Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/25/2025 in all areas

  1. Never happened LMAO you are so out of touch. It is an objective fact of history that congress received forged electoral certificates for several states indicting a Trump rather than Biden win and that these certificates were created by Republican operatives in those states not the state officials responsible for certifying their election count Absolutely happened. Again this is an objective fact of history, such as his infamous call to Georgian official Raffensburger. “ All I need is 11,780 votes, just say you found 11,780 votes” and suggesting anyone who doesn’t is going to be prosecuted for election fraud. The sham lawsuits clearly had absolutely no merit in fact or legal argument, did not meet even the basic legal standard for bringing forward to a court of law and several lawyers involved were eventually sanctioned for misconduct as a result, some losing their license. 1) Democts did nothing of the sort in 2016 2) the constitution requires that congress certify the election on January 6, period. There is no provision under the constitution to do it on any other date. By attempting to prevent certification on Jan 6, an unprecedented constitutional crisis with no clear resolution would have occurred if Republicans had been successful in preventing certification on Jan 6, which was their goal in order to proclaim the Biden win null and void and that Trump must remain office indefinitely until some sort of resolution could be found. There’s a reason the rally was held on Jan 6 near the Capitol and not some other date or other location, that’s not coincidence In fact rhetoric from Trump and the other supporters during and in the leaduup to the rally was notably violent ; ”you got to go to the streets and be as violent as Antifa.”” “we’re coming for you and we’re going to have a good time doing it!” “let’s have trial by combat.” “We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” Prior to Jan 6 Trump refused multiple recommendations from his own staff to use the word “peaceful” in any of his tweets and statements about the upcoming rally as staff were concerned that it could become violent Trump said the word “peacefully” ONCE in his speech which was written by his writers But the speech said the word “fight” more than 20 times and he ad-libbed it in his remarks 18 more times Even after Trump learned that hos minions had breached the Capitol rather than de-escalate he continued to tweet incendiary comments about how their country had been stolen and how Mile Pence had betrayed them and America Even if we give Trump credit he doesn’t deserve and assume that he didn’t intend for a mob of his brainwashed zealots to attack the Capitol, it was definitely foreseeable and a massive act of negligence and incompetence on his part Heres a little thought exercise you can do in the future: rather than pretend every egregious thing Trump does is totally normal and a nothingburger, try to imagine how you would react if Hillary, Obama or Biden had doe it instead. I highly doubt that if it was Biden and his supporters who had been committing those acts you would be ok with it.
    2 points
  2. This from the guy who posted ass porn for like 3 weeks straight. Kid you have already set that bar solo there is nothing I can do to beat you. So instead I point and laugh and mock you and play along and insult you back when you're insulting and have fun with it Nobody here takes you seriously. you behave like a 13 year old If you want to be taken seriously and treated with respect then first off you have to show respect to others and second off you can't have a hissy fit meltdown every single time someone points out that you're wrong. Because you're wrong a fair bit. And while you're at it maybe fix that, that would help a lot. I mean every once in a blue moon when you're actually making an effort you'll come up with some points that are sometimes interesting. It's not like I've never put a positive emoji on any of your posts. But most of your stuff is just pure I'll drive and you can't go around insulting other people and their families and then pretend to be outraged and horrified that someone insulted your family. You can't post ass porn for weeks and then pretend you're not the most disgusting poster here. You set the bar, other people are following. If you think things aren't looking great then go look in a mirror.
    2 points
  3. When Carney did his cabinet reshuffle before the election, his new cabinet was a bit different than Trudeau's: no gender equality in cabinet (it was close but not equal). But his new cabinet post-election? 28 Ministers, 14 men, 14 women. Virtue-signalling and voter pandering over merit and experience. The Liberal way. Carney "the great uniter" is a myth, he listens to the Liberal PR crew just like Trudeau. Nothing like gender wars to create a wedge issue and split a demographic down the middle. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-carneys-cabinet-a-familiar-mix-of-quotas-duplication-and-pork-barrel/ Oh and reducing the PMO's grip over elected MP's? HA!
    1 point
  4. Trump just signed an EO that will increase the number of nuclear plants. This is a very big deal that should be bipartisan. So how will the left oppose more cheap, no emission power?
