Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/11/2025 in Posts
-
This wasn’t the claim scooter. I told you clowns during the election that if Trump wins I hope they vindictively go after anyone and everyone they can. You don’t get a free pass for cheering this on when it was the left doing it the last 4 years.3 points
-
Premier David Eby is losing ground on the pipeline issue. Whether the pipeline is approved/started/etc. during his and Premier Danielle Smith's term of office doesn't matter . . . long game: It will be built!2 points
-
The obvious to Michael's comment of Brantford being named after an ancient indigenous warrior is... 'did he speak Punjabi'? Deflect all you want... the only obvious was that it was an immature and racist comment.2 points
-
It is not playing the victim when you have people maliciously following federal officers to interfere with their operations and ram their vehicles. Nor is it when you ambush them with gun fire or with a sniper... Just keep playing dumb.2 points
-
To strip[ racists of their infantile belief of their own superiority. And to keep the city people away2 points
-
Poilievre is the leader of the opposition and a conservative. Eby is a socialist and his impacable opponent in all things. No engagement between them is possible as they operate on two entirely different realities. Eby wants the government to run everything. Poilievre believes in private enterprise and Capitalism. Eby loves borrowing, while Poilevre wants to stop borrowing. Like you, Eby will oppose everything and anything Poilievre supports. No credible scientist thinks fossil fuel threatens human prosperity or survival.1 point
-
There was no victim in Trump’s “crime”. He borrowed money from the bank, and paid it back in full on time. James on the other hand, defrauded the government by avoiding taxes.1 point
-
Then why did a grand jury indict Thick Tish James? Just getting started on Tish' alleged RICO scam1 point
-
Danielle smith is not the one whining on National tv about getting this project canceled it is not good for BC other projects....that's all EBY...Danielle has been cheering on BC projects...as well as all the rest of the projects...Those on the left in BC just don't like Alberta....and it is not team Canada it is what is best for BC and that's it...if anything else gets in the way we are going to protest that...1 point
-
1 point
-
So is an entire province. And according to Sam Cooper's investigative journalism, the Liberal party is firmly in Chinese control, too. Lots of video of Trudeau leaving Vancouver hotels with Chinese crime lords. Canada is circling the toilet bowl and if we're going to get taken over by anybody, I'd rather it be the US, than China.1 point
-
Not surprising that my comment made a whooshing sound over your head. Mike was tongue in cheek with his comment, same as my reply, indigenous language in Brantford is as much Punjabi as Anishinaabemowin. The fact that you see this as racist speaks volumes.1 point
-
What exactly does Brantford being named after an ancient indigenous warrior and an immature and racist comment of "did he speak Punjabi'? have to do with an operator call? Think before you talk...1 point
-
The 919 operator doesn't care... this serves as an additional level of complexity during stressful periods when people aren't at their best and response times are dog shi%. If cell phones hadn't been invented it might be OK, but lot's of people don't have hardline phones now so it could be a problem if your dinner guest needs to call you an ambulance at 1525 West ʕaʔuk ʔaama k̓anis Street. Chew thoroughly before swallowing...1 point
-
Frankly I could care less. The whole world watched in disgust while Brandon and his slime abused the legal system. Now it's being rubbed in your black wet noses. You were warned this would be the result. So you can just sit back and enjoy the consequences of your own chickenshit. Chrissy...baby...nobody takes you seriously. Go smoke more rock and re-color your hair green.1 point
-
You're either immature or a racist... Which is it? I'm saying both, but curious how you view yourself.1 point
-
1 point
-
So you admit you won't be able to complain about Democrats doing the same thing in the future because you're not complaining about Republicans now. Maybe you should stick to the "I'm an old man and I don't understand" excuse. Lol1 point
-
Crazy that you see independent DoJ and state investigations and prosecutions of actual crimes and unfounded, nakedly political prosecutions at the order of the POTUS as the same thing. These cases are going nowhere. You don't care. All you actually want is for you orange Jesus to be above the law. You are offended that he was held accountable for his actions. And you want the people who stood up to him to be punished. WTF are you even talking about. Sober up and try again when you can string together a cogent reply.1 point
-
Don't be ridiculous. "The government" being involved is not the same as people in government being involved. Bob Mendez's crimes are not "the government's" crimes. Right? Absolutely those people in government who could be reasonably connected to planning J6 should have been investigated. They don't get a pass just because they in office.1 point
-
There is absolutely no proof that Chrissy did not regularly rape 6-year-olds who are unnamed and unidentified. So it must be true Literally how their logic works1 point
-
The evidence is that they are baseless assertions with no evidence. What next, want me to prove there are no unicorns?1 point
