Jump to content

OftenWrong

Senior Member
  • Posts

    10,589
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    118

Everything posted by OftenWrong

  1. I understand. I did say, we make a model. It is we who learn and grow, and so our understanding of that model changes.
  2. Okay. But there is evolution. I believe in it. So wait- things were not made perfect from the ground up? Things need to evolve? And how far can that evolution go. Physically, mentally. Spiritually. Can the creation exceed its creator? I say yes, it's possible. Just as I can learn a new and different pov from a simple child. Because over time, things get corrupted. Somebody or something made that a law of this "reality" you people live in. Don't like it? Who you gonna call? 🤷‍♂️
  3. So the Jagged meathead singher is not within your perview? "yuk yuk lol" ?
  4. They blew it because they went over-the-top, with their continual baseless accusations and floundering claims, and court cases with fines for hundreds of millions. Ordinary people are like, "Hey wait a minute, this smells like poo-poo."
  5. He is the right person for the job. Makes you wonder why we had to put up with these other douche bags - Smilin' Andy and O'Toole. Oh well I guess, pecking order an' stuff. 🤷‍♂️
  6. Perhaps god is so different that we don't understand it. Perhaps to the point we CANNOT understand it. We make a 'model' of god, and the model changes over time as we evolve and change. The old testament is the angry vengeful god, while the new one rejects that model and presents a newer, more enlightened, more peaceful and tolerant god. Then the Romans evolved this further, developing it into the foundation for western moral and legal thought. Note that the Romans rejected their former god(s), Jupiter et al being warrior-like, in lieu of a new and singular saviour of all mankind. Not just the Jews or the Egyptians, etc. They willingly made the transition from their long established violent past toward a new and modern future. It hints at what god really is.
  7. Hence the immortal question... standing at St. Peter's gate... "So when did you stop beating your wife?"
  8. So he's not ballin' the prosecutor? Well that's an improvement alright. Maybe they'll bring in Page and Strzok for a follow-up session.
  9. Result of a skewed (screwed) justice system- Judge warns of 'tsunami' of offenders faking Indigenous status to get lighter sentences
  10. There is no need for a win. As long as the war between Ukraine and Russia continues, the US and EU are winning.
  11. Trump loves Putin so much, he bombed his troops. Trump administration confirms the US military killed 'hundreds' of Russians in Syria Trump sent 'strong message' to Iran, Russia and Syria with missile strikes: White House spokesperson And he did it by HIMSELF, do you understand? That is to say, he ordered it to be done with American equipment and military force. NOT by proxy through a buncha washed up Nazi sad-sack Ukrainians.
  12. I guess a UNANIMOUS DECISION by the SCOTUS is not good enough for you. Try not to take it so hard. Must not get knickers in bunch.
  13. Or as in the Mohawk, iennekanandaaa. They would likely prefer that one. Much harder to spell, let alone say it, or sing it in our national anthem. It's not allowed to be re-spelled phonetically. Then you've simply anglicized it again. That way it shows more respect, you see. As is already happening anyway, incrementally, in drips and drabs all over the nation. Winnipeg-proposes-new-indigenous-street-names-but-theyre-too-hard-to-pronounce Edmonton-city-councillor-worries-naming-streets-with-indigenous-words-will-make-them-hard-to-pronounce
  14. Do not choke on your porridge, my friend... You need to welcome him back. Don't forget, he's everyone's president. Not just the deplorables...
  15. That's not the credentials you gave us. You're the troll. Good for you to try and back it up, but those credentials are ancient compared to the climate modelling we rely on today. Not that's it's any better today, just wrong as usual. 1929, they didn't even know about global warming. They were still busy burning fossil fuels and blowing things up. That's the research they were doing back then.
  16. Because the establishment/ deep state despises, and fears, Donald Trump's return. They tried to exile him to Elba, but somehow he has escaped and is back. And this time with even more power... Gonna be a dictator just for one day...
  17. He's an expert on population studies, in other words how to brain-wash you people into being obedient little sheep. Stay in your pen, little fella! Might be coyotes out there...
  18. Says 'Center for Population Studies'. Is that where they do research on how to make lemmings all go off a cliff? Because hella yes Watchin you people get taken for a long ride...
  19. Well covids still out there, so you are in the party now in a way. The trick is to get just a little bit, but every day. Anyway whether you agree or not, it is these issues and the associated politicing that make people distrust government-appointed health advisors.
  20. Technically the constant daily exposure to low levels of virus in the environment gives sustained immunity, better than the vaccines that wear out. The immune system reacts within 5 days. We can't develop new vaccines that quickly. Therefore, natural health is best. As wvidences now in my workplace, the younger lads are all bleating and sneezing. Old pappy oftenwrong was there every day. Now Instand resolute. My blood is like serum. - Charleton Heston
  21. These vaccine technologies if you will are a dead end. Their efficacy is limited, always was and still is, for these classes of viruses. Hence the paper concludes a new approach is urgently needed. At one point alludes to developing innate immunity, by inhaling a vapour of low amounts of the pathogen. You get it? Like Gramma said, go outside you ldiot and eat a peck of dirt. Or like my pappy used to say, every night you need a little of what kills ya.
  22. Of course I read it. I was asking you. Then I said that none of those three points are actually controversial. It's been common knowledge that respiratory viruses evolve too quickly for vaccines to work. Faste than the flu. The war on viruses has been a race to try and pre-empt the next virus, before it mutates again. Antibiotics is the same problem, and we are losing the war. The protozoans will win. Which is what the paper says, but it's not new knowledge. It simply appeals for a new approach to vaccines. As to #3, can the vaccine make it worse, the paper states: it seems likely that respiratory vaccines that fail to elicit robust cell-mediated immunity may be suboptimal for the elderly—but also that vaccines that elicit stronger cell-mediated responses could also increase the risk of immunopathogenic effects. I bolded the relevant part. Immunopathogenic means, an inappropriate immune response to an infection, can cause harm to the host in different ways. If the response is weak, immunopathology could take the form of pathogen proliferation. In other words, the vaccine made you weak. You gonna die.
×
×
  • Create New...