Leaderboard

Just curious but...can Canada defend itself? Not really eh? And...why should Canada be trusted, if we dont live up to our agreements? NATO is falling apart. Something that should have happened decades ago. The biggest threat to Canastan is Libbie immigration and over-regulation.

A lot.of judges in this country are ideological trash.

One thing I've noticed is the lefties have ZERO sense of humor. Post anything that puts the left in a humorous light and they all go into "attack mode" immediately.

Rewriting history is very marxist.

Man, the bigots and atheists hate it when you start talking about the clear Christian roots our nation was founded on. The topic presented here wasn’t that the Constitution says God, mentions the Bible, or that the legal framework clearly says anything about Jesus… or any of the other strawman arguments being made by the usual suspects.

It's not hedonic freedom that people need, it's a purpose. A frame work of moral and ethical constraint in which to organize their beliefs and action. There is nothing about sexual freedom that isn't hedonic. Sex without the responsibililty of bringing forth another life is no different than narcotics. Liberal society have fallen into the worship of the golden calf through peddling rights as if rights alone are inherently valued. The civil rights movement was fundamentally based on christian belief against tyranny but not against worship. It's not let my people go. Let my people go, so that they may worship in the wilderness. Liberal society devolve without the foundational faith that created it.

Why the MAGA Cult is Obsessed with Obama tldw: Obama destroys their bigotry of pretending blacks are inferior. Like one of my black frat brothers who got straight As at Illinois Tech.

It can't come soon enough.

Isn't that the tagline of Trumpstein Airways?

Everything you wrote there was stupid.

The joowish space lazers would probably burn it up, right Gaetan?

Alberta separatists vow to appeal petition denial as soon as US State Department tells them how

Clickbait for starving trappersnappers.

1. I dont care, PeeWee. Nor do I know if that's even true. So I'll check... OOPS... "In God We Trust" is the official motto of the United States and was first added to coins in 1864. It became mandatory on all U.S. currency following a law passed in 1955." Id1ot... 2. See point #1.

You already proved nicely you have no idea what science is (other than what google can teach you in 2 minutes). And you also have shown you're unable to produce any actual science on the subect. But we all appreciate you showing up, it's nice to start the week with a laugh

Well, that's a weird take. In the post to which you are replying I rather definitively refuted your comically absurd claim that (non-president) Washington issued a proclamation for a national day of prayer (before there was a nation) in May of 1776. I'm glad you've caught up to the correct decade for a Washington proclamation (you're welcome) but you'd have to actually make a cogent point to expect a refutation. WTF is your point? That the US is a Christian nation? It isn't, and was rendered deliberately so in the language of the constitution. Virtually every other government up to that point been predicated on divine right to rule. This was a government by and for the people. Yes, some of the founders were religious. But they deliberately restrained themselves from creating a religious government, because the endorsement of one is the exclusion of the others. It's secular for a reason, and to the benefit of every free person under the flag.

If Iran was Venezuela and it was as simple as removing the supreme leadership, then it would’ve been a safer bet. Consulting allies would’ve helped both to ensure that other countries could help keep the strait open and to give the US greater moral leverage in that part of the world. As it stands, there’s no removal of the regime and the strait remains under Iranian control. Clearly there’s no support for a ground invasion, so all we really got for this gambit is a cut in the oil supply, costlier shipping, and much higher gas prices. I understand that no one has a crystal ball, but this situation doesn’t achieve the goals you mentioned, nor is it an assurance that Iran will stop trying to make weapons grade nukes.

This is true. A Libbie is compelled by his/her affliction, to do everything in their power, to destroy Christianity. Just stop a second and think about the state of affairs in "the Christian world". West Europe has been flooded with Muslims. People who have nothing but disdain for us. The US and Canastan followed suit. These are people who have attacked Europe countless times. So why let them in our world en masse? The answer is rather obvious...no? I have no love for Christianity. But I am wise enough to recognize that it and common racial ancestry are the glue the should be holding "The Western World" together. And Libbies are intent on dissolving that cultural glue. Hence...they are traitors.

It doesn't really work in the current age though. It's either inflammatory anti-woke, or anti-trump. I don't laugh at any of it. To add: there's too much entertainment and not enough serious thought in the public sphere.

Giggle... Unfortunately...no matter how much you muddy him up...he just eats it up. Worms do that ya know.

You have not refuted a single point and are lost when it comes to what this day was all about. It was a day of prayer and repentance in remembrance to the May 1776 proclamation as they drafted the declaration of Independence (America's 250 is this year and just one of the events). The context to the 1776 proclamation being prayer and Christianity. Here's more for you from the link I posted The same week Congress passed the Bill of Rights, President George Washington declared, October 3, 1789: “It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the Providence of Almighty God, to obey His will...and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me ‘to recommend to the People of the United States a Day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness’..."

I can see that now. My apologies. Carry on then. 🙂

I'd argue the opposite. Comedy and satire should focus heavily on politics, and people should learn to stop being such fragile little buttercups over it.

