Leaderboard

What a sick and disgusting thing to say.

I just want to be clear... There is no relation...

Why do you ask such stupid questions? - Because you're just a Troll? -Because you're woefully uneducated? (Not your fault - your right wing politicians want you that way.) -Because you're just a hate-filled insecure incel? -Because that's what you read in your social media thought bubble? -Because you need to find a scapegoat for your life being so miserable?

The guy is brilliant in that respect... If it gets hot just change the subject so people start looking at something else. What better to distract peoples attention than a war! In fairness to him though, he's been busy. He'll get around to figuring out why losing another 92K jobs last month, 400K+ more people on long term unemployment, and manufacturing jobs declining in 14 of the 15 months since he took office. The guy is maybe the best ever, someone everyone said couldn't be done....just ask him. He'll figure the economy thing out when this war is done.

5 is 62 < 67. 3000 is 2933 > 67. You're right, not even. Go ask Google if you don't believe my math. Maybe look up the definition of close while you're at it. Have you done the math? Now do the math to estimate the dent 13000 doctors would put in the demand for doctors. We'd probably need 100,000 healthcare workers just to keep up.

Yeah, I suppose that's almost as close to a handful as 3000 isn't it? Meanwhile...there's 13000 doctors out there who'd probably be happy to take a jab in each cheek just for a chance to take their places

'An Iranian Intelligent Agent'....sounds like a smart guy. So what's your point with this?

Now you jackasses are concerned with the economy. What grand hypocrisy.

In connection to a plot from 2024.

So now you want to compare that to someone in our country trying to assassinate Trump? You, clowns, hate Trump so much that he has broken your brains.

Some people have difficulty with facts... or understanding what 'fiscal year' means, with defence spending projected to be 2.01% of GDP. I'm surprised 'The Western Standard', the trusted publication for all Western conservative minions wasn't aware of what 'fiscal year' meant either. Maybe time to go back to Rebel News or Fox for accurate information.

Lazy spambot strikes again!

Exactly. They conveniently forget about the Shah's corruption which led to his fall. But that would requite a history lesson and some reading...

Whixh is ALL an Internet poster is. Mostly right wing complainers with the easiest outlet to make themselves think they're being hears.

Aww Gee, what a shame. Coulda had an even bigger deficit for PP to whine about...

Everything Trump and this present administration has done has turned to shit. Period. This is not a generalization, it is what you voted for. You got your wish. Be happy.

It's obvious from the files that she was bananas and less and less credible each time they pressed her for info. In the end she couldn't remember the year, or even the city this supposedly happened in. ANd when they asked more questions she ran. This behavior is pretty typical of someone who's making up a story either to gain fame and money or because they've been put up to it by someone for some species of compensation. It's a joke

The only media coverage required, which could be from any outlet, is to simply listen to the guy talk. He's old and unable to keep focused on the task at hand, he's a pathological liar, hell bent on creating divisivness, devoid of morals, a world class grifter and easily the world's biggest narcissist. Not hard to figure out why he's hated, or despised as he is.

Just a few facts: "Canada is committed to reaching the NATO target of spending 2% of its GDP on defence by 2032. While this 2032 deadline was officially established, recent pressure and updated plans have seen discussions to potentially accelerate this timeline to 2027 or 2030. Original Commitment: The federal government formally committed in 2024 to hit the 2% target by 2032. Accelerated Goals: In early 2025, Defence Minister Bill Blair indicated a desire to move this timeline up to 2027, and other political figures have aimed for 2030." "Canada officially agreed to NATO's 2035 commitment to raise defence spending to 5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at the NATO Summit in June 2025, with Prime Minister Mark Carney announcing the pledge, which includes increasing core military spending to 3.5% of GDP and related security investments to 1.5% by 2035. This significant commitment aims to bolster NATO's readiness and strategic autonomy, building on earlier pledges to reach 2% of GDP." https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percent-defence-spending-target-1.7440870 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/defence-spending-two-percent-defence-spending-target-1.7440870 "

“Aspiration without effort is just empty rhetoric.” said the Carney. For that, please accept the obligatory bloodspot as an empty gesture from our resident pudding jumper.

