Leaderboard

There's no "unmasking" you weirdo. He's just a regular judge trying to administer the law. This is the executive trying to eliminate any check on his power by attacking the co-equal judicial branch. To end the rule of law and replace it with rule by executive fiat. Trump has done this consistently with the judiciary--and the media, for that matter. Every judge that inconveniences him is smeared and attacked and threatened to discourage the next one. The "dismantling" you're cheering about is the dismantling of democracy.

Quantifying Why Democrats Support Open Borders A Center for Immigration Studies report released today quantifies why Democrats support, or are indifferent to, open borders. The figures underlying the study may stun even the strongest proponents of border security. The net effect of increases in both legal and illegal immigration in the 2020 Census shifted 17 House seats and 17 Electoral College votes, resulting in a net gain of 14 seats in Blue States — ten seats shifting from red states and four from battleground states. That Democratic net gain is greater than the respective electoral votes of all but ten states. In part because districts with high percentages of noncitizens tend to vote Democrat, “of the 24 districts where one in five adults is not an American citizen, 20 were won by a Democrat in 2022. In contrast, the Democrat won in just five of the 54 districts where 98 percent of adults are citizens.” Millions of illegal aliens have flooded the country during the Biden presidency. An indeterminate number — estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands — have been flown into the country by the Biden administration and deposited in certain jurisdictions. Increasingly, Democrats needn’t be concerned about persuading American voters. They’ve gained electoral votes by the addition — strategic or otherwise — of illegal immigrants. This is a “fundamental transformation” of the country. https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117827/documents/HHRG-119-JU01-20250122-SD011.pdf

@Libbies Every once in a while, I read a thread and realize...or should I say reaffirm my belief that you people are slime...toe-jam...worms. "Oh it was just some individuals." You fcking spineless dweebs are disgusting. Ya wanna real war? Ya want us to let our anger go, the way you childish creeps have? You disgusting, cowardly dogs.

Yep, boring Joe Biden who oversaw the best pandemic recovery in the G7 and handed trump back a robust economy. Boring, sleepy Joe, who shaped policy like a rational adult instead of destroying global markets with toddler tantrums and 2AM toilet tweets. You can bet those aging MAGA faithful who were in retirement and looking to retire are not going to be happy about extending or rebooting their careers through a likely recession. But hey, they can all go pick fruit once Trump has destroyed the agricultural labor pool. Other jobs will be hard to keep and hard to get.

If as Trump says, tariffs will raise 6 trillion, that will be the biggest tax increase since 1982, or 1968 depending on the source. https://www.forbes.com/sites/katharinabuchholz/2025/04/04/trumps-tariffs-biggest-tax-hike-since-1982/ And yet Republicans will still increase the debt by over 9 trillion over the next ten years. The myth of Republican fiscal responsibility.

Interference in Canadian elections, on behalf of the LPOC, by the gov't of China, is A-OK according to some leading authorities: They look happy, but that's actually an arm-wrestle between the WEF and the Communist Party of China.

Yet again... you deflect from your own bad acting here by playing this whataboutism game.

PP has not run a good campaign. Going with Trump-like slogans like "Canada First" when everyone in the country hates Trump amid a tariff war is mind-numbingly bad decision-making. Read the room dude.

The meltdown continues. https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/tariffs/2025/04/07/the-latest-markets-sink-as-trumps-tariffs-roil-global-trading-system/ I've come the conclusion that the dismantling of democracy is exactly what Nationalist wants. Either that or he is the stupidest thing on two legs.

OH MY GAWD! YOU FELL FOR THAT? BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHBWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

https://338canada.com/polls.htm The 338 reported the poll from March 29. It looks. It's been about 25 polls since then, none of which show the CPC ahead. It would be easy to look back and compare predictions. What do you think?

One poll. From the article; Surveys released by seven other major pollsters (Leger, Nanos, Mainstreet Research, Pollara, Angus Reid Institute, Liaison Strategies, Ekos) all continue to show the Conservatives trailing by as much as nine points. In any case, I like the idea of a tightening race possibly culminating in a minority government. Hopefully the NDP regain some ground, they should if they can make hay out of the fact Carney is aiming to become a tax collector as opposed to having been a professional tax avoider in the private sector. Talk about a conflict of interest.