    1 point
  5. You are living in a country with more freedom, wealth ad opportunity than anyone who who ever lived before you, even if you are a brown person or new immigrant, which none of you are. Yet you carry on that it is a broken mess and everything is horrible. You f*cking ingrates! It is not the Liberals fault you are unable to improve your own lot and believe that fixing things means tearing them down and taking away opportunities from someone else. That's your own failing. Take the opportunity to educate yourself on basic political policy so you too do not end up utterly condemning communism and then praising some of it's end results while actually believing conservative policy would achieve those same things. Remember only a few ears ago you were condemning Justin for praising China's ability to do quickly the very thing you're now waving about as an accomplishment. Hypocritical ingrates.
    1 point
  6. Yes, I think I understand you perfectly now... thanks.
    1 point
  7. "THIS IS THE GREATEST CRISIS EVER FACED BY CANADA". And now that i've won, i'm off to europe to pal around a little. No budget for you!
    1 point
  8. Since you've not figured it out, I'll explain it to you. The CO2 that animals emit, comes FROM the atmosphere, whether it is plant or animal based food. AKA we are all just recycling CO2 that already freely exists and that has NO EFFECT on the climate. Fossil fuel CO2 that comes from your truck, was last in the atmosphere MILLIONS of years ago. AKA, releasing it INCREASES atmospheric concentrations and that GHG makes the planet warmer. Do you understand now?
    1 point
  9. So when you said "libbies" cause so much inflation you meant one moderate Democrat who inherited an economy in the midst of a generational crisis and successfully navigated the economy out said crisis into a soft landing? Spot on, as usual.🤣
    1 point
  10. More of his family photos? At least he finally found a topic that he's an expert on here.
    1 point
  11. Have you read your posts , the only one whining is you...I'd high five you if you had anything of value to say...but thats rarely happened... And yet you keep on responding, like my posts where crack cocaine, you need them to survive....it's why you won't put me on ignore, because you can't ....
    1 point
  12. "LOS ANGELES – The United States Attorney’s Office along with its federal law enforcement partners today announced the launch of Operation Guardian Angel, a program that seeks to neutralize California’s sanctuary state policy and protect Americans from criminal illegal aliens incarcerated in county jails by issuing federal arrest warrants for them. The Central District of California – comprised of the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura – is home to an estimated 1.5 million illegal aliens. Among this population are gang members and other dangerous felons. The operation will file complaints and arrest warrants to allow federal law enforcement to take as many defendants as possible into custody from state jails. The program, which began May 10, has resulted in the arrest of 13 defendants as of May 15. Those numbers are expected to grow. “Even the worst criminal aliens in state custody are frequently released into the community because California’s sanctuary state policies block cooperation with federal law enforcement,” said United States Attorney Bill Essayli. “These laws effectively render federal immigration detainers meaningless. The days of giving criminal illegal aliens a free pass are over. While California may be presently disregarding detainers, it cannot ignore federal arrest warrants.” https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/operation-guardian-angel-launched-neutralize-californias-sanctuary-state-policies The question now is, where are they going to put them? Do they ship their asses to El Salvador? Maybe we can stick them in labor camps and force them to contribute to society.
    1 point
  13. I can also type YOU ARE A LIAR. Only the truth. You STILL haven't responded to your FALSE claims about biological sources of CO2 being relevant to climate change. Have you figured that out yet? LMAO
    1 point
  14. Canada is in such bad shape because we’ve had a government in office for over a decade that’s pursued terrible policies that have made things worse for everyone except for the very wealthy.
    1 point
  15. Lol. So, it's your official position that the people illegally crossing the southern border are not overwhelmingly non-white, primarily Mexican and Latin American? You're going on record with that? You really are shameless in your eagerness to carry water. No bar too low. No claim too dishonest.
    1 point
  16. That’s not an argument either. But let me guess. The person who feels women occupying an equal place in society also believes anyone not white is a DEI hire. Obviously the years and years where white men exclusively occupied positions of power was purely merit based? I like how the fat old white men always think they’re the most qualified, even when they make ridiculously stupid posts like the OP.
    1 point
  17. Never happened. Never happened. Legal maneuvers aren't fraud. It isn't a constitutional crisis to challenge EC results. In fact, it's perfectly constitutional. Democrats did it, in droves, in 2016. Yep. Calling on people to march peacefully and patrioticly was code for take over the country while wearing costums and using no weapons. The legal maneuvers that Trump used were very similar to JFK in Hawaii in 1960. JFK sent "fraudlent" (otherwise known as alternate) electors. And it worked. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_United_States_presidential_election_in_Hawaii But you ran away from the fact that you are attempting to discredit me rather than addressing the issue. That's rule #2 of the lefty loon rules for debating. Apparently you have nothing.
    1 point
  18. Hilary conceded on the night of the election, unlike Trump. Trump attempted a number of fraudulent schemes to change the result of the election, unlike Hillary.