-
I am too very worried about the future of Canada and inflow of what I see as undesirable or destructive immigrants especially when I see even the Conservatives aren't that much different with liberals when it comes to immigration.1 point
-
1 point
-
The NDP mantra has always had the same number of sides as a circle, which side are you on?1 point
-
1 point
-
You only keep on harping about that subject when shown your abject hypocrisy. The "G" string on your harp is playing a "B♭".1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
It's kind of her thing when she gets cornered She accuses everyone else of her own failings. Dropping her case is recanting. I also posted the defintition of that. And i didn't post anything about her being threatened. That was your claim, tho you've never posted anything to back it up. LOLOL Just digging yourself deeper and deeper.... it must be hard to type between sobs and tears like that1 point
-
1 point
-
I still recall old-timers talking on the radio out fishing in their old language. It sounded like Klingon.1 point
-
You folks are being had ! It's the 'Indian way' of making fun of you. We can't pronounce those names ourselves, or spell them the same way twice. Smile when you try . . . others are laughing at you.1 point
-
1 point
-
You spend your time on here crying about the very things you sit here doing yourself.1 point
-
A baseless accusation. You don't even know what the threat was. You run away every time I ask you. There is nothing "peacefull" about attacking property, obstruction, and attacking ICE / Federal LEO. So, come on, man up. Tell us you denounce the violence against ICE. Tell us that you support law enforcement when they are enforcing Federal Immigration laws.1 point
-
Said nothing here... maybe. You clearly hold the sentiment and have gone on to confirm that. What was my lie? You are the one lying when you say you only said they should not wear masks, you also said: "pretending they’re victims. Very, very weak." She had nothing more than a baseless accusation and once again, you are running away from this threat you keep talking about when challenged.1 point
-
Well... you want to quibble over semantics, but the point remains. You are pushing vile disgusting hate towards ICE and have repeatedly refused to offer any commentary denouncing violence against them. What threat? I asked you this many times now and you run away. All we have is a claim by her she was threatened. You have no idea what, and there is no evidence of who, and nothing I found about her ever reporting this threat to the police for any investigation. There is nothing to discredit. She has offered nothing other than a baseless accusation.1 point
-
OK, you have now made disparaging comments about ICE. You want to quibble over "recanted" when the point remains the same, she is long gone. Case dismissed/Case dropped long ago.1 point
-
1 point
-
It's part of the deal. He fluffs foreign leaders up so that they can look good while they sign bad deals. At the end of the day, Trump's happy, Americans are happy, Carney's happy, and the MSM is happy because they get to brag him up, and only Canadian peons like us get screwed. It's a win/win as far as everyone but the Canadian public is concerned.1 point
-
So far so good with the peace deal. It looks like the exchange will happen.1 point
-
No, I don't agree as I have not gone back to look at your past comments, but the why are you running away from addressing this now? ICE agents are not "police" they are federal law enforcement with a specific task executing directed actions against known criminals or people here unlawfully. They are not "police" like they are out patrolling the streets having random every day encoutners and interactions with the public. Folks like you direct violence towards them and want to harm them, so they protect themselves. So basically, your big argument is that you have not overtly said anything about ICE, but you do have the sentiments towards them in not caring about them being attacked.1 point
-
A. I said violent not deadly (though it certainly was deadly) B. Participants are on camera touting the intent to overthrow the government. C. Insurrection does not require "government organizational efforts," but there certainly were multiple efforts to organize and instigate, including the sitting POTUS. D. No matter what you want to call it, any attempt to delay the view certification through violence was illegal--which was your absurd question.1 point
-
Should probably go without saying, but yeah, delaying the vote through violent insurrection is, indeed, against the law.1 point
-
What rock are you living under? He speaks French in literally every public appearance since his public debut earlier this year including a French language debate and responding to reporters’ French questions in French. Seriously, what a question. That said it’s long been known and admitted by him that his French is not great and people including him generally rate it a 6/10. He’s able to understand and be understood, with some small grammatical errors and heavy anglo accent. But Harper’s French was similarly not great at first and it improved over time. Ive already noticed Carney’s French has improved somewhat.1 point
-
When Carney first ran for federal Liberal, his French was weird, shakey. I am impressed with his recent French. His accent is now intelligent Canadian English-speaker; he has the vocabulary. ==== I conclude that Carney is a very ambitious guy.1 point