Bump. I'm gonna keep this in your faces till the economy comes roaring back. Gas prices are going down and so are a lot of things. Manufacturing is returning and The Gulf of America is open for business again.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/conservatives-lead-first-time-federal-223147507.html Conservatives in the lead for first time in federal campaign, new poll shows It has taken a lot of stupid comments, lies, gaffes, the revealing of several of Carney's conflicts of interest, and Carney getting caught with his hands in the US gov't and China cookie jars during this trade war, plus a lot of near-perfect campaigning from Poilievre, in order for the polls to start tilting back towards the PC's in the upcoming election. No doubt the Nanos polls, controlled by ex-LPOC staffer Alexander Nanos, will continue to skew the overall polling results in favour of Nanos's leader of choice, but no intelligent human takes those into consideration. Theoretically this new conservative lead would still translate into another LPOC minority gov't (and another pre-election windfall of LPOC-directed taxpayer money for our MSM to help them in the next election), but I think the polls will swing even further after the debate. Poilievre has a ridiculous number of arrows in his quiver, and Carney has so many things to answer for, that no moderator will be able to deflect every topic away from his laundry list of lies and conflicts of interest. Poilievre will beat Carney like a rented mule on that stage. CBC will no doubt do their best to make the debate (and this election) another referendum on climate change they'll back Carneys false assertions that the PM and Finance Minister had almost nothing to do with Canada's success at avoiding the recession that the US experienced in 2008, because they love the $2,000,000,000.00 taxpayer dollars that the LPOC gave them to help them in these elections the NDP, Bloc and Greens will no doubt see Poilievre as the guy guy to beat, and gang up like the bunch of jackals they are but PP is the most skilled debater that Canada has had in the last 50 years.

Election threats watchdog detects Beijing effort to influence Chinese Canadians on Carney - The Globe and Mail A federal election-threats watchdog has uncovered an information operation from Beijing trying to shape public opinion about Liberal Leader Mark Carney among Chinese Canadians. Oh look, the liberals who did nothing about the Chinese interfering on their behalf in the last election have the Chinese interfering on their behalf again in this election. Collecting carney should work out well for us shouldn't it? About the same as it did electing Trudeau

https://www.foxnews.com/us/domestic-terrorism-hits-tesla-drivers-dealers-former-fbi-field-boss-warns-could-get-worse Suspected Tesla arsonists hit with federal charges in acts of 'domestic terrorism': AG Three individuals were charged in federal cases after they used Molotov cocktails to violently attack Tesla properties around the country in acts of "domestic terrorism," Attorney General Pamela Bondi announced Thursday. "The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended," Bondi said. "Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars." All three face charges carrying a minimum penalty of five years and up to 20 years in prison, the department said. Adam Matthew Lansky, 41, on Jan. 20, threw approximately eight Molotov cocktails at a Tesla dealership located in Salem, Oregon, federal prosecutors said. One vehicle was completely destroyed, and several others were damaged. Lansky also threw a "large heavy object through the dealership window," they said. At the time of the attack, he was armed with a suppressed AR-15 rifle. Lucy Grace Nelson, also known as Justin Thomas Nelson, 42, was arrested in Loveland, Colorado, on Jan. 29 after attempting to light Teslas on fire with Molotov cocktails, prosecutors said. Nelson was later found in possession of materials used to produce additional incendiary weapons, including a container of gasoline, bottles, and wick materials, on Feb. 24, prosecutors said. This is no different from this. It's called DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Too bad you KNOW NOTHING about "mentally fit" Dr. LUser. Deflection is the last resort of the BANKRUPT.

Don't worry. Chiang is no longer a Liberal Party candidate. He's been replaced by a guy who is on the board of a Chinese Canadian organization that has been cited as being involved in foreign interference in Canada on behalf of China...

Citation from any reputable source? No? So you're just repeating playground rumors like the kiddies? Sad regression for an old impotent barnacle.

Not entirely sure what he really wants. However, going to be interesting to see how it plays out. The trade war is not going so well.

They also interfered in the leadership race in favor of Carney. Unsurprisingly, the headlines today in the MSM are saying that Beijing is 'targeting' Carney.

With this subject it is. You and I both know that the democrats want to make illegal immigration a thing, so what in the f*ck are you prattling about?

