Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/24/2025 in Posts

  1. Interesting idea. I assume the bar is lower, now that our number one trading partner kidnaps people and deports them without due process.
    3 points
  2. Bullshit. I always support whoever wins because I want them to do a good job for the country. That's all that really matters. I've voted for enough losers in my time not to get upset about it or take it personally. I'm not too concerned if either one of them wins. As far as an election being fixed is concerned, no party has ever made that accusation, ever. And this bullshit about pencils. FFS we have been using pencils since Christ was a cowboy regardless of who won. A Trump supporter accusing others of supporting fascism. That's rich.
    3 points
  3. And ^this does not even account for the variations caused by a brain that is NOT SYNCHRONIZED with the body.
    2 points
  4. In spite of being told by his own advisors and even a call from PM Carney, the compulsive oaf has after a week of forced silence been unable to keep his fat mouth shut and blurted out again how Canada should be the 51st state. Personally responsible for the Resurrection of the Liberal Party in Canada from a certain death, the Tangerine Twatface has shot all hopes for his northern Mini-Me in the final days of our election. The man cannot stop, cannot change, cannot think only continue with Tourette's like outbursts of 11diocy, not matter how harmful they are to US policies and public face. I would really love to see him have carried on so damn much he ended up sitting across the Trade talk table from Jagmeet Singh resplendent in a back-combed beard, his biggest, pinkest turban and dressed in blue jeans and a Canucks jersey. It would be exquisite to see Trump and his bumboy Vance squirming like eels trying to contain the explosive diarrhea in their heads from launching out their mouth. Opportunity missed. Congratulations Donald for shooting yourself in the foot.Again and again and again and again. No we don't need your cars either, we'll just rebadge them Frontenacs, Acadians, McLaighlins, Fargos and Beaumonts. Maybe shrink them a bit and sell them tariff free all over Europe, Asia and Africa.
    2 points
  5. I swear it's a 12 year old boy behind the avatar. Adult thinking is just beyond its abilities.
    2 points
  6. Exactly. But it WAS the law. And you said you always follow the law. If the law says Kill Jews or Truckers Bad, you fall in line. You do this because you have no principles. No morals. No ethics. Hee Haw I don't live in the past. I learn from it. You should too.
    2 points
  7. Trump basically said, yesterday, that he doesn't want any cars made in Canada. I guess he just wants to sell domestically now. Blowing up the Auto Pact basically ends The Big 3. I wouldn't mind having access to Chinese EVs. If we have any hope of weening ourself off ICE vehicles, they seem like the shot.
    2 points
  8. The conversation isn't about Carney and what he said, did or wants to do. It's about the obnoxious disruptive lout in the White House who at least has made it clear to one new person that 'foreign interference' in Canadian politics has almost exclusively come from the US since 1867. Trump can only be too stupid and compulsive to keep his mouth shut, or intentionally seeking to maintain a hostile US/Canada relationship thinking that will benefit him. You know, I know, everyone knows a Conservative govt would be more willing to accommodate more of Trump's agenda, they've said so promising tax cuts, weakened regulations and environmental standards, wars on woke, plastic straws, end EV mandates, every petty item of maga policy they can copy. So do I actually have to poke a finger in your eyes to make you understand and agree Trump is hurting your chances?
    2 points
  9. How big is your amygdala? Political ideology linked to subtle differences in brain structure, study finds The study showed that conservative voters tend to have a slightly larger amygdala than progressive voters—by approximately the size of a sesame seed. The amygdala is the part of the brain responsible for processing fear, rage and anxiety.
    2 points
  10. We're talking about biological exceptions that only make up 1% or so of the population. It's ludicrous how so few people can cause so many of the 40% of Canadians who are conservative to be so hostile towards everyone. It is what it is I guess.
