Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/01/2026 in all areas

  1. Listened to a few speeches- they're still running against Trudeau. Someone tell them he's not PM anymore. Danielle Smith gets an A+ for hypocrisy.
    4 points
  2. Why do you assume that it's somehow more difficult for non-whites to get photo ID? All adult passengers (18 years and older) flying within the United States are required to present an acceptable form of photo ID at the airport security checkpoint. This is enforced by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). See the hypocrisy here?
    2 points
  3. This was already debunked. The father ran, left the boy behind and ICE tried to get the mom to take him but she refused.
    2 points
  4. White right leaning voters are smart enough to get ID. Are you suggesting that non-white left-wing voters are too stupid to be able to acquire ID? Or is it that you're saying they're too lazy to and just don't care. In which case why would we want them voting? The ones who really don't tend to have the appropriate ID are people who shouldn't be voting at all because they're not citizens Let's be clear. Canada has had this for years. It is not a barrier to entry, traditionally our voter turnout is as high or higher than America's
    2 points
  5. And tearing down everything the USA has built and stood for is Trump's objective. Replace it with new Foundations where countries must pay $1 billion upfront and he's President for life.
    2 points
  6. I have a lot of sympathy for the trans. They have a mental health issue that needs to be addressed. They have been led to believe that if they cos play as the opposite sex that they will get better. That rarely, if ever, works. Mental health is a big problem. I don't know if Trump's insane asylums are the right move. Probably not. There needs to be a full program that starts with removing the stigma of mental health and encouraging treatment.
    2 points
  7. While remaining a shining example of a career politician.
    2 points
  8. It must be the Maple Leaf you sewed on your luggage. Is it a patch-over, the Fleur-de-lis just didn't do the job?
    1 point
  9. The second link said the same thing as the first. So how is the first wrong and the second right? Your articles said the economy would crash if other countries sold bonds. They never said whether the other economies could survive such a reckless move.
    1 point
  10. I was referring to you who indirectly support the massacre in Iran by trying to divert attention from present genocide by going back in history over 70 years. A plot to support the murderous Ayatollah because he is against Israel. Well long live Israel. We Iranians all support Israel. F*ck F*ck Palestine. What Trump has killed more than 50,000 in 48 hours. KIES AND MORE LIES.
    1 point
  11. I'm not surprised, and it sounds a lot more realistic.
    1 point
  12. You weren't talking about final judgements. Come on mike. Tell me, if it happens that even more "mistakes" are found, what then? 'ITS NOT ENOUGH TO CHANGE THE RESULTS! SO THERE!' Is that how Democracy is served? I've always found it...suspicious...that the very people who say they are "defending Democracy", turn out to be the ones caught 'with their fingers in the cookiejar'. Its more than proven that there was quite a bit of fraud going on. How much? More than normal. And it all seemed to be skewed one way. Funny that, eh? One real victim with this is public trust. Respect. People are so disappointed in this...street fight, that they dont believe anything anymore.
    1 point
  13. We'll see. Watch how much higher precious metals go. Precious metals going up is not a "good" sign.
    1 point
  14. The dominant composition of the Canadian federal system of government at a glance. Canada now has 40 million people, over 60% of which live in Ontario and Quebec. As to the Federal legislative branch, Ontario and Quebec hold 200 of the 343 seats available in the House of Commons, or 58% of seats, and 48 seats of the 105 seat Senate, being 46%. Regarding the executive branch currently, Federal Cabinet is comprised of 28 full Ministers, 17 of which are Members of Parliment from Ontario and Quebec, being 60% of Cabinet. The Federal Civil Service has 43% of the entire Federal Civil Service working in the National Capital Region (“NCR”) on either side of the Ontario and Quebec border. Then another 24% of the Federal Civil Service work in Ontario or Quebec outside the NCR, for a total of 67% of the Federal Civil Service being in Ontario and Quebec, inclusive of the NCR. The many administrative decisions made by the Government of Canada and it’s Civil Servants are only challengable in a court by way of judicial review to the the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal. This is so, as the Federal Court Act at s.18 makes it so, and prohibits Superior Courts in each Province consisting of judges from those Provinces, from questioning decisions of the Government of Canada by way of Judicial Review. These decisions are ones effecting Canadians not just in the NCR, Ontario or Quebec. Yet, both the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal have little representation from the other 8 provinces. The Federal Court Act mandates that its justices reside within 50 miles of the NCR, meaning they have to physically reside in Ontario or Quebec. There is no statutory or constitutional requirement that the Federal Court or Federal Court of Appeal have proportional or fair representation from each of the provinces either. Of the 37 Justice on the Federal Court of Canada, 25 of them or 67.5%, were appointed from the Ontario or Quebec Bar. As for the other 12 appointments, 3 are from the B.C. bar, 2 are from the Newfoundland bar, 2 are from the New Brunswick bar, 2 are from the Saskatchewan bar, 1 from the Nova Scotia bar, 1 from the Manitoba Bar, and 1 from the Alberta Bar. There are currently 17 justices of the Federal Court of Appeal. Of the 17 justices, 16 or 94% were from either the Quebec or Ontario Bar, and one is from Nova Scotia Bar. Any appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada requires leave. Generally, leave applications are denied, with only 6.8% being granted in 2025. At the Supreme Court of Canada, 6 of the 9 justices on the Supreme Court of Canada are from Ontario and Quebec, or 66.66%.