The faux fat liar who is stuck in that body is easy enough to find. The dead opossum sitting on the faux fat liars head is much harder to find and replicate.

The guy was in your country Deluginal.... not mine. Yeah, the shìt you DF's get excited about generally flys right over my head... thank goodness.

Exactly. Every day we are reminded about our pasty skin

How could any regime in Iran hate the US more than the current one? A lesson for Iran and any other country in the world is that if they want to undermine the security interests including vital security interests of the world's biggest superpower for many decades while allying with their biggest enemies then that superpower may take action. It's been a suicide mission for most in the middle east. The government of Iran is the enemy of US and Canada and it's own people. I hope the regime falls.

They often want the facts to care about their feelings. That's why they cite TrueNorth news, which deals in anger before facts.

Disagree. 1. Bill Gates is not running the world. 2. True, his wife left him. But like Woody Allen, I appreciate his contribution to humanity.

I'd worry about reading the dictionary before I started worrying about the constitution if I were you. You clearly don't understand what nihilism is

It is hard to manage federal Canada: ask Harper, or Mulroney. Or Chretien. Or certainly King. (I am still amazed that anglo protestant Harper got a majority.) ===== Trudeau Jnr won by the name, and looks. Gerald Butts made him PM. I happen to think that Carney is an arrogant bureaucrat. He is no Harper. No Pearson. He will never win a majority.

Trump will get what's coming to HIM, FASCIST.

Few English Canadians know our story. In the early 1960s, Trudeau Snr asked Levesque about going into politics. I remember Jean Marchand. I met him in a shopping mall in Ste-Foy. Heck, Jean Lesage once gave me a lift.

Yet another invented word by the moronic Left. The fearmongering just never stops.

The only way you get to this conclusion is by pretending that bracing yourself with your hand on the car hitting you as a that car comes towards you to push out of the way doesn't count as being hit by a car. Did you even read the link you shared? It clearly describes that he was hit, the argument they were making is that he was not knocked to the ground and "run over"

Yes, stamp your little feet because video evidence contradicts the narrative of your orange god. Have a nice little tantrum, and another drink.

Okay and? US economy churning just fine. World economy does not equal US economy.