    2 points
  11. This, folks, is what we call delusional coping. Behold it in all its glory.
    2 points
  12. Who is currently applying for a public servant position to run our country not others. That's like complaining that your surgeon has been a surgeon all his life and never even tried being a plumber. It's an absolutely Retarded thing to say. You want someone with experience in the industry that you are hiring them for. You want someone who understands the country that they are going to run. You do not want someone who has never been a politician for 5 minutes and has spent most of his adult life out of the country and has allegiance to three other countries. That's who you don't want Remember when you Twinkies all demanded that what we really needed as far as experience goes is a drama teacher? And we told you that's not what you want and it won't work out well? Yeah, you do not want an international banker who already has business dealings with trump's family and associates and who has lied at least two or three times every week of the campaign and who does not spend all of his time in Canada and has never done a political job in his life to run your country especially at a time when we are under attack from the very guy he does business with. We warned you last time you didn't listen look what happened. We're warning you this time, be smarter
    2 points
  13. I didn't change anyything. I said the government broke the law, as adjudicated in court. You said they didn't, because Bondi could "overrule an immigration judge WRT withholding. But a) she didn't do that, and b) it's not an immigration judge that ruled that the administration broke the law, it's a district court judge. This is not hard. They broke the law. The district court said they broke the law and had to bring him back. The SCOTUS affirmed that they broke the law and had to facilitate his return. You now want to argue that he's safer in some El Salvadoran nightmare prison than he was living a regular life with his wife and 3 kids? GTFO. This is just next-level dishonesty. -- A man who was legally in this country, working a steady union job to support his family, without any criminal record in this country or any other was suddenly snatched up, put on a plane, flown to a foreign country and put in prison. Think about how farking insane that is. That's nothing remotely resembling justice. That's third-world dictator shit. And you're loving it. You're disgusting.
    2 points
  14. If you can say anything about Trump, it's that he stays on message, even if that message is dumb and inaccurate. I think he sees Carney will win so he can continue to taunt us. His actions speak larger than the rhetoric. The tariffs are going to start causing real damage to the US economy and not just peoples stock portfolio. He was warned yesterday that using the Fed chair as a scapegoat will further undermine confidence in the US economy and this insane trade war with China could lead to empty shelves. He's looking for an offramp. But I kind of hope he doesn't. Crashing the US economy might finally rid us of this malignant political period in history.
    2 points
  15. ?????????? you are so weird Picasso paintings look at you and say "wtf is that supposed to be"?
    2 points
  16. If you look at the level of lying and gaslighting coming at us from the federal government and MSM these days, it's hard to imagine why elections would be any less bogus. What would be the point of putting all that time and money into disinformation for 4 years just to chance it all on an election? I'll admit that I couldn't read the OP because I don't do manifestos, but I did see a majority of Canadians welcome fascism in 2021, and I still don't see any of those maggots showing signs of remorse. Given the option to have 1-party rule does anyone think that eyeball, exflyer, aristedes, M Hardner, myata, etc would blink? If Carney just called off the election tonight and announced himself emperor, they'd be high-fiving and lining up to kiss the ring.
    2 points
  17. Hey! Stop using stupid democrats against us! Or we will send back all the PBR and that will be the only beer you will be able to drink!
    2 points
  18. But you do think that everybody who supported these guys should be upset that that happenedyou're horrified to see that if anything it raises these people in their eyes. You desperately want these people to suffer and those who support them to suffer with them and it's not happening and it's pretty obvious that that's upsetting you. So yeah. Does look like the truth hurts you a bit
    2 points
  19. Watch as Jasmine "Smollett" Crocket claims she became a lawyer because she was victim of a hate crime...no wait...TWO hate crimes and so where her friends...yeah, her friends...like all of them. You don't even need to watch the juxtaposed video to see the bìtch is lying. Watch her body language and her eyes. Classic "I'm making shit up" body language.
