What improvements would you like to see in this discussion forum?

[?Impact]

Since Greg is updating the forum, I have a request.

Can you modify the "Edited by" coding so that it only shows up after someone else has already replied to the thread? When you click submit and then notice typos or you want to clarify language, it shouldn't display the "edited by" message when no one has even replied the post yet. If you can't do it this way, at least have a timer where it doesn't come up unless the post has been edited more than two minutes later or something.

Yes, we all notice small problems after posting and jump back in to edit. The important point is the time-stamp on the edited by. Note that it is not just someone replying, but someone reading your message that is important. If the system knows for sure that nobody has read it then I agree that getting rid of the edited by makes sense, but I don't know the internals of the software to say if that is tracked.

[Altai]

You could add more forum sections. For example I wanted to share my make up videos but I could not find the related section for it and gave up.

Thé name of the forum is also a bit difficult to read and therefore difficult to remember. I often find it difficult to remember and use google seach history to join.

If I was you, I would open new topics everyday directly related with actual World politics and other actual news related with science or daily life for example.

I would close the chat section because chatting will cauae people's need to talk to reach at the saturation point.

If I was you, I would not allow any post related with users. We are here to talk about topics, not users.

You should use google ads and social media to make advertisement of the forum.

Edited September 14, 2016 by Altai

[cybercoma]

Yes, we all notice small problems after posting and jump back in to edit. The important point is the time-stamp on the edited by. Note that it is not just someone replying, but someone reading your message that is important. If the system knows for sure that nobody has read it then I agree that getting rid of the edited by makes sense, but I don't know the internals of the software to say if that is tracked.

I've figured out a way around it with the new setup. If I type a new post in the comment box, it will add my comment to the previous post as long as no one has added anything to the thread yet. It doesn't show that the post was edited either. So from now on, when I have something to add, I won't edit. I'll just type a new post and it will automatically consolidate things.

[BC_chick]

Doesn't it add the new post to the old post?

test

Yeah it adds to the post.

[WestCoastRunner]

Since more and more folks are using devices with smaller screens can a consistent and easy to read font be applied to all posts?  

[Charles Anthony]

Expanded member profile display for friends. 

[The_Squid]

Here’s a novel concept for improvement:

get rid of white supremacist posters and links to white supremacist websites.  

[Altai]

On 16.01.2014 at 7:47 PM, Greg said:

I'd like to have a sincere discussion about what type of improvements we can make to the MLW forums. I want to attract more members, and I think the best way to do that is to appeal to the existing membership for ideas and opinions on what we could do to make this forum the best in class.

I'm not just interested in new forum features, but modifications to existing forum features. This is an open thread, so lets hear from everyone, but PLEASE keep it on topic. The sky is the limit, I'm interested in all suggestions.

- No trolls
- Active moderators
- Fresh topics everyday



You can examine the forums with high number of members and note what they are doing. 

[OftenWrong]

I would like to see the ability to give negative reps. I think they would be useful, not as "revenge' but to indicate when a post is considered unacceptable for the forum. One example of what I mean is when we get a new forum member come on here and posts something that is purposely inflammatory. New posters should never be allowed to do this, in my opinion the rules should be more strictly enforced at the beginning.

If forum members can give it negative reps, it helps to set the tone for the forum, and this could be useful for other potential new members, who might then be more willing to join and participate.

I suspect there is a persistent troll or trolls who come here in the guise of new members, then post something extremely right or left wing because they want to make the forum appear to be a shithole. I use the term shithole figuratively. If other members can give these posts a negative rep, and preferably if there is a bi-partisan repudiation of the post, it indicates that we don't encourage this kind of discussion. This is somewhat better than simply ignoring. When a post such as this is made, ignoring it simply leaves it up on the board with no rebuttal. I think that makes the forum look bad. Just my 2 cents, keep up the good work.

[scribblet]

They had negative reps. although fewer than the positive, but removed them because of complaints.   I would suggest that new posters not be able to give out reps for say 3 months.

[OftenWrong]

19 minutes ago, scribblet said:

They had negative reps. although fewer than the positive, but removed them because of complaints.   I would suggest that new posters not be able to give out reps for say 3 months.

I don't recall hearing complaints, but then I don't quite read everything. I do recall "We are still experimenting".

Allowing members to give out negative reps is somewhat like giving us the ability to moderate one another. It is only symbolic, but might help to establish a baseline of acceptable forum behaviour promoted by the members themselves.

To be clear, I meant new posters should be closely scrutinized by the moderator and not permitted to make posts full of inflammatory rhetoric, even if the post was not reported by another member. Especially if it's a thread, because that creates the all-important headline. It only makes the forum look bad. For this reason some forums have a probationary period during which new members cannot start new threads, until they have posted a number of times. Others have similar restriction but use the moderator to decide if the new thread should be allowed, until they reach a certain threshold. This helps build trust that the new person is not a troll coming here to sabotage the forum.

So I suggest the following:
1) Allow negative reps.
2) New members cannot start new threads unless they reach a certain minimum post count, OR, new members threads are allowed but must be approved by the moderator. The minimum post count for the probationary period can be a fairly low, say 10 or 20. They get a message saying "You cannot make new threads during the probationary period until they are approved by a moderator. Your thread is being reviewed." etc
3) Any member who registers, posts a few things and does not return for a very long time, then suddenly reappears to make long inflammatory posts should go back on "probation" as in (2). It's is very likely "The Troll".

The troll wants to make this site look like a forum full of extremists and nut jobs, in order to convince others not to post here. My suggestions are an attempt to put a stop to this.

[Argus]

We need a new Canada General topic for all the things that might be going on in Canada which aren't strictly political and don't fit elsewhere.

[Charles Anthony]

^  Good idea.  I have brought this to Greg's attention. 