Has anything on this scale ever occurred before in US history?

The Premier of Quebec should not obtain a war bank for the province, because in the event of a conflict our adversaries would target it with a nuclear strike to burn the vaults full of money — and the population of Montreal would be wiped out. She should promote peace instead of trying to profit from wars like Mark Carney.

Well after that spurious remark... here's the gist... The Operation: Individuals known for vigorously defending Canada's first Prime Minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, and for questioning established residential school narratives were contacted by a fictitious company (using names like "Heritage Figures Canada" or "Forge Media"). The targets were initially told they were participating in a documentary or commercial shoot meant to "reclaim the legacy" of Macdonald. The "Gotcha": After an initial, seemingly friendly interview about Macdonald, the production team conducted a second filmed session where they revealed the premise was fake and openly mocked or challenged the interviewees' views in a Borat-style sting operation. The Targets: High-profile targets targeted by the pranksters included author and commentator Lindsay Shepherd, former professor Frances Widdowson, and Conservative MP Aaron Gunn. The Backlash: The use of a public broadcaster (alongside APTN) to conduct these sting operations sparked intense outrage and debate. Conservative MPs publicly condemned the use of taxpayer dollars to mock and humiliate private citizens. Current Status: The CBC has confirmed its involvement in the entertainment project, with spokespeople defending it as a long-established television format and satirical prank show. However, Conservative politicians have actively demanded formal investigations and accountability from the CBC regarding the ethics of the program. Now you pick a topic title that doesn't offend the fairy feelings.

So what? Christianity is not mentioned in the US Constitution. The document contains no references to Jesus, the Bible, or God, and it is considered a strictly secular framework for government. [1, 2] The only references to religion in the text are found in two specific provisions designed to protect freedom of conscience: Article VI, Clause 3: Prohibits any "religious Test" as a qualification for holding any public office or public trust in the United States. The First Amendment: Ensures religious freedom through the Establishment Clause (which prevents the government from establishing a state religion) and the Free Exercise Clause (which prevents the government from interfering with religious practice). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Historically, this intentional separation of church and state was formalized in the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, which explicitly stated that the United States government "is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." [1]

You don't know the difference between a good joke and a dumb statement.

Lol...some have TDS bad. But this fanatic is off the rails completely. Wha's a matter Gaetan? Did you get caught masterbating again?

Boys! Boys! Is this turd @robosmith has taken on the site, worth addressing? I mean really now. Isn't he and his effeminate Libbie hoard simply lamenting their own lack of manliness? Ignore the little twerp.

........... the degree of hate, resentment, racism and corruption demonstrated by the U.S. is truly revealing. The U.S. global power was literally designed, post WWII, by giants; FDR, Truman and Ike. Their genius imagined a World revolving around the emerging superpower, the U.S. It's designed strength was built on alliances, trade and ideology. They realized that although the U.S. might be the most powerful in terms of military, GDP, it was not as strong as the combined strength of it's allies. Can the U.S. remain 'great' and be alone? ah, no. Hormuz is a great example ............... alone.

America is neither Trustworthy nor Dependable. Period. The world walks away... Not soon enough. The only threat to Canada is America itself. We all knew that for decades. Shrug.

The leader of Congress is a kind of unhinged fanatic who has been brainwashed by evangelicals or another sect serving Satan. His deep desire is to serve the great prostitute Israel.

Yeah Muslim governments are the great humanitarians. LOL you're so naive. No Muslims attacked any Jews right?. The 1- sided narratives you shovel are a joke. Muslim leaders took away their homeland, Jews moved to Europe, Europe were exterminating them, so they took half of their homeland back. Good for them.

Are you saying that the US’s attack on Iran was sensible?

Oh good, about time Canada gets the memo. If you’re not even going to keep up the pretenses then we’ll absorb you.

It should be 2%. The US overspends on its military. Canada is spending more on its military than it has in 5 decades at least. It’s already past spending 2%. Just because Trump keeps moving the goalposts doesn’t mean we should take the bait. We should all have learned by now that it doesn’t matter what Canada does on trade, military spending, or anything else, the name of the game right now in Washington is squeezing other countries, including allies. While there will areas where we still need to make improvements, the amounts we’re spending on aircraft and ships is significant, especially since so much damage seems to be done by drones now on the cheap. If Canada isn’t going to be part of the conversation with the Pentagon, the Trump administration can’t complain about countries’ hesitation to support American moves in Iran or anywhere else. Besides, as Trump says, the US can do everything on its own and doesn’t need the help of smaller powers.

Are you sure about that? Ready to be crucified on this idea? It’s not too late for the delete.

Oh please. You are just trying to make excuses to maintain a fantasy that Democrats are as pure as the wind driven snow. The problem is, you are blinded by a blizzard of lies. Nine MN employees said (under oath) Walz and Ellison were aware of the fraud: Oversight Committee Releases Explosive Testimony Revealing Minnesota Fraud Cover-Up by Governor Walz and Attorney General Ellison This woman is just number 10. Her statements match the statements of nine Minnesota government employees. In a court or law, this will hold up.