    1 point
  20. You're just getting more vapid as you repeat this crap. Yes, the first immigration judge did indeed say that. As acknowledged multiple times. That does NOT make something proven nor it it conviction of a crime. Jeebus. It was not a trial. There is no explicit standard of evidence. The judge just decides if someone can stay or go. That's it. Yes, someone with a withholding of removal status is here legally. The legal system, legally and explicitly, said that they can remain in the country. They are issued a work permit. And you end with some epic bullshit there. He's not a proven gang member, but rather accused of being in a gang with very thin evidence. And there's no evidence whatsoever of him being involved in raping or killing women or girls, you asshat. He was just a guy with a job and a family, legally living in the US. -- Despite the accusations of being in a gang, in all the years he's been in the US (and on the planet) he's never been accused, tried or convicted of a crime. Even with all the scrutiny and regular check-ins (never missed) for his immigration status, never a whiff of him doing anything criminal. And again, whether he's the world's most super secret gang member when he's not at work or with his family, is irrelevant. Even people who ARE in gangs get a trial. They are not scooped up off the street and sent to prison in farking El Salvador. You are arguing that it's fine to scoop people off the street and just send them to a foreign prison. No need for a trial even! That's pretty goddamn monstrous--and about as unAmerican as it gets--but there you are.
    1 point
  21. Past PM Stephen Harper . . . Bachelor degree in Economics 1985, Master's degree in Economics 1991. Present PM Mark Carney . . . advisor to then PM Justin Trudeau? "the budget will balance itself . . . "
    1 point
  22. Jeebus. You are just full to the brim with crap. He has never had a criminal trial, let alone a conviction. 1. He was interviewed for loitering (day labor line at Home Depot) in 2019. He was not charged with any crime whatsoever and was instead referred to immigration because he was in the country illegally. 2. He was accused of being in a gang, but denied it. The evidence of him being in a gang is pretty thin, but Judge 1 --at hearing, not trial--found it plausible and was willing to deport him. He was then granted an order of withholding and was released with a work permit. At that point he is legally in the country and able to work. No "proven" gang membership because there was no trial. A judge simply found it believable at a hearing--which is a WILDLY different standard of evidence than a criminal trial. So, for five years he's fine, legally living and working in the US with a good job and a family. No trouble. No crime. No trial. No conviction. And then one day he gets pulled over, detained, put on a plane and shipped to a prison in El Salvador. AGAIN, without any trial or conviction. Just plucked out of a normal life and shipped to a gulag in another country. It's beyond farked up. It's insane that you people think this is justice or is a precedent we should set. I don't care if you believe deep down in your shriveled heart that someone has gang ties, in America we don't just grab that person off the street and send them to prison. Due farking process.
    1 point
  23. Then we set ours higher and start a race to the top.
    1 point
  24. Mostly, yes. No one has claimed otherwise. But those exceptions mean that biological sex is not binary. I had this conversation with some of the weirdos on this forum and they insisted that, despite the many exceptions, biological sex was still binary. It was bizarre.
    1 point
  25. Do you? At one time, it was illegal to hide Jews and legal to turn them in. You stand for that, do you? As was said here, you're a spineless invertebrate who has no morals or ethics and repeats whatever the government tells you, like a braying donkey. Hee Haw, Hee Haw you m0r0n.
    1 point
  26. Nope. That's history buddy. The liberals, the current liberals who are currently in power and have been there all along, have exceeded every one of their budget promises by at least 50% and in most cases double. Now if somebody does something again and again and again for 10 years, it is pretty reasonable for someone to say they are going to do it again. You know it's true, that's why you tried to dodge the question By posting irrelevant crap about the conservatives instead of addressing the issue. The liberals have more than doubled our national debt, borrowing more in 10 years than every other prime minister in history before them combined. Every single time they have promised that the deficit would only be so high it has grossly exceeded and usually doubled or tripled that. There's absolutely no reason in the universe to think carney won't do the same, in fact there is much reason to think he won't because if you look at his financials he did not account for the tariffs effect on the economy and therefore government revenue. Some prominent sources have said that will automatically put him 10 billion dollars in the red each year more than he has said. Sorry kiddo. I realize that you are a walking exercise and self-delusion and that's the only way you can remain a liberal in the first place but that does not change the facts