[Charles Anthony]

Off-Topic Posts (Visible/Hidden) feature 

 

Spoiled - Off-Topic Posts (Visible/Hidden)

Off-topic thread derailment posts would be hidden from public view but could be made visible to members who chose to see them.  Members could flag their own derailment as a courtesy to everybody else.  

[Greg]

Off-Topic Posts (Visible/Hidden) feature - can you be more specific? how would this feature be any different than what you've done above with existing features...?

[Charles Anthony]

51 minutes ago, Greg said:

how would this feature be any different than what you've done above with existing features...?

What I did above hides a selection of the post.  

This hypothetical feature would deal with entire posts that are flagged Off-Topic and hidden for that reason.  Members would be able to see such Off-Topic posts -- say, by activating an extra feature in their profile settings.  

Members who do not want to see off-topic posts would not see a difference.  

 

This is may be more of a feature suggestion for the Invision software.  

[Guest ProudConservative]

We need a spell checker! I hate sounding so stupid all the time

[Greg]

On 11/24/2019 at 11:15 AM, ProudConservative said:

spell checker!

Your browser should handle that functionality...

[Charles Anthony]

If possible, de-activation of the auto-quote feature would be good.  Quoting the entirety of a previous post should not be the default in a reply editor window.  

 

Here are some ideas presented by members of a different forum: 

Collabsible quotes? -- Electric Unicycle Forum

[Argus]

23 hours ago, Charles Anthony said:

If possible, de-activation of the auto-quote feature would be good.  Quoting the entirety of a previous post should not be the default in a reply editor window.  

Here are some ideas presented by members of a different forum: 

Collabsible quotes? -- Electric Unicycle Forum

Didn't seem to be 'some ideas'. Seemed to be all about quotes. I always split longer posts up, delete what I'm not replying to, and only retain the pertinent pieces. I don't know why others don't as it's convenient even for the other guy who has to then reply to me.

You could keep it simple and put in a hack that says your quoted text can't be longer than your response...

[eyeball]

On 2/20/2020 at 4:43 PM, Argus said:

I always split longer posts up, delete what I'm not replying to, and only retain the pertinent pieces. I don't know why others don't as it's convenient even for the other guy who has to then reply to me.

No kidding.  Doing this should preclude most attempts by doofuses who inject constant deflections, strawmen, whataboudisms and disingenuous nonsense into a thread as well but...  If there's anything a moderator or panel thereof could be doing to clean this place up is to make debating adhere more to the sort of rules that judges and moderators use in more formal matches.  The pitbull ring is fun I suppose and let's face it the quality of discourse out in the real world really isn't much better so it is what it is I guess.

[Greg]

On 11/27/2022 at 11:19 AM, Contrarian said:

- on the right side there is the block "New Topics", is it possible to add another block called "New Posts" after it -> to track new posts made all across the forum? It will increase visibility to other people's posts in different older threads. 

There are too many daily posts to make this a good idea.

There is already a feature that provides this functionality, it's available under the Activity tab:

https://repolitics.com/forums/discover/

You can adjust that stream or make a new one, which would contain whatever you want to see.

On 11/27/2022 at 11:19 AM, Contrarian said:

- if possible when copying something from an outside website and pasting it here to just bring the basic text, not the format. Is better for reading. That prompt with "Paste as plain text" does not always work.  

Not really, as copying and pasting isn't something that the forum software can manipulate. Copy and past functionality is a OS and or browser dependent function.  Maybe look for an extension that provides what you want in your browsers extension library.

[OftenWrong]

Is it possible to add a feature that lets you mark threads as "favourite threads"? Or better yet, mark others as un-favourite threads, like a flag indicating "block thread". Then allow a filter that selects to either show all the threads, or filtered out ones. That would reduce a lot of clutter and make for a more enjoyable browsing experience, imo.

Edited June 15, 2023 by OftenWrong

[ExFlyer]

I would like to see Admins just enforcing the rules like

No Trolling/Flaming  and

No Personal Attacks and

Insults - Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them.

Forum Moderation
 
These forums are not a free-for-all discussion area. Repolitics.com operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion.

 

[ExFlyer]

9 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

• The accuracy of online user numbers is uncertain, but platforms with over 200 users and growing require moderators is a change of opinion I am having. Yes, that one that does not create any threads and complains a lot has a point on that, one @Moonbox.
•  @Greg, this is just my opinion, I know is hard hence why I am not starting a forum on my platform, I don't want to moderate and deal with it, but folks in your growing platform might want to take this responsibility. Folks with years, that want to give back. 
• Having two moderators from opposite factions can encourage meaningful exchanges and discourage trolling.
• The focus is on the potential impact of the platform. The concern is how many out of the 200 users are not registering and participating.
• While acknowledging personal issues, taking a short break could benefit users if someone consistently violates simple rules.
• A cooling-off period of 1-2 days could be implemented to enforce and appreciate these rules. Even myself, if I come here on the whiskey and start putting up a circus in the future, even though one @Iceni warrior set me proper, I would welcome a 1-day break, why not? Maybe when I will come back, I would learn to keep my keyboard-less active. 
• If no implementation happens, there is also the option to go parallel with some folks and focus on exchanges with people that is mutually beneficial for the good of the platform. I think if more of us would do just that, focus on ideas amongst those who are willing to participate the level of discussion will improve too. I am not saying to use the ignore function, just exchange when it benefits you and the other person. Win-Win. 
  
  

I am not sure what that has to do with me answering the topic question of "What Improvements Would You Like To See In This Discussion Forum"?

I said I would like to see improvement by the Admins enforcing the existing rules.

There is one individual that does nothing but insult, argue and call everyone liars. I have been told they are regularly reported but are still there.