Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/17/2022 in all areas

  1. Sounds like I just told the truth about the Dems/CNN and some people are still in denial. Dolts: "But, but, but, Brionna was shot for sleeping black. M Brown was a gentle giant. The riots, assaults, murders and arson were mostly peaceful. Sandamn did taunt that native man racistly. Smollett was a victim. It's not a big deal that the FBI and Hillary's lawyer lied to the FISA court and presented false evidence. Joe Biden actually didn't know that Hunter was working at Burisma. And then when he admitted that he did know, it was just a beautiful moment of truth. You're a poopy head WestCanMan!" Is that basically where you were going there Beavey?
    2 points
  2. True but judging everyone by the extremists in their number is a good part of what is wrong with the world these days. It certainly is in today's political climate.
    2 points
  3. Our society has a disturbing obsession with sex. It's not just the lgbtq though they certainly have some disturbing stuff at their rallies ie Aguilera wearing a giant strap on to a "family friendly" event
    2 points
  4. Thank you for that. I have spent a lot of time investigating. Mostly I do it because I find it fascinating, but it is also frustrating posting things here. Example: I have followed Dr. Peter McCullough from the beginning, as he was actually working on the front lines with covid patients. I also knew him from reading medical journals - he was very well-published and respected until he started talking about his successes in dealing with covid. I was shocked and utterly dismayed when Dialamah posted information from his freshly scrubbed Wiki page - all his accomplishments and publishing was GONE and in its place was - he was a religious zealot, crackpot, don't listen to him. This same tactic has been done to every single scientist and doctor who has questioned the vaccines and protocols. Previously highly respected people in their fields are now pariahs without jobs. Anyways, another interesting thing I was just reading about - originally we were told that covid came from a bat, a pangolin or a snake - eventually they settled on the bat thing coming from the Wuhan wet market. What I was reading was that some scientists have questioned that from the beginning and believe it came from a venomous snake in China (dang, it starts with "C" and I can't think of the name now because I had never heard of it before.) There are elements of the DNA of this snake in the covid virus. Now, the interesting part was....you know how people who got covid said they lost their sense of taste and smell? When you suck the venom out of a snake-bite victim, you can lose your sense of taste and smell for up to 6 months. It's a thing with snake venom. Also interesting - snake anti-venom contains nicotine because the nicotine encapsulates the enzymes of the venom and assists in neutralizing the venom. The article/study pointed out how everyone expected smokers to get hit the hardest by covid, but that never happened and there were studies that came out and were quickly quashed that showed smokers were actually getting covid LESS than non-smokers. Speculated that the nicotine in cigarettes was a bit of a protection against covid as the nicotine would neutralize the enzymes created in the body by the virus. (KK, to be clear, I am NOT saying everyone should take up smoking to prevent covid, I'm just saying what the study speculated on.) Anyway, highly fascinating stuff if you have the patience and a bit of medical knowledge to read through some of the studies being done. Also, if you get covid, I highly recommend following Dr. McCullough's early treatment protocols. I know people (jabbed and unjabbed) who used it and were fine in hours and days.
    2 points
  5. Oh and you've never jaywalked before or went over the speed limit. (Wait...scratch that last one. Not sure you can break the speed limit on a bicycle. Maybe in Beaveworld.) In the circles Dinesh travels in - Democrat, corporate and Republican - slipping your buddy a few extra bucks for his or her campaign is like jay walking or breaking the speed limit. D'Souza is persona non-grata, enemy of the state though. They'd get him for jay walking too if they could. If you can impeach Trump or charge Flynn for the Mickey Mouse crap they did they could probably find a law to charge the Zuckerbergs for their election scam but let's face it, in Biden's "deep state" nobody's looking into it.
    2 points
  6. So the leftist Attorney General apparently rang up a 100k catering bill aboard an airplane to the UAE. This while we just announced here in Saskatchewan that they'll be cutting school lunch programs for underprivileged children. https://nationalpost.com/news/gov-gen-guests-rack-up-100k-in-flight-catering-bill-during-dubai-trip Why do we even pay for this nonsense anyway?
    1 point
  7. That's a total lie. When those guys debate they answer questions directly, and with facts, they don't change the subject and recite known lies and BS. You'd be in awe, like a caveman watching a jumbo jet taking off.
    1 point
  8. $400K was raised for Dr. Simone Gold's legal defense fund then she did a plea deal for her part on Jan 6, which got her 60 days in jail for a misdemeanor. Pretty sweet pay check for two months of your time. PT Barnum was right.