    1 point
  19. Oh, we do? Do we? You guys made up Russia collusion and then called Trump illegitimate. What you are doing is just demonization for distraction. You are the side that is cheating and then trying to blame the other side for pointing it out.
    1 point
  20. Why not fight fire with fire, Ship all the illegal aliens from the rest of the country to California, make Hollywood their new home. Methinks there would be a rapid change in thinking from Newsome and his acolytes.
    1 point
  21. 1 point
  22. Sanctuary cities are abiding by the law. And they exist because those policies are the best for the citizens who live there. In the US, border and immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility. States and cities have no role there, but they do have other obligations to their citizenry. Imagine that you're running a city in Southern California, for example. Undocumented people exist. That's a fact you can't change (federal responsibility) like the weather or the water level. You have to decide how to achieve your goals within the context of that reality. For example, law enforcement depends on community engagement and trust. You need people to follow the local laws and to assist with enforcement. You need people to share information with investigators. You need people to be witnesses. You need people to be willing to comply with a traffic stop. You need people to take responsibility after a fender bender. And on and on. Obviously, establishing every contact with your local LEO as an existential threat to the undocumented residents in your community undermines all of your local goals with regard to community trust and engagement. Are you going to sacrifice your macro objectives--what you owe to your constituents--to mitigate the deficiencies of the federal government? Remembering that your job is to govern your city, is helping the feds deport a handful of people worth driving a subset of your population out of compliance, trust and engagement? Of course not. That's an easy decision. You do what's right for your city and your people and let the feds worry about their obligations.
    1 point
  23. Sure, pointing out that Trump is overtly targeting people of color and favoring whites in yet another aspect of governance is "racist." If you're a dimwitted liar, that probably sounds like a super great counter argument.
    1 point
  24. The point is that, as usual, you are talking about things you don't remotely understand. Your premise that "libbies cause so much inflation" is obviously false. Democrats are, and historically have been, decisively better for the economy. The ideas are better. They work better in practice. The outcomes are on record.
    1 point
  25. Maybe the best case scenario... it would render it totally predictable, mildly amusing and limit its vocabulary to duh and LMAO.
    1 point
  26. No, you don’t know where the facts end and Republican innuendo and baseless allegations begin. I’ll say it again there’s NO EVIDENCE that Hillary personally interfered to hold up the deal or otherwise inappropriately interfered. None. There is no evidence that any of the deals were even mysteriously delayed or otherwise held up prior to a donation. None. Look these countries: Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States have been reliant on US military equipment and have been a vital US interest for DECADES. These arms deals are part of the US long term global strategy that spans multiple presidents and governments going back to the 1950s. They don’t just happen or not happen randomly on the whim of a single public servant who wants to take a little bribe Also Hillary’s State department is just one of many departments that major arms deals have to go through, it’s not like it’s her personal pet project. Sorry the claim is bullshit it come from a Republican propagandist’s book and he doesn’t offer any evidence because the book is written just to preach to the converted. Also I love how when it’s a democrat being accused you suddenly claim that flimsy circumstantial evidence and unsubstantiated rumours are compelling evidence. And yet when Republicans are accused of wrongdoing suddenly your standard of evidence so high as to become impossible. And as I already said donations to someone’s charity doesn’t benefit them directly so even if these baseless accusations were true it wouldn’t at all be the same as Trump’s rackets that pay him directly Trump is selling private audience with the president for personal profit to FOREIGNERS . He’s accepting extravagant gifts from foreign governments. Remember you insisted that Trudeau’s ONE plane ride in a lifelong family friend’s plane was bribery so how can you say gifting Trump a half billion dollar “palace in the sky” isn’t? YOU ARE THE HYPOCRITE Lastly you claim that it’s ok for Trump to accept bribes as long as he doesn’t actually give anything in return is ridiculous. It’s called conflict of interest Trump has launched policies related to crypto including creating a federal crypto reserve and of course he and the US government and his private business have all sorts of ongoing dealings with the Qataris And unlike tour claims about Hillary Trump is not one of a dozen people involved in these deals he is running the show. Lmao you wouldn’t know reality if it bit you on the ass, election denier. EDIT: it’s also hilarious that you try to suggest that inappropriate dealings with the Saudis originated under Obama when the Bush family (father and son) was LOUSY with Saudi money for years….again this was highlighted in Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11:
    1 point
  27. Who you keep switching things up don't you. First it's for brown people now it's just anybody that's not white and now you say the app is specifically designed for people who aren't white. Yet looking at it I see no indication that that's true. Also the app is not just for people crossing the borders. Seems like the racist here is you
    1 point
  28. I think the SMR's will produce less heat than his head if you do We'll have to start calling him Robochernobyl
    1 point
  29. Yes, dumbass, this newsflash just in: the people crossing the southern border are almost entirely non-white. Which you already know. And this is what the app is for. I'm typing this slower and louder because apparently it's necessary... If Trump had made a blanket shutdown blocking all asylum and refuge seekers you could at least pretend it wasn't racially motivated, even though we all know who Trump is targeting. But when he shuts down the pathways used overwhelmingly by brown people, and then opens up a special path for white people, it's undeniably racially motivated. It's not a question or an accusation, just a fact. Playing that dumb should bother you, but as you constantly demonstrate, there's no bar too low when it comes to defending orange people.