    1 point
  15. Yes. Deliberately, so he can exploit the fears of liberals like you for votes. Poilievre would have had a deal within the first couple of months. And they all cut deals with Trump. I don't give a shit about what the chattering classes at the WEF have to say. Anyone who dissed Trump at the WEF would have gotten similar applause. There are real-world concerns he sacrificed to get his accolades. Who proved their incompetence under Trudeau. All the courts are stuffed with Liberal appointees specifically selected for their conformity with the Left's shallow, social justice activist beliefs. I don't believe I've ever said much good about Poilievre aside from agreeing with some of his policies. But the Conservatives, whatever they're called, have always had a problem in selecting leaders due to bilingualism. Their base is out West and in rural Ontario. They lack the deep bench of bilingual MPs the Liberals always have. None of the last half dozen leaders would have been chosen leaders absent that bilingualism requirement. And btw, O'Toole was also called 'trumpist' and painted as a fellow traveler of white nationalists. ALL conservative leaders are disparaged by the media, and then by their mindless followers like you.
    1 point
  16. it's clear the Liberals have no idea what to do about improving the economy and no idea how to reach a trade deal with Trump. Carney's jet-setting lifestyle is performative nonsense. His speeches are like a father telling his small children everything is fine despite the car being repossessed and the family being evicted for non payment of rent. Increase our trade with others? How? Our West coast ports are pretty much at capacity and it would take years to expand them, and the process for even getting permissino would take even longer. Our east coast ports aren't much better, and the only one with an expansion underway is Montreal, and that's two additional slips. We can export 16% of our oil. No more. So all this talk of massive new trade expansion with other countries is just bluster and nonsense. It can't be done in anything under a decade. If the Liberals cared about the economy or Canada they'd change tactics, but instead, they're doubling down on fearmongering. The great negotiator, who would quickly get a trade deal with Trump now tells us to forget about the Americans, that China is our new friend. This is the same guy who told us last year that China was our most dangerous threat. I have little doubt Poilevre would do far better for us economically, but he'll have to fight through the left's fearmongering and bribery. The Liberals are running out of borrowing room to add more bribes, so are deliberately taunting Trump to keep up the threats and insults. That can only last so long, though. But the Conservatives need to be about more than the economy. They need to be about conservatism. And the root of conservatism is to conserve. I.e., to conserve the history, traditions, values, and culture of the country. All of those are under attack by the Left. All of English Canada's traditions and roots have been sawn away by the Liberals over the years because they lead to Britain, and the Liberals wanted to please Quebec by distancing us from them. But without a sense of shared identity, we are not a people. They didn't care. Trudeau even smugly said we were 'post nation' and had no core identity. But a country like that is fragile, with nothing to hold it together. Many younger Canadians in particular, feel lost because they've grown up with authority figures in schools, media, and government constantly berating them with what a terrible place Canada is, how it's an illegitimate state on stolen land, how it's genocidal and racist. All of this is utter nonsense and lies. Poilievre needs to commit to renewing what it means to be Canadian. And that does not include multiculturalism. The Prime Minister of the UK, the President of France, and the Chancellor of Germany have all stated that multiculturalism has been a disaster for them. But no politician in English Canada dares to challenge the concept. The problem is, you can have a multi-ethnic state, but if you are multicultural, then you are not one people. And as the current British PM has stated, you risk becoming an 'island of strangers' rather than a single people. Poilevre needs to drastically cut immigration. He has to address the lack of unity and tell newcomers they need to adapt and integrate, to embrace Canadian values, not just retain their old cultures and values.