Sure you do, yet you support Trump trashing the economy for no reason other than his own ego. 5 trillion comes from extending the cuts, the rest comes from additional cuts if you bother to read the link. If it is going to increase the debt by 5 trillion, maybe they shouldn't be extended if you actually do care.

And like you've been told a thousand times there's no comparison And you absolutely are standing up for terrorism right now

Like I said., Jan 6 pardoners complaining about torched Tesla's is pot calling kettle. Elon and every other Trump supporter either needs to support the rule of law or not, there's no picking and choosing. Torching cars is a no no. But Trumpsters suddenly complaining about people breaking the law should be ignored and laughed at for the hypocrites they are. I would even agree this is terrorism. I don't support the vandalism but it's hilarious seeing Trumpsters suddenly care about the rule of law.

This means that the democrats have indeed been trying to increase their voter base through illegal immigration. Is this not an act of war?

The word is "drivel" you halfwit. And yes, the dismantling of democracy. The intended disempowerment of the judicial branch to a state where laws can no longer protect the people from the whims of a dictator. In a nation of laws, you appeal an unfavorable decision. In a budding dictatorship, you attack the judge personally, you call the judge biased, you call the judge corrupt, you attack the judge's authority to adjudicate the matter, you attack the judicial branches authority to adjudicate the matter and ultimately you refuse to abide by decisions no matter what level of court has rendered the decision. The fall of a nation of laws in a few easy steps. And that's what you're blindly cheering on, without knowing anything whatsoever about any of the judges in question. You cheer it just because your master said it.

When has any other president personally attacked a judge and called for their dismissal when a ruling hasn’t gone their way? Anyone who thinks this is normal or acceptable in a country that claims to believe in democracy and rule of law is a complete id*ot

@gatomontes99 I don't blame or judge you for ignorance (everyone has gaps in knowledge) but I certainly do blame you for for combining ignorance with being a smug, arrogant douche. And now also for being a gutless weasel. Since you don't have the integrity to admit that you were mistaken, rude and arrogant while being ass backward--I'll do your Google University homework for you. For the folks playing along at home: This is you "Diamonds have a very low price elasticity. Increased prices result in severe drops in demand because a diamond is not necessary." This is reality CFI The lower the price elasticity of demand, the less responsive the quantity demanded is given a change in price. When the price elasticity of demand is less than one, the good is considered to show inelastic demand. When the quantity demanded does not respond to a change in price, it is said that demand is perfectly inelastic. If an inelastic good has its price increased, it will lead to increased revenues because each unit will be sold at a higher price. This is reality - Investopedia "Usually, unique goods, such as diamonds, are inelastic because they have few if any substitutes."

Yes, I had one when I worked in the US but have since drawn it down. It's the same as our RRSP. And if you are a retiree depending on it for your income you are watching it shrink before your eyes seeing your capital gains disappear or even showing losses. How many of these companies will still be paying dividends when the recession hits and the necessity to lower interest rates also kills your fixed income returns.

Again, you're pointing at an issue that is global in its breadth and scope. No one was or could have been prepared for a crazy maniac bent on torching the global economy on fire.

It's more than just plain arson. It's targetted. They did it for a specific reason. It's TERRORISM.

Your first comment here: "You get what you give Trumpsters."

Apparently, according to Power Play - Poilievre's been drawing thousands to his rallies. Carney's lead - kinda reminiscent of Harris, who was said to have surged, caught up with Trump.....and eventually said to be leading! We know what happened to that story. 😁

You are racist, Bot. Your own statement exposed you. Lol - of course you don't get that. 😁 By the looks of it.....you're hopeless. You gotta live with the brain you're born with! Nothing can be done.....unless you get a transplant. Lol - I hope Singh doesn't make taxpayers pay for that! 🤣 Go on. Keep talking, bot.

Of course you didn't. Having to face the truth petrifies you. Actually exposing yourself to contrary points of view terrifies you. Having to defend your position and rages you. You are, after all, a liberal. But others will have read it. And they'll know what you are

He considers the voices in his head a news source. If two of them say the same thing then he considers the story corroborated

Sure, we all know that despite his age, Biden was a top tier drone pilot. 🙄

I want to like that 10 times.

Every one owned slaves, LIAR. Not just "Dems." NO ONE "imports" illegal immigrants, LIAR. They come here on their own initiative because they have NOTHING better. Duh. Slaves ARE NOT PAID and have NO RIGHT to leave. Duh You don't know what you're talking about, IGNORAMUS.