    1 point
  9. As yesterday's testimony shows, the Traitor's closest aids knew there was no way Pence could just toss out the Electoral Votes. There is no provision in the U.S. Constitution for a thing to happen. The Traitor cannot handle losing the election, and that is all that is. He cannot accept he is a LOSER. Here is something that Cons need to remember and must never forget. When the Traitor called both the Governor of Georgia and the Secretary of State of Georgia to pressure them to find votes the Traitor could claim he won that State, well guess what sports fans.....both the Governor Brian Kemp and Secretary Brad Raffensperger taped those calls. And before the Cons to howl at the moon about such taping being illegal....no. Both the City of Washington, D.C. (Where the calls originated) and the State Georgia (Where the calls were received) have laws in place that allow for the tape of phones as long one party informs the other. Both Kemp and Raffensperger did inform the Traitor that the calls were being taped. In fact as Raffensperger did inform the Traitor that not only was the call being taped, but the Chief Legal Counsel for the Secretary of State's Office was in the office at the time the call was accepted and Raffensperger told the Traitor the call was being taped and the Chief Legal Counsel were present and the Traitor had no problem with the taping or the presence the Chief Counsel. What the Traitor was telling them to committ Election Fraud. Those phone calls are admissible. There was never.....REPEAT.....NEVER a path forward to victory for the Traitor. He LOST and he knows he LOST. He LOST the Popular Vote Twice. He LOST THE ELECTORAL VOTE.. The Traitor is the one thing he accuses his political enemies of being, A FRACKING LOSER!!!!!
    1 point
  10. In today's world of information there is little to be trusted, including what we once thought were our most esteemed and trustworthy "professional" organizations. So when it comes to "research", pick your poison. Me, I don't even need research. I surely don't need some spoon-fed college boy to tell me his theories. I use a little old thing called intelligense. The mad dash to inject with a completely novel technology, en-masse, raises alarms in those of us who know how easy it is to make mistakes or to have a cover-up. It's not even a matter of knowing science. It just depends on a very simple, fundamental question. Do you trust the government to run your life. ... Funny how you people like to smear mud all over one another. Yes, I like to watch that.
    1 point
  11. I think it’s very important that the discretion of parents’ beliefs is respected by government for the raising of children. I say that whether you are a Muslim, atheist, Christian, Jewish or any other kind of parent. What matters here is that on the fundamentals such as morality, faith, political beliefs, etc., the state must never be able to violate the beliefs of parents. Once the state disrespects parents’ views and imposes views or participation on children, we are removing the ability of parents to raise their kids in accordance with their values. Such things happen in the worst kinds of dictatorships.
    1 point
  12. So you don't believe parents have a right and a sacred responsibility to raise their children in the right way? There is a wrong way, actually many wrong ways and a right way. The broad way is wide and leads to destruction (and hell). The right way is narrow and few there be that find it. There is such a thing as parents and parental authority. Is that alien to you?
    1 point
  13. How about 'I don't want one'? Gas prices are high by design. It sickening
    1 point
  14. Hard to face what the political agenda that you support has reaped: - identity confusion - drug abuse - totalitarian restrictions and mandates - loss of community - depression and anxiety - lower living standards - hyperinflation Keep pretending that all is for the better.
    1 point
  15. Daily expense totals should have a limit, not unlike many private corporations. Receipts and guest names/business should be detailed and scrutinized.
    1 point
  16. Would you pit Biden, AOC, Maxine Watters, Adam Schiff, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders(the brightest minds in the Democratic party🙄) or any Democrat you care to name against the likes of Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk or Dinesh D'Souza? Are you kidding? There are actually some Youtube videos of real debates with some of the above mentioned conservatives and typically the lefty get's his/her/whatever gender pronoun handed back to them on a platter. Ben Shapiro did make a generous offer of $10,000 to a charity of AOC's choice if she would debate him but she did not respond. She did not want to leave her safe space and be exposed for being out of her depth. Charlie Kirk debates all the time and so does D'Souza. Taking questions from lefties and making them look foolish. And I would also point out that they do so in a civil manner without resorting to expletives and name calling. Does that sound familiar?
    1 point
  17. But even with cameras filming the same box why does the mule footage only appear once? They accuse the woman with gloves and mask of hitting the same box “dozens of times” according to her phone data yet for her everyone else the camera only shows them there once? If some nefarious conspirator went in to delete mule footage from the archives why didn’t he delete all their footage instead of leaving footage of exactly one drop for each of them?