    1 point
  17. It is far from Trudeaus party and getting farther every day. Trudeau tore apart relationships and Carney is putting them together again and making more. There is no way Trudeau could have given the speech Carney did in Davos. Caney is getting world wide respect and attention whereas Trudeau was hunkering down in Rideau Cottage. No, it is not Trudeaus' party any more.
    1 point
  18. There are a lot of states with voter ID laws and it changed nothing in demographics of who voted. The whole claim that voter id laws create this repressive environment is nonsense.
    1 point
  19. Wasn't this the one that if you read the entire thing that the FBI thought she was crazy.
    1 point
  20. The UN does good things all the time: World Health Organization (WHO): International public health. UNESCO: Education, science, and culture. ILO: International labor standards. FAO: Food and agriculture. World Bank Group & IMF: Finance and development. UNICEF: Children's rights. WFP: Food assistance. UNHCR: Refugee protection. UNDP: Development projects. But like any large organization, it has bloat, inefficencies, and corruption. That's no reason to throw out the baby with the bathwater. It's a good idea to have a forum where all countries can get together and work on problems. “All will concede that in order to have good neighbors, we must also be good neighbors. That applies in every field of human endeavor.” President Harry Truman
    1 point
  21. Kicking police vehicles is more than just being really mad. Well it doesn't make someone absolutely crazy it does show massively poor impulse control, serious anger management issues and poor judgment. Which means he had a mental health issue at the very least.
    1 point
  22. If white rural right-leaning voters were the ones who tended to not have photo ID Trump wouldn't be doing this. This is voter suppression and a power grab. The people who don't realize this aren't very smart, or willfully naive because it benefits their politics (which makes them tyrannical too).
    1 point
  23. He spat on an ICE vehicle and kicked out its tail light. Only a nutter would pull that against law enforcement.
    1 point
  24. You said the exact opposite when we were talking about trump's indictments. You stated that the indictments were fact and proof that trump had broken the law. You are such a lying sack of crap
    1 point
  25. You need a timeline for that? She became laughable so long ago you'd be better off with an archaeologist
    1 point
  26. They can't dump our bonds and trash our economy because they would trash their economy.
    1 point
  27. Another one of those informational things you will never find in Canada because Canada doesn't allow you to know information like this. It's similar to one I posted earlier for the UK.
    1 point
  28. What do you think is going to happen when all our former trade partners, who are holding trillions of U.S. dollars, dump all their U.S. treasury bonds? Here. Let me school you, dotard. "A mass dumping of U.S. Treasury bonds by foreign holders would likely trigger a severe, immediate financial crisis characterized by skyrocketing interest rates, a rapid devaluation of the dollar, and high inflation" That is the reality of where donalds imbicilic threats and trade wars has brought us. That fool all the red hats helped put into power, is about to crash our dollar, because hes a f_ckwit.
    1 point
  29. Asylum was designed to protect individuals fleeing persecution. It was not designed to import ideologies that reject the moral and political foundations of the societies offering refuge. But that is what has happened. Asylum systems evaluate fear of harm, not belief systems. They ask whether someone is in danger, not whether the worldview they carry is compatible with the society they are entering. Many asylum seekers are genuine victims of war and repression. That is not the issue. The issue is that asylum now functions as an ideological pipeline, not just a humanitarian one. Large numbers of applicants come from societies shaped by authoritarian politics, religious supremacy, tribal loyalty over civic law, honor-based justice, hostility to pluralism, and contempt for freedom of conscience. These are systemic frameworks. People are formed by them over decades. They do not disappear at the border. When these frameworks enter Western countries in significant numbers, they appear in voting blocs, censorship demands, intimidation campaigns parallel legal norms. The West assumes that exposure to freedom will automatically produce liberal citizens. That is not a law of nature. Freedom does not transform ideology by itself. It only protects the space where ideology can compete. If the imported ideology rejects freedom itself, it uses that space to organize against it. Asylum has become a mechanism for transferring populations whose political and theological assumptions are antithetical to the West. You can flee a dictatorship and still believe in the principles that created it. You can be oppressed by a system and still want to reproduce its logic in a new environment. A society that can't say “your beliefs are incompatible with this system” will eventually be forced to change its system instead. A political order based on individual rights can't survive mass importation of worldviews that deny individual rights. It does not matter how sincere the suffering was. It matters what replaces the suffering once safety is secured. What is being exported is not just people. It is moral architecture. Dan Burmawi
    1 point
  30. Let's just forget that he didn't get into deficit problems until the financial crisis, when the BQ, NDP and Liberals threatened to band together to take over unless we got a big economic incentive spending program, shall we?