Lol...I think his corset is too tight.

1. What is known with direct documentation: deaths tied to orders or agencies The clearest, directly documented fatality count linked to current Trump administration operations in the reporting is that ICE reported 46 people died while in ICE custody between January 2025 and March 18, 2026; reporters and researchers flag both the rising count and contested cause-of-death designations in specific cases [1]. 2. Short‑to‑medium term modeled domestic impacts: healthcare and regulatory rollbacks Peer‑reviewed and academic analyses model sizable domestic harms tied to Trump-era policies: one analysis of the administration’s proposed One Big Beautiful Bill estimated more than 16,000 additional U.S. deaths per year from Medicaid cuts and coverage losses under that bill [2], while The Lancet Commission’s comparative analysis attributes roughly 461,000 “unnecessary” U.S. deaths in 2018 to a spectrum of long‑running policy failures that were worsened during the Trump years—this is a counterfactual comparison to G7 death rates, not a headcount of individually attributed deaths [3]. 3. International and indirect effects: aid cuts and climate policy Two independent lines of modeling find very large international death tolls that would be indirectly linked to policy changes: a Center for Global Development update estimates lives lost from USAID cuts could plausibly be in the range of 500,000–1,000,000 based on outlays (and 670,000–1,600,000 based on obligations), while analysts of climate-policy rollbacks warn of cumulative millions of additional temperature‑related deaths globally tied to expanded fossil‑fuel trajectories associated with an “America First” agenda [4] [5]. Both are model outputs that depend on long chains of assumptions about budgets, global emissions pathways, and vulnerability in poorer countries. 4. How projections add up under three plausible scenarios (10‑year horizon) Using only direct, documented deaths produces a minimal 10‑year total of roughly 46 recorded ICE‑custody deaths [1]. A conservative policy‑impact scenario that counts the BMJ study’s healthcare‑bill estimate (16,000 excess U.S. deaths/year) yields about 160,000 excess U.S. deaths over ten years, plus the known ICE deaths [2] [1]. A higher‑impact domestic scenario that treats the Lancet Commission’s comparative figure (461,000 excess U.S. deaths in a single year attributable to systemic policy failures) as indicative of ongoing, annual excess mortality implies roughly 4.6 million excess U.S. deaths over ten years—this is a counterfactual estimate and controversial in method [3]. Adding international models—CGD’s 500,000–1,000,000 (or up to 1.6 million by obligations) and ProPublica/Guardian warnings of large climate‑related death tolls—produces aggregate multi‑million global death projections over a decade, but these are cumulative, model‑dependent projections rather than counted fatalities [4] [5]. 5. Caveats, competing perspectives and hidden agendas The estimates reflect different methods and implicit agendas: watchdog and humanitarian groups emphasize global lives lost (CGD, ProPublica) and may use worst‑case assumptions to motivate policy reversal [4] [5], commission reports like The Lancet use G7 counterfactuals to highlight systemic gaps but do not prove single‑cause attribution [3], and some advocacy pieces frame early‑term actions as producing “millions” of deaths to create political urgency [6]. Independent journalists and peer reviewers caution these model outputs rest on many assumptions; other sources (e.g., administration statements touting crime declines) offer a competing narrative about improving public safety but do not directly reconcile the mortality modeling [7]. 6. Bottom line for a ten‑year tally There is only one narrow, directly documented toll in these sources—46 ICE custody deaths [1]. Any larger ten‑year number depends entirely on which published models and counterfactuals one accepts: a focused policy effect (BMJ) implies ~160,000 excess U.S. deaths over ten years [2]; a broad counterfactual comparison (Lancet) implies millions over a decade if treated as ongoing [3]; international aid and climate models add hundreds of thousands to millions more globally [4] [5]. The reporting does not produce a single, authoritative 10‑year “Trump death count”; it produces competing, methodologically distinct estimates that must be read as scenarios, not precise tallies. I don't really give a shit about Trump, his family or his sycophants when they die. Just sayin.... let alone getting upset about a damn joke.

Yeah. You're the guy who insisted that it wasn't possible for him to win a second term You: Trump

It's invalid without 1st Nations consultation, gee, who didn't see that coming? https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clypn8py4zwo Oh well, if Albertans are smart maybe after consulting them they'll incorporate some First Nations perspectives on how to get a better deal out of Confederation next time. Can anyone see Danielle Smith invoking the Notwithstanding Clause? It just seems to come naturally with First Nations.

'The left is all about hatred and violence these days" haha .............. just cut to the chase - however, 😁repetition does nothing for u or ur arguments.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you... We're talking about Indian immigrants allowed into Canada under previous governments. NOT illegal immigration. If I was interested in US illegal immigration I would have commented in that US side of the forum. But sure, of course I support illegal immigrants now 🙄