    1 point
  27. Why do you assume I voted for the Liberals under Trudeau? I'm a fiscal conservative and he certainly wasn't.
    1 point
  28. I see he’s ranting about the ‘China loving Wall Street Journal’ now.
    1 point
  29. Awww Muffin. It must suck to support one of the biggest political collapses in Canadian history.
    1 point
  30. No, exactly as I said, district court judge Paula Xinis ordered his return. The administration has broken and continues to break the law, as affirmed by the SCOTUS. This is the United States of America, not yet Trumpistan. A court order is a court order, and the executive can't ignore it and the AG can't overturn it or retroactively deem actions legal. Whatever bullshit you read on Twitter, this is reality.
    1 point
  31. And, of course, Jared's business partner.
    1 point
  32. It is a safe bet that if he's saying 200 billion in new debt over the next 4 years, it's going to be between 300 and 400 at least.
    1 point
  33. No it wasn't, and we've been through this with you before as well. As we have provided proof many times that most of the equipment was either operational or easily made operational with limited effort including several Blackhawk helicopters.
    1 point
  34. Do politicians often visit ridings late in the campaign they haven’t a hope in just to freak the other guys out? I see Carney was in Trois-Rivières yesterday, a seat not won by the federal Liberals since 1980.
    1 point
  35. The last week of all the local Tories deflecting sshh shhh the issue isn't really Trump it's Liberal mishandling of.... the Mango Mor*n can't stop himself from blurting out and reclaiming center stage. Do continue to be blind to things that hurt your own cause.
    1 point
  36. Nonsense, I've never embraced you even once I think we may have detected part of your problem I think we may have detected the rest of your problem
    1 point
  37. Speaking of drivel... you ran away from this drivel of yours: "And that was the plan of Kirk and his goons. They went there to cause that and got what they wanted."
    1 point
  38. I think WCM is a little more on point. But they would call it Cis White Male.
    1 point
  39. Maybe they should just call it EBSWM: everyone but straight white males. Lol. Great minds think alike.
    1 point
  40. Am I supposed to feel sorry for them finally catching up to things people were pointing out decades ago? They were like this with the invasion of Iraq too - all for it at the time. Wait until AGW finally hits them betwixt the eyes. Should only take another 30 years.
    1 point
  41. You posted how it works on a binary poll with only two options, which this election isn't. Good job, donkey! 🙃 Answer the question: Give me the range of likely probabilities for the PPC's 0.9%, + or minus a 2.7% margin of error. Are they in a "statistical tie" with the Greens and the Bloc? According to your "definition", they are! 🤣 Except they're not, because we aren't a two-horse race with only two candidates, we have numerous other parties pulling significant portions of the vote, and thus cannot just slap the margin of error uniformly across every party. Often pollsters, journalists and political scientists calculate this as twice the reported margin of error of the poll. ... While this is the correct conclusion when there are only two possible survey responses, it is not correct when there are more than two possible responses, which is in fact virtually always the case. How much difference this makes depends on how many responses are outside the two categories of interest. ... Whenever we compare proportions of candidate support within a single survey, this is the formula we should use. For low amounts of undecided or third party support the results will be close to the “twice the margin of error” formula, but the correct margin of error will be less than this as the proportion of “other” responses increases.
    1 point
  42. I don't know, was it the missing action figure? Try frying some zucchini with a little butter, that should help.
    1 point
  43. That's where the GINI comes in. You are happy that the economy is being upended but you don't understand where it's going. How exactly will this result in a windfall for working people ? I never understood that.
    1 point
  44. Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland are micro-countries compared to ours. They don’t have the challenge of delivering care across a subcontinent. The country I’d like us to match is Australia, similar in magnitude, politics and culture with an indigenous population that has special challenges. We’re falling behind them too. They have a mixed system of public and private care.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...