    1 point
  31. Something I've said here a million times. If the left doesn't like the law, then they should have changed the law and should be aiming for change now. That is how things are done. Obama should have changed the law, or biden should have. IF you want these people to be legal. And whenever that is brought up the left wing posters here run and hide. They are well aware americans by and large do NOT want the law changed. So they don't want to bring it up. They just want to leave the laws in place BUT ignore them. "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW! Except people we like" - the left
    1 point
  32. The fact that I can't be sure if that's fake or not it says a hell of a lot about the liberals
    1 point
  33. 99.9% sure this is fake...but it is awesome!
    1 point
  34. I think a majority of Canadians want an end or reduction in immigrants from third world countries and especially muslim dominted countries not against immigration as a whole. Remember whatever you import, you become one, God forbid.
    1 point
  35. My issue with the trans is the cottage industry that exploits them by selling puberty blockers, surgeries etc. It violates basic ethics
    1 point
  36. That was your excuse here and this poor child had their body parts mutilated and is now going to recieve compensation for the lies
    1 point
  37. I think that is more likely than Trump being removed from office
    1 point
  38. With any luck an envoy of benevolent aliens from the United Galaxy are speeding on their way to invite us to join.
    1 point
  39. His win was obvious. Liberals are cheering even louder than Conservatives. His longer term future is still uncertain. 30% chance that there are more floor crossings which would make him a lame duck. He has shown negative aptitude at winning elections.
    1 point
  40. Mark Carney Wins Conservative Leadership Race Double down, double down. The castle walls didn't fall because you're not beating your heads against it hard enough.
    1 point
  41. Wah! We've got to protect our Canadian orange and olive growers from the threat of Chinese dragonfruits!
    1 point
  42. They never want to argue the facts directly because they know they can't.
    1 point
  43. "The credibility of FBI investigations can never be questioned. No level of evidence can ever prove FBI malfeasance or corruption." I'm just quoting you, Beave, so take that for what it's worth.
    1 point
  44. There were about 2500 people....is that 95% of the conservative members?? The Conservatives are celebrating Pierre Poilievre’s 87.4% “victory” like they just won the Stanley Cup. But here’s the part they don’t want you to know: This wasn’t an election. This was a confidence review run by party HQ. It wasn’t voted on by: • The public • Conservative voters • Or even the full CPC membership It was voted on by a small, tightly controlled group of registered party members approved by headquarters, the safest possible electorate. That’s not democracy. That’s a corporate board keeping their CEO. If Poilievre had lost: → THEN it would have gone to a real leadership election → THEN members would vote → THEN Canadians would see real competition But he didn’t face that. So no, he didn’t “win.” He was allowed to stay. That’s not a victory. That’s a boss not getting fired. This is the same guy who: • Blew a can’t-lose election • Lost his own seat • Drove MPs out of caucus • Became so toxic his party locked down the voting process And now the Conservatives are throwing confetti because he survived internal HR paperwork. That’s not leadership. That’s tenure. Pierre Poilievre wasn’t elected. He was selected. And every MP who quietly crosses the floor knows exactly what this “win” really means.
    1 point
  45. Congratulations. Now he can focus on the job to which he is most suited, Leader of the Loyal opposition. It is the best job in politics. He can say anything, propose any policy, without consequence. It is absolute freedom and he gets to live in a better residence. And you get to spend more time with your family. 😀 The worst role to have these days is Prime Minister, where your every utterance and action, no matter how noble, only alienates another group. No matter what party label, no matter how competant you are, from the moment you are appointed to the office, you begin the descent into unpopularity. Pierre, relish your position for as long as you can and be careful not to trigger an election. Have fun.
    1 point
  46. worrying about China stealing Cdn auto jobs while the USA has been and IS openly and actively been doing exactly that. Australia saw all it's car builders walk away, and they actually had one (Holden) of their own. They can and do buy Chinese and even Japanese Kei cars, their main complaint is that even those are gouging them on price markups. Aw gee we might have to pay $20K for a $10K car that 'competes' with the $60K cars we have now....
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...