OftenWrong
Senior Member-
Posts
10,589 -
Joined
-
Days Won
118
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by OftenWrong
-
The justice according to new and old testament
OftenWrong replied to Gaétan's topic in Religion & Politics
I understand. I did say, we make a model. It is we who learn and grow, and so our understanding of that model changes. -
The justice according to new and old testament
OftenWrong replied to Gaétan's topic in Religion & Politics
Okay. But there is evolution. I believe in it. So wait- things were not made perfect from the ground up? Things need to evolve? And how far can that evolution go. Physically, mentally. Spiritually. Can the creation exceed its creator? I say yes, it's possible. Just as I can learn a new and different pov from a simple child. Because over time, things get corrupted. Somebody or something made that a law of this "reality" you people live in. Don't like it? Who you gonna call? 🤷♂️ -
The justice according to new and old testament
OftenWrong replied to Gaétan's topic in Religion & Politics
Perhaps god is so different that we don't understand it. Perhaps to the point we CANNOT understand it. We make a 'model' of god, and the model changes over time as we evolve and change. The old testament is the angry vengeful god, while the new one rejects that model and presents a newer, more enlightened, more peaceful and tolerant god. Then the Romans evolved this further, developing it into the foundation for western moral and legal thought. Note that the Romans rejected their former god(s), Jupiter et al being warrior-like, in lieu of a new and singular saviour of all mankind. Not just the Jews or the Egyptians, etc. They willingly made the transition from their long established violent past toward a new and modern future. It hints at what god really is. -
The justice according to new and old testament
OftenWrong replied to Gaétan's topic in Religion & Politics
Hence the immortal question... standing at St. Peter's gate... "So when did you stop beating your wife?" -
The justice according to new and old testament
OftenWrong replied to Gaétan's topic in Religion & Politics
Perhaps we are just his flotsam and jetsam. -
There is no need for a win. As long as the war between Ukraine and Russia continues, the US and EU are winning.
-
The Real Reason Trump Loves Putin
OftenWrong replied to robosmith's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Trump loves Putin so much, he bombed his troops. Trump administration confirms the US military killed 'hundreds' of Russians in Syria Trump sent 'strong message' to Iran, Russia and Syria with missile strikes: White House spokesperson And he did it by HIMSELF, do you understand? That is to say, he ordered it to be done with American equipment and military force. NOT by proxy through a buncha washed up Nazi sad-sack Ukrainians. -
Or as in the Mohawk, iennekanandaaa. They would likely prefer that one. Much harder to spell, let alone say it, or sing it in our national anthem. It's not allowed to be re-spelled phonetically. Then you've simply anglicized it again. That way it shows more respect, you see. As is already happening anyway, incrementally, in drips and drabs all over the nation. Winnipeg-proposes-new-indigenous-street-names-but-theyre-too-hard-to-pronounce Edmonton-city-councillor-worries-naming-streets-with-indigenous-words-will-make-them-hard-to-pronounce
-
The many problems with Electric vehicles.
OftenWrong replied to taxme's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That's not the credentials you gave us. You're the troll. Good for you to try and back it up, but those credentials are ancient compared to the climate modelling we rely on today. Not that's it's any better today, just wrong as usual. 1929, they didn't even know about global warming. They were still busy burning fossil fuels and blowing things up. That's the research they were doing back then. -
The many problems with Electric vehicles.
OftenWrong replied to taxme's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
He's an expert on population studies, in other words how to brain-wash you people into being obedient little sheep. Stay in your pen, little fella! Might be coyotes out there... -
The many problems with Electric vehicles.
OftenWrong replied to taxme's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Says 'Center for Population Studies'. Is that where they do research on how to make lemmings all go off a cliff? Because hella yes Watchin you people get taken for a long ride... -
Technically the constant daily exposure to low levels of virus in the environment gives sustained immunity, better than the vaccines that wear out. The immune system reacts within 5 days. We can't develop new vaccines that quickly. Therefore, natural health is best. As wvidences now in my workplace, the younger lads are all bleating and sneezing. Old pappy oftenwrong was there every day. Now Instand resolute. My blood is like serum. - Charleton Heston
-
These vaccine technologies if you will are a dead end. Their efficacy is limited, always was and still is, for these classes of viruses. Hence the paper concludes a new approach is urgently needed. At one point alludes to developing innate immunity, by inhaling a vapour of low amounts of the pathogen. You get it? Like Gramma said, go outside you ldiot and eat a peck of dirt. Or like my pappy used to say, every night you need a little of what kills ya.
-
Of course I read it. I was asking you. Then I said that none of those three points are actually controversial. It's been common knowledge that respiratory viruses evolve too quickly for vaccines to work. Faste than the flu. The war on viruses has been a race to try and pre-empt the next virus, before it mutates again. Antibiotics is the same problem, and we are losing the war. The protozoans will win. Which is what the paper says, but it's not new knowledge. It simply appeals for a new approach to vaccines. As to #3, can the vaccine make it worse, the paper states: it seems likely that respiratory vaccines that fail to elicit robust cell-mediated immunity may be suboptimal for the elderly—but also that vaccines that elicit stronger cell-mediated responses could also increase the risk of immunopathogenic effects. I bolded the relevant part. Immunopathogenic means, an inappropriate immune response to an infection, can cause harm to the host in different ways. If the response is weak, immunopathology could take the form of pathogen proliferation. In other words, the vaccine made you weak. You gonna die.