Well, we have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. We have built investigation dossiers on eight people: Bill Gates (2,265 documents), Woody Allen (2,613), Reid Hoffman (1,976), Bill Clinton (1,586), Larry Summers (739), Leon Black (667), Elon Musk (55), and Donald Trump. For Donald Trump, across the entire corpus, we found 40 documents. Not 40 damning documents. 40 documents total -- every sworn deposition, every FBI interview, every civil complaint, every flight log entry, every media reference of any kind linking Trump to Epstein in the largest document production in DOJ history. As with Elon, the number is the story. And as with Elon, the documents themselves tell that story even better. Every quote below is verbatim. Every citation is a DOJ document number you can verify. Click the links. This post comes from those links. There are just 40. You can read them yourself. THE FRIENDSHIP It must be made clear: Trump and Epstein were friends. This must be stated plainly, because everything that follows only makes sense if you understand that. They were Palm Beach neighbors in the 1990s. Both owned waterfront estates. Both moved in the same Manhattan social circles -- the dinner-party circuit that included Mort Zuckerman, Leon Black, Ronald Perelman, and a dozen other New York billionaires. In March 2003, Vanity Fair profiled Epstein as "The Talented Mr. Epstein" and named Trump as one of seven businessmen who dined at his 71st Street townhouse [187-11]. Juan Alessi, Epstein's house manager, named Trump among many prominent visitors to the Palm Beach property [055-12]. A 1993 photograph shows Trump and Marla Maples with Epstein and Maxwell at a New York party [EFTA00787056]. This was before Epstein's convictions. In 2002, reached by phone for a New York Magazine profile, Trump gave the currently most weaponized quote in the entire archive: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." [EFTA00013640] That quote has been cited thousands of times. It was given on speakerphone, before any public allegations, before any investigation, before any reason to be cautious. "It is even said that" is hearsay framing -- Trump reporting what others say. "On the younger side" is ambiguous. But the quote exists, and it reflects a social warmth that post-Epstein scandal Trump would prefer to erase. In 2003, Ghislaine Maxwell assembled a leather-bound album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump's contribution: a card with "several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker," signed below the waist [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. These are the facts, and the facts must be stated openly. The friendship was real. But what happened next matters more. THE FALLING OUT Around 2004, that friendship ended. Trump outbid Epstein at auction for the Maison de L'Amitie estate in Palm Beach. In Michael Wolff's 2017 recordings, Epstein himself confirmed the real estate dispute as the breaking point [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. But the real estate dispute was simply the excuse that Epstein made for something darker. Brad Edwards, the attorney who represented Epstein's victims, established under oath that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club [773-04]. There is no documented contact between Trump and Epstein after the falling out in 2004. Not one email. Not one phone call. Not one schedule entry. Not one reference of any kind in 1.39 million documents. After 2004, the relationship was over. Trump had drawn a hard line. THE GIRL IN THE SPA Virginia Roberts was sixteen years old, earning nine dollars an hour as a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago [1218-11]. In her memoir, she described the club in awestruck terms -- "sheer awe at the gold arches." Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was reading a book about massage [EFTA01689026]. "I was working at Donald Trump's spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work." [1090-16] Roberts names many powerful men in her testimony. Clinton. Prince Andrew. Dershowitz. Wexner. She does not name Trump. He was the property owner. But Maxwell did the recruiting. An FBI interview of a different victim's mother captures how this worked: she "heard that a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house and this made [her] think that if they are there then how could EPSTEIN be a criminal" [EFTA00089603]. That is what Epstein did with famous names. He wore used them as bait. As camouflage. If Epstein was associated with so-and-so, then how could he be a predator? Trump, unlike others, immediately put a stop to that. THE ACCUSATIONS Three allegations against Trump exist in the corpus. A Jane Doe civil lawsuit against Epstein's estate alleges that Epstein introduced her to Trump when she was fourteen, "allegedly elbowing Trump and saying, 'This is a good one, right?' Trump smiled and nodded in agreement" [1078-5]. At the Maxwell trial, a victim testified under oath that Epstein introduced her to Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she was fourteen [120-cr-00330/745]. That testimony confirmed the social introduction. It contained no allegation of misconduct by Trump. Defense counsel used Trump's name to establish Epstein's social reach, not to implicate Trump. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, a civil complaint alleged the rape of a thirteen-year-old at Epstein's 71st Street house in the summer of 1994 -- Katie Johnson v. Trump & Epstein [EFTA01386393]. It was filed pro se, dismissed for improper filing, refiled with an attorney, and dropped before trial. It was never proven, never tested under cross-examination, never corroborated by any other witness in the criminal investigation. In August 2017, Epstein told Michael Wolff on tape: "I was Donald's closest friend for 10 years" [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. He claimed Trump liked to "f--- the wives of his best friends" and that Melania first slept with Trump on Epstein's plane. These recordings were released days before the 2024 election. They are unsworn claims by a convicted pedophile and serial liar to an author -- a man who told the same journalist his week included "woody allen, elon musk, frank gehri... bill gates" [EFTA02561193]. And that pedophile and liar had an axe to grind. A big one. Those are the allegations. What follows is what happened when they were investigated. THE INVESTIGATION The FBI investigated Donald Trump in connection with the Epstein case. The master case index lists him as a "positive case hit" with "salacious information": "Donald Trump (one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate)" [EFTA00161528]. One allegation. One