Go back and read what you said. Your lawyer might get you off on technicality but the rest of us can clearly see that you were standing up for and excusing that behavior. You certainly didn't condemn it Sure you do, that's why you said it so many times above. Oh wait...... I assume you're having a conversation with your mirror That's not how hypocrisy works. You can believe that somebody was unreasonably persecuted for their demonstrations rightly or wrongly and still agree that attacking innocent civilians that had absolutely nothing to do with any political issue is wrong. They are two not even remotely connected things. There is absolutely no connection between the belief that the protesters were treated excessively for a political demonstration at a political office, and people throwing a rock through the window of a vehicle that had absolutely nothing to do with anything and injuring and almost killing a pregnant woman. They are not even in the same universe Oh so this isn't wrong, this isn't terrorism, this isn't violent crime, this is karma!!!! AAAAHhhhhhh gotcha. What was that you were saying about not supporting this you lying sack of crap hypocrite? They have every leg to stand on. A political protest that happens at a political building involving politicians is a protest. It's 100% legitimate to do. It got out of control and became a riot and those people were prosecuted under the law legally. Trump disagrees with that and has pardoned them and he has done so within the law 100% legally. These people are attempting to kill innocent civilians who have absolutely nothing to do with the political issue at hand because at some point in history they bought a car that also has nothing to do with the issue at hand. The very fact that you would attempt to excuse this Behavior as you just did moments after claiming you weren't going to shows that you not only support terrorism when it suits you but that any act of violence the left does is perfectly fine with you where is any act of violence that the right does is terrible awful evil no good very bad Your parents should be deeply Ashamed Of you and if they are not then everybody else in your family should be deeply ashamed of them. You literally just did. Karma you called it. Pretty amusing considering it's a motor vehicle. You absolutely 100% do but you know that doing so makes you a bad person so every now and then you try and pretend that you don't and then go right back to supporting it. "THIS VIOLENCE IS KARMA (and occasionally truckma)!!! also i don't support it BUT ITS TOTALLY WHAT THEY DESERVE, THATS HOW KARMA WORKS!!! but i shouldn't so i'm going to say i don't BUT THE REALITY IS ITS COMPLETELY UNDERSTANDABLE BECAUSE MUSK IS ASSOCIATED WITH TEH COMPANY AND I DON"T LIKE HIM SO THAT MEANS THEY DESERVE THIS!!!! But i tihnk it's bad, honest..... please.

Why is China about to become the world's #1 economy? Because Trump is actively destroying the current #1.

True brainwashing means that one believes day is night, black is white, wrong is right. You can't get right there in an open society. We're going to see instead is something we haven't seen in a while. People having to come to terms with being wrong

Why, are you looking for a friend?

2 Lib-hoes are on their way to a Tesla dealership to smear feces on the cars, in order to protest Elon Musk saving US taxpayers some money and protecting free speech, when one of them spots a makeup compact lying on the ground. She opens it up, looks in the mirror and says: "Hey, I think I know this chick!" The other one grabs it, looks in the mirror, and says: "How do you know if she identifies as a chick? Maybe she identifies as a hen, you racist!" The first one fires back: "I meant a woman, not a bird. Stop assuming that she's a furry, you religious bigot!" The second one shrieks: "OMG! ARE YOU ASSUMING SHE'S A WOMAN!?!?!? You are such a homophobe!" Ho one yells: "YOU JUST DID IT TOO! YOU CALLED HER "SHE", THAT MAKES YOU AN ISLAMOPHOBE TOO!" Ho two is stunned into silence... "OMG, are we Nazis? I just saw a documentary that said Hitler slept on his side, just like I do... And he put Nazi symbols on cars as well... just like we do... I'm not really feeling it anymore. Instead of going to that dealership and each smearing a bunch of cars, let's just go back there and we will both smear that one." Ho one appears lost in though for a moment, then says "The one by our parking spot? Awesome!" They trundle back to smear the Tesla, then Lib ho one says, "OMG! My key just unlocked the door, we can crap inside of it!" Lib ho two: "What if we get locked in?" Lib Ho one: "I will use the mirror from this dude's makeup contact to cut myself, then you can call an ambulance from that payphone."

I'm going to quietly wait for you to admit you were wrong on this statement.

John Cleese explains stupidy