural social isolation

no doubt the Nazis would have sided with rural isolationism as the solution

the cities themselves, full of Jewish Bolsheviks, was the only threat to them

Nazism is a monomania

you bend all solutions to your preconceived dogma

Jews were portrayed as dirty disease-carriers in the German media already before they engaged their final solution. It was part of the justification for corralling them into camps.

....

As Mr. Trudeau said- 

“They are extremists who don’t believe in science, they’re often misogynists, also often racists,” said Trudeau. “It’s a small group that muscles in, and we have to make a choice in terms of leaders, in terms of the country. Do we tolerate these people?”

Opposition shockingly silent on PM's hatred of unvaccinated Canadians

:o   Jawohl mein herr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,714
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    wopsas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...