Leaderboard

You must be lying. The Liberals say we have zero IT people in Canada.

According to Trump he is using the US military to take PERSONAL REVENGE on Iran in a blatant violation of the Constitution of using government resources for political purposes. VIDEO

This is rich.

Frankly...you're just wrong. You dont like being told you're wrong, so you dismiss the argument. You can and will, make all sorts of excuses for why people should not believe their own senses, but its all just smoke and mirrors. Im here...for you Pumkin. Whenever you Tweenkies try to obfuscate and confuse, I'll be there to let people know that... 'No. You saw what you saw. This person is just a petty little boy who didn't get spanked enough as a kid.'

Looks like Japan has rejected Carney's costly "carbon neutral" oil & gas and his MOU piece of paper. They just signed $56 billion energy deal with the US. Japan Signs a $56 Billion Energy Deal with the US: Boosting Ties Amid Global Uncertainty - Energy News Beat Japan just elected a conservative leader who doesn't buy into the Net Zero agenda. I'm telling you - the tyranny of the Net Zero/Green Billionaires is ending all over the world. Canada is the last to wake up. It's the only place left that Carney can squeeze out the last of the Net Zero dollars.

See, these are exactly the kinds of half-truths you engage in. The administration is still required to report civilian deaths to Congress. This does not even appear to have been a drone strike. The point remains, you were the liar who said the administration was outright denying it.

It was first proposed in April of 2019. The project might start in 2028 and it might be completed by 2035, unless there are more environmental reviews or red tape that gets in the way.

Did we? I have not seen an official report that corroborated that. I saw a NYT article that claimed anonymous sources said we did. I saw a Tomahawk hit near the school. But I have not seen anything that definitively states we struck the school.

This rant is a good example of how a few real issues get mashed together with a bunch of exaggerations. Like a bullshit snowball rolling downhill. First, the idea that the Biden administration told border agents to let “anyone claiming asylum” into the country isn’t how U.S. law works. People who reach the border have had the legal right to request asylum for decades, under laws passed by Congress (not Biden). The government has to process those claims. You can read the basics of how asylum works from the U.S. government here: https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/asylum Because detention space is limited and immigration courts are massively backlogged, many migrants are released with a Notice to Appear in court. That practice (the so-called “catch and release”) — existed under multiple administrations, including Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden. Reuters explanation: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-is-catch-and-release-us-immigration-policy-2023-09-21/ If someone misses their immigration hearing, judges can issue a deportation order “in absentia.” That’s literally built into the law. The problem is the immigration court backlog, which is now in the millions of cases. U.S. Department of Justice immigration court statistics: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/workload-and-adjudication-statistics The claim that the federal government handed out Social Security numbers and welfare to “illegal aliens” is also misleading. Asylum applicants can apply for a work permit after a waiting period, and if approved they can receive an SSN for tax and employment purposes. That rule has existed for decades. USCIS info: https://www.uscis.gov/i-765 Driver’s licenses aren’t even controlled by the federal government — those are issued by states. Some states allow undocumented residents or asylum applicants to get them, some don’t. The “free cell phones” claim mostly comes from confusion about case-management or monitoring programs used by immigration authorities or nonprofits. They’re not handing out iPhones to everyone crossing the border. Associated Press fact check: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-immigrant-phone-internet-government-521577996794 Finally, deportations absolutely still happened. ICE continued removals during the Biden years, though priorities and totals changed. ICE enforcement statistics: https://www.ice.gov/statistics So yes, the immigration system is messy. The backlog is huge, and the policy debates are real (too bad Trump wanted a campaign issue an killed the Republican-led legislation to change the law). But the version that says “they just told everyone to come in, gave them benefits, and never deported anyone” isn’t a description of policy. It’s a meme--a bad meme. And, as I said, wildly disconnected from reality. The fact is that Biden was actually slightly more restrictive than Trump. The difference is the volume of encounters. CATO 1. Even if you were right (and you're not) it would change the FACT of record production. Record production happened. You can argue that Biden tried to prevent it (again, wrong) but that he failed. But it is an undisputable fact that it happened and it's a myth that Biden strangled supply and drove high gas prices. It's basic supply and demand. Record supply did not drive high prices. 2. Biden did reduce lease acreage, but that's exploratory acreage. Not at all related to short-term supply. If you want to talk about short term supply, you'll want to look at drilling permits. And there, Biden granted MORE permits than trump, both in raw numbers and percentage approved. Again, Nationalist's BS claim is completely busted. How farking whatckadoodle crazy do you have to be to describe Trump's former national security advisor as a left wing nutjob? Facts are facts. Trump/Pompeo signed the deal with the Taliban. They cut out the Afghan government. And they withdrew 90% of the Troops. And they left Biden holding the bag for the final 10%. -- Trump's deal. Trump's withdrawal. Trump is why the Taliban now runs Afghanistan again. ^^That's all reality. You can't contradict a single one of those facts. I bring receipts, you bring bullshit you heard on Twitter and have dogmatically internalized.