victim who refused to cooperate. No prosecution. The FBI's National Threat Operations Center received four separate complaints naming Trump [EFTA01660679]. A hearsay oral sex claim via a friend-of-friend chain. An anonymous party guest list. A claim about "big orgy parties" from a sixteen-year-old model. A Trump Golf Course allegation "deemed not credible." All anonymous. None corroborated. The Senate Judiciary Committee -- bipartisan, Grassley and Durbin -- reported that FBI personnel were specifically instructed to "flag" any records in which President Trump was mentioned across all 1.39 million documents. The result: no incriminating "client list." No evidence of criminal conduct [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. The Southern District of New York, which prosecuted the Epstein case, had Trump's phone records in their evidence. Their grand jury presentation includes a message slip showing Trump called Epstein on November 1, 2000 -- a routine call, no message content [EFTA00008599]. The same presentation, same pages, includes message slips reading "She has females for Mr. J.E." Prosecutors had Trump's innocuous call alongside explicit trafficking procurement. They found nothing to charge. Attorney General William Barr, under oath before the House Oversight Committee: "I was never informed of the evidence, and I'm skeptical there is any... if they had evidence, this would've been low-hanging fruit." [oversight_republican_staff_memo] THE ATTORNEY WHO WOULD KNOW Brad Edwards represented Epstein's victims for years. He investigated every lead. He subpoenaed records, deposed witnesses, and built the case that led to federal prosecution. He was the attorney most motivated to find evidence against anyone connected to Epstein. In April 2010, Edwards filed a sworn affidavit: "While research by other plaintiffs' attorneys and myself has uncovered other persons that were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield, we have no information that any of those people (other than Mr. Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victims of Mr. Epstein's molestation." [560-03] Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola: "There is no evidence the President was involved in Epstein's schemes" [773-04]. Edwards filed a notice to depose Trump in September 2009 [701]. As a witness. Not as a suspect. He sought Trump's testimony to help the victim's case. And there is this: when Edwards was investigating Epstein, reaching out to the powerful men in Epstein's orbit for cooperation, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and returned his call [50-2009-CA-040800/549]. The attorney who spent years investigating on behalf of Epstein's victims -- who had every reason to find evidence, every incentive to implicate the powerful -- swore under oath that his investigation found nothing linking Trump to the abuse. When he called, Trump answered. Readily. Trump knew what Epstein was and wanted to talk about it. WHAT THE DOCUMENTS DON'T SHOW Pilot David Rodgers flew Epstein's planes for twenty-eight years. He sat for a seventeen-page FBI interview and reviewed his flight logs covering 1991 through 2007 [EFTA00159180]. Trump appears once: Flight 934, January 5, 1997. Passengers: Epstein, Maxwell, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, and Didier, a chef. Route: Palm Beach to Newark. No flight in the corpus shows Trump traveling to Little Saint James, to Zorro Ranch, or to any international destination on Epstein's aircraft. Epstein's famous ninety-two-page personal contact book does not contain a "Donald Trump" entry [black-book-redacted]. It lists Robert and Blaine Trump, Ivana Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Trump Management Inc. -- the socialite channel, not Donald. There are zero financial transactions between Trump and Epstein in any direction. No donations. No investments. No advisory fees. No foundation grants. Even Epstein's own defense lawyers, in a motion to pare down a 169-person witness list, argued that Trump had "no connection at all" to the case [1338]. And Epstein himself, in a draft letter, grouped Trump among "friends and other innocent bystanders" whose names had been dragged in by "abusive discovery" [EFTA01128737]. THE COMPARISON The Epstein documents reveal concentric circles of association. At the center: people who were financially entangled, who visited the island repeatedly, who maintained the relationship through and after Epstein's conviction. Trump was not in any of these circles. Woody Allen: 2,613 documents. Nine years of regular contact. Dinner companion. Epstein attended his film shoots. Bill Gates: 2,265 documents. Multiple confirmed meetings. Donations routed through Epstein. Boris Nikolic named in Epstein's will. Reid Hoffman: 1,976 documents. 36 documented gift exchanges. Slept at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Bill Clinton: 1,586 documents. 147 sexually explicit messages with Maxwell. Multiple confirmed island visits. Flights on Epstein's plane confirmed by his pilot ("ten or twenty times"). Active participation in the post-arrest denial campaign. Larry Summers: 739 documents. Regular dinner companion. Island visits with family. Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics funded through Epstein. Leon Black: 667 documents. $158 million paid to Epstein across a decades-long financial relationship. Elon Musk: 55 documents. Zero financial transactions. Twenty-two months of sporadic, taciturn emails with Epstein chasing Musk, but leaving Epstein little to grab onto. Donald Trump: 40 documents. Zero financial transactions. Zero island visits. One commuter flight. A friendship that ended in 2004, eleven years before the first federal prosecution, after Trump drew the line and Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago for his behavior. The only person in Epstein's orbit who returned the victim's attorney's call. Trump's entire file is 1.8% the size of Gates's. WHAT REMAINS These documents show a man who was part of an early social world he did not yet completely understand, who called a predator "terrific" before anyone knew what that predator was, who sent a crude birthday card before there was any reason not to, whose property was used as a hunting ground without his knowledge or permission -- and who, when the investigation came, banned the predator from his club, picked up the phone for the victim's attorney, and was cleared by every investigative body that looked. 40 documents. Every quote verbatim. Every citation verifiable. Full compendium (40 docs): THE_DONALD_TRUMP_FILES.pdf - Google Drive AI-optimized compendium (upload to any LLM and ask it anything): trump_gold_complete.md - Google Drive

