The_Squid

A right wing blogger says he lied...

A billion dollars worth of business for Canada from the Trudeau India trip. Conservatives everywhere must be ecstatic! Oh wait.... Trudeau... must hate.

a and b set out the punishments if you're fund guilty. It clearly says an attempt at theft is illegal. Come on ?Impact... you also need to quit while you're behind. If you don't understand the Criminal Code, then maybe this will help:

Here is one of them on the witness standing telling the court he was a thief. So.... you still don't think they were thieves? What point did you counter? You said they could be charged with manslaughter... I gave you actual citations to show that this was not the case. Clearly, you didn't know what you were talking about. And now you come back with some other assertion with nothing to back it up. Criminal negligence is also covered under Homicide in the Criminal Code, so this also wouldn't be an option due to the same section of the Constitution. You are simply talking out your ass.

You've shown that you already don't know anything about what he can and can't be charged with after this verdict. Quit while you're behind.

what if one of them admitted under oath at the trial to stealing ? Would you call them thieves then?

So breaking into a vehicle on the other property was what....? Starting an ATV that isn't yours on their property is .... what?

No, you're very wrong. He can't be retried for the same case, even if it's a lesser charge. Manslaughter is implicit in the murder charge.

Details are ambiguous all over this case... Why do you think they were there?

Committing crimes while armed are definitely more serious than not. Theft can be an indictable offence. Doing so with a firearm carries a minimum sentence of an additional year, if memory serves... On the subject of whether they intended on stealing, it seems very clear that they were in the act of stealing and had already tried to steal a vehicle elsewhere. I'm not sure where you guys are getting your facts.... are you just making them up?

No, he can't. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/charter-charte/check/art11h.html

I didn’t say anything about being toppled by the wind, although it doesn’t meet current standards for wind or earthquake resistance. It is past due for replacement, so why not replace it? are you an engineer? How much do you know about bridges? What does a DC3 have to do wth this bridge?