Big and bad? Doubtful. What I think they are, is an example of the lack of male hormones men have been experiencing. Our shit diets and stupid ideas coincide. In short...Libbies are weak. They're also loud and rather embarrassing...frankly.

Even the AI bot I had a long argument with relented after I showed it a similar quote and walked it through some PMQ landscaping arithmetic.... it was more polite though. Best of luck...

I am pretty sure we have said we are investigating it and that it is still under investigation. Why is it you lie to support Iran? Do you really hate Trump that much, that you will sacrifice your own integrity and cheer against your own country?

So... you are complaining that you are not taxing it even more because gas prices change and companies make a profit?

Good point. I'm hopinf eventually America gets it's head out it's ass and come back to some semblance of reality. Hard time reading? Yep. America broke it, they bought it.

Trump and his sycophants have made a colossal mess of everything they touch. And now they want to threaten the world in order to help them out of their created crisis. Should have thought some of this through. Maybe some day the Americans will actually get sick of this gong show. But, I don't think they smart enough to see it yet. Maybe when gas prices reach eight dollars a gallon, then they will get off their asses. Who knows. If and when the world decides to deal with their mess it will, be for their own benefit, not the benefit of the belligerent and foolish Whitehouse.

Carney's 26 trips to diversify trade, laid out in one place. Mark Carney’s 26 trips abroad: A breakdown of the prime minister’s trade deals and travel after 1 year in office - The Hub Despite the majority of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s 26 trips to foreign focusing on diversifying trade, no major expansive trade deals have yet been signed. “Only one new trade agreement has formally been signed, [with Indonesia], and it has not yet actually been ratified yet.” Steinberg also pointed to reductions in Chinese agricultural tariffs, but noted that this only brings us back to the 2024 status quo, rather than adding net-new export destinations. While Steinberg believes Carney is on the right track with signing new trade deals, he says it’s too early to celebrate. He adds that trade with the U.S. should still be Canada’s primary focus. “I applaud the ongoing discussions with other trade partners, especially India, where I see great long-term potential, but most of these discussions have yet to actually reduce any trade barriers,” Steinberg explained. “Carney’s primary focus should be on renegotiating CUSMA, or at least keeping it alive until President Trump leaves office. Losing CUSMA would hurt our economy more than any potential trade agreements with other countries could possibly help it.” While laudable, the economics professor sees diversifying the bulk of Canada’s trade elsewhere outside of the States to be a foolhardy exercise.

A carbon tax has zero to do with the price of oil. Why do you find it difficult to understand that oil pricing is set globally? You have an odd way of thinking if you believe the CBC has say one way or the other in what oil prices should be.... 1. CBC is a media organization. Who there is telling you that they want higher oil prices? 2. No, it's everyone's position and basic common sense that high energy costs affect everyone, especially those in a lower income category. Is that a revelation that you just learned with this spike in prices? 3. Yes oil prices were that high but gets real convoluted during and coming off the pandemic... Biden came in during covid which first saw oil absolutely tank in price then as the world economies started to dig themselves out and demand escalated. At the same time Russia decided to invade Ukraine which saw their oil off the market because of sanctions causing the price to escalate more. It was a big deal then and is a big deal now. I'd think twice about calling other people 'dummy' when you're talking about a climate activist supposedly controlling the 'lefts' thoughts. Your fascination with Trump is admirable. Laughable, but admirable in your defence of the guy...

Yes dear.

Gee, I thought America didn't "need" anyone else.... Donnie Diaoers go back to your room and throw a tantrum on your bed again. You can post further insults on your very own site and continue ot be so f-cking stupid to think you can make people do what you want by insulting them. The fool is also letting Iranian oil tanklers through the Strait of Hormuz so as not to further disrupt the world oil supply! How much more proof do Americans need that their President is completely bonkers insane and it's time for Article 25? Iran should send every single one of those tankers to Cuba as a big f-ck you. Squeeze you cheeks together Donnie and trap these three by their tongues.

X appears to be your trusted source of information , and I guess why wouldn't it be when you get this type of insight from someone named 'Concerned Citizen'. Have you found this platform to be more reliable than the many traditional (or I'd guess you call them main stream) news organizations?

You pathetically and desperately LYING about allowing ASYLUM CLAIMS being "open borders" over and over is not going make YOUR LIES TRUE.

I believe that if your a dick eventually someone is going to push your face in....in this case murdering tens of thousands of it's citizens, plus sponsoring terrorism around the middle east those actions are catching up to them.... What i can't understand is why your supporting these thugs....it time you really look at your citizenship papers and decide are you an American or just another fake citizen that takes advantage of everything the US has to offer, but does not want to give anything back....there are millions around the world that would pay to switch places with you... And I'm the Narcissist, your funny... sorry but you being on the left side of the scale and fit every one of those symptoms

I can make assumptions, but curious why you struggle with the meaning of words. Could you not understand what was said?

Liquid breakfast down at the bar today? Or did you just realize you can't refute those facts and tap out?