    1 point
  18. Well, from what i am hearing on FOX NEWS these days, BiDumb's numbers are falling like a rock sinking to the bottom of an ocean every day. Even blacks and Hispanics have had enough of his antics, lies and bullshit. Many are now moving over to the Republican camp. It is going to be a wipe out for the demonrats come the midterms. Yahoo cowboy! This J6 hearing fiasco is the demonrats last chance to try and convince and get as many buffoons out there as they can to vote for them in the midterms. Sadly, for them, their ratings for their insurrection side show trial are very low. Hardly anybody is watching the trial show. Only buffoons, and idiots, and lefty stupid liberals are watching and hoping that they can nail Trump's ass to the wall. They just keep on trying, and trying, and trying but to no avail. Losers indeed. 😆
    1 point
  19. Did you omit by chance that the people in the demonrat party have also committed acts of crimes that did get caught for their criminal behaviours and actions? You seem to like to always point out as to what conservatives do wrong all the time, but why don't you even things out here, and show and talk about some of the many not so nice but naughty things that demonrats have done? Well? Come on, man. 🙃
    1 point
  20. Oh and another thing I keep forgetting to mention. I heard D'Souza mention it in an interview. Not sure, but I think it may have been posted here. It's the one where he replies to Ben Shapiro, I think. He says the reason you can't follow the mules box to box with video is CCTV is only targeted on some boxes. He believes they all should have it but they don't.
    1 point
  21. I've known Beave longer than the rest of you, so I'll back him up on this one. He's no troll. He actually believes every bit of nonsense he peddles no matter how much facts get in the way of his feelings. But you've got to understand he's coming from a different reality than the rest of us. I call it "Beaveworld." In Beave world what you'd like to believe is what is. Except this is the criteria True the Vote used before labeling somebody a mule: "Visit 10 or more drop boxesVisit 5 or more visits to an NGOVisit one of the geofenced drop boxes"
    1 point
  22. One of them (Dinesh) made a conscious decision to be a criminal and break the law and the other (Zuckerberg) chose to obey the law. That’s the difference that matters here. Zuckerberg obeyed the law and everything he sod was perfectly legal. It doesn’t mean I thinks its a fine law or that massive donations should be legal, but its the law Republicans especially fought for.
    1 point
  23. Sounds lie @WestCanMan has fallen so far down his conspiracy hole he thinks his crackpot minority opinion is actually held by the majority of people.
    1 point
  24. Could the beaver be a lefty liberal troll by chance? Just wondering about that? 🤔
    1 point
  25. Proportional Representation, PR, is not an improvement and it is not democratic. People who advocate for PR definitely do not understand what it means. What it does though is it deprives ridings (electoral districts) from having the candidate with the most votes be their representative. This is not democracy. PR allows political parties, not the voters, choose a certain number of candidates. Each party gets to choose a certain number of candidates depending on the percentage of total votes they receive. But those candidates are not elected by any particular riding. They are the anointed favourites of a political party. So these hand-picked, unelected members of Parliament are not responsible to any particular riding because they were not chosen by a riding. The result of this is democracy is subverted by taken over by political parties. People lose direct control of the electoral process. You also end up with more MPs from tiny fringe or small political parties because they are given MPs according to the percentage of the total national vote even though they could not elect any candidates in any ridings. This is a gross subversion of the established democratic system. It also means there will be fewer MPs elected in the governing party most of time and increases the chances that there will be no majority government. That means the government is weakened greatly and unable to get important things done especially in times of crisis. You could end up with mostly minority governments because there would be far more MPs who were not elected by a riding, but are hand-picked by the small political parties. That means likely more governments will be defeated in Parliament and more elections as the endless cycle of elections is repeated more frequently. The people lose their rights to choose the candidate for their riding and some hand picked elites of other political parties are appointed to be MPs.
    1 point
  26. Things change. Many churches now recognize gay and lesbian clergy.
    1 point
  27. it has been seen FPTP doesn’t prevent anyone from voting for alternatives if they were going to vote for alternatives they'd already be doing it they don't because they don't want alternatives
    1 point
  28. the same reason they don't vote for any real alternatives now Canadians don't want real alternatives they are happy with the status quo they like dull and dusty not cool, modern and exciting you are projecting on the electorate they don't think like you do you expect Canadians to react as you would to PR which is ridiculous are you really so oblivious as to think your political views are shared by most Canadians? get real, bro
    1 point
  29. That would be a tremendous uphill battle for them - just look at the Greens. The system is so skewed and hopelessly outdated that virtually any change would be better than the status quo. And again in a system that deliberately throws away so much of the vote, we shouldn't use the same word for very different entities. For a Lib/NDP coalition to reach a majority in PR would be a serious feat. But in FPTP, you first skew the popular vote in a major way, and then create this quasi-coalition. These numbers don't reflect and cannot reflect the reality of the country, and further, it's entirely deliberate, suits the default players to maintain the grip on power. Of course with tacit complacency of the populace.
    1 point
  30. Once again another gem from Mark Dice. There have been enormous changes for Americans since Biden took office. Let's see: record high gas prices and inflation, the Taliban controls Afghanistan, Putin has chosen to take military action and China may soon follow suit. Crime is rising particularly in Democratic run cities. Southern border is wide open, hundreds of thousands of illegals streaming across monthly along with fentanyl. Schools are being overrun with drag queens. A recession is coming. Is any of this not factual?
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...