Sounds pretty similar indeed. The opposition party in Venezuela won 73% of the vote. Maduro retained power and the opposition candidate still lives in exile--just as he did before Trump's actions. I think it more likely that he stick within the established power structure, but who knows what he can squeeze from someone else. Good luck though, sincerely. As much as I don't approve of how this was executed, it would lt would be great if he did something decent on the other side of it.

Cut copy and paste how many Canadian doctors were fired for not getting vaccinated during the pandemic yourself.

No. You Tweenkies spent several months trying to prove a lie. Finally someone "jimmies" some pictures and all of the sudden...you think you have a case. Ya got no case. Not only have we already seen the vids, but the sad fact is, you've lied so often that your credibility is shot.

Not at all....just look at the facts. That Bovino thug who was the so-called commander in MN is under investigation for Nothing will come from it.... Your AG is corrupt, and only bows to Trump who is taking a shìt kicking in public opinion of something he should have absolutely nailed in his mandate. Entire failures from the top down in that administration....

.............. def trivial ........ one way or the other really isn't going to make a wit of difference to people's lives - but it was a move intended to garner attention - put the Government in the news - trigger debate. Trump could be so lucky to be only dealing with such seemingly mundane decisions (strategy)

After that rant you delivered the other day about the pointlessness of cites and sources? LMAO! I mean I definitely concur in your case. No, but you go ahead and feel free to catch something painful and lingering yourself.

Hyuk hyuck I know you are but whaddum i ? Yer the racist fer calling me a racist, hyuk hyuk. The Defender of the Right taxes his brain for an intellectual response.

It's not really a war - it was just a quick and decisive ass kicking. Iran already wants play nice, so this is really just a nothing burger.

Yeah, I said I voted for Trudeau in 2015. After that...no. Other than that.... your typical partisan and rambling view of the world isn't even worth a response.

Since you call anyone and everyone who disagrees with you a liar, and you've repeated this pattern thousands of times on this forum in hundreds of threads, I'm afraid the problem is you. 🙃

Thank you for admitting you don't realize the truth and are delusional Guardian said they had it from people who had copies. So not from the public relase. DUUUUUuuuuuuhhhhhh The extra people were never charged so they didn't find them THAT convincing obviously. And once again you claim that investigating someone is proof that they're guilty when it's someone you don't like. Your own source called the claims 'outlandish'. Sooooo - According to you bondi lied when she said there were no accusation in the file and it turns out the file was missing. Soooo that would make her right. It was when they went back that YOUR OWN SOURCE says she became more and more "outlandish". Right there in the story YOU provided Oh the article that says her claims were outlandish? And it would be the same file for all four, just for separate interviews . One person. Sooo yeah. And again not only do you look like a complete twat for your childish answers but you still can't explain why he would be so devious that he would remove three out of four files but leave the other one there when it hints to the existence of the other ones as well. I mean even the villains in Scooby-Doo aren't that stupid. So do you want to explain that one?