    1 point
  30. We've yet to have any noteworthy good results. We've got an economy he's quickly tipping into recession, a constitutional crisis, a government waging war on journalism, science and education, an insane tariff policy and the volatile market to match. There's pretty much nothing the orange buffoon can't turn to shit in just 100 days.
    1 point
  31. If you want to lower depression and suicide in youth, teach them that their bodies are healthy and beautiful and perfect just the way nature made them. Telling someone that they were "born in the wrong body" is absolutely disgusting and psychologically abusive. As is enabling delusions using powerful medications and cosmetic surgeries. If a guy wants to wear lipstick and a dress then wear lipstick and a dress.
    1 point
  32. They're happy to keep fooling themselves. Dropping bombs on people's head is not genocide, but redistributing the land of the wealthy is genocide. Fleeing economic predicaments is not grounds for refugee status, unless you're a white S African Favouring immigration of only the white citizens of a country is not racist. I know you are but what am I? All the usual responses from the Ignoroids.
    1 point
  33. Sorry thats just another unproven Republican allegation bases on zero evidence m, which I think even you have embellished further. There’s no evidence that Hillary first “refused” or was directly involved in any way. The only ACTUAL facts are that 1) countries who have been purchasing weapons from the USA LONG BEFORE Obama and Hillary continued to do so during their time and 2) they also made donations to the Clinton foundation. As for Biden, again more unproven claims we don’t need to go down that road again Second of all, making a charitable donation to registered charity that is open to public scrutiny where there’s no clear direct benefit to the Clintons is definitely different than openly and brazenly giving cash directly to Trump through these crypto and private club schemes and clearly and openly getting special access to POTUS as a reward. Unlike your claims about Clinton and Biden it’s not an unproven rumour that that Trump is doing it, he’s doing it in the open for everyone to see
    1 point
  34. Watch his Quislings rally to claim it's not corruption and perfectly okay to use his Presidency to profit personally.
    1 point
  35. Carney is still a left wing ideologue. He talked like a red tory during the election to trick people into voting for him but at the end of the day he's still a woke social justice loser. Of course he's going to side with the terrorists, just like ilhan omar and the crew. And the palestinians in canada will actually attack him, while the jews will not. Jews don't have violent protests so why would he side with them? Isreal needs to wrap this up one way or another. These tards will make life more and more difficult for them over time.
    1 point
  36. This aged well...very well. https://news-pravda.com/usa/2025/05/23/1359451.html ICYMI: "Our sources were telling us Hunter Biden was spending more time in the Oval Office than Joe Biden," says Rep James Comer as he discusses congress' start to the Biden cover-up probe
    1 point
  37. 1 point
  38. Liar. Nobody who respected their parents would behave like you do. And you've insulted other's family and parents including mine , so it's pretty hard to believe you're terribly choked up about it. And quit posting your family photos, we don't need to see it
    1 point
  39. "Father, I'm very depressed. Can I pump myself full of hormones until I grow boobs and then cut my d*ck off? It'll make me feel better". "Yes, son. Head to the car while I grab the keys and tell mom we'll be late for dinner".
    0 points
  40. Oh Gee let's adapt the MAGA whine about DEI and claim Carney's appointing unqualified women just for show. After all, in a country that's 51% women giving them equal consideration is just more leftist liberal extreme marxist elitist globalist SJW virtue signalling..... Because it's 2025. Ten years later and you still don't 'get it'.
    -1 points
  41. That’s not an argument. I’m thinking that Carney is going to quickly wear out his welcome to Canadians as well as the media.
    -1 points
  42. Why would we care? Like.. sink into what? Neither did trudeau's but you still voted for him. And? You're including is pension in that, would you include pensions in calculations for any other union worker?
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...