I don't think it really matters, does it? I don't think anyone is going hysterical here either. It just seems kind of weird that you have a murderer with a history of violent offenses getting special consideration because he has a different skin colour. The Liberal Justice systems has, IMO, long prioritized rehabilitation over public safety. I have trouble understanding why rehabilitation should even be a consideration for someone like this.

3 strikes. You're out. I correctly claimed (with documentation) that Biden did not have an open border policy. Your bogus rebuttal was that the numbers were high against record attempts to cross. That's not a rebuttal. I correctly claimed (with documentation) that we had record oil production under Biden. Your bogus rebuttal is a list of things some guy thinks were hostile to oil production. That's not a rebuttal. I correctly claimed (with documentation) that we had Trump, not Biden, "surrendered" Afghanistan and withdrew 90% of the troops. Your bogus rebuttal is that Biden miscalculated in that scenario the probability and pace of the Taliban takeover. Again, that's not a rebuttal. Why don you even post this shit? Do you just assume that no one will read the articles and notice that you're FOS? Another excellent rebuttal. You guys are a real brain trust.

It's different with democrats. They actually roll up their sleeves and get to work on the ballots themselves: changing ballots through Dominion machines (in red, out blue), mail fraud etc. Show me where Republicans have pulled the same level of shit.

Well, then I guess you'd better go lock him up, comrade. I wish you had this same level of outrage when Biden was waving illegal aliens into the country.

The CBC is not a fan of Trump. They try to report the facts, but the wording they use betrays that. As for the carney, he'll do what Trump wants...as usual. "Elbows Up".

Well, we won't see @robosmith in this thread again.

Let4rds hate Trump because they see him as being opposed to the ayatollahs and Xis of this world.

Nobody claims climate science was a lie. We can't, you haven't shown us any. But we're claiming is that there is no scientific studies that demonstrate the climate change isn't a crisis more than anything we can do will have a meaningful impact. And you know that's true. Which is why you had to pretend we were arguing something different Whenever you're backed into a corner, your default is to lie

But you just assumed it was obvious to Poilievre. Now you've changed your mind... LMAO!

Yes. He's another liberal. Yes. These questions are simplistic. No offense.

LMAO! Who do you think are the masters of Brookfield? Don't look at me, I never voted for him. A tax avoider turned tax collector? That was always to glaring a contrast right from the get go. And look after them with the belief that no poor man ever gave them a job.

His previous job was in the wealth protection racket - literally making the world safer for capitalists. I truly do not understand any possible downside that matters to Conservatives could possibly stack up against this cardinal tenet of conservatism. Poilievre would do an even better job of taking care of the 1%? I guess that stands to reason.

Answer the question: Are you really so naive that you believe donald invaded Iran to "help" the Iranian people?

And they pay a 25% VAT and there is no refund cheque coming in the mail for that. It's applied to almost everything, including food and drugs.

More than you it would seem Not really. Almost all the Canadian consumption is made in Canada. We actually make more than we need in the remainder goes to the states. And there are no terrorists for vehicles made in America coming into Canada. There are terrorists from Vehicles made in Canada going into America So you're wrong two ways. And just so you know, nobody looks more like a Twat who says somebody else doesn't understand something and then goes on to prove they don't understand something. You might want to watch that in the future, twat

Minion... Yes Harper. Your typical anti-liberal shit didn't play well after you learned it was actually Harper who signed the regulations you said we're a joke. Minion...

lol... your usual comeback when you realize you got nothing. It was the Harper thing that fùcked everything up for you wasn't it. Minion.... 😂

I would respond that the problem with Islam is its unwavering determination that all the world must be under Islam, and that until that time, there will be endless war against all the lands that refuse to bow to Mecca. You think the only reason to criticize Islamic culture is to feel good about myself? What if I heavily disapprove of so many religion-based aspects of Islamic culture and society that I am disgusted by its barbarism, intolerance, and brutality? Not to mention that it insists everyone join it and live under its savage rules or die.

1 hour ago, John Stone said: regime change? Absolutely it's time for a regime change! Trump and his band of equally unqualified id!ots have proven to be monumental failures in this war, foreign relations, and domestic policies....it's time to go. It's also time for some politicians to grow a spine and do their part in getting this useless POS out of office.

Seriously man. Stop being such a pathetic lying coward. 1996: “This Is an Anti-Fraud Amendment” In 1996, Schumer argued in favor of identification requirements tied to preventing fraud. “Let’s admit the truth,” Schumer said at the time. “Everywhere people go they’re asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you’re a bona fide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is an anti-fraud amendment.” He continued by saying one of the main concerns constituents raised about illegal immigration was that individuals could obtain jobs and benefits “because of fraud.” The comments reflected a broader bipartisan push in the 1990s toward tightening documentation standards tied to employment and benefits. https://wabcradio.com/2026/02/16/schumer-back-tracks-on-voter-id-anti-fraud-then-jim-crow-2-0-now/

You would think that there aren't people this stupid in Canada, but here we are.

fantastic news! These fascist scumsuckers are now behind bars. Perfect.